Recent domain gain
Relative Performance rose 2 points
83 to 85 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 85 is 4.7 points above the 80.3 average among 175 districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
Geographic public school district
Round Top-Carmine ISD
Fayette County · Region 13: Austin · 239 students
Official district websiteEnrollment, registration and eligibility
- Current score
- 89/1002025-26
- Change
- −2 ptssince 2021-22
- Score vs similar economic context
- +3.0 ptsvs 86 average · 175 rated districts serving a similar economic context
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
- 60 of 175tied with 17 others
- Score vs region
- +8.8 ptsvs 80.2 average · 50 rated districts in Region 13: Austin
- Region 13: Austin placement
- 6 of 50tied with 3 others
- Score vs county
- +1.2 ptsvs 87.8 average · 5 rated districts in Fayette County
- Score vs similar-size group
- +5.1 ptsvs 83.9 average · 183 similarly sized rated districts
- Similar size placement
- 56 of 183tied with 11 others
- Score vs state
- +7.3 ptsvs 81.7 average · 1,019 rated Texas districts
- Texas placement
- 166 of 1,019tied with 43 others
B89
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 95 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 86 average for 175 rated districts serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 80.2 average for 50 rated districts in Region 13: Austin.The current score is above the 87.8 average for 5 rated districts in Fayette County.The current score is above the 83.9 average for 183 similarly sized rated districts.The current score is above the 81.7 average for 1,019 rated Texas districts.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
Current strength
Attendance above the similar-context average
97.2% +1.8 pts vs 95.4%
- 97.2% is 1.8 percentage points above the 95.4% average among 175 districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
- Tied for 3rd of 175 districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure; 2 districts share that value.
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
- Meets
- 74%vs 59.4% avg · +14.6 pts
- Masters
- 39%vs 25.8% avg · +13.2 pts
Among 175 districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measureRecent domain gain
Relative Performance rose 2 points
83 to 85 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 85 is 8.9 points above the 76.1 average among 50 districts in Region 13: Austin reporting this measure.
Current strength
Earned college credit for a dual credit course above the Region 13: Austin average
57.1% +31.6 pts vs 25.5%
- 57.1% is 31.6 percentage points above the 25.5% average among 48 districts in Region 13: Austin reporting this measure.
- 1st of 48 districts in Region 13: Austin reporting this measure.
Current strength
Academic Growth above the Region 13: Austin average
86 +14.5 pts vs 71.5
- 86 is 14.5 points above the 71.5 average among 50 districts in Region 13: Austin reporting this measure.
- 2nd of 50 districts in Region 13: Austin reporting this measure.
Recent domain gain
Relative Performance rose 2 points
83 to 85 2024-25 to 2025-26
See the full measureRecent domain gain
Relative Performance rose 2 points
83 to 85 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 85 is 3.3 points above the 81.7 average among 183 similarly sized districts reporting this measure.
Current strength
Chronically absent lower than the similar-size average
1.4% −11.4 pts vs 12.8%
- 1.4% is 11.4 percentage points lower than the 12.8% average among 183 similarly sized districts reporting this measure.
- 1st-lowest of 183 similarly sized districts reporting this measure.
Current strength
Attendance above the similar-size average
97.2% +2.2 pts vs 95%
- 97.2% is 2.2 percentage points above the 95% average among 183 similarly sized districts reporting this measure.
- Tied for 1st of 183 similarly sized districts reporting this measure; 2 districts share that value.
Recent domain gain
Relative Performance rose 2 points
83 to 85 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 85 is 5.2 points above the 79.8 average among 1,019 Texas districts reporting this measure.
STAAR result
All Subjects above Texas averages at Meets and Masters
- Meets
- 74%vs 49.7% avg · +24.3 pts
- Masters
- 39%vs 19.6% avg · +19.4 pts
Among 1,019 Texas districts reporting this measure.
See the full measureSTAAR result
Math above Texas averages at Meets and Masters
- Meets
- 76%vs 43.3% avg · +32.7 pts
- Masters
- 41%vs 16.2% avg · +24.8 pts
Among 1,019 Texas districts reporting this measure.
See the full measureSelected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this district.
Read the full rating context and placement
Round Top-Carmine ISD is rated B by TEA, scoring 89 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 86 average for 175 rated districts serving a similar economic context. It is down 2 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 60th of 175 rated districts serving a similar economic context (tied with 17 others).
