Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Woodville HS

Tyler County · Region 05: Beaumont · 364 students

Current score
70/1002025-26
Change
+8 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
−9.7 ptsvs 79.7 average · 1,997 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
1,641 of 1,997tied with 30 others
C70

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 78 in 2021-22. The current score is below the 79.7 average for 1,997 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

STAAR result

Science above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
54%vs 45.1% avg · +8.9 pts
Masters
22%vs 20% avg · +2 pts

Among 1,727 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Woodville HS is rated C by TEA, scoring 70 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 79.7 average for 1,997 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 8 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 1,641st of 1,997 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 30 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. Official improvement and transfer notices
  3. 5 years of ratings
  4. Where the score comes from
  5. Student outcomes
  6. After high school: the following fall
  7. Who this school serves
  8. Student counts behind the percentages
  9. Enrollment over time
  10. Discipline and removal from class
  11. Spending per student
  12. Teachers and actual class size
  13. Where this school ranks best
  14. Where this comes from

Official improvement and transfer notices

Official state and federal designations can carry support, reporting requirements or a family transfer option that a single A–F rating does not explain.

2026 federal improvement status

Comprehensive Support and Improvement

Official support label: Comprehensive Identified

Identification reason: CSI Low Performance

TEA track year 1 · Title I campus

Open the official TEA list and methodology

Schools identified for improvement

This school
Listed
Selected comparison
28.4%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,997 rated schools reporting

Schools on the PEG list

This school
Not listed
Selected comparison
3.2%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,997 rated schools reporting

Selected comparison percentages are the share of reporting schools in that group found on each dated list. They are neutral prevalence context; changing the comparison never changes this school's official status.

These are dated TEA statuses, fetched 24 August 2026; they are not added to or subtracted from this site's rating.

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
9080706050 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageWoodville HS 6276767370 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated C with 78 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26C7079.7 1,997 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25C7379.4 1,975 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24C7677.5 1,960 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23C7678.1 1,929 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22D6282.1 1,908 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement71 C−6.3 vs similar economic context · 1,888 reporting
  • School Progress75 C−5.6 vs similar economic context · 1,881 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps58 F−18.9 vs similar economic context · 1,864 reporting
  • Academic Growth58 F−15.8 vs similar economic context · 1,822 reporting
  • Relative Performance75 C−4.0 vs similar economic context · 1,881 reporting
  • Woodville HS
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,997 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement71C9
School Progress75C5
Closing the Gaps58F2
Academic Growth58F2
Relative Performance75C5

Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 2 points below D in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (75), so Student Achievement (71) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 75.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level70%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,888 reporting
  • Meets grade level35%−13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,888 reporting
  • Masters grade level9%−10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,888 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level58%−17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,885 reporting
  • Meets grade level32%−20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,885 reporting
  • Masters grade level4%−17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,885 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level66%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,877 reporting
  • Meets grade level23%−19 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,877 reporting
  • Masters grade level9%−7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,877 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level89%+16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,727 reporting
  • Meets grade level54%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,727 reporting
  • Masters grade level22%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,727 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level86%+13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 914 reporting
  • Meets grade level36%−10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 914 reporting
  • Masters grade level4%−17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 914 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,997 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Graduation

Four-Year
92.9%−0.7 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 445 rated schools reporting
Five-Year
94.4%+1.1 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 441 rated schools reporting
Six-Year
94.2%+1.8 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 441 rated schools reporting
Dropout Rate
1.5%+0.8 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 447 rated schools reporting

These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only schools in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported school rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.

