Top placement
Science — Masters
50% Tied for 2nd of 12 charter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure · 2025-26 · 2 share this value
See the full measureCharter school system
Imagine International Academy of North Texas
Administrative office: McKinney · 1,438 students
Official charter system websiteEnrollment, registration and eligibility
- Current score
- 95/1002025-26
- Change
- −2 ptssince 2021-22
- Score vs similar economic context
- +6.0 ptsvs 89 average · 13 rated charter school systems serving a similar economic context
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
- 4 of 13tied with 1 other
- Score vs similar-size group
- +14.2 ptsvs 80.8 average · 39 similarly sized rated charter school systems
- Similar size placement
- 3 of 39tied with 1 other
- Score vs state
- +15.3 ptsvs 79.7 average · 165 rated Texas charter school systems
- Texas charter placement
- 7 of 165tied with 2 others
A95
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 98 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 89 average for 13 rated charter school systems serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 80.8 average for 39 similarly sized rated charter school systems.The current score is above the 79.7 average for 165 rated Texas charter school systems.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
Top placement
Chronically absent
2.1% 2nd-lowest of 12 charter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure · 2025-26
See the full measureTop placement
Attendance
97.4% 2nd of 12 charter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure · 2025-26
See the full measureCurrent strength
Chronically absent lower than the similar-size average
2.1% −14 pts vs 16.1%
- 2.1% is 14 percentage points lower than the 16.1% average among 39 similarly sized charter school systems reporting this measure.
- 1st-lowest of 39 similarly sized charter school systems reporting this measure.
Current strength
Attendance above the similar-size average
97.4% +3.4 pts vs 94%
- 97.4% is 3.4 percentage points above the 94% average among 39 similarly sized charter school systems reporting this measure.
- 1st of 39 similarly sized charter school systems reporting this measure.
Current strength
Closing the Gaps above the similar-size average
97 +17.9 pts vs 79.1
- 97 is 17.9 points above the 79.1 average among 39 similarly sized charter school systems reporting this measure.
- 2nd of 39 similarly sized charter school systems reporting this measure.
Current strength
Attendance above the Texas charter average
97.4% +4.1 pts vs 93.3%
- 97.4% is 4.1 percentage points above the 93.3% average among 162 Texas charter school systems reporting this measure.
- Tied for 3rd of 162 Texas charter school systems reporting this measure; 2 charter school systems share that value.
Top placement
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)
95.2% 3rd of 100 Texas charter school systems reporting this measure · 2025-26
See the full measureSTAAR result
Reading above Texas charter averages at Meets and Masters
- Meets
- 88%vs 49.5% avg · +38.5 pts
- Masters
- 59%vs 20.8% avg · +38.2 pts
Among 165 Texas charter school systems reporting this measure.
- Tied for 3rd of 165 Texas charter school systems reporting this measure; 2 charter school systems share that value.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this charter school system.
Read the full rating context and placement
Imagine International Academy of North Texas is rated A by TEA, scoring 95 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 89 average for 13 rated charter school systems serving a similar economic context. It is down 2 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 4th of 13 rated charter school systems serving a similar economic context (tied with 1 other).
Imagine International Academy of North Texas is rated A by TEA, scoring 95 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.8 average for 39 similarly sized rated charter school systems. It is down 2 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 3rd of 39 similarly sized rated charter school systems (tied with 1 other).
Imagine International Academy of North Texas is rated A by TEA, scoring 95 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 79.7 average for 165 rated Texas charter school systems. It is down 2 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 7th of 165 rated Texas charter school systems (tied with 2 others).
Put the numbers in context
Compare with
Jump to a section
- Overview
- 5 years of ratings
- Where the score comes from
- Student outcomes
- After high school: the following fall
- Who this charter school system serves
- Student counts behind the percentages
- Enrollment over time
- Students entering this charter system
- Discipline and removal from class
- 1 schools in this charter school system
- Spending per student
- Teachers
- Where this charter school system ranks best
- Where this comes from
5 years of ratings
Follow the solid line to see how this charter school system has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 98 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
View the yearly scores and comparisons
| Year | Rating | Score | Selected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rate | StateTexas charter average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | A | 95 | 89.0 13 reporting | 79.7 165 reporting |
| 2024-25 | A | 96 | 89.8 12 reporting | 79.2 160 reporting |
| 2023-24 | A | 95 | 89.0 12 reporting | 78.2 159 reporting |
| 2022-23 | A | 98 | 88.8 12 reporting | 77.4 158 reporting |
| 2021-22 | A | 97 | 90.5 12 reporting | 82.4 150 reporting |
Where the score comes from
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
- Imagine International Academy of North Texas
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate (13 in cohort)
| Domain | Score | Grade | Points to next grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| Student Achievement | 94 | A | — |
| School Progress | 88 | B | 2 |
| Closing the Gaps | 97 | A | — |
| Academic Growth | 85 | B | 5 |
| Relative Performance | 88 | B | 2 |
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this charter school system that better measure is Student Achievement (94), so School Progress (88) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 94.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
- Approaches grade level
- Meets grade level
- Masters grade level
- Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (13 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for charter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Graduation
- Four-Year
- 97.6%−0.6 pts vs similar economic context average for charter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 8 rated charter school systems reporting
- Five-Year
- 97.7%+11.0 pts vs similar economic context average for charter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 8 rated charter school systems reporting
- Six-Year
- 97.5%+23.5 pts vs similar economic context average for charter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 8 rated charter school systems reporting
- Dropout Rate
- 0.0%−0.1 pts vs similar economic context average for charter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 8 rated charter school systems reporting
These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only charter school systems in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported charter school system rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.
