Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Weimar JH

Colorado County · Region 03: Victoria · 229 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
91/1002025-26
Change
+2 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+10.6 ptsvs 80.4 average · 1,961 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
194 of 1,961tied with 89 others
A91

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 89 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 80.4 average for 1,961 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Recent movement

Overall score rose 5 points

86 to 91 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 91 is 10.6 points above the 80.4 average among 1,961 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Recent domain gain

Student Achievement rose 6 points

85 to 91 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 91 is 12.4 points above the 78.6 average among 1,871 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

STAAR result

All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
64%vs 49% avg · +15 pts
Masters
35%vs 20.1% avg · +14.9 pts

Among 1,871 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Weimar JH is rated A by TEA, scoring 91 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.4 average for 1,961 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 2 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 194th of 1,961 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 89 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this school ranks best
  12. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageWeimar JH 8985828691 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 89 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26A9180.4 1,961 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25B8680.2 1,936 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24B8278.2 1,916 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23B8578.7 1,884 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22B8982.4 1,859 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement91 A+12.4 vs similar economic context · 1,871 reporting
  • School Progress92 A+10.8 vs similar economic context · 1,864 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps87 B+9.3 vs similar economic context · 1,846 reporting
  • Academic Growth87 B+12.8 vs similar economic context · 1,808 reporting
  • Relative Performance92 A+12.5 vs similar economic context · 1,864 reporting
  • Weimar JH
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,961 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement91A—
School Progress92A—
Closing the Gaps87B3
Academic Growth87B3
Relative Performance92A—

Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 3 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (92), so Student Achievement (91) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 92.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level87%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,871 reporting
  • Meets grade level64%+15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,871 reporting
  • Masters grade level35%+15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,871 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level90%+14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,868 reporting
  • Meets grade level69%+15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,868 reporting
  • Masters grade level45%+23 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,868 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level90%+18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,860 reporting
  • Meets grade level64%+21 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,860 reporting
  • Masters grade level24%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,860 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level85%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,713 reporting
  • Meets grade level63%+16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,713 reporting
  • Masters grade level43%+22 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,713 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level69%−6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 944 reporting
  • Meets grade level49%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 944 reporting
  • Masters grade level27%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 944 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,961 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
229
Economically disadvantaged
61.9%−0.4 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
15.2%−1.4 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
17.5%−1.4 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
96.6%+2.4 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
7.4%−8.9 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Weimar JH

African American: 7.2%Hispanic: 50.2%White: 41.3%American Indian: 0.4%Two or More Races: 0.9%
  • African American 7.2%
  • Hispanic 50.2%
  • White 41.3%
  • American Indian 0.4%
  • Two or More Races 0.9%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,961 reporting for every category shown · 1,961 in full cohort

African American: 10.7%Hispanic: 49.5%White: 33.3%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 2.3%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 3.8%
  • African American 10.7%
  • Hispanic 49.5%
  • White 33.3%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 2.3%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 3.8%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
223
Economically disadvantaged students
138
Emergent bilingual students
34
Special education students
39

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
14
Students in TEA mobility denominator
231
TEA-published mobility rate
6.1%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 229 students in 2025–26, an increase of 1 (0.4%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
229

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
+1

Increase · +0.4%

Change since 2021–22
+16

Increase · +7.5%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
229
Selected comparison
626.3

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,925 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Weimar JH
School yearStudents enrolledWeimar JHChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 213 First available year 638.9
2022–23 214 Increase of 1 (0.5%) 643.3
2023–24 209 Decrease of 5 (2.3%) 640.4
2024–25 228 Increase of 19 (9.1%) 637.1
2025–26 229 Increase of 1 (0.4%) 626.3

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
24

10.4% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
44

19.05 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
231

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
10.4%
Selected comparison
12.8%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,493 rated schools reporting

−2.4 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
19.05
Selected comparison
29.4

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,618 rated schools reporting

