Recent movement
Overall score rose 7 points
75 to 82 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 82 is 3.1 points above the 78.9 average among 336 districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
Geographic public school district
Panther Creek CISD
Coleman County · Region 15: San Angelo · 139 students
Official district websiteEnrollment, registration and eligibility
- Current score
- 82/1002025-26
- Change
- +1 ptssince 2021-22
- Score vs similar economic context
- +3.1 ptsvs 78.9 average · 336 rated districts serving a similar economic context
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
- 119 of 336tied with 15 others
- Score vs region
- −0.9 ptsvs 82.9 average · 45 rated districts in Region 15: San Angelo
- Region 15: San Angelo placement
- 25 of 45tied with 4 others
- Score vs county
- +4.0 ptsvs 78 average · 3 rated districts in Coleman County
- Score vs similar-size group
- −0.3 ptsvs 82.3 average · 133 similarly sized rated districts
- Similar size placement
- 72 of 133tied with 6 others
- Score vs state
- +0.3 ptsvs 81.7 average · 1,019 rated Texas districts
- Texas placement
- 487 of 1,019tied with 51 others
B82
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 87 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 78.9 average for 336 rated districts serving a similar economic context.The current score is below the 82.9 average for 45 rated districts in Region 15: San Angelo.The current score is above the 78 average for 3 rated districts in Coleman County.The current score is level with the 82.3 average for 133 similarly sized rated districts.The current score is level with the 81.7 average for 1,019 rated Texas districts.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
Recent domain gain
Closing the Gaps rose 18 points
64 to 82 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 82 is 6.1 points above the 75.9 average among 335 districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
Current strength
Student Achievement above the similar-context average
82 +4.5 pts vs 77.5
- 82 is 4.5 points above the 77.5 average among 336 districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
Recent movement
Overall score rose 7 points
75 to 82 2024-25 to 2025-26
See the full measureRecent domain gain
Closing the Gaps rose 18 points
64 to 82 2024-25 to 2025-26
- Tied for 2nd of 44 districts in Region 15: San Angelo reporting both years for one-year gain; 2 districts share that change.
Current strength
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness above the Region 15: San Angelo average
18.8% +14.8 pts vs 4%
- 18.8% is 14.8 percentage points above the 4% average among 44 districts in Region 15: San Angelo reporting this measure.
- 2nd of 44 districts in Region 15: San Angelo reporting this measure.
Recent movement
Overall score rose 7 points
75 to 82 2024-25 to 2025-26
See the full measureRecent domain gain
Closing the Gaps rose 18 points
64 to 82 2024-25 to 2025-26
See the full measureRecent movement
Overall score rose 7 points
75 to 82 2024-25 to 2025-26
See the full measureRecent domain gain
Closing the Gaps rose 18 points
64 to 82 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 82 is 2.3 points above the 79.7 average among 133 similarly sized districts reporting this measure.
Current strength
Earned college credit for a dual credit course above the similar-size average
56.3% +16.1 pts vs 40.2%
- 56.3% is 16.1 percentage points above the 40.2% average among 109 similarly sized districts reporting this measure.
Recent movement
Overall score rose 7 points
75 to 82 2024-25 to 2025-26
See the full measureRecent domain gain
Closing the Gaps rose 18 points
64 to 82 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 82 is 2.9 points above the 79.1 average among 1,015 Texas districts reporting this measure.
Current strength
Four-Year Graduation Rate above the Texas average
100% +3.9 pts vs 96.1%
- 100% is 3.9 percentage points above the 96.1% average among 975 Texas districts reporting this measure (standard accountability only).
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this district.
Read the full rating context and placement
Panther Creek CISD is rated B by TEA, scoring 82 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 78.9 average for 336 rated districts serving a similar economic context. It is up 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 119th of 336 rated districts serving a similar economic context (tied with 15 others).
Panther Creek CISD is rated B by TEA, scoring 82 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 82.9 average for 45 rated districts in Region 15: San Angelo. It is up 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 25th of 45 rated districts in Region 15: San Angelo (tied with 4 others).
Panther Creek CISD is rated B by TEA, scoring 82 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 78 average for 3 rated districts in Coleman County. It is up 1 point since 2021-22.
Panther Creek CISD is rated B by TEA, scoring 82 out of 100 for 2025-26 — level with the 82.3 average for 133 similarly sized rated districts. It is up 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 72nd of 133 similarly sized rated districts (tied with 6 others).
Panther Creek CISD is rated B by TEA, scoring 82 out of 100 for 2025-26 — level with the 81.7 average for 1,019 rated Texas districts. It is up 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 487th of 1,019 rated Texas districts (tied with 51 others).
