Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Warren JH

Tyler County · Region 05: Beaumont · 267 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
72/1002025-26
Change
−12 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
−9.4 ptsvs 81.4 average · 1,769 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
1,486 of 1,769tied with 50 others
C72

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 82 in 2021-22. The current score is below the 81.4 average for 1,769 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

STAAR result

Science above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
54%vs 50.7% avg · +3.3 pts
Masters
30%vs 23.7% avg · +6.3 pts

Among 1,560 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Current strength

Chronically absent lower than the similar-context average

9.3% −5.5 pts vs 14.8%

  • 9.3% is 5.5 percentage points lower than the 14.8% average among 1,714 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Warren JH is rated C by TEA, scoring 72 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 81.4 average for 1,769 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 12 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 1,486th of 1,769 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 50 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. Official improvement and transfer notices
  3. 5 years of ratings
  4. Where the score comes from
  5. Student outcomes
  6. Who this school serves
  7. Student counts behind the percentages
  8. Enrollment over time
  9. Discipline and removal from class
  10. Spending per student
  11. Teachers and actual class size
  12. Where this school ranks best
  13. Where this comes from

Official improvement and transfer notices

Official state and federal designations can carry support, reporting requirements or a family transfer option that a single A–F rating does not explain.

Schools identified for improvement

This school
Listed
Selected comparison
21.8%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,769 rated schools reporting

Schools on the PEG list

This school
Not listed
Selected comparison
1.4%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,769 rated schools reporting

Selected comparison percentages are the share of reporting schools in that group found on each dated list. They are neutral prevalence context; changing the comparison never changes this school's official status.

These are dated TEA statuses, fetched 24 August 2026; they are not added to or subtracted from this site's rating.

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
90807060 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageWarren JH 8482757772 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 82 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26C7281.4 1,769 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25C7781.6 1,746 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24C7579.5 1,720 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23B8280.1 1,693 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22B8483.0 1,669 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement74 C−6.8 vs similar economic context · 1,701 reporting
  • School Progress70 C−11.3 vs similar economic context · 1,694 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps67 D−11.7 vs similar economic context · 1,679 reporting
  • Academic Growth65 D−10.2 vs similar economic context · 1,654 reporting
  • Relative Performance70 C−9.2 vs similar economic context · 1,694 reporting
  • Warren JH
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,769 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement74C6
School Progress70C10
Closing the Gaps67D3
Academic Growth65D5
Relative Performance70C10

Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 3 points below C in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (74), so School Progress (70) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 74.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level69%−8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,701 reporting
  • Meets grade level41%−11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,701 reporting
  • Masters grade level16%−6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,701 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level73%−6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,699 reporting
  • Meets grade level44%−13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,699 reporting
  • Masters grade level19%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,699 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level64%−10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,691 reporting
  • Meets grade level37%−9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,691 reporting
  • Masters grade level10%−8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,691 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level82%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,560 reporting
  • Meets grade level54%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,560 reporting
  • Masters grade level30%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,560 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level57%−19 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 884 reporting
  • Meets grade level27%−22 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 884 reporting
  • Masters grade level12%−11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 884 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,769 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
267
Economically disadvantaged
53.2%−0.4 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
0.7%−13.2 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
18.7%−0.1 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
94.9%+0.4 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
9.3%−5.5 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Warren JH

African American: 0.7%Hispanic: 8.2%White: 86.9%American Indian: 0.7%Asian: 0.4%Two or More Races: 3%
  • African American 0.7%
  • Hispanic 8.2%
  • White 86.9%
  • American Indian 0.7%
  • Asian 0.4%
  • Two or More Races 3%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,769 reporting for every category shown · 1,769 in full cohort

African American: 9.8%Hispanic: 42.9%White: 39.8%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 2.8%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 4.1%
  • African American 9.8%
  • Hispanic 42.9%
  • White 39.8%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 2.8%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 4.1%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
267
Economically disadvantaged students
142
Emergent bilingual students
2
Special education students
50

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
43
Students in TEA mobility denominator
313
TEA-published mobility rate
13.7%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 267 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 19 (6.6%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
267

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
−19

Decrease · −6.6%

Change since 2021–22
−12

Decrease · −4.3%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
267
Selected comparison
638.6

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,731 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Warren JH
School yearStudents enrolledWarren JHChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 279 First available year 641.8
2022–23 280 Increase of 1 (0.4%) 647.8
2023–24 253 Decrease of 27 (9.6%) 647
2024–25 286 Increase of 33 (13.0%) 644.3
2025–26 267 Decrease of 19 (6.6%) 638.6

