Current strength
Chronically absent lower than the similar-context average
10% −9.2 pts vs 19.2%
- 10% is 9.2 percentage points lower than the 19.2% average among 2,012 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
Traditional public school campus
W A Martin Elem
Kaufman County · Region 10: Richardson · 669 students
- Current score
- 56/1002025-26
- Change
- −17 ptssince 2021-22
- Score vs similar economic context
- −22.2 ptsvs 78.2 average · 2,090 rated schools serving a similar economic context
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
- 2,034 of 2,090tied with 13 others
- Score vs region
- −26.2 ptsvs 82.2 average · 1,157 rated schools in Region 10: Richardson
- Region 10: Richardson placement
- 1,144 of 1,157tied with 2 others
- Score vs county
- −21.6 ptsvs 77.6 average · 62 rated schools in Kaufman County
- Kaufman County placement
- 61 of 62tied with 1 other
- Score vs similar-size group
- −24.6 ptsvs 80.6 average · 4,450 similarly sized rated schools
- Similar size placement
- 4,381 of 4,450tied with 12 others
- Score vs state
- −25.3 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
- Texas placement
- 7,514 of 7,646tied with 20 others
F56
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 72 in 2021-22. The current score is below the 78.2 average for 2,090 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is below the 82.2 average for 1,157 rated schools in Region 10: Richardson.The current score is below the 77.6 average for 62 rated schools in Kaufman County.The current score is below the 80.6 average for 4,450 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is below the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
Current strength
Attendance above the similar-context average
95.1% +1.5 pts vs 93.6%
- 95.1% is 1.5 percentage points above the 93.6% average among 2,014 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
Current strength
Chronically absent lower than the Region 10: Richardson average
10% −4.5 pts vs 14.5%
- 10% is 4.5 percentage points lower than the 14.5% average among 1,107 schools in Region 10: Richardson reporting this measure.
Current strength
Chronically absent lower than the Kaufman County average
10% −7.9 pts vs 17.9%
- 10% is 7.9 percentage points lower than the 17.9% average among 59 schools in Kaufman County reporting this measure.
Current strength
Attendance above the Kaufman County average
95.1% +1.6 pts vs 93.5%
- 95.1% is 1.6 percentage points above the 93.5% average among 59 schools in Kaufman County reporting this measure.
Current strength
Chronically absent lower than the similar-size average
10% −5.3 pts vs 15.3%
- 10% is 5.3 percentage points lower than the 15.3% average among 4,355 similarly sized schools reporting this measure.
Current strength
Chronically absent lower than the Texas average
10% −6.7 pts vs 16.7%
- 10% is 6.7 percentage points lower than the 16.7% average among 7,358 Texas schools reporting this measure.
Current strength
Attendance above the Texas average
95.1% +1 pts vs 94.1%
- 95.1% is 1 percentage points above the 94.1% average among 7,366 Texas schools reporting this measure.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
W A Martin Elem is rated F by TEA, scoring 56 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 78.2 average for 2,090 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 17 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 2,034th of 2,090 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 13 others).
W A Martin Elem is rated F by TEA, scoring 56 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 82.2 average for 1,157 rated schools in Region 10: Richardson. It is down 17 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 1,144th of 1,157 rated schools in Region 10: Richardson (tied with 2 others).
W A Martin Elem is rated F by TEA, scoring 56 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 77.6 average for 62 rated schools in Kaufman County. It is down 17 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 61st of 62 rated schools in Kaufman County (tied with 1 other).
W A Martin Elem is rated F by TEA, scoring 56 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 80.6 average for 4,450 similarly sized rated schools. It is down 17 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 4,381st of 4,450 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 12 others).
W A Martin Elem is rated F by TEA, scoring 56 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is down 17 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 7,514th of 7,646 rated Texas schools (tied with 20 others).
1 consecutive year rated unacceptable.
Put the numbers in context
Compare with
Jump to a section
- Overview
- Official improvement and transfer notices
- 5 years of ratings
- Where the score comes from
- Student outcomes
- Who this school serves
- Student counts behind the percentages
- Enrollment over time
- Discipline and removal from class
- Spending per student
- Teachers and actual class size
- Where this comes from
Official improvement and transfer notices
Official state and federal designations can carry support, reporting requirements or a family transfer option that a single A–F rating does not explain.
