+2.8 ptsvs 84.2 average · 1,398 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
540 of 1,398tied with 90 others
Score vs region
+4.8 ptsvs 82.2 average · 94 rated schools in Region 09: Wichita Falls
Region 09: Wichita Falls placement
29 of 94tied with 2 others
Score vs county
−4.0 ptsvs 91 average · 8 rated schools in Archer County
Score vs similar-size group
+5.0 ptsvs 82 average · 455 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
161 of 455tied with 19 others
Score vs state
+5.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
2,456 of 7,646tied with 307 others
B87
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 89 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 84.2 average for 1,398 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 82.2 average for 94 rated schools in Region 09: Wichita Falls.The current score is below the 91 average for 8 rated schools in Archer County.The current score is above the 82 average for 455 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
69%vs 57.9% avg · +11.1 pts
Masters
30%vs 26.6% avg · +3.4 pts
Among 1,358 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Windthorst JH is rated B by TEA, scoring 87 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 84.2 average for 1,398 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 3 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 540th of 1,398 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 90 others).
Windthorst JH is rated B by TEA, scoring 87 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 82.2 average for 94 rated schools in Region 09: Wichita Falls. It is down 3 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 29th of 94 rated schools in Region 09: Wichita Falls (tied with 2 others).
Windthorst JH is rated B by TEA, scoring 87 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 91 average for 8 rated schools in Archer County. It is down 3 points since 2021-22.
Windthorst JH is rated B by TEA, scoring 87 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 82 average for 455 similarly sized rated schools. It is down 3 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 161st of 455 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 19 others).
Windthorst JH is rated B by TEA, scoring 87 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is down 3 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 89 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement91 A+6.4 vs similar economic context · 1,358 reporting
School Progress90 A+7.6 vs similar economic context · 1,354 reporting
Closing the Gaps77 C−4.5 vs similar economic context · 1,344 reporting
Academic Growth81 B+3.3 vs similar economic context · 1,331 reporting
Relative Performance90 A+10.6 vs similar economic context · 1,354 reporting
Windthorst JH
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,398 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
91
A
—
School Progress
90
A
—
Closing the Gaps
77
C
3
Academic Growth
81
B
9
Relative Performance
90
A
—
Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 3 points below B in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (91), so
School Progress (90) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 91.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level92%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,358 reporting
Meets grade level69%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,358 reporting
Masters grade level30%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,358 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level95%+13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,357 reporting
Meets grade level75%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,357 reporting
Masters grade level42%+14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,357 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level92%+14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,352 reporting
Meets grade level68%+17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,352 reporting
Masters grade level19%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,352 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level90%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,254 reporting
Meets grade level79%+22 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,254 reporting
Masters grade level36%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,254 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
Approaches grade level83%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 702 reporting
Meets grade level45%−9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 702 reporting
Masters grade level21%−6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 702 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,398 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
111
Economically disadvantaged
40.5%−1.0 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
8.1%−3.3 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
21.6%+3.4 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
97.0%+2.1 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
2.8%−9.8 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Windthorst JH
African American 0.9%
Hispanic 25.2%
White 73%
Asian 0.9%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,398 reporting for every category shown · 1,398 in full cohort
African American 9.3%
Hispanic 35.7%
White 45.6%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.5%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 4.4%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 09: Wichita Falls · 94 reporting for every category shown · 94 in full cohort
African American 5.2%
Hispanic 29%
White 58.7%
American Indian 0.6%
Asian 1%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 5.5%
Selected comparison averageFor Archer County · 8 reporting for every category shown · 8 in full cohort
African American 0.5%
Hispanic 16.1%
White 79.8%
American Indian 0.8%
Asian 0.2%
Two or More Races 2.6%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 455 reporting for every category shown · 455 in full cohort