College, career and military readiness

Total credit for CCMR criteria
76.0%−11.7 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
CriterionThis school% of graduatesAveragesimilar economic contextDifferencepercentage pointsReportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria76.0%87.7%−11.7 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 479 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course19.3%59.5%−40.2 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 483 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA12.0%27.6%−15.6 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 483 rated schools reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)1.2%11.0%−9.8 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 483 rated schools reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course33.7%33.9%−0.2 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 483 rated schools reporting
Earned an industry-based certification47.0%37.9%+9.1 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 483 rated schools reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate8.4%1.9%+6.5 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 483 rated schools reporting
Earned an associate degree0.0%7.2%−7.2 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 483 rated schools reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit0.0%3.8%−3.8 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 483 rated schools reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness1.2%3.3%−2.1 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 483 rated schools reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student10.8%7.9%+2.9 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 483 rated schools reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces6.0%3.2%+2.8 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 483 rated schools reporting

Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this school minus the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate, counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported school percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

After high school: the following fall

Where school graduates appeared in Texas public higher-education records the fall after graduation. This is a limited next-step measure, not an eventual college-going or completion rate.

Graduates in the report
69

Class of 2023–24

Enrolled in Texas public higher education
31

44.9% of graduates

Not found in Texas public higher-ed records
36

52.2% of graduates

Not trackable
2

Fall 2024

Graduates in the report

This school
69
Selected comparison
239.4

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 389 rated schools reporting

Enrolled in Texas public higher education

This school
31
Selected comparison
105.2

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 389 rated schools reporting

Texas-public enrollment rate

This school
44.9%
Selected comparison
43.9%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 389 rated schools reporting

+1.0 pts vs similar economic context

Not-found rate

This school
52.2%
Selected comparison
50.8%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 389 rated schools reporting

+1.4 pts vs similar economic context

Not-trackable rate

This school
2.9%
Selected comparison
5.4%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 389 rated schools reporting

−2.5 pts vs similar economic context

Most common named Texas public destinations

  1. ANGELINA COLLEGE (006661)6

Selected comparison counts are neutral cohort scale context. The percentages put differently sized graduating classes on the same basis, but still cover only the limited Texas-public system observed by this report.

Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, high-school graduates enrolled in higher education, fetched 24 August 2026. The report covers graduates who enrolled in a Texas public college or university the following fall and includes only districts or campuses with more than 25 graduates.

“Not found” does not mean a graduate did not continue their education. It can include private or out-of-state college, work, military service, enrollment after the fall term, or another path the Texas public system does not observe.

“Not trackable” is not an outcome. THECB uses it for graduates with a non-standard identifier that could not be matched to higher-education records.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
364
Economically disadvantaged
65.9%−0.2 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
4.9%−13.6 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
19.5%+0.6 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
93.1%−1.0 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
24.7%+7.8 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Woodville HS

African American: 22.8%Hispanic: 15.1%White: 53.8%American Indian: 1.6%Asian: 0.5%Pacific Islander: 0.5%Two or More Races: 5.5%
  • African American 22.8%
  • Hispanic 15.1%
  • White 53.8%
  • American Indian 1.6%
  • Asian 0.5%
  • Pacific Islander 0.5%
  • Two or More Races 5.5%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,997 reporting for every category shown · 1,997 in full cohort

African American: 11.6%Hispanic: 52.8%White: 29.3%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 2.2%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 3.7%
  • African American 11.6%
  • Hispanic 52.8%
  • White 29.3%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 2.2%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 3.7%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
364
Economically disadvantaged students
240
Emergent bilingual students
18
Special education students
71

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
56
Students in TEA mobility denominator
397
TEA-published mobility rate
14.1%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 364 students in 2025–26, an increase of 4 (1.1%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
364

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
+4

Increase · +1.1%

Change since 2021–22
−1

Decrease · −0.3%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
364
Selected comparison
627.7

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,963 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Woodville HS
School yearStudents enrolledWoodville HSChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 365 First available year 643.2
2022–23 367 Increase of 2 (0.5%) 648.8
2023–24 364 Decrease of 3 (0.8%) 647.3
2024–25 360 Decrease of 4 (1.1%) 643.4
2025–26 364 Increase of 4 (1.1%) 627.7

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
91

22.9% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
163

41.06 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
397

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
22.9%
Selected comparison
12.8%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,542 rated schools reporting

+10.1 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
41.06
Selected comparison
30.3