2026 federal improvement status
Additional Targeted Support
Official support label: ATS
Identification reason: Hispanic, White, Economically Disadvantaged, Continuously Enrolled
TEA track year 1
Schools identified for improvement
- This school
- Listed
- Selected comparison
- 32.5%
Schools on the PEG list
- This school
- Not listed
- Selected comparison
- 5.7%
Selected comparison percentages are the share of reporting schools in that group found on each dated list. They are neutral prevalence context; changing the comparison never changes this school's official status.
These are dated TEA statuses, fetched 24 August 2026; they are not added to or subtracted from this site's rating.
5 years of ratings
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated C with 72 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
View the yearly scores and comparisons
| Year | Rating | Score | Selected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rate | StateTexas average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | F | 56 | 78.2 2,090 reporting | 81.3 7,646 reporting |
| 2024-25 | C | 76 | 77.8 2,076 reporting | 81.2 7,554 reporting |
| 2023-24 | D | 61 | 75.5 2,064 reporting | 78.9 7,466 reporting |
| 2022-23 | B | 81 | 76.0 2,041 reporting | 79.1 7,377 reporting |
| 2021-22 | C | 73 | 81.7 2,024 reporting | 83.7 7,283 reporting |
Where the score comes from
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
- W A Martin Elem
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,090 in cohort)
| Domain | Score | Grade | Points to next grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| Student Achievement | 57 | F | 3 |
| School Progress | 57 | F | 3 |
| Closing the Gaps | 54 | F | 6 |
| Academic Growth | 55 | F | 5 |
| Relative Performance | 57 | F | 3 |
Closest to moving up: Student Achievement, 3 points below D in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
- Approaches grade level
- Meets grade level
- Masters grade level
- Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,090 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
- Students
- 669
- Economically disadvantaged
- 75.8%−0.2 pts vs similar economic context
- English learners
- 58.1%+33.2 pts vs similar economic context
- Special education
- 18.8%±0.0 pts vs similar economic context
- Attendance
- 95.1%+1.5 pts vs similar economic context
- Chronically absent
- 10.0%−9.2 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
W A Martin Elem
- African American 9.2%
- Hispanic 74.5%
- White 12%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 1.4%
- Two or More Races 2.7%
Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,090 reporting for every category shown · 2,090 in full cohort
- African American 13.3%
- Hispanic 63%
- White 18.4%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 1.9%
- Pacific Islander 0.2%
- Two or More Races 3%
Selected comparison average For Region 10: Richardson · 1,157 reporting for every category shown · 1,157 in full cohort
- African American 17.4%
- Hispanic 43.5%
- White 24.5%
- American Indian 0.6%
- Asian 9.9%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 4%
Selected comparison average For Kaufman County · 62 reporting for every category shown · 62 in full cohort
- African American 24.7%
- Hispanic 39.8%
- White 29.6%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 1.3%
- Pacific Islander 0.2%
- Two or More Races 4.2%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized schools · 4,450 reporting for every category shown · 4,450 in full cohort
- African American 12.4%
- Hispanic 54%
- White 24.4%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 5.1%
- Pacific Islander 0.2%
- Two or More Races 3.6%
Statewide average 7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
- African American 11.5%
- Hispanic 52.6%
- White 27.8%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 4.2%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
- Students in this TEA accountability summary
- 666
- Economically disadvantaged students
- 505
- Emergent bilingual students
- 387
- Special education students
- 125
Campus mobility · 2024–25
- Mobile students
- 73
- Students in TEA mobility denominator
- 550
- TEA-published mobility rate
- 13.3%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 669 students in 2025–26, an increase of 55 (9.0%) from 2024–25.
