Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

White Oak Pri

Gregg County · Region 07: Kilgore · 371 students

Current score
82/1002025-26
Change
−3 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
−1.0 ptsvs 83 average · 1,530 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
854 of 1,530tied with 68 others
B82

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 84 in 2021-22. The current score is below the 83 average for 1,530 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Current strength

Chronically absent lower than the similar-context average

6.3% −7.1 pts vs 13.4%

  • 6.3% is 7.1 percentage points lower than the 13.4% average among 1,485 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

White Oak Pri is rated B by TEA, scoring 82 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 83 average for 1,530 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 3 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 854th of 1,530 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 68 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Who this school serves
  5. Student counts behind the percentages
  6. Enrollment over time
  7. Discipline and removal from class
  8. Spending per student
  9. Teachers and actual class size
  10. Where this school ranks best
  11. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageWhite Oak Pri 8582788582 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 84 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26B8283.0 1,530 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25B8583.4 1,500 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24C7881.4 1,473 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23B8282.0 1,457 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22B8584.2 1,437 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement—Not reported · similar economic context 83.2 · 1,486 reporting
  • School Progress—Not reported · similar economic context 81.9 · 1,482 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps—Not reported · similar economic context 80.3 · 1,473 reporting
  • Academic Growth—Not reported · similar economic context 76.6 · 1,457 reporting
  • Relative Performance—Not reported · similar economic context 79.4 · 1,482 reporting
  • White Oak Pri
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,530 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement—Not rated—
School Progress—Not rated—
Closing the Gaps—Not rated—
Academic Growth—Not rated—
Relative Performance—Not rated—

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
371
Economically disadvantaged
45.1%−0.8 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
3.6%−8.4 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
18.0%−0.4 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.6%+0.9 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
6.3%−7.1 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

White Oak Pri

African American: 1.6%Hispanic: 9.8%White: 80.9%American Indian: 0.8%Two or More Races: 6.8%
  • African American 1.6%
  • Hispanic 9.8%
  • White 80.9%
  • American Indian 0.8%
  • Two or More Races 6.8%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,530 reporting for every category shown · 1,530 in full cohort

African American: 9.3%Hispanic: 38.1%White: 44.1%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 3.7%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 4.3%
  • African American 9.3%
  • Hispanic 38.1%
  • White 44.1%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 3.7%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 4.3%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
366
Economically disadvantaged students
165
Emergent bilingual students
13
Special education students
66

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
16
Students in TEA mobility denominator
192
TEA-published mobility rate
8.3%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 371 students in 2025–26, an increase of 22 (6.3%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
371

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
+22

Increase · +6.3%

Change since 2021–22
+14

Increase · +3.9%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
371
Selected comparison
675.3

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,491 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for White Oak Pri
School yearStudents enrolledWhite Oak PriChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 357 First available year 672.4
2022–23 295 Decrease of 62 (17.4%) 678.4
2023–24 295 No change 678.9
2024–25 349 Increase of 54 (18.3%) 674.4
2025–26 371 Increase of 22 (6.3%) 675.3

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Suppressed

Rate not available

Disciplinary actions
Suppressed

Rate not available

Cumulative year-end enrollment
357

2024–25

TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for White Oak Pri
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 377 14 3.7% 16 4.24 9.3% 17.7
2021–22 375 18 4.8% 44 11.73 11.4% 24.4
2022–23 309 15 4.8% 33 10.68 11.8% 25.9
2023–24 312 14 4.5% 31 9.94 11.7% 26.5
2024–25 357 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for White Oak Pri in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
In-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Out-of-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$5k$12k$20k20182020202220242025
  • White Oak Pri
  • Parent district: White Oak ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$6,813
Selected comparison
$12,025

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,499 rated schools reporting

−$5,212 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $6,813 per student for this campus, $13,545 per student for its parent district, White Oak ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearWhite Oak PriParent district: White Oak ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$5,211$18,249$13,054$7,775 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,377 rated schools reporting
2019$6,135$12,609$13,108$7,980 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,397 rated schools reporting
2020$6,141$11,456$14,058$8,431 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,408 rated schools reporting
2021$7,257$15,806$14,797$8,862 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,427 rated schools reporting
2022$7,655$15,055$15,708$10,226 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,440 rated schools reporting
2023$8,664$14,897$16,792$10,609 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,457 rated schools reporting
2024$8,646$14,498$18,125$11,658 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,473 rated schools reporting
2025$6,813$13,545$18,972$12,025 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,499 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$64,912−$2,264 vs similar economic context
Teachers
28−16.2 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
13.2−7.5 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

White Oak Pri

1 to 5 years: 6.9%6 to 10 years: 15.5%11 to 20 years: 50.5%21 to 30 years: 19.5%Over 30 years: 6.9%
  • 1 to 5 years 6.9%
  • 6 to 10 years 15.5%
  • 11 to 20 years 50.5%
  • 21 to 30 years 19.5%
  • Over 30 years 6.9%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,530 reporting for every category shown · 1,530 in full cohort

Beginning: 5.5%1 to 5 years: 23.7%6 to 10 years: 19.5%11 to 20 years: 30.2%21 to 30 years: 16.7%Over 30 years: 4.1%
  • Beginning 5.5%
  • 1 to 5 years 23.7%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.5%
  • 11 to 20 years 30.2%
  • 21 to 30 years 16.7%
  • Over 30 years 4.1%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for White Oak Pri in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classWhite Oak Pri · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten20.318
Grade 116.418.4
Grade 215.318.6

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 3 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 20 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

1 measure

  • 5of 38

    Chronically absent (lowest is best)

    Gregg County · of the 38 that report this measure

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 092908102.