Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Wilson Elem

Dallas County · Region 10: Richardson · 513 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
91/1002025-26
Change
+13 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
−0.1 ptsvs 91.1 average · 639 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
350 of 639tied with 65 others
A91

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 82 in 2021-22. The current score is level with the 91.1 average for 639 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Current strength

Academic Growth above the similar-context average

88 +2.4 pts vs 85.6

  • 88 is 2.4 points above the 85.6 average among 624 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Wilson Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 91 out of 100 for 2025-26 — level with the 91.1 average for 639 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 13 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 350th of 639 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 65 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this school ranks best
  12. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageWilson Elem 7884858691 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 82 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26A9191.1 639 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25B8691.4 630 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24B8590.5 614 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23B8490.8 597 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22C7891.4 586 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement92 A−0.1 vs similar economic context · 629 reporting
  • School Progress88 B+0.6 vs similar economic context · 627 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps90 A+1.3 vs similar economic context · 625 reporting
  • Academic Growth88 B+2.4 vs similar economic context · 624 reporting
  • Relative Performance75 C−3.7 vs similar economic context · 627 reporting
  • Wilson Elem
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (639 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement92A—
School Progress88B2
Closing the Gaps90A—
Academic Growth88B2
Relative Performance75C5

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (92), so School Progress (88) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 92.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level88%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 629 reporting
  • Meets grade level70%−4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 629 reporting
  • Masters grade level43%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 629 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level90%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 629 reporting
  • Meets grade level76%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 629 reporting
  • Masters grade level49%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 629 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level88%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 627 reporting
  • Meets grade level70%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 627 reporting
  • Masters grade level44%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 627 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level81%−8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 591 reporting
  • Meets grade level51%−17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 591 reporting
  • Masters grade level23%−19 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 591 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (639 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
513
Economically disadvantaged
12.7%−0.9 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
12.5%+1.8 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
24.0%+8.2 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
96.8%+0.9 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
4.6%−2.3 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Wilson Elem

African American: 4.1%Hispanic: 17.3%White: 39%American Indian: 0.2%Asian: 31.8%Two or More Races: 7.6%
  • African American 4.1%
  • Hispanic 17.3%
  • White 39%
  • American Indian 0.2%
  • Asian 31.8%
  • Two or More Races 7.6%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 639 reporting for every category shown · 639 in full cohort

African American: 6%Hispanic: 19.7%White: 48.2%American Indian: 0.4%Asian: 20%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 5.6%
  • African American 6%
  • Hispanic 19.7%
  • White 48.2%
  • American Indian 0.4%
  • Asian 20%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 5.6%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
513
Economically disadvantaged students
65
Emergent bilingual students
64
Special education students
123

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
29
Students in TEA mobility denominator
369
TEA-published mobility rate
7.9%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 513 students in 2025–26, an increase of 37 (7.8%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
513

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
+37

Increase · +7.8%

Change since 2021–22
+31

Increase · +6.4%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
513
Selected comparison
864

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 635 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Wilson Elem
School yearStudents enrolledWilson ElemChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 482 First available year 874.6
2022–23 498 Increase of 16 (3.3%) 895.3
2023–24 491 Decrease of 7 (1.4%) 881.6
2024–25 476 Decrease of 15 (3.1%) 874.9
2025–26 513 Increase of 37 (7.8%) 864

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Suppressed

Rate not available

Disciplinary actions
Suppressed

Rate not available

Cumulative year-end enrollment
498

2024–25

TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Wilson Elem
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 518 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2021–22 507 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2022–23 547 Suppressed — 16 2.93 — 9.8
2023–24 519 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2024–25 498 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Wilson Elem in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
In-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Out-of-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$7k$14k$21k20182020202220242025
  • Wilson Elem
  • Parent district: Coppell ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$15,297
Selected comparison
$10,839

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 630 rated schools reporting

+$4,458 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $15,297 per student for this campus, $19,999 per student for its parent district, Coppell ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearWilson ElemParent district: Coppell ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$8,578$16,953$13,054$7,300 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 536 rated schools reporting
2019$8,636$16,508$13,108$7,397 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 553 rated schools reporting
2020$8,654$13,424$14,058$7,701 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 566 rated schools reporting
2021$8,890$12,615$14,797$8,276 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 576 rated schools reporting
2022$8,922$13,617$15,708$9,508 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 587 rated schools reporting
2023$9,795$13,588$16,792$9,621 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 597 rated schools reporting
2024$18,391$17,514$18,125$10,645 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 615 rated schools reporting
2025$15,297$19,999$18,972$10,839 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 630 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$75,354+$6,112 vs similar economic context
Teachers
39−17.1 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
13.3−1.6 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Wilson Elem

1 to 5 years: 13%6 to 10 years: 10.4%11 to 20 years: 49.4%21 to 30 years: 24.7%Over 30 years: 2.6%
  • 1 to 5 years 13%
  • 6 to 10 years 10.4%
  • 11 to 20 years 49.4%
  • 21 to 30 years 24.7%
  • Over 30 years 2.6%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 639 reporting for every category shown · 639 in full cohort

Beginning: 4.3%1 to 5 years: 23.4%6 to 10 years: 20%11 to 20 years: 32.4%21 to 30 years: 16.9%Over 30 years: 2.7%
  • Beginning 4.3%
  • 1 to 5 years 23.4%
  • 6 to 10 years 20%
  • 11 to 20 years 32.4%
  • 21 to 30 years 16.9%
  • Over 30 years 2.7%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Wilson Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classWilson Elem · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten14.518.9
Grade 113.519.1
Grade 216.519.6
Grade 314.521.3
Grade 420.520.4
Grade 52422.2

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 105 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

Other top-5% rankings

High placements in larger reporting groups

2 measures

  • 20of 1,107

    Attendance

    Region 10: Richardson · of the 1,107 that report this measure · tied with 19

  • 235of 4,524

    Math — Masters

    Similar size · of the 4,524 that report this measure · tied with 18

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 057922106.