Recent domain gain
Academic Growth rose 13 points
70 to 83 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 83 is 6.8 points above the 76.2 average among 200 districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
Geographic public school district
Divide ISD
Kerr County · Region 15: San Angelo · 41 students
Official district websiteEnrollment, registration and eligibility
- Current score
- 82/1002025-26
- Change
- +6 ptssince 2021-22
- Score vs similar economic context
- −3.6 ptsvs 85.6 average · 200 rated districts serving a similar economic context
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
- 141 of 200tied with 11 others
- Score vs region
- −0.9 ptsvs 82.9 average · 45 rated districts in Region 15: San Angelo
- Region 15: San Angelo placement
- 25 of 45tied with 4 others
- Score vs county
- −3.0 ptsvs 85 average · 5 rated districts in Kerr County
- Score vs similar-size group
- +11.1 ptsvs 70.9 average · 9 similarly sized rated districts
- Score vs state
- +0.3 ptsvs 81.7 average · 1,019 rated Texas districts
- Texas placement
- 487 of 1,019tied with 51 others
B82
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 80 in 2021-22. The current score is below the 85.6 average for 200 rated districts serving a similar economic context.The current score is below the 82.9 average for 45 rated districts in Region 15: San Angelo.The current score is below the 85 average for 5 rated districts in Kerr County.The current score is above the 70.9 average for 9 similarly sized rated districts.The current score is level with the 81.7 average for 1,019 rated Texas districts.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
Current strength
Chronically absent lower than the similar-context average
0% −10.6 pts vs 10.6%
- 0% is 10.6 percentage points lower than the 10.6% average among 200 districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
- 1st-lowest of 200 districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
Current strength
Attendance above the similar-context average
97.7% +2.4 pts vs 95.3%
- 97.7% is 2.4 percentage points above the 95.3% average among 200 districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
- 1st of 200 districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
Recent domain gain
Academic Growth rose 13 points
70 to 83 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 83 is 11.1 points above the 71.9 average among 45 districts in Region 15: San Angelo reporting this measure.
Current strength
Chronically absent lower than the Region 15: San Angelo average
0% −14.4 pts vs 14.4%
- 0% is 14.4 percentage points lower than the 14.4% average among 45 districts in Region 15: San Angelo reporting this measure.
- 1st-lowest of 45 districts in Region 15: San Angelo reporting this measure.
Current strength
Attendance above the Region 15: San Angelo average
97.7% +3 pts vs 94.7%
- 97.7% is 3 percentage points above the 94.7% average among 45 districts in Region 15: San Angelo reporting this measure.
- 1st of 45 districts in Region 15: San Angelo reporting this measure.
Recent domain gain
Academic Growth rose 13 points
70 to 83 2024-25 to 2025-26
See the full measureRecent domain gain
Academic Growth rose 13 points
70 to 83 2024-25 to 2025-26
See the full measureRecent domain gain
Academic Growth rose 13 points
70 to 83 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 83 is 10.5 points above the 72.5 average among 1,018 Texas districts reporting this measure.
Current strength
Chronically absent lower than the Texas average
0% −15.1 pts vs 15.1%
- 0% is 15.1 percentage points lower than the 15.1% average among 1,019 Texas districts reporting this measure.
- Tied for 1st-lowest of 1,019 Texas districts reporting this measure; 4 districts share that value.
STAAR result
All Subjects above Texas averages at Meets and Masters
- Meets
- 58%vs 49.7% avg · +8.3 pts
- Masters
- 26%vs 19.6% avg · +6.4 pts
Among 1,019 Texas districts reporting this measure.
See the full measureSelected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this district.
Read the full rating context and placement
Divide ISD is rated B by TEA, scoring 82 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 85.6 average for 200 rated districts serving a similar economic context. It is up 6 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 141st of 200 rated districts serving a similar economic context (tied with 11 others).
Divide ISD is rated B by TEA, scoring 82 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 82.9 average for 45 rated districts in Region 15: San Angelo. It is up 6 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 25th of 45 rated districts in Region 15: San Angelo (tied with 4 others).
Divide ISD is rated B by TEA, scoring 82 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 85 average for 5 rated districts in Kerr County. It is up 6 points since 2021-22.