−10.3 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Weimar JH
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 210 47 22.4% 105 50.00 9.8% 19.3
2021–22 214 40 18.7% 80 37.38 12.7% 29.2
2022–23 231 44 19.1% 90 38.96 13.2% 31.3
2023–24 232 39 16.8% 96 41.38 13.1% 31.1
2024–25 231 24 10.4% 44 19.05 12.8% 29.4
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Weimar JH in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 24 10.4% 44 19.05 12.8% 29.4
In-school suspensions 23 10.0% 43 18.61 11.5% 22.7
Out-of-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$6k$15k$24k20182020202220242025
  • Weimar JH
  • Parent district: Weimar ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$8,704
Selected comparison
$12,505

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,932 rated schools reporting

−$3,801 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $8,704 per student for this campus, $17,552 per student for its parent district, Weimar ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearWeimar JHParent district: Weimar ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$6,989$12,279$13,054$7,926 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,789 rated schools reporting
2019$7,091$12,361$13,108$8,074 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,805 rated schools reporting
2020$8,109$15,529$14,058$8,681 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,827 rated schools reporting
2021$7,616$23,214$14,797$9,109 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,840 rated schools reporting
2022$7,570$20,507$15,708$10,474 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,860 rated schools reporting
2023$7,743$16,118$16,792$11,140 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,884 rated schools reporting
2024$9,268$16,148$18,125$11,965 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,912 rated schools reporting
2025$8,704$17,552$18,972$12,505 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,932 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$62,944−$3,392 vs similar economic context
Teachers
17−25.8 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
13.5−5.6 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Weimar JH

Beginning: 12.1%1 to 5 years: 18.2%6 to 10 years: 6.1%11 to 20 years: 52.1%21 to 30 years: 11.5%
  • Beginning 12.1%
  • 1 to 5 years 18.2%
  • 6 to 10 years 6.1%
  • 11 to 20 years 52.1%
  • 21 to 30 years 11.5%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,961 reporting for every category shown · 1,961 in full cohort

Beginning: 6.2%1 to 5 years: 25.8%6 to 10 years: 19.1%11 to 20 years: 28.3%21 to 30 years: 16%Over 30 years: 4.2%
  • Beginning 6.2%
  • 1 to 5 years 25.8%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.1%
  • 11 to 20 years 28.3%
  • 21 to 30 years 16%
  • Over 30 years 4.2%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Weimar JH in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classWeimar JH · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Grade 519.519.7
Grade 617.517.7
Secondary English1415
Secondary math14.615.8
Secondary science17.317.2
Secondary social studies17.317.2

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 117 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#1 rankings

First-place results

7 measures

  • 1of 13

    Attendance

    Colorado County · of the 13 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 1of 12

    All Subjects — Masters

    Colorado County · of the 12 that report this measure

  • 1of 12

    Reading — Approaches

    Colorado County · of the 12 that report this measure

  • 1of 12

    Reading — Masters

    Colorado County · of the 12 that report this measure

  • 1of 11

    Math — Approaches

    Colorado County · of the 11 that report this measure

  • 1of 11

    Math — Meets

    Colorado County · of the 11 that report this measure

  • 1of 11

    Math — Masters

    Colorado County · of the 11 that report this measure · tied with 1

#2–3 rankings

Second- and third-place results

11 measures

  • 2of 13

    Overall score

    Colorado County · of the 13 that report this measure

  • 2of 12

    Student Achievement

    Colorado County · of the 12 that report this measure

  • 2of 12

    All Subjects — Approaches

    Colorado County · of the 12 that report this measure

  • 2of 12

    All Subjects — Meets

    Colorado County · of the 12 that report this measure

  • 2of 12

    Reading — Meets

    Colorado County · of the 12 that report this measure

  • 2of 11

    School Progress

    Colorado County · of the 11 that report this measure

  • 2of 11

    Academic Growth

    Colorado County · of the 11 that report this measure

  • 2of 11

    Relative Performance

    Colorado County · of the 11 that report this measure

  • 2of 10

    Science — Masters

    Colorado County · of the 10 that report this measure

  • 3of 13

    Chronically absent (lowest is best)

    Colorado County · of the 13 that report this measure

  • 3of 10

    Science — Meets

    Colorado County · of the 10 that report this measure

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

3 measures

  • 4of 11

    Closing the Gaps

    Colorado County · of the 11 that report this measure

  • 4of 10

    Science — Approaches

    Colorado County · of the 10 that report this measure

  • 10of 13

    Per-student spending

    Colorado County · of the 13 that report this measure

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 045905041.