Recent domain gain
Closing the Gaps rose 2 points
86 to 88 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 88 is 10 points above the 78 average among 1,830 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
Traditional public school campus
Weimar Elem
Colorado County · Region 03: Victoria · 303 students
Official school websiteSchool information and family resources
- Current score
- 86/1002025-26
- Change
- −4 ptssince 2021-22
- Score vs similar economic context
- +5.2 ptsvs 80.8 average · 1,936 rated schools serving a similar economic context
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
- 590 of 1,936tied with 78 others
- Score vs region
- +6.2 ptsvs 79.8 average · 129 rated schools in Region 03: Victoria
- Region 03: Victoria placement
- 43 of 129tied with 6 others
- Score vs county
- +5.8 ptsvs 80.2 average · 13 rated schools in Colorado County
- Colorado County placement
- 5 of 13among reporting schools
- Score vs similar-size group
- +5.5 ptsvs 80.5 average · 2,752 similarly sized rated schools
- Similar size placement
- 877 of 2,752tied with 113 others
- Score vs state
- +4.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
- Texas placement
- 2,764 of 7,646tied with 299 others
B86
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 92 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 80.8 average for 1,936 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 79.8 average for 129 rated schools in Region 03: Victoria.The current score is above the 80.2 average for 13 rated schools in Colorado County.The current score is above the 80.5 average for 2,752 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
- Meets
- 57%vs 49.8% avg · +7.2 pts
- Masters
- 26%vs 20.6% avg · +5.4 pts
Among 1,854 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measureSTAAR result
Math above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
- Meets
- 57%vs 43.8% avg · +13.2 pts
- Masters
- 23%vs 17% avg · +6 pts
Among 1,843 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measureRecent domain gain
Closing the Gaps rose 2 points
86 to 88 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 88 is 11 points above the 77 average among 116 schools in Region 03: Victoria reporting this measure.
STAAR result
All Subjects above Region 03: Victoria averages at Meets and Masters
- Meets
- 57%vs 48.8% avg · +8.2 pts
- Masters
- 26%vs 19.8% avg · +6.2 pts
Among 119 schools in Region 03: Victoria reporting this measure.
See the full measureSTAAR result
Math above Region 03: Victoria averages at Meets and Masters
- Meets
- 57%vs 43.4% avg · +13.6 pts
- Masters
- 23%vs 16.7% avg · +6.3 pts
Among 116 schools in Region 03: Victoria reporting this measure.
See the full measureRecent domain gain
Closing the Gaps rose 2 points
86 to 88 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 3rd of 11 schools in Colorado County reporting this measure.
Top placement
Chronically absent
6.9% 1st-lowest of 13 schools in Colorado County reporting this measure · 2025-26
See the full measureTop placement
Attendance
96.6% Tied for 1st of 13 schools in Colorado County reporting this measure · 2025-26 · 2 share this value
See the full measureRecent domain gain
Closing the Gaps rose 2 points
86 to 88 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 88 is 9.9 points above the 78.1 average among 2,506 similarly sized schools reporting this measure.
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-size averages at Meets and Masters
- Meets
- 57%vs 49.5% avg · +7.5 pts
- Masters
- 26%vs 21.1% avg · +4.9 pts
Among 2,507 similarly sized schools reporting this measure.
See the full measureSTAAR result
Math above similar-size averages at Meets and Masters
- Meets
- 57%vs 45.4% avg · +11.6 pts
- Masters
- 23%vs 18.3% avg · +4.7 pts
Among 2,507 similarly sized schools reporting this measure.
See the full measureRecent domain gain
Closing the Gaps rose 2 points
86 to 88 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 88 is 9.3 points above the 78.7 average among 7,185 Texas schools reporting this measure.
STAAR result
All Subjects above Texas averages at Meets and Masters
- Meets
- 57%vs 50.8% avg · +6.2 pts
- Masters
- 26%vs 22.8% avg · +3.2 pts
Among 7,260 Texas schools reporting this measure.
See the full measureSTAAR result
Math above Texas averages at Meets and Masters
- Meets
- 57%vs 46.3% avg · +10.7 pts
- Masters
- 23%vs 19.7% avg · +3.3 pts
Among 7,227 Texas schools reporting this measure.
See the full measureSelected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Weimar Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 86 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.8 average for 1,936 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 4 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 590th of 1,936 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 78 others).
Weimar Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 86 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 79.8 average for 129 rated schools in Region 03: Victoria. It is down 4 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 43rd of 129 rated schools in Region 03: Victoria (tied with 6 others).
Weimar Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 86 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.2 average for 13 rated schools in Colorado County. It is down 4 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 5th of 13 rated schools in Colorado County.
Weimar Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 86 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.5 average for 2,752 similarly sized rated schools. It is down 4 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 877th of 2,752 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 113 others).