- Latest enrollment
- 669
2025–26
- Change from 2024–25
- +55
Increase · +9.0%
- Change since 2021–22
- +7
Increase · +1.1%
Enrollment in 2025–26
- This school
- 669
- Selected comparison
- 634.8
| School year | Students enrolledW A Martin Elem | Change from previous school year | Average enrollmentselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021–22 | 662 | First available year | 652.4 |
| 2022–23 | 644 | Decrease of 18 (2.7%) | 655.8 |
| 2023–24 | 585 | Decrease of 59 (9.2%) | 653.1 |
| 2024–25 | 614 | Increase of 29 (5.0%) | 650.9 |
| 2025–26 | 669 | Increase of 55 (9.0%) | 634.8 |
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
- Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
- 23
3.4% of cumulative year-end enrollment
- Disciplinary actions
- 26
3.87 per 100 students
- Cumulative year-end enrollment
- 672
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
- This school
- 3.4%
- Selected comparison
- 13.2%
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
- This school
- 3.87
- Selected comparison
- 31.6
| School year | Cumulative enrollment | Studentsall discipline | Students% of enrollment | Actionsall discipline | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020–21 | 632 | 14 | 2.2% | 24 | 3.80 | 9.0% | 17.8 |
| 2021–22 | 735 | 60 | 8.2% | 84 | 11.43 | 12.9% | 30.7 |
| 2022–23 | 717 | 43 | 6.0% | 60 | 8.37 | 13.5% | 33.3 |
| 2023–24 | 636 | 44 | 6.9% | 68 | 10.69 | 13.4% | 33 |
| 2024–25 | 672 | 23 | 3.4% | 26 | 3.87 | 13.2% | 31.6 |
See 2024–25 discipline categories
| Category | Students | Students% of enrollment | Actions | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All discipline | 23 | 3.4% | 26 | 3.87 | 13.2% | 31.6 |
| In-school suspensions | 22 | 3.3% | 23 | 3.42 | 11.6% | 23.3 |
| Out-of-school suspensions | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| DAEP placements | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| Mandatory DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary DAEP placements | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
- W A Martin Elem
- Parent district: Crandall ISD
- Texas average
- Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
- This school
- $7,897
- Selected comparison
- $13,047
For 2025, TEA reported $7,897 per student for this campus, $14,500 per student for its parent district, Crandall ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
| Year | W A Martin Elem | Parent district: Crandall ISD | Texas average | Selected comparison average | Reportingselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | $6,266 | $16,781 | $13,054 | $8,035 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,958 rated schools reporting |
| 2019 | $6,725 | $12,138 | $13,108 | $8,181 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,976 rated schools reporting |
| 2020 | $7,576 | $12,906 | $14,058 | $8,727 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,995 rated schools reporting |
| 2021 | $6,672 | $16,654 | $14,797 | $9,300 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,007 rated schools reporting |
| 2022 | $6,679 | $13,651 | $15,708 | $10,603 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,024 rated schools reporting |
| 2023 | $7,581 | $22,248 | $16,792 | $11,158 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,041 rated schools reporting |
| 2024 | $9,444 | $17,922 | $18,125 | $12,269 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,062 rated schools reporting |
| 2025 | $7,897 | $14,500 | $18,972 | $13,047 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,074 rated schools reporting |
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
- Average salary
- $60,181−$6,526 vs similar economic context
- Teachers
- 37−6.4 vs similar economic context
- Students per staff member
- 18.1+4.0 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
W A Martin Elem
- Beginning 18.8%
- 1 to 5 years 40.3%
- 6 to 10 years 11.7%
- 11 to 20 years 13.4%
- 21 to 30 years 16.1%
Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,090 reporting for every category shown · 2,090 in full cohort
- Beginning 6.7%
- 1 to 5 years 27.5%
- 6 to 10 years 19%
- 11 to 20 years 27.2%
- 21 to 30 years 15.2%
- Over 30 years 3.7%
Selected comparison average For Region 10: Richardson · 1,157 reporting for every category shown · 1,157 in full cohort
- Beginning 6.9%
- 1 to 5 years 29%
- 6 to 10 years 20.1%
- 11 to 20 years 27.5%
- 21 to 30 years 13.7%
- Over 30 years 2.8%
Selected comparison average For Kaufman County · 62 reporting for every category shown · 62 in full cohort
- Beginning 8.2%
- 1 to 5 years 34%
- 6 to 10 years 18.6%
- 11 to 20 years 21.9%
- 21 to 30 years 14.8%
- Over 30 years 2.5%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized schools · 4,450 reporting for every category shown · 4,450 in full cohort
- Beginning 6.1%
- 1 to 5 years 26.6%
- 6 to 10 years 19.9%
- 11 to 20 years 29%
- 21 to 30 years 15.3%
- Over 30 years 2.9%
Statewide average 7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
- Beginning 6.2%
- 1 to 5 years 25.6%
- 6 to 10 years 19.2%
- 11 to 20 years 28.7%
- 21 to 30 years 15.9%
- Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
| Grade or subject | Average students per classW A Martin Elem · 2024–25 | Average students per classselected comparison |
|---|---|---|
| Kindergarten | 22 | 17.9 |
| Grade 1 | 23.4 | 18.2 |
| Grade 2 | 19 | 18.3 |
| Grade 3 | 20.6 | 18.7 |
| Grade 4 | 16.9 | 19 |
| Grade 5 | 21.7 | 20 |
| Grade 6 | 27.3 | 18 |
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 7 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Download the full dataset · this campus's district
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 129901101.