+15.3 ptsvs 78.7 average · 2,075 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
74 of 2,075tied with 26 others
Score vs region
+13.5 ptsvs 80.5 average · 839 rated schools in Region 11: Fort Worth
Region 11: Fort Worth placement
35 of 839tied with 18 others
Score vs county
+14.0 ptsvs 80 average · 466 rated schools in Tarrant County
Tarrant County placement
24 of 466tied with 9 others
Score vs similar-size group
+13.9 ptsvs 80.1 average · 4,145 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
180 of 4,145tied with 68 others
Score vs state
+12.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
379 of 7,646tied with 208 others
A94
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 87 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 78.7 average for 2,075 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 80.5 average for 839 rated schools in Region 11: Fort Worth.The current score is above the 80 average for 466 rated schools in Tarrant County.The current score is above the 80.1 average for 4,145 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
55%vs 44.8% avg · +10.2 pts
Masters
19%vs 17.7% avg · +1.3 pts
Among 1,940 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Young Men's Leadership Academy is rated A by TEA, scoring 94 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 78.7 average for 2,075 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 10 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 74th of 2,075 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 26 others).
Young Men's Leadership Academy is rated A by TEA, scoring 94 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.5 average for 839 rated schools in Region 11: Fort Worth. It is up 10 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 35th of 839 rated schools in Region 11: Fort Worth (tied with 18 others).
Young Men's Leadership Academy is rated A by TEA, scoring 94 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80 average for 466 rated schools in Tarrant County. It is up 10 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 24th of 466 rated schools in Tarrant County (tied with 9 others).
Young Men's Leadership Academy is rated A by TEA, scoring 94 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.1 average for 4,145 similarly sized rated schools. It is up 10 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 180th of 4,145 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 68 others).
Young Men's Leadership Academy is rated A by TEA, scoring 94 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is up 10 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 87 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement88 B+13.1 vs similar economic context · 1,940 reporting
School Progress95 A+15.1 vs similar economic context · 1,934 reporting
Closing the Gaps92 A+16.0 vs similar economic context · 1,919 reporting
Academic Growth60 D−12.9 vs similar economic context · 1,873 reporting
Relative Performance95 A+16.7 vs similar economic context · 1,934 reporting
Young Men's Leadership Academy
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,075 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
88
B
2
School Progress
95
A
—
Closing the Gaps
92
A
—
Academic Growth
60
D
10
Relative Performance
95
A
—
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (95), so
Student Achievement (88) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 95.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level81%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,940 reporting
Meets grade level55%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,940 reporting
Masters grade level19%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,940 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level81%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,937 reporting
Meets grade level62%+13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,937 reporting
Masters grade level21%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,937 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level76%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,929 reporting
Meets grade level45%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,929 reporting
Masters grade level13%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,929 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level89%+19 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,786 reporting
Meets grade level55%+14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,786 reporting
Masters grade level18%+0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,786 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
Approaches grade level83%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 880 reporting
Meets grade level57%+15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 880 reporting
Masters grade level26%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 880 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,075 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Graduation
Four-Year
96.9%+3.1 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 407 rated schools reporting
Five-Year
96.7%+3.2 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 407 rated schools reporting
Six-Year
93.5%+0.8 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 406 rated schools reporting
Dropout Rate
1.0%±0.0 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 410 rated schools reporting
These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only schools in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported school rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.