Weimar Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 86 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is down 4 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 2,764th of 7,646 rated Texas schools (tied with 299 others).
Put the numbers in context
Compare with
Jump to a section
5 years of ratings
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 92 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
View the yearly scores and comparisons
| Year | Rating | Score | Selected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rate | StateTexas average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | B | 86 | 80.8 1,936 reporting | 81.3 7,646 reporting |
| 2024-25 | B | 88 | 80.6 1,911 reporting | 81.2 7,554 reporting |
| 2023-24 | A | 90 | 78.6 1,890 reporting | 78.9 7,466 reporting |
| 2022-23 | B | 84 | 79.2 1,856 reporting | 79.1 7,377 reporting |
| 2021-22 | A | 90 | 82.5 1,831 reporting | 83.7 7,283 reporting |
Where the score comes from
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
- Weimar Elem
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,936 in cohort)
| Domain | Score | Grade | Points to next grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| Student Achievement | 83 | B | 7 |
| School Progress | 85 | B | 5 |
| Closing the Gaps | 88 | B | 2 |
| Academic Growth | 85 | B | 5 |
| Relative Performance | 85 | B | 5 |
Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 2 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (85), so Student Achievement (83) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 85.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
- Approaches grade level
- Meets grade level
- Masters grade level
- Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,936 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
- Students
- 303
- Economically disadvantaged
- 59.7%−0.3 pts vs similar economic context
- English learners
- 12.1%−3.7 pts vs similar economic context
- Special education
- 17.4%−1.4 pts vs similar economic context
- Attendance
- 96.6%+2.3 pts vs similar economic context
- Chronically absent
- 6.9%−8.9 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Weimar Elem
- African American 10.7%
- Hispanic 38.6%
- White 48%
- Asian 0.7%
- Two or More Races 2%
Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,936 reporting for every category shown · 1,936 in full cohort
- African American 10.3%
- Hispanic 47.9%
- White 35.1%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 2.4%
- Pacific Islander 0.2%
- Two or More Races 3.9%
Selected comparison average For Region 03: Victoria · 129 reporting for every category shown · 129 in full cohort
- African American 6%
- Hispanic 57.6%
- White 33.3%
- American Indian 0.2%
- Asian 0.7%
- Two or More Races 2.1%
Selected comparison average For Colorado County · 13 reporting for every category shown · 13 in full cohort
- African American 9.5%
- Hispanic 54%
- White 33.2%
- American Indian 0.2%
- Asian 0.2%
- Two or More Races 2.7%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized schools · 2,752 reporting for every category shown · 2,752 in full cohort
- African American 10.9%
- Hispanic 52.9%
- White 30.4%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 2.2%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 3.2%
Statewide average 7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
- African American 11.5%
- Hispanic 52.6%
- White 27.8%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 4.2%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
- Students in this TEA accountability summary
- 298
- Economically disadvantaged students
- 178
- Emergent bilingual students
- 36
- Special education students
- 52
Campus mobility · 2024–25
- Mobile students
- 18
- Students in TEA mobility denominator
- 203
- TEA-published mobility rate
- 8.9%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 303 students in 2025–26, an increase of 13 (4.5%) from 2024–25.
- Latest enrollment
- 303
2025–26
- Change from 2024–25
- +13
Increase · +4.5%
- Change since 2021–22
- +15
Increase · +5.2%
Enrollment in 2025–26
- This school
- 303
- Selected comparison
- 632.5
| School year | Students enrolledWeimar Elem | Change from previous school year | Average enrollmentselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021–22 | 288 | First available year | 638.7 |
| 2022–23 | 302 | Increase of 14 (4.9%) | 643.3 |
| 2023–24 | 314 | Increase of 12 (4.0%) | 642.6 |
| 2024–25 | 290 | Decrease of 24 (7.6%) | 640 |
| 2025–26 | 303 | Increase of 13 (4.5%) | 632.5 |
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
- Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
- Not reported
Rate not available
- Disciplinary actions
- Not reported
Rate not available
- Cumulative year-end enrollment
- 301
2024–25
| School year | Cumulative enrollment | Studentsall discipline | Students% of enrollment | Actionsall discipline | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020–21 | 288 | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| 2021–22 | 293 | Suppressed | — | 11 | 3.75 | — | 28.2 |
| 2022–23 | 312 | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| 2023–24 | 327 | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| 2024–25 | 301 | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
See 2024–25 discipline categories
| Category | Students | Students% of enrollment | Actions | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All discipline | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| In-school suspensions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Out-of-school suspensions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
