Enrollment in 2025–26
- This school
- 224
- Selected comparison
- 636.7
Traditional public school campus
Woodrow Wilson Elem
Gray County · Region 16: Amarillo · 224 students
- Current score
- 61/1002025-26
- Change
- +3 ptssince 2023-24
- Score vs similar economic context
- −17.9 ptsvs 78.9 average · 2,049 rated schools serving a similar economic context
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
- 1,926 of 2,049tied with 10 others
- Score vs region
- −20.8 ptsvs 81.8 average · 208 rated schools in Region 16: Amarillo
- Region 16: Amarillo placement
- 196 of 208tied with 2 others
- Score vs county
- −10.1 ptsvs 71.1 average · 9 rated schools in Gray County
- Score vs similar-size group
- −20.0 ptsvs 81 average · 1,597 similarly sized rated schools
- Similar size placement
- 1,509 of 1,597tied with 3 others
- Score vs state
- −20.3 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
- Texas placement
- 7,285 of 7,646tied with 27 others
D61
At a glance
The available rating history is moving up. The current score is below the 78.9 average for 2,049 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is below the 81.8 average for 208 rated schools in Region 16: Amarillo.The current score is below the 71.1 average for 9 rated schools in Gray County.The current score is below the 81 average for 1,597 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is below the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Read the full rating context and placement
Woodrow Wilson Elem is rated D by TEA, scoring 61 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 78.9 average for 2,049 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 3 points since 2023-24.
Ranks 1,926th of 2,049 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 10 others).
Woodrow Wilson Elem is rated D by TEA, scoring 61 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 81.8 average for 208 rated schools in Region 16: Amarillo. It is up 3 points since 2023-24.
Ranks 196th of 208 rated schools in Region 16: Amarillo (tied with 2 others).
Woodrow Wilson Elem is rated D by TEA, scoring 61 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 71.1 average for 9 rated schools in Gray County. It is up 3 points since 2023-24.
Woodrow Wilson Elem is rated D by TEA, scoring 61 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 81 average for 1,597 similarly sized rated schools. It is up 3 points since 2023-24.
Ranks 1,509th of 1,597 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 3 others).
Woodrow Wilson Elem is rated D by TEA, scoring 61 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is up 3 points since 2023-24.
Ranks 7,285th of 7,646 rated Texas schools (tied with 27 others).
1 consecutive year rated unacceptable.
Put the numbers in context
Compare with
Jump to a section
3 years of ratings
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
View the yearly scores and comparisons
| Year | Rating | Score | Selected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rate | StateTexas average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | D | 61 | 78.9 2,049 reporting | 81.3 7,646 reporting |
| 2024-25 | D | 62 | 78.5 2,032 reporting | 81.2 7,554 reporting |
| 2023-24 | F | 58 | 76.4 2,018 reporting | 78.9 7,466 reporting |
Where the score comes from
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
- Woodrow Wilson Elem
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,049 in cohort)
| Domain | Score | Grade | Points to next grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| Student Achievement | — | Not rated | — |
| School Progress | — | Not rated | — |
| Closing the Gaps | — | Not rated | — |
| Academic Growth | — | Not rated | — |
| Relative Performance | — | Not rated | — |
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
- Students
- 224
- Economically disadvantaged
- 72.3%±0.0 pts vs similar economic context
- English learners
- 26.7%+4.7 pts vs similar economic context
- Special education
- 13.6%−5.2 pts vs similar economic context
- Attendance
- —
- Chronically absent
- —
Student demographics
Woodrow Wilson Elem
- African American 2.9%
- Hispanic 51.9%
- White 42.7%
- American Indian 0.5%
- Asian 1%
- Two or More Races 1%
Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,049 reporting for every category shown · 2,049 in full cohort
- African American 12.6%
- Hispanic 59.2%
- White 22.4%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 2%
- Pacific Islander 0.2%
- Two or More Races 3.3%
Selected comparison average For Region 16: Amarillo · 208 reporting for every category shown · 208 in full cohort
- African American 4.1%
- Hispanic 49.5%
- White 41.7%
- American Indian 0.4%
- Asian 1.7%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 2.6%
Selected comparison average For Gray County · 9 reporting for every category shown · 9 in full cohort
- African American 1.8%
- Hispanic 40.4%
- White 53.4%
- American Indian 0.5%
- Asian 0.5%
- Two or More Races 3.5%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized schools · 1,597 reporting for every category shown · 1,597 in full cohort
- African American 9.1%
- Hispanic 49.3%
- White 36.9%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 1.3%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 3.1%
Statewide average 7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
- African American 11.5%
- Hispanic 52.6%
- White 27.8%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 4.2%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
- Students in this TEA accountability summary
- 206
- Economically disadvantaged students
- 149
- Emergent bilingual students
- 55
- Special education students
- 28
TEA context labels
- Highest grade is early education, pre-K or kindergarten
Campus mobility · 2024–25
- Mobile students
- Not reported
- Students in TEA mobility denominator
- Not reported
- TEA-published mobility rate
- Not reported
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 224 students in 2025–26, an increase of 31 (16.1%) from 2024–25.
