Current strength
Chronically absent lower than the similar-context average
0% −23.2 pts vs 23.2%
- 0% is 23.2 percentage points lower than the 23.2% average among 1,891 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
Traditional public school campus · Alternative Education Accountability
Youth Recovery Home
Webb County · Region 01: Edinburg · 15 students
Not Rated
At a glance
TEA did not issue an overall rating for Youth Recovery Home for 2025-26. Everything TEA did publish for this school is below.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
Current strength
Attendance above the similar-context average
100% +7 pts vs 93%
- 100% is 7 percentage points above the 93% average among 1,897 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
Current strength
Chronically absent lower than the Region 01: Edinburg average
0% −19.8 pts vs 19.8%
- 0% is 19.8 percentage points lower than the 19.8% average among 490 schools in Region 01: Edinburg reporting this measure.
Current strength
Attendance above the Region 01: Edinburg average
100% +6 pts vs 94%
- 100% is 6 percentage points above the 94% average among 490 schools in Region 01: Edinburg reporting this measure.
Current strength
Chronically absent lower than the Webb County average
0% −15.9 pts vs 15.9%
- 0% is 15.9 percentage points lower than the 15.9% average among 76 schools in Webb County reporting this measure.
Current strength
Attendance above the Webb County average
100% +5.5 pts vs 94.5%
- 100% is 5.5 percentage points above the 94.5% average among 76 schools in Webb County reporting this measure.
Current strength
Chronically absent lower than the similar-size average
0% −41.2 pts vs 41.2%
- 0% is 41.2 percentage points lower than the 41.2% average among 20 similarly sized schools reporting this measure.
Current strength
Attendance above the similar-size average
100% +12.7 pts vs 87.3%
- 100% is 12.7 percentage points above the 87.3% average among 20 similarly sized schools reporting this measure.
Current strength
Chronically absent lower than the Texas average
0% −16.7 pts vs 16.7%
- 0% is 16.7 percentage points lower than the 16.7% average among 7,358 Texas schools reporting this measure.
Current strength
Attendance above the Texas average
100% +5.9 pts vs 94.1%
- 100% is 5.9 percentage points above the 94.1% average among 7,366 Texas schools reporting this measure.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
TEA did not issue an overall rating for Youth Recovery Home for 2025-26. Everything TEA did publish for this school is below.
TEA did not issue an overall rating for Youth Recovery Home for 2025-26. Everything TEA did publish for this school is below.
TEA did not issue an overall rating for Youth Recovery Home for 2025-26. Everything TEA did publish for this school is below.
TEA did not issue an overall rating for Youth Recovery Home for 2025-26. Everything TEA did publish for this school is below.
TEA did not issue an overall rating for Youth Recovery Home for 2025-26. Everything TEA did publish for this school is below.
TEA did not issue an overall rating for this school. Scores below are the figures TEA published; the letter grades are the state's where it issued them.
Put the numbers in context
Compare with
Jump to a section
5 years of ratings
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
View the yearly scores and comparisons
| Year | Rating | Score | Selected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rate | StateTexas average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Not Rated | — | 77.6 2,007 reporting | 81.3 7,646 reporting |
| 2024-25 | Not Rated | — | 77.3 1,989 reporting | 81.2 7,554 reporting |
| 2023-24 | Not Rated | — | 73.8 1,971 reporting | 78.9 7,466 reporting |
| 2022-23 | Not Rated | — | 73.3 1,965 reporting | 79.1 7,377 reporting |
| 2021-22 | Not Rated | — | 81.9 1,940 reporting | 83.7 7,283 reporting |
Where the score comes from
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
- Youth Recovery Home
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,007 in cohort)
| Domain | Score | Grade | Points to next grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| Student Achievement | — | Not rated | — |
| School Progress | — | Not rated | — |
| Closing the Gaps | — | Not rated | — |
| Academic Growth | — | Not rated | — |
| Relative Performance | — | Not rated | — |
The scores above are the ones TEA published. TEA did not issue letter grades for this school, so none are shown: the A–F thresholds marked on the chart are the state's, but applying them here would produce a grade the state chose to withhold.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
- Students
- 15
- Economically disadvantaged
- 93.3%+1.9 pts vs similar economic context
- English learners
- 13.3%−27.8 pts vs similar economic context
- Special education
- 20.0%+2.4 pts vs similar economic context
- Attendance
- 100.0%+7.0 pts vs similar economic context
- Chronically absent
- 0.0%−23.2 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Youth Recovery Home
- Hispanic 80%
- White 13.3%
- Two or More Races 6.7%
Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,007 reporting for every category shown · 2,007 in full cohort
- African American 15%
- Hispanic 76.6%
- White 5.3%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 1.2%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 1.5%
Selected comparison average For Region 01: Edinburg · 505 reporting for every category shown · 505 in full cohort
- African American 0.2%
- Hispanic 97.5%
- White 1.9%
- Asian 0.3%
- Two or More Races 0.1%
Selected comparison average For Webb County · 76 reporting for every category shown · 76 in full cohort
- African American 0.1%
- Hispanic 98.3%
- White 1.3%
- Asian 0.2%
- Two or More Races 0.1%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized schools · 24 reporting for every category shown · 24 in full cohort
- African American 7.3%
- Hispanic 54.8%
- White 33.4%
- Asian 0.3%
- Two or More Races 4.2%
Statewide average 7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
- African American 11.5%
- Hispanic 52.6%
- White 27.8%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 4.2%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
- Students in this TEA accountability summary
- 15
- Economically disadvantaged students
- 14
- Emergent bilingual students
- 2
- Special education students
- 3
TEA context labels
- Alternative education type: residential facility
- Rated under AEA procedures
- Residential treatment facility under AEA or AskTED
Campus mobility · 2024–25
- Mobile students
- 72
- Students in TEA mobility denominator
- 72
- TEA-published mobility rate
- 100%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 15 students in 2025–26, no change from 2024–25.