Round Top-Carmine ISD is rated B by TEA, scoring 89 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.2 average for 50 rated districts in Region 13: Austin. It is down 2 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 6th of 50 rated districts in Region 13: Austin (tied with 3 others).
Round Top-Carmine ISD is rated B by TEA, scoring 89 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 87.8 average for 5 rated districts in Fayette County. It is down 2 points since 2021-22.
Round Top-Carmine ISD is rated B by TEA, scoring 89 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 83.9 average for 183 similarly sized rated districts. It is down 2 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 56th of 183 similarly sized rated districts (tied with 11 others).
Round Top-Carmine ISD is rated B by TEA, scoring 89 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.7 average for 1,019 rated Texas districts. It is down 2 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 166th of 1,019 rated Texas districts (tied with 43 others).
Put the numbers in context
Compare with
Jump to a section
- Overview
- 5 years of ratings
- Where the score comes from
- Student outcomes
- Who this district serves
- Student counts behind the percentages
- Enrollment over time
- Students crossing district lines
- Discipline and removal from class
- Community around the district
- 2 schools in this district
- Spending per student
- Teachers
- Where this district ranks best
- Where this comes from
5 years of ratings
Follow the solid line to see how this district has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 95 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
View the yearly scores and comparisons
| Year | Rating | Score | Selected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rate | StateTexas average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | B | 89 | 86.0 175 reporting | 81.7 1,019 reporting |
| 2024-25 | B | 89 | 84.8 175 reporting | 80.3 1,019 reporting |
| 2023-24 | B | 89 | 83.3 175 reporting | 78.7 1,017 reporting |
| 2022-23 | A | 90 | 83.7 175 reporting | 79.2 1,018 reporting |
| 2021-22 | A | 91 | 84.3 175 reporting | 80.6 1,017 reporting |
Where the score comes from
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
- Round Top-Carmine ISD
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate (175 in cohort)
| Domain | Score | Grade | Points to next grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| Student Achievement | 89 | B | 1 |
| School Progress | 86 | B | 4 |
| Closing the Gaps | 90 | A | — |
| Academic Growth | 86 | B | 4 |
| Relative Performance | 85 | B | 5 |
Closest to moving up: Student Achievement, 1 point below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this district that better measure is Student Achievement (89), so School Progress (86) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 89.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
- Approaches grade level
- Meets grade level
- Masters grade level
- Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (175 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Graduation
- Four-Year
- 93.8%−3.7 pts vs similar economic context average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 167 rated districts reporting
- Five-Year
- 100.0%+2.2 pts vs similar economic context average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 166 rated districts reporting
- Six-Year
- 100.0%+2.2 pts vs similar economic context average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 167 rated districts reporting
- Dropout Rate
- 0.0%−0.3 pts vs similar economic context average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 167 rated districts reporting
These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only districts in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported district rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.
College, career and military readiness
- Total credit for CCMR criteria
- 71.0%−19.8 pts vs similar economic context
| Criterion | This district% of graduates | Averagesimilar economic context | Differencepercentage points | Reportingselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total credit for CCMR criteria | 71.0% | 90.8% | −19.8 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 167 rated districts reporting |
| Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course | 50.0% | 60.8% | −10.8 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 167 rated districts reporting |
| Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA | 50.0% | 37.3% | +12.7 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 167 rated districts reporting |
| Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s) | 7.1% | 11.6% | −4.5 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 167 rated districts reporting |
| Earned college credit for a dual credit course | 57.1% | 40.6% | +16.5 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 167 rated districts reporting |
| Earned an industry-based certification | 21.4% | 40.2% | −18.8 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 167 rated districts reporting |
| Earned a level I or level II certificate | 0.0% | 1.0% | −1.0 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 167 rated districts reporting |
| Earned an associate degree | 0.0% | 2.2% | −2.2 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 167 rated districts reporting |
| Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit | 0.0% | 5.6% | −5.6 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 167 rated districts reporting |
| Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness | 0.0% | 2.6% | −2.6 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 167 rated districts reporting |
| Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student | 0.0% | 7.7% | −7.7 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 167 rated districts reporting |
| Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces | 7.1% | 3.4% | +3.7 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 167 rated districts reporting |
Every row is a share of this district's graduates, and every row is a way of meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this district minus the average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate, counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported district percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only districts for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this district serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
- Students
- 239
- Economically disadvantaged
- 33.8%−2.0 pts vs similar economic context
- English learners
- 10.5%+4.2 pts vs similar economic context
- Special education
- 16.9%+0.1 pts vs similar economic context
- Attendance
- 97.2%+1.8 pts vs similar economic context
- Chronically absent
- 1.4%−8.8 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Round Top-Carmine ISD
- African American 2.5%
- Hispanic 25.3%
- White 67.9%
- Pacific Islander 0.4%
- Two or More Races 3.8%
Selected comparison average For districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 175 reporting for every category shown · 175 in full cohort
- African American 4.1%
- Hispanic 26.8%
- White 63.2%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 1.8%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 3.7%
Selected comparison average For Region 13: Austin · 50 reporting for every category shown · 50 in full cohort
- African American 4.9%
- Hispanic 47.7%
- White 40.6%
- American Indian 0.2%
- Asian 2.8%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 3.6%
Selected comparison average For Fayette County · 5 reporting for every category shown · 5 in full cohort
- African American 5.4%
- Hispanic 34.4%
- White 56.5%
- American Indian 0.1%
- Asian 0.5%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 3%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized districts · 183 reporting for every category shown · 183 in full cohort
- African American 2.4%
- Hispanic 36.5%
- White 57.7%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 0.2%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 2.8%
Statewide average 1,019 reporting for every category shown · 1,019 Texas districts in full cohort
- African American 6.3%
- Hispanic 43.1%
- White 45.4%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 1.4%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 3.3%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
- Students in this TEA accountability summary
- 237
- Economically disadvantaged students
- 80
- Emergent bilingual students
- 25
- Special education students
- 40
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 239 students in 2025–26, an increase of 4 (1.7%) from 2024–25.
- Latest enrollment
- 239
2025–26
- Change from 2024–25
- +4
Increase · +1.7%
- Change since 2021–22
- −2
Decrease · −0.8%
Enrollment in 2025–26
- This district
- 239
- Selected comparison
- 4,905.3
| School year | Students enrolledRound Top-Carmine ISD | Change from previous school year | Average enrollmentselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021–22 | 241 | First available year | 4,722.8 |
| 2022–23 | 254 | Increase of 13 (5.4%) | 4,830.6 |
| 2023–24 | 240 | Decrease of 14 (5.5%) | 4,877.7 |
| 2024–25 | 235 | Decrease of 5 (2.1%) | 4,921.6 |
| 2025–26 | 239 | Increase of 4 (1.7%) | 4,905.3 |
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting districts in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this district's own counts do not.
Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Students crossing district lines
How many students live in one public-school district and attend in another. These are movement counts, not a measure of family satisfaction or school quality.
- Transfers in
- 81
Live in another district; attend here · 2025–26
- Transfers out
- 28
Live here; attend in another public district or charter · 2025–26
- Transfers in minus transfers out
- +53
Arithmetic context only
Transfers in · 2025–26
- This district
- 81
- Selected comparison
- 221.6
Transfers out · 2025–26
- This district
- 28
- Selected comparison
- 389.3
Transfers in minus out · 2025–26
- This district
- +53
- Selected comparison
- −175
| School year | Transfers inRound Top-Carmine ISD | Transfers outRound Top-Carmine ISD | In minus outRound Top-Carmine ISD | Transfers inselected comparison average | Transfers outselected comparison average | In minus outselected comparison average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021–22 | 63 | 30 | +33 | 190.3 | 297.3 | −115 |
| 2022–23 | 72 | 31 | +41 | 188.9 | 320 | −138 |
| 2023–24 | 66 | 26 | +40 | 192.8 | 338.1 | −151 |
| 2024–25 | 69 | 30 | +39 | 208.1 | 372 | −172 |
| 2025–26 | 81 | 28 | +53 | 221.6 | 389.3 | −175 |
Largest reported origins for transfers in
- Giddings ISD 14490143
- Burton ISD 23990312
Top reported flows only. TEA published 2 of 10 counterpart counts and masked 8.
Selected comparison figures are average reported counts, not rates; group size and district enrollment affect them. They provide scale context and are not a performance judgment. This district's official totals do not change when the comparison does.