Divide ISD is rated B by TEA, scoring 82 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 70.9 average for 9 similarly sized rated districts. It is up 6 points since 2021-22.
Divide ISD is rated B by TEA, scoring 82 out of 100 for 2025-26 — level with the 81.7 average for 1,019 rated Texas districts. It is up 6 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 487th of 1,019 rated Texas districts (tied with 51 others).
Put the numbers in context
Compare with
Jump to a section
- Overview
- 5 years of ratings
- Where the score comes from
- Student outcomes
- Who this district serves
- Student counts behind the percentages
- Enrollment over time
- Students crossing district lines
- Discipline and removal from class
- Community around the district
- 1 schools in this district
- Spending per student
- Teachers
- Where this district ranks best
- Where this comes from
5 years of ratings
Follow the solid line to see how this district has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 80 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
View the yearly scores and comparisons
| Year | Rating | Score | Selected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rate | StateTexas average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | B | 82 | 85.6 200 reporting | 81.7 1,019 reporting |
| 2024-25 | B | 83 | 84.4 200 reporting | 80.3 1,019 reporting |
| 2023-24 | B | 82 | 82.9 200 reporting | 78.7 1,017 reporting |
| 2022-23 | C | 77 | 83.4 200 reporting | 79.2 1,018 reporting |
| 2021-22 | C | 76 | 83.9 200 reporting | 80.6 1,017 reporting |
Where the score comes from
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
- Divide ISD
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate (200 in cohort)
| Domain | Score | Grade | Points to next grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| Student Achievement | 83 | B | 7 |
| School Progress | 83 | B | 7 |
| Closing the Gaps | 78 | C | 2 |
| Academic Growth | 83 | B | 7 |
| Relative Performance | 75 | C | 5 |
Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 2 points below B in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
- Approaches grade level
- Meets grade level
- Masters grade level
- Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (200 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only districts for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this district serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
- Students
- 41
- Economically disadvantaged
- 36.6%−1.3 pts vs similar economic context
- English learners
- 0.0%−6.7 pts vs similar economic context
- Special education
- 9.8%−7.2 pts vs similar economic context
- Attendance
- 97.7%+2.4 pts vs similar economic context
- Chronically absent
- 0.0%−10.6 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Divide ISD
- Hispanic 17.1%
- White 82.9%
Selected comparison average For districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 200 reporting for every category shown · 200 in full cohort
- African American 4.1%
- Hispanic 28.3%
- White 62%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 1.6%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 3.6%
Selected comparison average For Region 15: San Angelo · 45 reporting for every category shown · 45 in full cohort
- African American 1.5%
- Hispanic 42.7%
- White 53.1%
- American Indian 0.2%
- Asian 0.3%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 2.1%
Selected comparison average For Kerr County · 5 reporting for every category shown · 5 in full cohort
- African American 0.6%
- Hispanic 40.9%
- White 56%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 0.3%
- Pacific Islander 0.2%
- Two or More Races 1.7%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized districts · 9 reporting for every category shown · 9 in full cohort
- African American 1.3%
- Hispanic 38%
- White 56%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 2%
- Two or More Races 2.5%
Statewide average 1,019 reporting for every category shown · 1,019 Texas districts in full cohort
- African American 6.3%
- Hispanic 43.1%
- White 45.4%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 1.4%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 3.3%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
- Students in this TEA accountability summary
- 41
- Economically disadvantaged students
- 15
- Emergent bilingual students
- 0
- Special education students
- 4
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 41 students in 2025–26, an increase of 6 (17.1%) from 2024–25.
- Latest enrollment
- 41
2025–26
- Change from 2024–25
- +6
Increase · +17.1%
- Change since 2021–22
- +9
Increase · +28.1%
Enrollment in 2025–26
- This district
- 41
- Selected comparison
- 4,700.7
| School year | Students enrolledDivide ISD | Change from previous school year | Average enrollmentselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021–22 | 32 | First available year | 4,500.5 |
| 2022–23 | 37 | Increase of 5 (15.6%) | 4,619.1 |
| 2023–24 | 35 | Decrease of 2 (5.4%) | 4,674 |
| 2024–25 | 35 | No change | 4,710.9 |
| 2025–26 | 41 | Increase of 6 (17.1%) | 4,700.7 |
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting districts in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this district's own counts do not.
Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Students crossing district lines
How many students live in one public-school district and attend in another. These are movement counts, not a measure of family satisfaction or school quality.
- Transfers in
- 14
Live in another district; attend here · 2025–26
- Transfers out
- Suppressed
Live here; attend in another public district or charter · 2025–26
- Transfers in minus transfers out
- Not available
Arithmetic context only
Transfers in · 2025–26
- This district
- 14
- Selected comparison
- 203.4
| School year | Transfers inDivide ISD | Transfers outDivide ISD | In minus outDivide ISD | Transfers inselected comparison average | Transfers outselected comparison average | In minus outselected comparison average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021–22 | 22 | 20 | +2 | 184.8 | 266.4 | −89 |
| 2022–23 | 21 | 18 | +3 | 182.1 | 288.2 | −111 |
| 2023–24 | 19 | 12 | +7 | 185.1 | 305.4 | −126 |
| 2024–25 | 16 | Suppressed | Not available | 196.6 | — | — |
| 2025–26 | 14 | Suppressed | Not available | 203.4 | — | — |
Selected comparison figures are average reported counts, not rates; group size and district enrollment affect them. They provide scale context and are not a performance judgment. This district's official totals do not change when the comparison does.
Source: TEA Student Transfer Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The totals are TEA's official district rows; this site does not add masked detail cells. A transfer records a mismatch between district of residence and public district or charter of attendance. It does not say why a family transferred, whether the move was optional, or whether either school is better.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
- Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
- Suppressed
Rate not available
- Disciplinary actions
- Suppressed
Rate not available
- Cumulative year-end enrollment
- 37
2024–25
| School year | Cumulative enrollment | Studentsall discipline | Students% of enrollment | Actionsall discipline | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020–21 | 24 | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| 2021–22 | 32 | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| 2022–23 | 39 | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| 2023–24 | 40 | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| 2024–25 | 37 | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
See 2024–25 discipline categories
| Category | Students | Students% of enrollment | Actions | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All discipline | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| In-school suspensions | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| Out-of-school suspensions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized districts can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this district's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Community around the district
A district serves a place as well as a roster. These Census estimates describe the resident community without treating its circumstances as an explanation or a verdict on students.
- People living inside the district boundary
- 221
2024 Census estimate
- Children ages 5–17
- 29
Living inside the boundary
- Children ages 5–17 in families in poverty
- 4
13.8%
- School-age child poverty rate
- 13.8%
4 of 29
Boundary population
- This district
- 221
- Selected comparison
- 27,393.1
School-age population
- This district
- 29
- Selected comparison
- 5,052.4
School-age population in poverty
- This district
- 4
- Selected comparison
- 431.8
School-age child poverty rate
- This district
- 13.8%
- Selected comparison
- 11.1%
Population averages provide neutral scale context and can differ sharply across a region, county or the state. The poverty-rate comparison is the like-for-like percentage; none of these Census measures is treated as school performance.
Source: U.S. Census Bureau 2024 Small Area Income and Poverty Estimates, fetched 24 August 2026. These are modeled estimates for residents inside the geographic district, not the students enrolled by the district. A family's poverty status is context, never a school-quality measure.
1 schools in this district
Number of schools in the district
- This district
- 1
- Selected comparison
- 6.9
The selected comparison is a neutral average district size. This district's school count and school-type mix remain its own facts.
- Elementary
- 1
Browse all 1 schoolsName, type, rating, score and enrollment
| School | Type | Rating | Score | Students |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Divide Elem | Elementary | B | 82 | 41 |
Spending per student
The selected txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference stay visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
- Divide ISD
- TEA peer group
- Texas average
- Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
- This district
- $25,445
- Selected comparison
- $23,855
This district spends $5,652 less per student than TEA's peer group, and $6,473 more per student than the state average.