Put the numbers in context
Compare with
Jump to a section
- Overview
- 5 years of ratings
- Where the score comes from
- Student outcomes
- Who this district serves
- Student counts behind the percentages
- Enrollment over time
- Students crossing district lines
- Discipline and removal from class
- Community around the district
- 1 schools in this district
- Spending per student
- Teachers
- Where this district ranks best
- Where this comes from
5 years of ratings
Follow the solid line to see how this district has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 87 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
View the yearly scores and comparisons
| Year | Rating | Score | Selected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rate | StateTexas average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | B | 82 | 78.9 336 reporting | 81.7 1,019 reporting |
| 2024-25 | C | 75 | 77.3 336 reporting | 80.3 1,019 reporting |
| 2023-24 | B | 83 | 75.6 336 reporting | 78.7 1,017 reporting |
| 2022-23 | B | 82 | 76.2 336 reporting | 79.2 1,018 reporting |
| 2021-22 | B | 81 | 78.2 336 reporting | 80.6 1,017 reporting |
Where the score comes from
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
- Panther Creek CISD
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate (336 in cohort)
| Domain | Score | Grade | Points to next grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| Student Achievement | 82 | B | 8 |
| School Progress | 80 | B | 10 |
| Closing the Gaps | 82 | B | 8 |
| Academic Growth | 69 | D | 1 |
| Relative Performance | 80 | B | 10 |
Closest to moving up: Student Achievement, 8 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this district that better measure is Student Achievement (82), so School Progress (80) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 82.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
- Approaches grade level
- Meets grade level
- Masters grade level
- Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (336 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Graduation
- Four-Year
- 100.0%+4.2 pts vs similar economic context average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 319 rated districts reporting
- Five-Year
- 100.0%+3.7 pts vs similar economic context average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 320 rated districts reporting
- Six-Year
- 100.0%+4.2 pts vs similar economic context average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 318 rated districts reporting
- Dropout Rate
- 0.0%−0.6 pts vs similar economic context average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 323 rated districts reporting
These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only districts in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported district rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.
College, career and military readiness
- Total credit for CCMR criteria
- 94.0%+5.6 pts vs similar economic context
| Criterion | This district% of graduates | Averagesimilar economic context | Differencepercentage points | Reportingselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total credit for CCMR criteria | 94.0% | 88.4% | +5.6 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 320 rated districts reporting |
| Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course | 31.3% | 56.3% | −25.0 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 323 rated districts reporting |
| Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA | 6.3% | 23.2% | −16.9 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 323 rated districts reporting |
| Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s) | 0.0% | 5.5% | −5.5 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 323 rated districts reporting |
| Earned college credit for a dual credit course | 56.3% | 31.6% | +24.7 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 323 rated districts reporting |
| Earned an industry-based certification | 31.3% | 44.4% | −13.1 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 323 rated districts reporting |
| Earned a level I or level II certificate | 6.3% | 2.2% | +4.1 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 323 rated districts reporting |
| Earned an associate degree | 6.3% | 4.4% | +1.9 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 323 rated districts reporting |
| Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit | 0.0% | 2.9% | −2.9 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 323 rated districts reporting |
| Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness | 18.8% | 4.0% | +14.8 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 323 rated districts reporting |
| Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student | 12.5% | 9.8% | +2.7 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 323 rated districts reporting |
| Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces | 0.0% | 3.3% | −3.3 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 323 rated districts reporting |
Every row is a share of this district's graduates, and every row is a way of meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this district minus the average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate, counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported district percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only districts for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this district serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
- Students
- 139
- Economically disadvantaged
- 72.7%+1.1 pts vs similar economic context
- English learners
- 4.3%−10.8 pts vs similar economic context
- Special education
- 26.6%+8.0 pts vs similar economic context
- Attendance
- 94.1%±0.0 pts vs similar economic context
- Chronically absent
- 20.1%+2.6 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Panther Creek CISD
- African American 2.2%
- Hispanic 21.6%
- White 71.2%
- Two or More Races 5%
Selected comparison average For districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 336 reporting for every category shown · 336 in full cohort
- African American 8%
- Hispanic 53.7%
- White 34%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 0.8%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 3.1%
Selected comparison average For Region 15: San Angelo · 45 reporting for every category shown · 45 in full cohort
- African American 1.5%
- Hispanic 42.7%
- White 53.1%
- American Indian 0.2%
- Asian 0.3%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 2.1%
Selected comparison average For Coleman County · 3 reporting for every category shown · 3 in full cohort
- African American 2.6%
- Hispanic 25.6%
- White 66.7%
- American Indian 0.2%
- Asian 0.6%
- Two or More Races 4.3%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized districts · 133 reporting for every category shown · 133 in full cohort
- African American 3.2%
- Hispanic 38%
- White 55%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 0.2%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 3.2%
Statewide average 1,019 reporting for every category shown · 1,019 Texas districts in full cohort
- African American 6.3%
- Hispanic 43.1%
- White 45.4%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 1.4%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 3.3%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
- Students in this TEA accountability summary
- 139
- Economically disadvantaged students
- 101
- Emergent bilingual students
- 6
- Special education students
- 37
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 139 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 24 (14.7%) from 2024–25.
