Campus · Traditional
Wichita County Juvenile Justice Aep
Wichita County · Region 09: Wichita Falls · 18 students
TEA did not issue an overall rating for Wichita County Juvenile Justice Aep for 2025-26. Everything TEA did publish for this school is below.
TEA did not issue an overall rating for this school. Scores below are the figures TEA published; the letter grades are the state's where it issued them.
Jump to a section
5 years of ratings
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years.
| Year | Rating | Score | Similar | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Not Rated | — | 77.5 | 81.3 |
| 2024-25 | Not Rated | — | 77.1 | 81.2 |
| 2023-24 | Not Rated | — | 73.8 | 78.9 |
| 2022-23 | Not Rated | — | 73.7 | 79.1 |
| 2021-22 | Not Rated | — | 81.7 | 83.7 |
How this school's change over time is ranked
TEA publishes most measures for one year only, so a change ranking exists just where the same figure is published across years — the overall score, the five score domains, and per-student spending. This page does not yet state where Wichita County Juvenile Justice Aep itself places on these lists, only that the lists exist; open one to find this school's own row.
Texas schools
Where the score comes from
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
- Wichita County Juvenile Justice Aep
- Similar student population (2,370)
- Region 09: Wichita Falls (94)
| Domain | Score | Grade | Points to next grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| Student Achievement | — | Not rated | — |
| School Progress | — | Not rated | — |
| Closing the Gaps | — | Not rated | — |
| Academic Growth | — | Not rated | — |
| Relative Performance | — | Not rated | — |
The scores above are the ones TEA published. TEA did not issue letter grades for this school, so none are shown: the A–F thresholds marked on the chart are the state's, but applying them here would produce a grade the state chose to withhold.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
- Approaches grade level
- Meets grade level
- Masters grade level
- Tick: Similar student population (2,370)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The tick on each bar marks the average for Similar student population (2,370 schools) — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
- Students
- 18
- Economically disadvantaged
- 88.9%−0.2 pts vs similar
- English learners
- 11.1%−27.4 pts vs similar
- Special education
- 38.9%+20.9 pts vs similar
- Attendance
- 92.4%−0.6 pts vs similar
- Chronically absent
- 31.6%+8.9 pts vs similar
Student demographics
- African American 44.4%
- Hispanic 27.8%
- White 22.2%
- American Indian 5.6%
Spending per student
Compared against TEA's own peer group, which controls for size and student population, and against the state.
- Wichita County Juvenile Justice Aep
- TEA peer group
- Texas average
TEA's published file does not include peer-group spending for this entity, so no comparison is shown.
Not reported by TEA for this entity: peer.
Teachers
- Average salary
- $73,217+$5,153 vs similar
- Teachers
- 6
- Students per staff member
- 3
Teaching experience
- 11 to 20 years 16.7%
- 21 to 30 years 66.7%
- Over 30 years 16.7%
Where this school ranks best
Out of 76 rankings computed across every published metric and every comparison group, these are the placements that stand out. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
-
4of 34
Average teacher salary
Wichita County · of the 34 that report this measure
-
6of 94
Average teacher salary
Region 09: Wichita Falls · of the 94 that report this measure
-
5of 34
Per-student spending
Wichita County · of the 34 that report this measure · tied with 20
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this campus ranks poorly. Each statement below states its cohort and its denominator so it can be checked — a rank without an n is a boast, not a fact. Ties are shown because a shared ceiling is not a sole first place. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
Every figure on this page comes from data the Texas Education Agency publishes at txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026 and archived with a checksum so each number stays traceable to the bytes TEA served.
Download the full dataset · this campus's district
Single-file records are pre-built for districts only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here — 9,086 entities in two formats is 18,172 assets, on top of everything else this site
publishes, and that is past the 20,000-asset limit this site is published under. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 243905009.