College, career and military readiness
- Total credit for CCMR criteria
- 98.0%+9.5 pts vs similar economic context
| Criterion | This district% of graduates | Averagesimilar economic context | Differencepercentage points | Reportingselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total credit for CCMR criteria | 98.0% | 88.5% | +9.5 | average for charter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 8 rated charter school systems reporting |
| Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course | 90.5% | 75.5% | +15.0 | average for charter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 8 rated charter school systems reporting |
| Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA | 90.5% | 75.5% | +15.0 | average for charter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 8 rated charter school systems reporting |
| Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s) | 95.2% | 63.7% | +31.5 | average for charter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 8 rated charter school systems reporting |
| Earned college credit for a dual credit course | 0.0% | 16.0% | −16.0 | average for charter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 8 rated charter school systems reporting |
| Earned an industry-based certification | 0.0% | 0.2% | −0.2 | average for charter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 8 rated charter school systems reporting |
| Earned a level I or level II certificate | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.0 | average for charter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 8 rated charter school systems reporting |
| Earned an associate degree | 0.0% | 1.2% | −1.2 | average for charter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 8 rated charter school systems reporting |
| Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit | 0.0% | 5.8% | −5.8 | average for charter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 8 rated charter school systems reporting |
| Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness | 0.0% | 1.4% | −1.4 | average for charter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 8 rated charter school systems reporting |
| Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student | 4.8% | 5.6% | −0.8 | average for charter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 8 rated charter school systems reporting |
| Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces | 2.4% | 2.3% | +0.1 | average for charter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 8 rated charter school systems reporting |
Every row is a share of this charter school system's graduates, and every row is a way of meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this charter school system minus the average for charter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate, counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported charter school system percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only charter school systems for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
After high school: the following fall
Where district graduates appeared in Texas public higher-education records the fall after graduation. This is a limited next-step measure, not an eventual college-going or completion rate.
- Graduates in the report
- 43
Class of 2023–24
- Enrolled in Texas public higher education
- 15
34.9% of graduates
- Not found in Texas public higher-ed records
- 23
53.5% of graduates
- Not trackable
- 5
Fall 2024
Graduates in the report
- This charter school system
- 43
- Selected comparison
- 69.8
Enrolled in Texas public higher education
- This charter school system
- 15
- Selected comparison
- 40.5
Texas-public enrollment rate
- This charter school system
- 34.9%
- Selected comparison
- 55.8%
Not-found rate
- This charter school system
- 53.5%
- Selected comparison
- 38.4%
Not-trackable rate
- This charter school system
- 11.6%
- Selected comparison
- 5.8%
Most common named Texas public destinations
- U. OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN (003658)5
Selected comparison counts are neutral cohort scale context. The percentages put differently sized graduating classes on the same basis, but still cover only the limited Texas-public system observed by this report.
Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, high-school graduates enrolled in higher education, fetched 24 August 2026. The report covers graduates who enrolled in a Texas public college or university the following fall and includes only districts or campuses with more than 25 graduates.
“Not found” does not mean a graduate did not continue their education. It can include private or out-of-state college, work, military service, enrollment after the fall term, or another path the Texas public system does not observe.
“Not trackable” is not an outcome. THECB uses it for graduates with a non-standard identifier that could not be matched to higher-education records.
