+6.1 ptsvs 84.9 average · 1,290 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
285 of 1,290tied with 90 others
Score vs region
+8.8 ptsvs 82.2 average · 94 rated schools in Region 09: Wichita Falls
Region 09: Wichita Falls placement
17 of 94tied with 3 others
Score vs county
+12.8 ptsvs 78.2 average · 34 rated schools in Wichita County
Wichita County placement
2 of 34tied with 1 other
Score vs similar-size group
+10.9 ptsvs 80.1 average · 4,145 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
491 of 4,145tied with 213 others
Score vs state
+9.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
1,157 of 7,646tied with 413 others
A91
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 87 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 84.9 average for 1,290 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 82.2 average for 94 rated schools in Region 09: Wichita Falls.The current score is above the 78.2 average for 34 rated schools in Wichita County.The current score is above the 80.1 average for 4,145 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
63%vs 59.4% avg · +3.6 pts
Masters
35%vs 27.9% avg · +7.1 pts
Among 1,255 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
West Foundation Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 91 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 84.9 average for 1,290 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 2 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 285th of 1,290 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 90 others).
West Foundation Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 91 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 82.2 average for 94 rated schools in Region 09: Wichita Falls. It is up 2 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 17th of 94 rated schools in Region 09: Wichita Falls (tied with 3 others).
West Foundation Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 91 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 78.2 average for 34 rated schools in Wichita County. It is up 2 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 2nd of 34 rated schools in Wichita County (tied with 1 other).
West Foundation Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 91 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.1 average for 4,145 similarly sized rated schools. It is up 2 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 491st of 4,145 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 213 others).
West Foundation Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 91 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is up 2 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 87 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement90 A+4.5 vs similar economic context · 1,255 reporting
School Progress82 B−0.9 vs similar economic context · 1,251 reporting
Closing the Gaps92 A+9.7 vs similar economic context · 1,242 reporting
Academic Growth80 B+1.6 vs similar economic context · 1,232 reporting
Relative Performance82 B+2.4 vs similar economic context · 1,251 reporting
West Foundation Elem
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,290 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
90
A
—
School Progress
82
B
8
Closing the Gaps
92
A
—
Academic Growth
80
B
10
Relative Performance
82
B
8
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (90), so
School Progress (82) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 90.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level81%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,255 reporting
Meets grade level63%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,255 reporting
Masters grade level35%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,255 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level83%−0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,254 reporting
Meets grade level68%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,254 reporting
Masters grade level38%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,254 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level80%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,250 reporting
Meets grade level63%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,250 reporting
Masters grade level36%+13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,250 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level76%−7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,155 reporting
Meets grade level47%−11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,155 reporting
Masters grade level29%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,155 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,290 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
415
Economically disadvantaged
38.0%−0.9 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
9.0%−2.0 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
28.6%+10.7 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
94.7%−0.3 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
9.4%−2.8 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
West Foundation Elem
African American 8.5%
Hispanic 24.9%
White 48.4%
Asian 8%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 9.9%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,290 reporting for every category shown · 1,290 in full cohort
African American 9.1%
Hispanic 34.2%
White 46.6%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.1%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 4.5%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 09: Wichita Falls · 94 reporting for every category shown · 94 in full cohort
African American 5.2%
Hispanic 29%
White 58.7%
American Indian 0.6%
Asian 1%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 5.5%
Selected comparison averageFor Wichita County · 34 reporting for every category shown · 34 in full cohort
African American 11.7%
Hispanic 32.8%
White 45.8%
American Indian 0.4%
Asian 1.3%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 7.8%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,145 reporting for every category shown · 4,145 in full cohort
African American 11.8%
Hispanic 55%
White 26.1%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 3.4%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.3%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
413
Economically disadvantaged students
157
Emergent bilingual students
37
Special education students
118
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
40
Students in TEA mobility denominator
353