- Latest enrollment
- 15
2025–26
- Change from 2024–25
- 0
No change
Enrollment in 2025–26
- This school
- 15
- Selected comparison
- 568.8
| School year | Students enrolledYouth Recovery Home | Change from previous school year | Average enrollmentselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021–22 | 13 | First available year | 614.7 |
| 2022–23 | Not reported | Not available | — |
| 2023–24 | 16 | No adjacent prior year | 601 |
| 2024–25 | 15 | Decrease of 1 (6.3%) | 594.3 |
| 2025–26 | 15 | No change | 568.8 |
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
- Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
- Not reported
Rate not available
- Disciplinary actions
- Not reported
Rate not available
- Cumulative year-end enrollment
- 67
2024–25
| School year | Cumulative enrollment | Studentsall discipline | Students% of enrollment | Actionsall discipline | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020–21 | 36 | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| 2021–22 | 36 | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| 2022–23 | 47 | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| 2023–24 | 76 | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| 2024–25 | 67 | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
See 2024–25 discipline categories
| Category | Students | Students% of enrollment | Actions | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All discipline | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| In-school suspensions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Out-of-school suspensions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
- Youth Recovery Home
- Parent district: United ISD
- Texas average
- Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
- This school
- $26,610
- Selected comparison
- $13,195
For 2025, TEA reported $26,610 per student for this campus, $14,348 per student for its parent district, United ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
| Year | Youth Recovery Home | Parent district: United ISD | Texas average | Selected comparison average | Reportingselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | $1,896 | $13,187 | $13,054 | $8,333 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,892 rated schools reporting |
| 2020 | $498 | $12,004 | $14,058 | $8,850 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,921 rated schools reporting |
| 2021 | $39 | $13,076 | $14,797 | $9,670 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,923 rated schools reporting |
| 2022 | $11,613 | $15,006 | $15,708 | $11,245 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,940 rated schools reporting |
| 2023 | $35,885 | $14,779 | $16,792 | $11,791 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,964 rated schools reporting |
| 2024 | $21,447 | $15,029 | $18,125 | $12,665 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,974 rated schools reporting |
| 2025 | $26,610 | $14,348 | $18,972 | $13,195 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,987 rated schools reporting |
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
- Average salary
- $70,279+$1,932 vs similar economic context
- Teachers
- 2−38.2 vs similar economic context
- Students per staff member
- 8.6−6.1 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Youth Recovery Home
- 6 to 10 years 11.8%
- 11 to 20 years 11.8%
- 21 to 30 years 70.6%
- Over 30 years 11.8%
Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,007 reporting for every category shown · 2,007 in full cohort
- Beginning 7.5%
- 1 to 5 years 27.1%
- 6 to 10 years 18.8%
- 11 to 20 years 27.2%
- 21 to 30 years 14.8%
- Over 30 years 3.4%
Selected comparison average For Region 01: Edinburg · 505 reporting for every category shown · 505 in full cohort
- Beginning 2.7%
- 1 to 5 years 19.3%
- 6 to 10 years 16.2%
- 11 to 20 years 35%
- 21 to 30 years 22.6%
- Over 30 years 4.2%
Selected comparison average For Webb County · 76 reporting for every category shown · 76 in full cohort
- Beginning 2.5%
- 1 to 5 years 18.4%
- 6 to 10 years 16%
- 11 to 20 years 32.7%
- 21 to 30 years 25.1%
- Over 30 years 5.2%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized schools · 24 reporting for every category shown · 24 in full cohort
- Beginning 1.9%
- 1 to 5 years 15.3%
- 6 to 10 years 10.4%
- 11 to 20 years 19.4%
- 21 to 30 years 22.7%
- Over 30 years 9.4%
Statewide average 7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
- Beginning 6.2%
- 1 to 5 years 25.6%
- 6 to 10 years 19.2%
- 11 to 20 years 28.7%
- 21 to 30 years 15.9%
- Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
| Grade or subject | Average students per classYouth Recovery Home · 2024–25 | Average students per classselected comparison |
|---|---|---|
| Secondary English | 4 | 15.1 |
| Secondary math | 3.5 | 16.8 |
| Secondary science | 2.5 | 17.7 |
| Secondary social studies | 4 | 17.7 |
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 4 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Download the full dataset · this campus's district
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 240903031.