Who this charter school system serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
- Students
- 1,438
- Economically disadvantaged
- 1.4%−2.8 pts vs similar economic context
- English learners
- 19.8%+8.9 pts vs similar economic context
- Special education
- 7.4%−3.5 pts vs similar economic context
- Attendance
- 97.4%+1.3 pts vs similar economic context
- Chronically absent
- 2.1%−3.7 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Imagine International Academy of North Texas
- African American 15%
- Hispanic 11.8%
- White 14.2%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 54.7%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 3.8%
Selected comparison average For charter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 13 reporting for every category shown · 13 in full cohort
- African American 7.6%
- Hispanic 19.1%
- White 41.7%
- American Indian 0.4%
- Asian 24.7%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 6.3%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized charter school systems · 39 reporting for every category shown · 39 in full cohort
- African American 12.5%
- Hispanic 57.5%
- White 17.6%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 8.9%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 3.1%
Texas charter average 165 reporting for every category shown · 165 Texas charter school systems in full cohort
- African American 21%
- Hispanic 54.7%
- White 15.7%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 5.3%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 2.9%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
- Students in this TEA accountability summary
- 1,438
- Economically disadvantaged students
- 20
- Emergent bilingual students
- 285
- Special education students
- 107
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 1,438 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 7 (0.5%) from 2024–25.
- Latest enrollment
- 1,438
2025–26
- Change from 2024–25
- −7
Decrease · −0.5%
- Change since 2021–22
- +52
Increase · +3.8%
Enrollment in 2025–26
- This charter school system
- 1,438
- Selected comparison
- 1,484.2
| School year | Students enrolledImagine International Academy of North Texas | Change from previous school year | Average enrollmentselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021–22 | 1,386 | First available year | 1,017.5 |
| 2022–23 | 1,399 | Increase of 13 (0.9%) | 1,159.3 |
| 2023–24 | 1,437 | Increase of 38 (2.7%) | 1,285.3 |
| 2024–25 | 1,445 | Increase of 8 (0.6%) | 1,364.3 |
| 2025–26 | 1,438 | Decrease of 7 (0.5%) | 1,484.2 |
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting charter school systems in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this charter school system's own counts do not.
Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Students entering this charter system
How many students live in a geographic school district and attend this charter system. These are movement counts, not a quality rating.
- Transfers in
- 1,438
Live in a geographic district; attend this charter system · 2025–26
Transfers in · 2025–26
- This charter school system
- 1,438
- Selected comparison
- 1,484.2
| School year | Transfers inImagine International Academy of North Texas | Transfers inselected charter comparison average |
|---|---|---|
| 2021–22 | 1,386 | 1,017.5 |
| 2022–23 | 1,399 | 1,159.3 |
| 2023–24 | 1,437 | 1,285.3 |
| 2024–25 | 1,445 | 1,364.3 |
| 2025–26 | 1,438 | 1,484.2 |
Largest reported resident-district origins
- McKinney ISD 043907571
- Frisco ISD 043905311
- Prosper ISD 043912196
- Allen ISD 043901147
- Melissa ISD 04390885
Top reported flows only. TEA published 9 of 17 counterpart counts and masked 8.
TEA does not publish a transfers-out total or a resident population for this charter system. A charter system is not a geographic attendance boundary, so a net transfer balance cannot be calculated and this page does not label the system a transfer gainer or loser.
Selected comparison figures are average reported transfer-in counts among charter systems, not rates; system size affects them. They provide scale context and are not a performance judgment. This charter system’s official total does not change when the comparison does.
Source: TEA Student Transfer Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The total and origin rows are TEA’s published charter-system figures; this site does not add masked detail cells. A transfer-in count does not say why a family chose the charter or whether one school is better.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
- Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
- 28
1.9% of cumulative year-end enrollment
- Disciplinary actions
- 34
2.29 per 100 students
- Cumulative year-end enrollment
- 1,487
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
- This charter school system
- 1.9%
- Selected comparison
- 4.0%
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
- This charter school system
- 2.29
- Selected comparison
- 5.8
| School year | Cumulative enrollment | Studentsall discipline | Students% of enrollment | Actionsall discipline | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020–21 | 1,494 | 11 | 0.7% | 16 | 1.07 | 1.8% | 2.7 |
| 2021–22 | 1,441 | 34 | 2.4% | 45 | 3.12 | 4.1% | 6.8 |
| 2022–23 | 1,445 | 29 | 2.0% | 36 | 2.49 | 3.4% | 4.8 |
| 2023–24 | 1,472 | 25 | 1.7% | 32 | 2.17 | 4.0% | 6 |
| 2024–25 | 1,487 | 28 | 1.9% | 34 | 2.29 | 4.0% | 5.8 |
See 2024–25 discipline categories
| Category | Students | Students% of enrollment | Actions | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All discipline | 28 | 1.9% | 34 | 2.29 | 4.0% | 5.8 |
| In-school suspensions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Out-of-school suspensions | 28 | 1.9% | 34 | 2.29 | 1.7% | 2 |
| DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized charter school systems can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this charter school system's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
1 schools in this charter school system
Number of schools in the charter school system
- This charter school system
- 1
- Selected comparison
- 2.6
The selected comparison is a neutral average charter school system size. This charter school system's school count and school-type mix remain its own facts.