TEA-published mobility rate
11.3%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 415 students in 2025–26, an increase of 34 (8.9%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
415
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
+34
Increase · +8.9%
Change since 2021–22
−13
Decrease · −3.0%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
415
Selected comparison
721.9
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,260 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for West Foundation Elem
School year
Students enrolledWest Foundation Elem
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
428
First available year
729.7
2022–23
421
Decrease of 7 (1.6%)
731.9
2023–24
380
Decrease of 41 (9.7%)
733.3
2024–25
381
Increase of 1 (0.3%)
729
2025–26
415
Increase of 34 (8.9%)
721.9
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
10
2.5% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
16
3.95 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
405
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
2.5%
Selected comparison
10.4%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,005 rated schools reporting
−7.9 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
3.95
Selected comparison
22.4
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,088 rated schools reporting
−18.4 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for West Foundation Elem
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
432
21
4.9%
39
9.03
8.6%
16.1
2021–22
449
30
6.7%
71
15.81
10.6%
22.5
2022–23
448
25
5.6%
42
9.38
11.1%
23.7
2023–24
398
15
3.8%
22
5.53
10.8%
24
2024–25
405
10
2.5%
16
3.95
10.4%
22.4
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for West Foundation Elem in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
10
2.5%
16
3.95
10.4%
22.4
In-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
15
3.70
—
17.3
Out-of-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
West Foundation Elem
Parent district: Wichita Falls ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$9,573
Selected comparison
$11,878
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,265 rated schools reporting
−$2,305 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $9,573 per student for this campus, $16,256 per student for its parent district, Wichita Falls ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
West Foundation Elem
Parent district: Wichita Falls ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$6,689
$10,240
$13,054
$7,708
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,156 rated schools reporting
2019
$7,003
$9,938
$13,108
$7,851
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,172 rated schools reporting
2020
$7,464
$11,086
$14,058
$8,195
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,178 rated schools reporting
2021
$8,783
$12,729
$14,797
$8,667
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,196 rated schools reporting
2022
$8,259
$16,921
$15,708
$9,869
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,215 rated schools reporting
2023
$7,246
$22,796
$16,792
$10,452
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,233 rated schools reporting
2024
$11,760
$22,647
$18,125
$11,666
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,247 rated schools reporting
2025
$9,573
$16,256
$18,972
$11,878
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,265 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$62,051−$5,495 vs similar economic context
Teachers
26−22.2 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
16.2+2.1 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
West Foundation Elem
Beginning 9%
1 to 5 years 24.7%
6 to 10 years 31.4%
11 to 20 years 15.7%
21 to 30 years 15.7%
Over 30 years 3.9%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,290 reporting for every category shown · 1,290 in full cohort
Beginning 5.2%
1 to 5 years 23.2%
6 to 10 years 19.4%
11 to 20 years 31.3%
21 to 30 years 17.1%
Over 30 years 3.6%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 09: Wichita Falls · 94 reporting for every category shown · 94 in full cohort
Beginning 5.3%
1 to 5 years 21.6%
6 to 10 years 18.7%
11 to 20 years 28.8%
21 to 30 years 20%
Over 30 years 5.7%
Selected comparison averageFor Wichita County · 34 reporting for every category shown · 34 in full cohort
Beginning 3%
1 to 5 years 24%
6 to 10 years 24%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 16.5%
Over 30 years 3.8%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,145 reporting for every category shown · 4,145 in full cohort
Beginning 6.1%
1 to 5 years 25.7%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 29%
21 to 30 years 16.3%
Over 30 years 3.5%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for West Foundation Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classWest Foundation Elem · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten
18
18.2
Grade 1
18
18.8
Grade 2
21.3
19
Grade 3
20
19.7
Grade 4
20
19.4
Grade 5
20
20.8
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 105 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
8 measures
2of 34
Overall score
Wichita County · of the 34 that report this measure · tied with 1
2of 30
Closing the Gaps
Wichita County · of the 30 that report this measure
2of 30
All Subjects — Masters
Wichita County · of the 30 that report this measure · tied with 1
3of 30
Student Achievement
Wichita County · of the 30 that report this measure · tied with 1
3of 30
All Subjects — Meets
Wichita County · of the 30 that report this measure · tied with 1
3of 30
Reading — Masters
Wichita County · of the 30 that report this measure
3of 30
Math — Meets
Wichita County · of the 30 that report this measure
3of 30
Math — Masters
Wichita County · of the 30 that report this measure
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
8 measures
5of 30
Reading — Meets
Wichita County · of the 30 that report this measure
5of 30
Math — Approaches
Wichita County · of the 30 that report this measure · tied with 2
6of 30
Academic Growth
Wichita County · of the 30 that report this measure · tied with 1
6of 30
All Subjects — Approaches
Wichita County · of the 30 that report this measure · tied with 1
6of 30
Reading — Approaches
Wichita County · of the 30 that report this measure
9of 32
Chronically absent (lowest is best)
Wichita County · of the 32 that report this measure
10of 30
Relative Performance
Wichita County · of the 30 that report this measure · tied with 1
10of 30
Science — Masters
Wichita County · of the 30 that report this measure
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 243905126.