- Latest enrollment
- 139
2025–26
- Change from 2024–25
- −24
Decrease · −14.7%
- Change since 2021–22
- −26
Decrease · −15.8%
Enrollment in 2025–26
- This district
- 139
- Selected comparison
- 5,260.8
| School year | Students enrolledPanther Creek CISD | Change from previous school year | Average enrollmentselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021–22 | 165 | First available year | 5,470 |
| 2022–23 | 145 | Decrease of 20 (12.1%) | 5,487.6 |
| 2023–24 | 161 | Increase of 16 (11.0%) | 5,434.8 |
| 2024–25 | 163 | Increase of 2 (1.2%) | 5,403 |
| 2025–26 | 139 | Decrease of 24 (14.7%) | 5,260.8 |
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting districts in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this district's own counts do not.
Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Students crossing district lines
How many students live in one public-school district and attend in another. These are movement counts, not a measure of family satisfaction or school quality.
- Transfers in
- 54
Live in another district; attend here · 2025–26
- Transfers out
- 36
Live here; attend in another public district or charter · 2025–26
- Transfers in minus transfers out
- +18
Arithmetic context only
Transfers in · 2025–26
- This district
- 54
- Selected comparison
- 327.7
Transfers out · 2025–26
- This district
- 36
- Selected comparison
- 1,004.6
Transfers in minus out · 2025–26
- This district
- +18
- Selected comparison
- −744
| School year | Transfers inPanther Creek CISD | Transfers outPanther Creek CISD | In minus outPanther Creek CISD | Transfers inselected comparison average | Transfers outselected comparison average | In minus outselected comparison average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021–22 | 59 | 28 | +31 | 223.1 | 853.6 | −702 |
| 2022–23 | 43 | 31 | +12 | 255.4 | 896.8 | −710 |
| 2023–24 | 60 | 37 | +23 | 278.8 | 963.8 | −748 |
| 2024–25 | 68 | 40 | +28 | 317.3 | 985.1 | −725 |
| 2025–26 | 54 | 36 | +18 | 327.7 | 1,004.6 | −744 |
Largest reported origins for transfers in
- Coleman ISD 04290144
Top reported flows only. TEA published 1 of 5 counterpart counts and masked 4.
Largest reported destinations for transfers out
- Coleman ISD 04290119
Top reported flows only. TEA published 1 of 8 counterpart counts and masked 7.
Selected comparison figures are average reported counts, not rates; group size and district enrollment affect them. They provide scale context and are not a performance judgment. This district's official totals do not change when the comparison does.
Source: TEA Student Transfer Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The totals are TEA's official district rows; this site does not add masked detail cells. A transfer records a mismatch between district of residence and public district or charter of attendance. It does not say why a family transferred, whether the move was optional, or whether either school is better.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
- Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
- Suppressed
Rate not available
- Disciplinary actions
- Suppressed
Rate not available
- Cumulative year-end enrollment
- 184
2024–25
| School year | Cumulative enrollment | Studentsall discipline | Students% of enrollment | Actionsall discipline | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020–21 | 179 | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| 2021–22 | 185 | 15 | 8.1% | 20 | 10.81 | 12.4% | 28.3 |
| 2022–23 | 174 | 18 | 10.3% | 23 | 13.22 | 12.8% | 30.4 |
| 2023–24 | 180 | 16 | 8.9% | 19 | 10.56 | 12.6% | 29.8 |
| 2024–25 | 184 | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
See 2024–25 discipline categories
| Category | Students | Students% of enrollment | Actions | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All discipline | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| In-school suspensions | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| Out-of-school suspensions | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized districts can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this district's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Community around the district
A district serves a place as well as a roster. These Census estimates describe the resident community without treating its circumstances as an explanation or a verdict on students.
- People living inside the district boundary
- 1,086
2024 Census estimate
- Children ages 5–17
- 127
Living inside the boundary
- Children ages 5–17 in families in poverty
- 24
18.9%
- School-age child poverty rate
- 18.9%
24 of 127
Boundary population
- This district
- 1,086
- Selected comparison
- 35,356.4
School-age population
- This district
- 127
- Selected comparison
- 6,246.1
School-age population in poverty
- This district
- 24
- Selected comparison
- 1,320.3
School-age child poverty rate
- This district
- 18.9%
- Selected comparison
- 21.1%
Population averages provide neutral scale context and can differ sharply across a region, county or the state. The poverty-rate comparison is the like-for-like percentage; none of these Census measures is treated as school performance.