Source: TEA Student Transfer Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The totals are TEA's official district rows; this site does not add masked detail cells. A transfer records a mismatch between district of residence and public district or charter of attendance. It does not say why a family transferred, whether the move was optional, or whether either school is better.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
- Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
- Suppressed
Rate not available
- Disciplinary actions
- 12
5.00 per 100 students
- Cumulative year-end enrollment
- 240
2024–25
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
- This district
- 5
- Selected comparison
- 16.9
| School year | Cumulative enrollment | Studentsall discipline | Students% of enrollment | Actionsall discipline | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020–21 | 256 | 12 | 4.7% | 19 | 7.42 | 6.5% | 12.5 |
| 2021–22 | 247 | 26 | 10.5% | 54 | 21.86 | 8.3% | 17.3 |
| 2022–23 | 261 | 10 | 3.8% | 18 | 6.90 | 8.7% | 18.3 |
| 2023–24 | 246 | 13 | 5.3% | 22 | 8.94 | 8.6% | 18.3 |
| 2024–25 | 240 | Suppressed | — | 12 | 5.00 | — | 16.9 |
See 2024–25 discipline categories
| Category | Students | Students% of enrollment | Actions | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All discipline | Suppressed | — | 12 | 5.00 | — | 16.9 |
| In-school suspensions | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| Out-of-school suspensions | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| DAEP placements | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| Mandatory DAEP placements | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| Discretionary DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized districts can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this district's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Community around the district
A district serves a place as well as a roster. These Census estimates describe the resident community without treating its circumstances as an explanation or a verdict on students.
- People living inside the district boundary
- 1,948
2024 Census estimate
- Children ages 5–17
- 219
Living inside the boundary
- Children ages 5–17 in families in poverty
- 19
8.7%
- School-age child poverty rate
- 8.7%
19 of 219
Boundary population
- This district
- 1,948
- Selected comparison
- 29,144.3
School-age population
- This district
- 219
- Selected comparison
- 5,337.2
School-age population in poverty
- This district
- 19
- Selected comparison
- 430.8
School-age child poverty rate
- This district
- 8.7%
- Selected comparison
- 10.5%
Population averages provide neutral scale context and can differ sharply across a region, county or the state. The poverty-rate comparison is the like-for-like percentage; none of these Census measures is treated as school performance.
Source: U.S. Census Bureau 2024 Small Area Income and Poverty Estimates, fetched 24 August 2026. These are modeled estimates for residents inside the geographic district, not the students enrolled by the district. A family's poverty status is context, never a school-quality measure.
2 schools in this district
Number of schools in the district
- This district
- 2
- Selected comparison
- 7.2
The selected comparison is a neutral average district size. This district's school count and school-type mix remain its own facts.
- Elementary
- 1
- High School
- 1
Browse all 2 schoolsName, type, rating, score and enrollment
| School | Type | Rating | Score | Students |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round Top-Carmine Elem | Elementary | A | 91 | 121 |
| Round Top-Carmine HS | High School | B | 88 | 118 |
Spending per student
The selected txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference stay visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
- Round Top-Carmine ISD
- TEA peer group
- Texas average
- Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
- This district
- $23,247
- Selected comparison
- $23,586
This district spends $2,682 less per student than TEA's peer group, and $4,275 more per student than the state average.
View yearly spending figures
| Year | Round Top-Carmine ISD | TEA peer group | Texas average | Selected comparison average | Reportingselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | $18,509 | $14,290 | $13,054 | $14,660 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 174 rated districts reporting |
| 2019 | $13,014 | $14,384 | $13,108 | $14,790 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 174 rated districts reporting |
| 2020 | $13,083 | $16,581 | $14,058 | $15,551 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 174 rated districts reporting |
| 2021 | $15,018 | $17,863 | $14,797 | $16,207 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 174 rated districts reporting |
| 2022 | $15,156 | $19,817 | $15,708 | $17,738 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 175 rated districts reporting |
| 2023 | $17,426 | $21,827 | $16,792 | $18,626 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 175 rated districts reporting |
| 2024 | $16,575 | $23,517 | $18,125 | $21,526 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 175 rated districts reporting |
| 2025 | $23,247 | $25,929 | $18,972 | $23,586 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 175 rated districts reporting |
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers
- Average salary
- $63,012−$2,778 vs similar economic context
- Teachers
- 26−309.7 vs similar economic context
- Students per staff member
- 9−4.0 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Round Top-Carmine ISD
- Beginning 3.8%
- 1 to 5 years 3.8%
- 6 to 10 years 22.3%
- 11 to 20 years 48.5%
- 21 to 30 years 21.2%
Selected comparison average For districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 175 reporting for every category shown · 175 in full cohort
- Beginning 4.6%
- 1 to 5 years 20.3%
- 6 to 10 years 18.4%
- 11 to 20 years 32.9%
- 21 to 30 years 18.9%
- Over 30 years 4.8%
Selected comparison average For Region 13: Austin · 50 reporting for every category shown · 50 in full cohort
- Beginning 6.9%
- 1 to 5 years 24.5%
- 6 to 10 years 18.9%
- 11 to 20 years 29.6%
- 21 to 30 years 16.2%
- Over 30 years 3.9%
Selected comparison average For Fayette County · 5 reporting for every category shown · 5 in full cohort
- Beginning 8.7%
- 1 to 5 years 14.1%
- 6 to 10 years 18.6%
- 11 to 20 years 33.6%
- 21 to 30 years 20.4%
- Over 30 years 4.4%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized districts · 183 reporting for every category shown · 183 in full cohort
- Beginning 7.3%
- 1 to 5 years 21.9%
- 6 to 10 years 16.4%
- 11 to 20 years 28.3%
- 21 to 30 years 19.2%
- Over 30 years 6.8%
Statewide average 1,019 reporting for every category shown · 1,019 Texas districts in full cohort
- Beginning 6.4%
- 1 to 5 years 23.9%
- 6 to 10 years 17.7%
- 11 to 20 years 28.7%
- 21 to 30 years 17.7%
- Over 30 years 5.5%
Teacher turnover over time
TEA reported a 5.1% teacher turnover rate in 2024–25.