College, career and military readiness
Total credit for CCMR criteria
100.0%+13.5 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
Criterion
This school% of graduates
Averagesimilar economic context
Differencepercentage points
Reportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria
100.0%
86.5%
+13.5
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 449 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course
93.3%
59.0%
+34.3
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 452 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA
63.3%
26.0%
+37.3
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 452 rated schools reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)
30.0%
11.6%
+18.4
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 452 rated schools reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course
33.3%
32.6%
+0.7
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 452 rated schools reporting
Earned an industry-based certification
53.3%
37.1%
+16.2
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 452 rated schools reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate
0.0%
2.3%
−2.3
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 452 rated schools reporting
Earned an associate degree
0.0%
7.6%
−7.6
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 452 rated schools reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit
46.7%
4.6%
+42.1
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 452 rated schools reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness
0.0%
3.2%
−3.2
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 452 rated schools reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student
3.3%
8.1%
−4.8
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 452 rated schools reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces
0.0%
2.9%
−2.9
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 452 rated schools reporting
Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of
meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this
school minus the average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate,
counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that
criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported school percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
After high school: the following fall
Where school graduates appeared in Texas public higher-education records the fall after graduation. This is a limited next-step measure, not an eventual college-going or completion rate.
Graduates in the report
29
Class of 2023–24
Enrolled in Texas public higher education
17
58.6% of graduates
Not found in Texas public higher-ed records
10
34.5% of graduates
Not trackable
2
Fall 2024
Graduates in the report
This school
29
Selected comparison
251.9
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 377 rated schools reporting
Enrolled in Texas public higher education
This school
17
Selected comparison
107.5
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 377 rated schools reporting
Texas-public enrollment rate
This school
58.6%
Selected comparison
42.6%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 377 rated schools reporting
+16.0 pts vs similar economic context
Not-found rate
This school
34.5%
Selected comparison
51.5%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 377 rated schools reporting
−17.0 pts vs similar economic context
Not-trackable rate
This school
6.9%
Selected comparison
5.9%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 377 rated schools reporting
+1.0 pts vs similar economic context
Most common named Texas public destinations
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS (003594)6
Selected comparison counts are neutral cohort scale context. The percentages put differently sized graduating classes on the same basis, but still cover only the limited Texas-public system observed by this report.
Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, high-school graduates enrolled in higher education, fetched 24 August 2026. The report covers graduates who enrolled in a Texas public college or university the following fall and includes only districts or campuses with more than 25 graduates.
“Not found” does not mean a graduate did not continue their education. It can include private or out-of-state college, work, military service, enrollment after the fall term, or another path the Texas public system does not observe.
“Not trackable” is not an outcome. THECB uses it for graduates with a non-standard identifier that could not be matched to higher-education records.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
415
Economically disadvantaged
73.7%+0.1 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
21.2%−1.6 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
12.5%−6.3 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
94.7%+1.0 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
14.1%−4.6 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Young Men's Leadership Academy
African American 36.1%
Hispanic 51.6%
White 6.7%
American Indian 0.2%
Asian 3.6%
Two or More Races 1.7%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,075 reporting for every category shown · 2,075 in full cohort
African American 12.8%
Hispanic 60.6%
White 21%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 1.9%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.2%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 11: Fort Worth · 839 reporting for every category shown · 839 in full cohort
African American 15.4%
Hispanic 39.6%
White 34.4%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.3%
Pacific Islander 0.3%
Two or More Races 4.6%
Selected comparison averageFor Tarrant County · 466 reporting for every category shown · 466 in full cohort
African American 21.3%
Hispanic 45.2%
White 22.9%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.4%
Pacific Islander 0.3%
Two or More Races 4.6%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,145 reporting for every category shown · 4,145 in full cohort
African American 11.8%
Hispanic 55%
White 26.1%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 3.4%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.3%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
415
Economically disadvantaged students
306
Emergent bilingual students