Source: U.S. Census Bureau 2024 Small Area Income and Poverty Estimates, fetched 24 August 2026. These are modeled estimates for residents inside the geographic district, not the students enrolled by the district. A family's poverty status is context, never a school-quality measure.
1 schools in this district
Number of schools in the district
- This district
- 1
- Selected comparison
- 9.1
The selected comparison is a neutral average district size. This district's school count and school-type mix remain its own facts.
- K-12
- 1
Browse all 1 schoolsName, type, rating, score and enrollment
| School | Type | Rating | Score | Students |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Panther Creek School | K-12 | B | 82 | 139 |
Spending per student
The selected txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference stay visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
- Panther Creek CISD
- TEA peer group
- Texas average
- Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
- This district
- $22,605
- Selected comparison
- $23,059
This district spends $8,492 less per student than TEA's peer group, and $3,633 more per student than the state average.
View yearly spending figures
| Year | Panther Creek CISD | TEA peer group | Texas average | Selected comparison average | Reportingselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | $12,665 | $14,290 | $13,054 | $14,174 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 336 rated districts reporting |
| 2019 | $15,666 | $21,900 | $13,108 | $14,346 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 336 rated districts reporting |
| 2020 | $15,356 | $21,220 | $14,058 | $15,525 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 336 rated districts reporting |
| 2021 | $16,687 | $22,787 | $14,797 | $16,816 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 336 rated districts reporting |
| 2022 | $19,188 | $28,874 | $15,708 | $18,053 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 336 rated districts reporting |
| 2023 | $24,645 | $35,111 | $16,792 | $20,144 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 336 rated districts reporting |
| 2024 | $21,954 | $33,004 | $18,125 | $21,375 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 336 rated districts reporting |
| 2025 | $22,605 | $31,097 | $18,972 | $23,059 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 336 rated districts reporting |
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers
- Average salary
- $74,559+$10,864 vs similar economic context
- Teachers
- 20−335.2 vs similar economic context
- Students per staff member
- 6.9−6.4 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Panther Creek CISD
- 1 to 5 years 5%
- 6 to 10 years 25.4%
- 11 to 20 years 32.8%
- 21 to 30 years 25.9%
- Over 30 years 10.9%
Selected comparison average For districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 336 reporting for every category shown · 336 in full cohort
- Beginning 7.4%
- 1 to 5 years 26.5%
- 6 to 10 years 17.4%
- 11 to 20 years 26.3%
- 21 to 30 years 17%
- Over 30 years 5.5%
Selected comparison average For Region 15: San Angelo · 45 reporting for every category shown · 45 in full cohort
- Beginning 7.4%
- 1 to 5 years 23.7%
- 6 to 10 years 15.9%
- 11 to 20 years 28.6%
- 21 to 30 years 19%
- Over 30 years 5.5%
Selected comparison average For Coleman County · 3 reporting for every category shown · 3 in full cohort
- Beginning 7.3%
- 1 to 5 years 13%
- 6 to 10 years 18.7%
- 11 to 20 years 26.5%
- 21 to 30 years 25.5%
- Over 30 years 9%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized districts · 133 reporting for every category shown · 133 in full cohort
- Beginning 8.2%
- 1 to 5 years 23.8%
- 6 to 10 years 15.2%
- 11 to 20 years 27%
- 21 to 30 years 18.3%
- Over 30 years 7.5%
Statewide average 1,019 reporting for every category shown · 1,019 Texas districts in full cohort
- Beginning 6.4%
- 1 to 5 years 23.9%
- 6 to 10 years 17.7%
- 11 to 20 years 28.7%
- 21 to 30 years 17.7%
- Over 30 years 5.5%
Teacher turnover over time
TEA reported a 13.4% teacher turnover rate in 2024–25.
Teacher turnover rate · 2024–25
- This district
- 13.4%
- Selected comparison
- 23.3%
| School year | Teacher turnover ratePanther Creek CISD | Average turnover rateselected comparison |
|---|---|---|
| 2020–21 | 10.8% | 18.3% |
| 2021–22 | 15.2% | 22.1% |
| 2022–23 | 30.4% | 26.0% |
| 2023–24 | 4.2% | 22.8% |
| 2024–25 | 13.4% | 23.3% |
TEA defines this district rate as the share of teacher full-time equivalents from the prior fall who are not employed as teachers in the district in the current fall. That can include leaving the district or remaining in a different role; it is not a campus-level measure. The comparison average changes with the selected group; this district's reported rate does not.
Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
Where this district ranks best
Out of 160 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
1 measure
-
2of 44
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness
Region 15: San Angelo · of the 44 that report this measure
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
2 measures
-
7of 44
Earned a level I or level II certificate
Region 15: San Angelo · of the 44 that report this measure
-
8of 44
Earned an associate degree
Region 15: San Angelo · of the 44 that report this measure
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this district ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this district; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no district would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.