Teacher turnover rate · 2024–25
- This district
- 5.1%
- Selected comparison
- 18.2%
| School year | Teacher turnover rateRound Top-Carmine ISD | Average turnover rateselected comparison |
|---|---|---|
| 2020–21 | 12.6% | 13.4% |
| 2021–22 | 0.0% | 17.3% |
| 2022–23 | 23.5% | 18.6% |
| 2023–24 | 28.5% | 18.3% |
| 2024–25 | 5.1% | 18.2% |
TEA defines this district rate as the share of teacher full-time equivalents from the prior fall who are not employed as teachers in the district in the current fall. That can include leaving the district or remaining in a different role; it is not a campus-level measure. The comparison average changes with the selected group; this district's reported rate does not.
Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
Where this district ranks best
Out of 160 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#1 rankings
First-place results
4 measures
-
1of 183
Attendance
Similar size · of the 183 that report this measure · tied with 1
-
1of 183
Chronically absent (lowest is best)
Similar size · of the 183 that report this measure
-
1of 49
Science — Approaches
Region 13: Austin · of the 49 that report this measure
-
1of 48
Earned college credit for a dual credit course
Region 13: Austin · of the 48 that report this measure
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
7 measures
-
2of 50
Academic Growth
Region 13: Austin · of the 50 that report this measure
-
2of 50
Math — Meets
Region 13: Austin · of the 50 that report this measure
-
2of 50
Math — Masters
Region 13: Austin · of the 50 that report this measure
-
2of 49
Science — Meets
Region 13: Austin · of the 49 that report this measure
-
2of 49
Science — Masters
Region 13: Austin · of the 49 that report this measure
-
3of 50
Math — Approaches
Region 13: Austin · of the 50 that report this measure
-
3of 48
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces
Region 13: Austin · of the 48 that report this measure
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
15 measures
-
4of 50
All Subjects — Approaches
Region 13: Austin · of the 50 that report this measure
-
4of 50
All Subjects — Meets
Region 13: Austin · of the 50 that report this measure
-
5of 50
All Subjects — Masters
Region 13: Austin · of the 50 that report this measure · tied with 1
-
5of 49
Social Studies — Approaches
Region 13: Austin · of the 49 that report this measure · tied with 2
-
6of 50
School Progress
Region 13: Austin · of the 50 that report this measure
-
6of 50
Relative Performance
Region 13: Austin · of the 50 that report this measure
-
6of 49
Closing the Gaps
Region 13: Austin · of the 49 that report this measure
-
6of 49
Social Studies — Meets
Region 13: Austin · of the 49 that report this measure · tied with 1
-
7of 169
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)
Similar size · of the 169 that report this measure
-
7of 50
Student Achievement
Region 13: Austin · of the 50 that report this measure · tied with 1
-
8of 50
Reading — Approaches
Region 13: Austin · of the 50 that report this measure · tied with 1
-
8of 49
Social Studies — Masters
Region 13: Austin · of the 49 that report this measure · tied with 2
-
9of 50
Reading — Meets
Region 13: Austin · of the 50 that report this measure
-
9of 50
Reading — Masters
Region 13: Austin · of the 50 that report this measure · tied with 1
-
10of 48
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA
Region 13: Austin · of the 48 that report this measure
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this district ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this district; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no district would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.