Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Wildwood Springs Elem

Hays County · Region 13: Austin · 553 students

Current score
90/1002025-26
Score vs similar economic context
−1.7 ptsvs 91.7 average · 375 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
276 of 375tied with 24 others
A90

At a glance

The current score is below the 91.7 average for 375 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

No academic result met this site’s published threshold for a selected positive signal against Similar economic-disadvantage rate.

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Wildwood Springs Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 90 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 91.7 average for 375 rated schools serving a similar economic context. TEA has published 1 year of scores for this school, so there is no trend to read yet.

Ranks 276th of 375 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 24 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 1 year of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Teachers
  8. Where this school ranks best
  9. Where this comes from

1 year of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 90 2025-26

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26A9091.7 375 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement91 A−1.8 vs similar economic context · 368 reporting
  • School Progress81 B−7.2 vs similar economic context · 366 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps86 B−3.6 vs similar economic context · 363 reporting
  • Academic Growth81 B−5.9 vs similar economic context · 363 reporting
  • Relative Performance59 F−18.9 vs similar economic context · 366 reporting
  • Wildwood Springs Elem
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (375 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement91A—
School Progress81B9
Closing the Gaps86B4
Academic Growth81B9
Relative Performance59F1

Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 4 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (91), so School Progress (81) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 91.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level91%−0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 368 reporting
  • Meets grade level66%−11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 368 reporting
  • Masters grade level34%−14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 368 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level95%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 368 reporting
  • Meets grade level75%−6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 368 reporting
  • Masters grade level44%−7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 368 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level88%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 366 reporting
  • Meets grade level62%−12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 366 reporting
  • Masters grade level29%−15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 366 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level87%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 337 reporting
  • Meets grade level41%−29 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 337 reporting
  • Masters grade level17%−27 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 337 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (375 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
553
Economically disadvantaged
4.5%−3.8 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
3.4%−7.9 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
15.7%+0.5 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
—
Chronically absent
—

Student demographics

Wildwood Springs Elem

African American: 0.7%Hispanic: 19.5%White: 66.5%Asian: 6.7%Two or More Races: 6.5%
  • African American 0.7%
  • Hispanic 19.5%
  • White 66.5%
  • Asian 6.7%
  • Two or More Races 6.5%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 375 reporting for every category shown · 375 in full cohort

African American: 4.6%Hispanic: 16.4%White: 48.1%American Indian: 0.5%Asian: 24.6%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 5.8%
  • African American 4.6%
  • Hispanic 16.4%
  • White 48.1%
  • American Indian 0.5%
  • Asian 24.6%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 5.8%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
553
Economically disadvantaged students
25
Emergent bilingual students
19
Special education students
87

TEA context labels

  • New campus compared with last year’s fall enrollment

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
Not reported
Students in TEA mobility denominator
Not reported
TEA-published mobility rate
Not reported

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Teachers

Average salary
$62,735−$6,792 vs similar economic context
Teachers
37−18.6 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
14.8±0.0 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Wildwood Springs Elem

Beginning: 5.3%1 to 5 years: 37.4%6 to 10 years: 15.8%11 to 20 years: 38.8%21 to 30 years: 2.7%
  • Beginning 5.3%
  • 1 to 5 years 37.4%
  • 6 to 10 years 15.8%
  • 11 to 20 years 38.8%
  • 21 to 30 years 2.7%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 375 reporting for every category shown · 375 in full cohort

Beginning: 4.2%1 to 5 years: 24.1%6 to 10 years: 19.9%11 to 20 years: 31.6%21 to 30 years: 16.8%Over 30 years: 2.4%
  • Beginning 4.2%
  • 1 to 5 years 24.1%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.9%
  • 11 to 20 years 31.6%
  • 21 to 30 years 16.8%
  • Over 30 years 2.4%

Where this school ranks best

Out of 90 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#2–3 rankings

Second- and third-place results

3 measures

  • 2of 50

    Reading — Approaches

    Hays County · of the 50 that report this measure

  • 3of 50

    All Subjects — Approaches

    Hays County · of the 50 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 3of 49

    Math — Approaches

    Hays County · of the 49 that report this measure · tied with 2

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

2 measures

  • 8of 50

    Reading — Meets

    Hays County · of the 50 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 10of 49

    Math — Meets

    Hays County · of the 49 that report this measure

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 105904106.