88
Special education students
52
Early college pathways
Pathways in Technology Early College High School (P-TECH)
81
TEA-published share: 19.5%
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
31
Students in TEA mobility denominator
426
TEA-published mobility rate
7.3%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 415 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 3 (0.7%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
415
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
−3
Decrease · −0.7%
Change since 2021–22
+40
Increase · +10.7%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
415
Selected comparison
638.8
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,043 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Young Men's Leadership Academy
School year
Students enrolledYoung Men's Leadership Academy
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
375
First available year
656.1
2022–23
377
Increase of 2 (0.5%)
660.2
2023–24
397
Increase of 20 (5.3%)
657.8
2024–25
418
Increase of 21 (5.3%)
655.2
2025–26
415
Decrease of 3 (0.7%)
638.8
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
92
22.3% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
168
40.78 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
412
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
22.3%
Selected comparison
13.2%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,570 rated schools reporting
+9.1 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
40.78
Selected comparison
31.8
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,680 rated schools reporting
+9.0 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Young Men's Leadership Academy
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
388
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2021–22
369
98
26.6%
192
52.03
13.0%
31.1
2022–23
372
81
21.8%
154
41.40
13.6%
33.4
2023–24
393
81
20.6%
186
47.33
13.5%
33.1
2024–25
412
92
22.3%
168
40.78
13.2%
31.8
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Young Men's Leadership Academy in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
92
22.3%
168
40.78
13.2%
31.8
In-school suspensions
63
15.3%
88
21.36
11.8%
23.8
Out-of-school suspensions
56
13.6%
71
17.23
7.7%
11.8
DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Young Men's Leadership Academy
Parent district: Fort Worth ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$14,444
Selected comparison
$13,155
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,055 rated schools reporting
+$1,290 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $14,444 per student for this campus, $18,965 per student for its parent district, Fort Worth ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Young Men's Leadership Academy
Parent district: Fort Worth ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$14,549
$12,883
$13,054
$8,052
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,930 rated schools reporting
2019
$13,889
$12,735
$13,108
$8,194
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,948 rated schools reporting
2020
$11,437
$14,060
$14,058
$8,748
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,969 rated schools reporting
2021
$11,916
$17,533
$14,797
$9,288
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,982 rated schools reporting
2022
$61,913
$16,930
$15,708
$10,569
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,002 rated schools reporting
2023
$42,751
$17,853
$16,792
$11,200
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,019 rated schools reporting
2024
$21,682
$18,199
$18,125
$12,340
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,043 rated schools reporting
2025
$14,444
$18,965
$18,972
$13,155
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,055 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$72,066+$5,489 vs similar economic context
Teachers
37−5.9 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
11.1−2.9 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Young Men's Leadership Academy
Beginning 3.2%
1 to 5 years 16%
6 to 10 years 24.3%
11 to 20 years 35%
21 to 30 years 10.7%
Over 30 years 10.7%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,075 reporting for every category shown · 2,075 in full cohort
Beginning 6.7%
1 to 5 years 27.2%
6 to 10 years 19%
11 to 20 years 27.2%
21 to 30 years 15.3%
Over 30 years 3.8%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 11: Fort Worth · 839 reporting for every category shown · 839 in full cohort
Beginning 5.6%
1 to 5 years 24%
6 to 10 years 20.6%
11 to 20 years 30%
21 to 30 years 16.7%
Over 30 years 2.8%
Selected comparison averageFor Tarrant County · 466 reporting for every category shown · 466 in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 24%
6 to 10 years 20.5%
11 to 20 years 29.9%
21 to 30 years 16.3%
Over 30 years 2.7%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,145 reporting for every category shown · 4,145 in full cohort
Beginning 6.1%
1 to 5 years 25.7%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 29%
21 to 30 years 16.3%
Over 30 years 3.5%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Young Men's Leadership Academy in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classYoung Men's Leadership Academy · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Grade 6
11.1
17.8
Secondary English
6.2
15.3
Secondary languages other than English
6.4
18
Secondary math
6.2
16.2
Secondary science
8.5
17.5
Secondary social studies
6.9
17.5
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 200 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
3 measures
4of 74
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit
Tarrant County · of the 74 that report this measure
6of 74
Earned an industry-based certification
Tarrant County · of the 74 that report this measure
9of 74
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course
Tarrant County · of the 74 that report this measure
Other top-5% rankings
High placements in larger reporting groups
3 measures
13of 456
School Progress
Tarrant County · of the 456 that report this measure · tied with 4
13of 455
Relative Performance
Tarrant County · of the 455 that report this measure · tied with 2
24of 466
Overall score
Tarrant County · of the 466 that report this measure · tied with 9
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 220905083.