- K-12
- 1
Browse all 1 schoolsName, type, rating, score and enrollment
| School | Type | Rating | Score | Students |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Imagine International Academy of North Texas | K-12 | A | 95 | 1,438 |
Spending per student
The selected txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference stay visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
- Imagine International Academy of North Texas
- TEA peer group
- Texas average
- Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
- This charter school system
- $9,618
- Selected comparison
- $11,202
This charter school system spends $10,143 less per student than TEA's peer group, and $9,354 less per student than the state average.
View yearly spending figures
| Year | Imagine International Academy of North Texas | TEA peer group | Texas average | Selected comparison average | Reportingselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | $8,097 | $13,246 | $13,054 | $8,924 | average for charter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 12 rated charter school systems reporting |
| 2019 | $8,694 | $12,865 | $13,108 | $8,922 | average for charter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 12 rated charter school systems reporting |
| 2020 | $8,683 | $13,729 | $14,058 | $8,908 | average for charter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 12 rated charter school systems reporting |
| 2021 | $8,559 | $14,629 | $14,797 | $9,089 | average for charter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 12 rated charter school systems reporting |
| 2022 | $9,526 | $15,859 | $15,708 | $10,499 | average for charter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 12 rated charter school systems reporting |
| 2023 | $10,007 | $17,414 | $16,792 | $10,318 | average for charter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 12 rated charter school systems reporting |
| 2024 | $9,393 | $19,844 | $18,125 | $10,551 | average for charter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 12 rated charter school systems reporting |
| 2025 | $9,618 | $19,761 | $18,972 | $11,202 | average for charter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 12 rated charter school systems reporting |
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers
Teacher turnover over time
| School year | Teacher turnover rateImagine International Academy of North Texas | Average turnover rateselected comparison |
|---|---|---|
| 2020–21 | Not reported | — |
| 2021–22 | Not reported | — |
| 2022–23 | Not reported | — |
| 2023–24 | Not reported | — |
| 2024–25 | Not reported | — |
TEA defines this charter school system rate as the share of teacher full-time equivalents from the prior fall who are not employed as teachers in the charter school system in the current fall. That can include leaving the charter school system or remaining in a different role; it is not a campus-level measure. The comparison average changes with the selected group; this charter school system's reported rate does not.
Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
Where this charter school system ranks best
Out of 101 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#1 rankings
First-place results
7 measures
-
1of 39
All Subjects — Approaches
Similar size · of the 39 that report this measure · tied with 1
-
1of 39
Reading — Approaches
Similar size · of the 39 that report this measure
-
1of 39
Reading — Masters
Similar size · of the 39 that report this measure
-
1of 39
Math — Approaches
Similar size · of the 39 that report this measure · tied with 1
-
1of 39
Science — Approaches
Similar size · of the 39 that report this measure · tied with 2
-
1of 39
Attendance
Similar size · of the 39 that report this measure
-
1of 39
Chronically absent (lowest is best)
Similar size · of the 39 that report this measure
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
16 measures
-
2of 39
Closing the Gaps
Similar size · of the 39 that report this measure
-
2of 39
Academic Growth
Similar size · of the 39 that report this measure · tied with 1
-
2of 39
All Subjects — Meets
Similar size · of the 39 that report this measure
-
2of 39
All Subjects — Masters
Similar size · of the 39 that report this measure
-
2of 39
Reading — Meets
Similar size · of the 39 that report this measure
-
2of 39
Science — Meets
Similar size · of the 39 that report this measure
-
2of 39
Science — Masters
Similar size · of the 39 that report this measure
-
2of 39
Social Studies — Meets
Similar size · of the 39 that report this measure
-
2of 39
Social Studies — Masters
Similar size · of the 39 that report this measure
-
2of 29
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA
Similar size · of the 29 that report this measure
-
2of 29
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)
Similar size · of the 29 that report this measure
-
3of 39
Overall score
Similar size · of the 39 that report this measure · tied with 1
-
3of 39
Math — Meets
Similar size · of the 39 that report this measure
-
3of 39
Math — Masters
Similar size · of the 39 that report this measure
-
3of 39
Social Studies — Approaches
Similar size · of the 39 that report this measure · tied with 1
-
3of 13
Relative Performance
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 13 that report this measure · tied with 1
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
4 measures
-
4of 39
School Progress
Similar size · of the 39 that report this measure · tied with 1
-
5of 39
Student Achievement
Similar size · of the 39 that report this measure
-
8of 29
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course
Similar size · of the 29 that report this measure · tied with 1
-
10of 12
Per-student spending
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 12 that report this measure
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this charter school system ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this charter school system; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no charter school system would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Download this charter school system as CSV · JSON · the whole dataset