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
74

23.6% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
173

55.27 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
313

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
23.6%
Selected comparison
12.3%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,376 rated schools reporting

+11.3 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
55.27
Selected comparison
27.7

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,480 rated schools reporting

+27.6 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Warren JH
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 331 54 16.3% 133 40.18 9.8% 19
2021–22 313 66 21.1% 118 37.70 12.3% 27.8
2022–23 307 55 17.9% 106 34.53 12.8% 29.5
2023–24 288 70 24.3% 155 53.82 12.7% 29.7
2024–25 313 74 23.6% 173 55.27 12.3% 27.7
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Warren JH in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 74 23.6% 173 55.27 12.3% 27.7
In-school suspensions 68 21.7% 138 44.09 11.1% 21.4
Out-of-school suspensions 14 4.5% 17 5.43 6.2% 8.9
DAEP placements 15 4.8% 17 5.43 4.6% 5.4
Mandatory DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
JJAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$6k$13k$20k20182020202220242025
  • Warren JH
  • Parent district: Warren ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$9,732
Selected comparison
$12,144

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,743 rated schools reporting

−$2,412 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $9,732 per student for this campus, $16,719 per student for its parent district, Warren ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearWarren JHParent district: Warren ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$6,986$10,939$13,054$7,876 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,614 rated schools reporting
2019$7,433$12,241$13,108$8,051 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,628 rated schools reporting
2020$8,557$12,080$14,058$8,597 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,643 rated schools reporting
2021$9,011$13,026$14,797$8,993 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,660 rated schools reporting
2022$8,558$12,794$15,708$10,272 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,672 rated schools reporting
2023$9,761$14,666$16,792$10,848 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,693 rated schools reporting
2024$11,090$16,516$18,125$11,735 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,717 rated schools reporting
2025$9,732$16,719$18,972$12,144 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,743 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$68,423+$1,824 vs similar economic context
Teachers
22−20.0 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
12.1−7.5 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Warren JH

Beginning: 10%1 to 5 years: 23.1%6 to 10 years: 14.5%11 to 20 years: 29%21 to 30 years: 24%
  • Beginning 10%
  • 1 to 5 years 23.1%
  • 6 to 10 years 14.5%
  • 11 to 20 years 29%
  • 21 to 30 years 24%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,769 reporting for every category shown · 1,769 in full cohort

Beginning: 5.8%1 to 5 years: 24.8%6 to 10 years: 19.2%11 to 20 years: 28.9%21 to 30 years: 16.5%Over 30 years: 4.3%
  • Beginning 5.8%
  • 1 to 5 years 24.8%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.2%
  • 11 to 20 years 28.9%
  • 21 to 30 years 16.5%
  • Over 30 years 4.3%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Warren JH in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classWarren JH · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Grade 626.217.7
Secondary English20.615
Secondary math22.315.9
Secondary science2317.4
Secondary social studies23.417.4

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 117 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#2–3 rankings

Second- and third-place results

1 measure

  • 3of 13

    Science — Masters

    Tyler County · of the 13 that report this measure · tied with 1

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

19 measures

  • 4of 13

    All Subjects — Masters

    Tyler County · of the 13 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 5of 13

    Attendance

    Tyler County · of the 13 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 5of 13

    Chronically absent (lowest is best)

    Tyler County · of the 13 that report this measure

  • 6of 13

    Student Achievement

    Tyler County · of the 13 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 6of 13

    Reading — Masters

    Tyler County · of the 13 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 6of 13

    Math — Masters

    Tyler County · of the 13 that report this measure

  • 6of 13

    Science — Approaches

    Tyler County · of the 13 that report this measure

  • 6of 13

    Science — Meets

    Tyler County · of the 13 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 7of 13

    Overall score

    Tyler County · of the 13 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 7of 13

    Closing the Gaps

    Tyler County · of the 13 that report this measure

  • 7of 13

    Academic Growth

    Tyler County · of the 13 that report this measure

  • 7of 13

    Reading — Approaches

    Tyler County · of the 13 that report this measure

  • 7of 13

    Math — Meets

    Tyler County · of the 13 that report this measure

  • 8of 13

    All Subjects — Meets

    Tyler County · of the 13 that report this measure

  • 8of 13

    Reading — Meets

    Tyler County · of the 13 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 9of 13

    School Progress

    Tyler County · of the 13 that report this measure

  • 9of 13

    Relative Performance

    Tyler County · of the 13 that report this measure

  • 9of 13

    All Subjects — Approaches

    Tyler County · of the 13 that report this measure

  • 9of 13

    Math — Approaches

    Tyler County · of the 13 that report this measure

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 229904041.