Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Ware Elem

Gregg County · Region 07: Kilgore · 398 students

Current score
81/1002025-26
Change
−3 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+3.4 ptsvs 77.6 average · 1,879 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
775 of 1,879tied with 63 others
B81

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 83 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 77.6 average for 1,879 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

STAAR result

Math above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
53%vs 39% avg · +14 pts
Masters
19%vs 15.1% avg · +3.9 pts

Among 1,739 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Current strength

Overall score above the similar-context average

81 +3.4 pts vs 77.6

  • 81 is 3.4 points above the 77.6 average among 1,879 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Current strength

Closing the Gaps above the similar-context average

77 +2 pts vs 75

  • 77 is 2 points above the 75 average among 1,730 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Ware Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 81 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 77.6 average for 1,879 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 3 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 775th of 1,879 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 63 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
90807060 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageWare Elem 8477799081 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 83 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26B8177.6 1,879 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25A9077.4 1,862 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24C7973.8 1,844 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23C7773.2 1,840 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22B8481.9 1,816 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement74 C+3.8 vs similar economic context · 1,743 reporting
  • School Progress83 B+4.2 vs similar economic context · 1,740 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps77 C+2.0 vs similar economic context · 1,730 reporting
  • Academic Growth80 B+6.7 vs similar economic context · 1,717 reporting
  • Relative Performance83 B+6.3 vs similar economic context · 1,739 reporting
  • Ware Elem
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,879 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement74C6
School Progress83B7
Closing the Gaps77C3
Academic Growth80B10
Relative Performance83B7

Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 3 points below B in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (83), so Student Achievement (74) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 83.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level75%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,743 reporting
  • Meets grade level46%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,743 reporting
  • Masters grade level16%−0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,743 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level75%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,743 reporting
  • Meets grade level46%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,743 reporting
  • Masters grade level15%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,743 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level81%+15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,739 reporting
  • Meets grade level53%+14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,739 reporting
  • Masters grade level19%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,739 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level62%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,646 reporting
  • Meets grade level31%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,646 reporting
  • Masters grade level9%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,646 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,879 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
398
Economically disadvantaged
94.5%+2.6 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
43.2%+1.4 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
15.8%−1.7 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
94.1%+1.1 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
18.2%−5.0 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Ware Elem

African American: 33.2%Hispanic: 60.1%White: 4.8%Asian: 0.8%Pacific Islander: 0.3%Two or More Races: 1%
  • African American 33.2%
  • Hispanic 60.1%
  • White 4.8%
  • Asian 0.8%
  • Pacific Islander 0.3%
  • Two or More Races 1%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,879 reporting for every category shown · 1,879 in full cohort

African American: 15%Hispanic: 77%White: 4.9%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 1.2%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 1.5%
  • African American 15%
  • Hispanic 77%
  • White 4.9%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 1.2%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 1.5%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
398
Economically disadvantaged students
376
Emergent bilingual students
172
Special education students
63

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
66
Students in TEA mobility denominator
450
TEA-published mobility rate
14.7%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 398 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 13 (3.2%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
398

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
−13

Decrease · −3.2%

Change since 2021–22
−59

Decrease · −12.9%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
398
Selected comparison
560.9

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,860 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Ware Elem
School yearStudents enrolledWare ElemChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 457 First available year 608.7
2022–23 401 Decrease of 56 (12.3%) 604.8
2023–24 399 Decrease of 2 (0.5%) 594.7
2024–25 411 Increase of 12 (3.0%) 587.5
2025–26 398 Decrease of 13 (3.2%) 560.9

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Not reported

Rate not available

Disciplinary actions
Not reported

Rate not available

Cumulative year-end enrollment
443

2024–25

TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Ware Elem
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 524 13 2.5% 14 2.67 6.8% 13
2021–22 502 14 2.8% 20 3.98 12.5% 29.6
2022–23 442 22 5.0% 39 8.82 13.6% 32.6
2023–24 444 37 8.3% 75 16.89 13.6% 32.8
2024–25 443 Not reported — Not reported — — —
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Ware Elem in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline Not reported — Not reported — — —
In-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Out-of-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$5k$15k$25k20182020202220242025
  • Ware Elem
  • Parent district: Longview ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$10,529
Selected comparison
$13,274

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,861 rated schools reporting

−$2,745 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $10,529 per student for this campus, $23,597 per student for its parent district, Longview ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearWare ElemParent district: Longview ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$5,646$11,258$13,054$8,348 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,770 rated schools reporting
2019$6,731$12,245$13,108$8,362 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,794 rated schools reporting
2020$7,880$13,308$14,058$8,856 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,798 rated schools reporting
2021$7,133$15,792$14,797$9,696 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,800 rated schools reporting
2022$7,610$17,809$15,708$11,229 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,817 rated schools reporting
2023$9,511$17,283$16,792$11,835 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,840 rated schools reporting
2024$9,234$19,461$18,125$12,709 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,848 rated schools reporting
2025$10,529$23,597$18,972$13,274 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,861 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$59,321−$9,128 vs similar economic context
Teachers
28−11.5 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
14.2−0.5 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Ware Elem

Beginning: 14.3%1 to 5 years: 35.7%6 to 10 years: 7.1%11 to 20 years: 21.4%21 to 30 years: 17.9%Over 30 years: 3.6%
  • Beginning 14.3%
  • 1 to 5 years 35.7%
  • 6 to 10 years 7.1%
  • 11 to 20 years 21.4%
  • 21 to 30 years 17.9%
  • Over 30 years 3.6%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,879 reporting for every category shown · 1,879 in full cohort

Beginning: 7.6%1 to 5 years: 27.1%6 to 10 years: 18.7%11 to 20 years: 27.1%21 to 30 years: 14.9%Over 30 years: 3.4%
  • Beginning 7.6%
  • 1 to 5 years 27.1%
  • 6 to 10 years 18.7%
  • 11 to 20 years 27.1%
  • 21 to 30 years 14.9%
  • Over 30 years 3.4%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Ware Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classWare Elem · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Grade 118.318.3
Grade 21618.3
Grade 31618.5
Grade 424.518.3
Grade 52219.1

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 092903125.