View yearly spending figures
| Year | Divide ISD | TEA peer group | Texas average | Selected comparison average | Reportingselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | $19,254 | $22,035 | $13,054 | $14,166 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 200 rated districts reporting |
| 2019 | $17,468 | $21,900 | $13,108 | $14,588 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 200 rated districts reporting |
| 2020 | $17,539 | $21,220 | $14,058 | $15,617 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 200 rated districts reporting |
| 2021 | $28,315 | $22,787 | $14,797 | $16,195 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 200 rated districts reporting |
| 2022 | $21,706 | $28,874 | $15,708 | $17,803 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 200 rated districts reporting |
| 2023 | $18,496 | $35,111 | $16,792 | $19,033 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 200 rated districts reporting |
| 2024 | $22,028 | $33,004 | $18,125 | $22,015 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 200 rated districts reporting |
| 2025 | $25,445 | $31,097 | $18,972 | $23,855 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 200 rated districts reporting |
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers
- Average salary
- $61,751−$3,803 vs similar economic context
- Teachers
- 3−319.8 vs similar economic context
- Students per staff member
- 13.9+1.3 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Divide ISD
- 1 to 5 years 69%
- 11 to 20 years 31%
Selected comparison average For districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 200 reporting for every category shown · 200 in full cohort
- Beginning 4.9%
- 1 to 5 years 20.9%
- 6 to 10 years 18.4%
- 11 to 20 years 32.1%
- 21 to 30 years 18.7%
- Over 30 years 5%
Selected comparison average For Region 15: San Angelo · 45 reporting for every category shown · 45 in full cohort
- Beginning 7.4%
- 1 to 5 years 23.7%
- 6 to 10 years 15.9%
- 11 to 20 years 28.6%
- 21 to 30 years 19%
- Over 30 years 5.5%
Selected comparison average For Kerr County · 5 reporting for every category shown · 5 in full cohort
- Beginning 2.3%
- 1 to 5 years 25.6%
- 6 to 10 years 17.7%
- 11 to 20 years 32.9%
- 21 to 30 years 18.9%
- Over 30 years 2.8%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized districts · 9 reporting for every category shown · 9 in full cohort
- Beginning 14.5%
- 1 to 5 years 20.2%
- 6 to 10 years 11.9%
- 11 to 20 years 33.1%
- 21 to 30 years 11.5%
- Over 30 years 9%
Statewide average 1,019 reporting for every category shown · 1,019 Texas districts in full cohort
- Beginning 6.4%
- 1 to 5 years 23.9%
- 6 to 10 years 17.7%
- 11 to 20 years 28.7%
- 21 to 30 years 17.7%
- Over 30 years 5.5%
Teacher turnover over time
TEA reported a 0.0% teacher turnover rate in 2024–25.
Teacher turnover rate · 2024–25
- This district
- 0.0%
- Selected comparison
- 18.0%
| School year | Teacher turnover rateDivide ISD | Average turnover rateselected comparison |
|---|---|---|
| 2020–21 | 0.0% | 13.9% |
| 2021–22 | 28.6% | 17.7% |
| 2022–23 | 0.0% | 18.8% |
| 2023–24 | 0.0% | 18.8% |
| 2024–25 | 0.0% | 18.0% |
TEA defines this district rate as the share of teacher full-time equivalents from the prior fall who are not employed as teachers in the district in the current fall. That can include leaving the district or remaining in a different role; it is not a campus-level measure. The comparison average changes with the selected group; this district's reported rate does not.
Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
Where this district ranks best
Out of 54 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#1 rankings
First-place results
2 measures
-
1of 1,019
Chronically absent (lowest is best)
Texas average · of the 1,019 that report this measure · tied with 3 · full ranking
-
1of 200
Attendance
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 200 that report this measure
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
1 measure
-
3of 45
Reading — Approaches
Region 15: San Angelo · of the 45 that report this measure
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
5 measures
-
4of 45
Reading — Masters
Region 15: San Angelo · of the 45 that report this measure
-
6of 45
Reading — Meets
Region 15: San Angelo · of the 45 that report this measure
-
7of 45
All Subjects — Masters
Region 15: San Angelo · of the 45 that report this measure · tied with 1
-
9of 45
All Subjects — Meets
Region 15: San Angelo · of the 45 that report this measure · tied with 1
-
10of 45
Math — Meets
Region 15: San Angelo · of the 45 that report this measure
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this district ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this district; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no district would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.