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,649 rated schools reporting

+10.8 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Woodville HS
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 403 90 22.3% 213 52.85 9.7% 19.3
2021–22 402 106 26.4% 256 63.68 12.9% 30.3
2022–23 405 103 25.4% 247 60.99 13.4% 32.2
2023–24 401 92 22.9% 158 39.40 13.2% 31.8
2024–25 397 91 22.9% 163 41.06 12.8% 30.3
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Woodville HS in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 91 22.9% 163 41.06 12.8% 30.3
In-school suspensions 75 18.9% 106 26.70 11.5% 23
Out-of-school suspensions 30 7.6% 46 11.59 7.2% 10.7
DAEP placements 11 2.8% 11 2.77 5.0% 6.1
Mandatory DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$6k$22k$38k20182020202220242025
  • Woodville HS
  • Parent district: Woodville ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$25,025
Selected comparison
$12,736

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,973 rated schools reporting

+$12,289 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $25,025 per student for this campus, $34,205 per student for its parent district, Woodville ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearWoodville HSParent district: Woodville ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$10,150$12,015$13,054$7,962 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,838 rated schools reporting
2019$10,137$16,080$13,108$8,115 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,853 rated schools reporting
2020$10,190$13,630$14,058$8,692 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,872 rated schools reporting
2021$11,331$15,002$14,797$9,162 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,886 rated schools reporting
2022$12,120$15,862$15,708$10,466 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,907 rated schools reporting
2023$15,976$22,280$16,792$11,189 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,930 rated schools reporting
2024$21,473$36,154$18,125$12,077 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,957 rated schools reporting
2025$25,025$34,205$18,972$12,736 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,973 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$62,177−$4,298 vs similar economic context
Teachers
38−5.0 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
9.6−4.3 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Woodville HS

Beginning: 11.4%1 to 5 years: 38.6%6 to 10 years: 16.4%11 to 20 years: 21.7%21 to 30 years: 7.9%Over 30 years: 4%
  • Beginning 11.4%
  • 1 to 5 years 38.6%
  • 6 to 10 years 16.4%
  • 11 to 20 years 21.7%
  • 21 to 30 years 7.9%
  • Over 30 years 4%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,997 reporting for every category shown · 1,997 in full cohort

Beginning: 6.3%1 to 5 years: 26.4%6 to 10 years: 19.1%11 to 20 years: 27.9%21 to 30 years: 15.8%Over 30 years: 4%
  • Beginning 6.3%
  • 1 to 5 years 26.4%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.1%
  • 11 to 20 years 27.9%
  • 21 to 30 years 15.8%
  • Over 30 years 4%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Woodville HS in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classWoodville HS · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Secondary English18.415.1
Secondary languages other than English21.117.6
Secondary math19.716
Secondary science20.217.4
Secondary social studies22.817.3

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 181 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#2–3 rankings

Second- and third-place results

1 measure

  • 2of 13

    Per-student spending

    Tyler County · of the 13 that report this measure

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

12 measures

  • 5of 13

    Science — Approaches

    Tyler County · of the 13 that report this measure

  • 5of 13

    Science — Masters

    Tyler County · of the 13 that report this measure

  • 6of 13

    Science — Meets

    Tyler County · of the 13 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 7of 37

    Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces

    Region 05: Beaumont · of the 37 that report this measure

  • 7of 13

    School Progress

    Tyler County · of the 13 that report this measure

  • 7of 13

    Relative Performance

    Tyler County · of the 13 that report this measure

  • 7of 13

    Math — Masters

    Tyler County · of the 13 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 8of 37

    Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student

    Region 05: Beaumont · of the 37 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 8of 13

    All Subjects — Approaches

    Tyler County · of the 13 that report this measure

  • 8of 13

    Math — Approaches

    Tyler County · of the 13 that report this measure

  • 9of 13

    Overall score

    Tyler County · of the 13 that report this measure

  • 9of 13

    Student Achievement

    Tyler County · of the 13 that report this measure

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 229903001.