District · Traditional
Rio Grande City Grulla ISD
Starr County · Region 01: Edinburg · 9,157 students
Rio Grande City Grulla ISD is rated B by TEA, scoring 86 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 76.9 average of the 54 districts serving a similar share of economically disadvantaged students, and above the statewide average of 81.7. It is unchanged since 2021-22 — both years scored under TEA's current rules, since TEA rewrote them in 2023; under the rules in force back then it scored 90.
Ranks 303rd of 1,019 Texas districts (tied with 46 others), and 15th of 37 in Region 01: Edinburg (tied with 2 others).
Jump to a section
5 years of ratings
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 90 that year.
| Year | Rating | Score | Similar | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | B | 86 | 76.9 | 81.7 |
| 2024-25 | B | 82 | 73.4 | 80.3 |
| 2023-24 | B | 83 | 71.9 | 78.7 |
| 2022-23 | C | 79 | 71.9 | 79.2 |
| 2021-22 | B | 86 | 76.0 | 80.6 |
How this district's change over time is ranked
TEA publishes most measures for one year only, so a change ranking exists just where the same figure is published across years — the overall score, the five score domains, and per-student spending. This page does not yet state where Rio Grande City Grulla ISD itself places on these lists, only that the lists exist; open one to find this district's own row.
Texas districts
Region 01: Edinburg
Where the score comes from
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
- Rio Grande City Grulla ISD
- Similar student population (54)
- Region 01: Edinburg (37)
| Domain | Score | Grade | Points to next grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| Student Achievement | 82 | B | 8 |
| School Progress | 87 | B | 3 |
| Closing the Gaps | 84 | B | 6 |
| Academic Growth | 74 | C | 6 |
| Relative Performance | 87 | B | 3 |
Closest to moving up: School Progress, 3 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this district that better measure is School Progress (87), so Student Achievement (82) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 87.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
- Approaches grade level
- Meets grade level
- Masters grade level
- Tick: Similar student population (54)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The tick on each bar marks the average for Similar student population (54 districts) — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Graduation
- Four-Year
- 98.0%+5.7 pts vs similar
- Five-Year
- 99.4%+5.5 pts vs similar
- Six-Year
- 99.6%+4.9 pts vs similar
- Dropout Rate
- 0.0%−1.1 pts vs similar
College, career and military readiness
| Criterion | This district | similar | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total credit for CCMR criteria | 89.0% | 84.0% | +5.0 |
| Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course | 37.6% | 48.1% | −10.5 |
| Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA | 21.1% | 20.0% | +1.1 |
| Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s) | 18.7% | 8.2% | +10.5 |
| Earned college credit for a dual credit course | 30.1% | 31.4% | −1.3 |
| Earned an industry-based certification | 50.3% | 39.3% | +11.0 |
| Earned a level I or level II certificate | 6.1% | 3.1% | +3.0 |
| Earned an associate degree | 9.2% | 6.3% | +2.9 |
| Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit | 4.7% | 2.8% | +1.9 |
| Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness | 0.3% | 2.4% | −2.1 |
| Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student | 9.5% | 9.4% | +0.1 |
| Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces | 2.1% | 2.6% | −0.5 |
Who this district serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
- Students
- 9,157
- Economically disadvantaged
- 97.7%+5.7 pts vs similar
- English learners
- 65.8%+36.9 pts vs similar
- Special education
- 14.1%−3.1 pts vs similar
- Attendance
- 93.5%+0.6 pts vs similar
- Chronically absent
- 22.8%−1.0 pts vs similar
Student demographics
- Hispanic 99.4%
- White 0.4%
- Asian 0.2%
Spending per student
Compared against TEA's own peer group, which controls for size and student population, and against the state.
- Rio Grande City Grulla ISD
- TEA peer group
- Texas average
Spends $1,774 less per student than its peer group, and $1,776 less than the state average.
Teachers
- Average salary
- $61,086−$4,392 vs similar
- Teachers
- 691
- Students per staff member
- 13.2
Teaching experience
- Beginning 5.6%
- 1 to 5 years 22.1%
- 6 to 10 years 12.6%
- 11 to 20 years 27%
- 21 to 30 years 27.3%
- Over 30 years 5.4%
Where this district ranks best
Out of 123 rankings computed across every published metric and every comparison group, these are the placements that stand out. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
-
1of 54
Social Studies — Masters
Similar student population · of the 54 that report this measure
-
3of 54
Social Studies — Meets
Similar student population · of the 54 that report this measure
-
3of 37
Earned a level I or level II certificate
Region 01: Edinburg · of the 37 that report this measure
-
4of 54
Science — Meets
Similar student population · of the 54 that report this measure · tied with 2
-
4of 37
Social Studies — Approaches
Region 01: Edinburg · of the 37 that report this measure · tied with 1
-
5of 54
Social Studies — Approaches
Similar student population · of the 54 that report this measure
-
5of 37
Social Studies — Meets
Region 01: Edinburg · of the 37 that report this measure
-
6of 54
Student Achievement
Similar student population · of the 54 that report this measure · tied with 1
-
6of 54
Science — Masters
Similar student population · of the 54 that report this measure
-
6of 52
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)
Similar student population · of the 52 that report this measure
-
6of 37
Social Studies — Masters
Region 01: Edinburg · of the 37 that report this measure
-
6of 37
Six-Year Graduation Rate
Region 01: Edinburg (standard accountability only) · of the 37 that report this measure
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this district ranks poorly. Each statement below states its cohort and its denominator so it can be checked — a rank without an n is a boast, not a fact. Ties are shown because a shared ceiling is not a sole first place. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no district would put in a press release.
16 schools in this district
| School | Type | Rating | Score | Students |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Preparatory for Early College HS | High School | A | 97 | 440 |
| Alberto and Celia Barrera Elem | Elementary | A | 96 | 400 |
| Grulla Elem | Elementary | A | 91 | 437 |
| John & Olive Hinojosa Elem | Elementary | A | 91 | 394 |
| Ringgold Elem | Elementary | A | 91 | 499 |
| Veterans MS | Middle / Jr. High | B | 88 | 708 |
| Grulla MS | Middle / Jr. High | B | 87 | 638 |
| General Ricardo Sanchez Elem | Elementary | B | 87 | 706 |
| Rio Grande City HS | High School | B | 86 | 1,617 |
| Ringgold MS | Middle / Jr. High | B | 86 | 597 |
| Alto Bonito Elem | Elementary | B | 84 | 584 |
| Dr Mario E Ramirez Elem | Elementary | B | 83 | 493 |
| Grulla HS | High School | C | 79 | 721 |
| Roque Guerra Jr Elem | Elementary | C | 79 | 588 |
| La Union Elem | Elementary | D | 69 | 324 |
| The Lead Center | High School | D | 65 | 11 |
Where this comes from
Every figure on this page comes from data the Texas Education Agency publishes at txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026 and archived with a checksum so each number stays traceable to the bytes TEA served.