African American 6.2%
Hispanic 46.8%
White 43.1%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 0.6%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
111
Economically disadvantaged students
45
Emergent bilingual students
9
Special education students
24
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
6
Students in TEA mobility denominator
109
TEA-published mobility rate
5.5%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 111 students in 2025–26, an increase of 4 (3.7%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
111
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
+4
Increase · +3.7%
Change since 2021–22
−4
Decrease · −3.5%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
111
Selected comparison
700
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,366 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Windthorst JH
School year
Students enrolledWindthorst JH
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
115
First available year
697.7
2022–23
124
Increase of 9 (7.8%)
704.9
2023–24
125
Increase of 1 (0.8%)
706
2024–25
107
Decrease of 18 (14.4%)
703.2
2025–26
111
Increase of 4 (3.7%)
700
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Suppressed
Rate not available
Disciplinary actions
Suppressed
Rate not available
Cumulative year-end enrollment
109
2024–25
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Windthorst JH
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
106
11
10.4%
14
13.21
9.0%
17
2021–22
118
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2022–23
124
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2023–24
125
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2024–25
109
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Windthorst JH in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
In-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Out-of-school suspensions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Windthorst JH
Parent district: Windthorst ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$9,414
Selected comparison
$11,959
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,369 rated schools reporting
−$2,545 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $9,414 per student for this campus, $15,643 per student for its parent district, Windthorst ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Windthorst JH
Parent district: Windthorst ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$6,433
$11,203
$13,054
$7,798
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,253 rated schools reporting
2019
$6,766
$12,058
$13,108
$7,997
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,272 rated schools reporting
2020
$7,483
$12,348
$14,058
$8,379
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,280 rated schools reporting
2021
$7,485
$12,987
$14,797
$8,775
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,298 rated schools reporting
2022
$6,797
$13,709
$15,708
$10,112
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,315 rated schools reporting
2023
$6,797
$13,683
$16,792
$10,567
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,332 rated schools reporting
2024
$7,271
$15,128
$18,125
$11,670
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,347 rated schools reporting
2025
$9,414
$15,643
$18,972
$11,959
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,369 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$61,352−$6,066 vs similar economic context
Teachers
9−36.7 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
12.3−1.7 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Windthorst JH
Beginning 4.4%
1 to 5 years 27.8%
6 to 10 years 13.3%
11 to 20 years 38.9%
21 to 30 years 5.6%
Over 30 years 10%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,398 reporting for every category shown · 1,398 in full cohort
Beginning 5.3%
1 to 5 years 23.4%
6 to 10 years 19.5%
11 to 20 years 30.9%
21 to 30 years 17%
Over 30 years 3.8%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 09: Wichita Falls · 94 reporting for every category shown · 94 in full cohort
Beginning 5.3%
1 to 5 years 21.6%
6 to 10 years 18.7%
11 to 20 years 28.8%
21 to 30 years 20%
Over 30 years 5.7%
Selected comparison averageFor Archer County · 8 reporting for every category shown · 8 in full cohort
Beginning 2.8%
1 to 5 years 17.1%
6 to 10 years 11.4%
11 to 20 years 37.2%
21 to 30 years 25.1%
Over 30 years 6.4%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 455 reporting for every category shown · 455 in full cohort
Beginning 7.2%
1 to 5 years 23%
6 to 10 years 16.4%
11 to 20 years 26.6%
21 to 30 years 18%
Over 30 years 7%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Windthorst JH in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classWindthorst JH · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Grade 6
13.1
18.1
Secondary English
14.3
15.7
Secondary math
20.5
16.6
Secondary science
21
18
Secondary social studies
21
18
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 96 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
3 measures
2of 92
Attendance
Region 09: Wichita Falls · of the 92 that report this measure
2of 92
Chronically absent (lowest is best)
Region 09: Wichita Falls · of the 92 that report this measure · tied with 1
3of 88
Reading — Approaches
Region 09: Wichita Falls · of the 88 that report this measure · tied with 1
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
6 measures
6of 88
All Subjects — Approaches
Region 09: Wichita Falls · of the 88 that report this measure · tied with 2
6of 88
Reading — Masters
Region 09: Wichita Falls · of the 88 that report this measure
6of 87
Science — Meets
Region 09: Wichita Falls · of the 87 that report this measure · tied with 1
8of 88
Reading — Meets
Region 09: Wichita Falls · of the 88 that report this measure · tied with 1
8of 88
Math — Meets
Region 09: Wichita Falls · of the 88 that report this measure
10of 88
Math — Approaches
Region 09: Wichita Falls · of the 88 that report this measure
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 005904041.