- Weimar Elem
- Parent district: Weimar ISD
- Texas average
- Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
- This school
- $10,044
- Selected comparison
- $12,455
For 2025, TEA reported $10,044 per student for this campus, $17,552 per student for its parent district, Weimar ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
| Year | Weimar Elem | Parent district: Weimar ISD | Texas average | Selected comparison average | Reportingselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | $6,719 | $12,279 | $13,054 | $7,923 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,763 rated schools reporting |
| 2019 | $6,906 | $12,361 | $13,108 | $8,072 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,783 rated schools reporting |
| 2020 | $7,407 | $15,529 | $14,058 | $8,682 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,801 rated schools reporting |
| 2021 | $8,233 | $23,214 | $14,797 | $9,092 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,814 rated schools reporting |
| 2022 | $8,553 | $20,507 | $15,708 | $10,420 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,832 rated schools reporting |
| 2023 | $8,852 | $16,118 | $16,792 | $11,090 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,856 rated schools reporting |
| 2024 | $8,930 | $16,148 | $18,125 | $11,902 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,886 rated schools reporting |
| 2025 | $10,044 | $17,552 | $18,972 | $12,455 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,907 rated schools reporting |
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
- Average salary
- $63,913−$2,586 vs similar economic context
- Teachers
- 22−19.6 vs similar economic context
- Students per staff member
- 13.4−5.8 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Weimar Elem
- 1 to 5 years 9%
- 6 to 10 years 43.7%
- 11 to 20 years 43.2%
- 21 to 30 years 4.5%
Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,936 reporting for every category shown · 1,936 in full cohort
- Beginning 6%
- 1 to 5 years 25.4%
- 6 to 10 years 19.2%
- 11 to 20 years 28.4%
- 21 to 30 years 16.3%
- Over 30 years 4.2%
Selected comparison average For Region 03: Victoria · 129 reporting for every category shown · 129 in full cohort
- Beginning 7.1%
- 1 to 5 years 24.6%
- 6 to 10 years 15.4%
- 11 to 20 years 29.3%
- 21 to 30 years 17.1%
- Over 30 years 6.4%
Selected comparison average For Colorado County · 13 reporting for every category shown · 13 in full cohort
- Beginning 4%
- 1 to 5 years 23.6%
- 6 to 10 years 16%
- 11 to 20 years 26%
- 21 to 30 years 24.7%
- Over 30 years 5.7%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized schools · 2,752 reporting for every category shown · 2,752 in full cohort
- Beginning 6.2%
- 1 to 5 years 25%
- 6 to 10 years 18.5%
- 11 to 20 years 28.8%
- 21 to 30 years 16.9%
- Over 30 years 4.2%
Statewide average 7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
- Beginning 6.2%
- 1 to 5 years 25.6%
- 6 to 10 years 19.2%
- 11 to 20 years 28.7%
- 21 to 30 years 15.9%
- Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
| Grade or subject | Average students per classWeimar Elem · 2024–25 | Average students per classselected comparison |
|---|---|---|
| Kindergarten | 18 | 17.9 |
| Grade 1 | 17.3 | 18.2 |
| Grade 2 | 18.7 | 18.4 |
| Grade 3 | 14 | 18.6 |
| Grade 4 | 18 | 18.9 |
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
Where this school ranks best
Out of 90 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#1 rankings
First-place results
2 measures
-
1of 13
Attendance
Colorado County · of the 13 that report this measure · tied with 1
-
1of 13
Chronically absent (lowest is best)
Colorado County · of the 13 that report this measure
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
8 measures
-
3of 12
All Subjects — Approaches
Colorado County · of the 12 that report this measure
-
3of 12
All Subjects — Meets
Colorado County · of the 12 that report this measure
-
3of 12
Reading — Approaches
Colorado County · of the 12 that report this measure
-
3of 12
Reading — Meets
Colorado County · of the 12 that report this measure
-
3of 12
Reading — Masters
Colorado County · of the 12 that report this measure
-
3of 11
Closing the Gaps
Colorado County · of the 11 that report this measure
-
3of 11
Academic Growth
Colorado County · of the 11 that report this measure · tied with 2
-
3of 11
Math — Masters
Colorado County · of the 11 that report this measure · tied with 1
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
8 measures
-
4of 12
All Subjects — Masters
Colorado County · of the 12 that report this measure
-
4of 11
Relative Performance
Colorado County · of the 11 that report this measure · tied with 2
-
4of 11
Math — Meets
Colorado County · of the 11 that report this measure
-
5of 13
Overall score
Colorado County · of the 13 that report this measure
-
5of 12
Student Achievement
Colorado County · of the 12 that report this measure
-
5of 11
School Progress
Colorado County · of the 11 that report this measure · tied with 2
-
5of 11
Math — Approaches
Colorado County · of the 11 that report this measure
-
7of 13
Per-student spending
Colorado County · of the 13 that report this measure
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Download the full dataset · this campus's district
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 045905102.