- Latest enrollment
- 224
2025–26
- Change from 2024–25
- +31
Increase · +16.1%
- Change since 2023–24
- +18
Increase · +8.7%
| School year | Students enrolledWoodrow Wilson Elem | Change from previous school year | Average enrollmentselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023–24 | 206 | First available year | 656.1 |
| 2024–25 | 193 | Decrease of 13 (6.3%) | 653.4 |
| 2025–26 | 224 | Increase of 31 (16.1%) | 636.7 |
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
- Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
- Not reported
Rate not available
- Disciplinary actions
- Not reported
Rate not available
- Cumulative year-end enrollment
- 205
2024–25
| School year | Cumulative enrollment | Studentsall discipline | Students% of enrollment | Actionsall discipline | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023–24 | 226 | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| 2024–25 | 205 | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
See 2024–25 discipline categories
| Category | Students | Students% of enrollment | Actions | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All discipline | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| In-school suspensions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Out-of-school suspensions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
- Woodrow Wilson Elem
- Parent district: Pampa ISD
- Texas average
- Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
- This school
- $10,147
- Selected comparison
- $13,177
For 2025, TEA reported $10,147 per student for this campus, $14,386 per student for its parent district, Pampa ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
| Year | Woodrow Wilson Elem | Parent district: Pampa ISD | Texas average | Selected comparison average | Reportingselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | $10,739 | $12,808 | $18,125 | $12,348 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,017 rated schools reporting |
| 2025 | $10,147 | $14,386 | $18,972 | $13,177 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,031 rated schools reporting |
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers
- Average salary
- $57,798−$8,743 vs similar economic context
- Teachers
- 11−32.7 vs similar economic context
- Students per staff member
- 19.6+5.6 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Woodrow Wilson Elem
- 1 to 5 years 27.6%
- 6 to 10 years 35.2%
- 11 to 20 years 18.1%
- 21 to 30 years 18.1%
Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,049 reporting for every category shown · 2,049 in full cohort
- Beginning 6.6%
- 1 to 5 years 27%
- 6 to 10 years 19%
- 11 to 20 years 27.4%
- 21 to 30 years 15.4%
- Over 30 years 3.9%
Selected comparison average For Region 16: Amarillo · 208 reporting for every category shown · 208 in full cohort
- Beginning 6%
- 1 to 5 years 26.5%
- 6 to 10 years 18%
- 11 to 20 years 28.4%
- 21 to 30 years 16.2%
- Over 30 years 5%
Selected comparison average For Gray County · 9 reporting for every category shown · 9 in full cohort
- Beginning 3.5%
- 1 to 5 years 27.4%
- 6 to 10 years 21.2%
- 11 to 20 years 32.6%
- 21 to 30 years 10.6%
- Over 30 years 4.9%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized schools · 1,597 reporting for every category shown · 1,597 in full cohort
- Beginning 6.6%
- 1 to 5 years 24.1%
- 6 to 10 years 17.6%
- 11 to 20 years 28.4%
- 21 to 30 years 17.7%
- Over 30 years 5.1%
Statewide average 7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
- Beginning 6.2%
- 1 to 5 years 25.6%
- 6 to 10 years 19.2%
- 11 to 20 years 28.7%
- 21 to 30 years 15.9%
- Over 30 years 3.7%
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Download the full dataset · this campus's district
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 090904118.