+2.4 ptsvs 77.6 average · 2,028 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
891 of 2,028tied with 71 others
Score vs region
−5.7 ptsvs 85.7 average · 505 rated schools in Region 01: Edinburg
Region 01: Edinburg placement
402 of 505tied with 11 others
Score vs county
−8.3 ptsvs 88.3 average · 76 rated schools in Webb County
Webb County placement
73 of 76among reporting schools
Score vs similar-size group
−0.7 ptsvs 80.7 average · 4,201 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
2,306 of 4,201tied with 131 others
Score vs state
−1.3 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
4,402 of 7,646tied with 276 others
B80
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 93 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 77.6 average for 2,028 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is below the 85.7 average for 505 rated schools in Region 01: Edinburg.The current score is below the 88.3 average for 76 rated schools in Webb County.The current score is below the 80.7 average for 4,201 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is below the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
47%vs 40.5% avg · +6.5 pts
Masters
23%vs 16.1% avg · +6.9 pts
Among 1,880 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Veterans Memorial Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 80 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 77.6 average for 2,028 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 15 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 891st of 2,028 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 71 others).
Veterans Memorial Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 80 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 85.7 average for 505 rated schools in Region 01: Edinburg. It is down 15 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 402nd of 505 rated schools in Region 01: Edinburg (tied with 11 others).
Veterans Memorial Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 80 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 88.3 average for 76 rated schools in Webb County. It is down 15 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 73rd of 76 rated schools in Webb County.
Veterans Memorial Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 80 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 80.7 average for 4,201 similarly sized rated schools. It is down 15 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 2,306th of 4,201 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 131 others).
Veterans Memorial Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 80 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is down 15 points since 2021-22.
Official state and federal designations can carry support, reporting requirements or a family transfer option that a single A–F rating does not explain.
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,028 rated schools reporting
Schools on the PEG list
This school
Not listed
Selected comparison
9.2%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,028 rated schools reporting
Selected comparison percentages are the share of reporting schools in that group found on each dated list. They are neutral prevalence context; changing the comparison never changes this school's official status.
These are dated TEA statuses, fetched 24 August 2026; they are not added to or subtracted from this site's rating.
5 years of ratings
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 93 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement75 C+4.8 vs similar economic context · 1,880 reporting
School Progress84 B+5.3 vs similar economic context · 1,877 reporting
Closing the Gaps70 C−4.9 vs similar economic context · 1,866 reporting
Academic Growth66 D−7.1 vs similar economic context · 1,850 reporting
Relative Performance84 B+7.3 vs similar economic context · 1,876 reporting
Veterans Memorial Elem
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,028 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
75
C
5
School Progress
84
B
6
Closing the Gaps
70
C
10
Academic Growth
66
D
4
Relative Performance
84
B
6
Closest to moving up: School Progress, 6 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (84), so
Student Achievement (75) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 84.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level72%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,880 reporting
Meets grade level47%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,880 reporting
Masters grade level23%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,880 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level78%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,879 reporting
Meets grade level55%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,879 reporting
Masters grade level26%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,879 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level70%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,875 reporting
Meets grade level45%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,875 reporting
Masters grade level23%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,875 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level60%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,770 reporting
Meets grade level28%−6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,770 reporting
Masters grade level12%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,770 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,028 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
725
Economically disadvantaged
93.1%+1.8 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
46.5%+5.5 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
19.0%+1.4 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
94.5%+1.5 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
14.0%−9.1 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Veterans Memorial Elem
Hispanic 97.9%
White 1.9%
Two or More Races 0.1%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,028 reporting for every category shown · 2,028 in full cohort
African American 15%
Hispanic 76.5%
White 5.4%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 1.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 1.6%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 01: Edinburg · 505 reporting for every category shown · 505 in full cohort
African American 0.2%
Hispanic 97.5%
White 1.9%
Asian 0.3%
Two or More Races 0.1%
Selected comparison averageFor Webb County · 76 reporting for every category shown · 76 in full cohort
African American 0.1%
Hispanic 98.3%
White 1.3%
Asian 0.2%
Two or More Races 0.1%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,201 reporting for every category shown · 4,201 in full cohort
African American 12.3%
Hispanic 53.9%
White 24.3%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.4%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.6%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
722
Economically disadvantaged students
672
Emergent bilingual students
336
Special education students
137
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
49
Students in TEA mobility denominator
644
TEA-published mobility rate
7.6%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 725 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 90 (11.0%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
725
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
−90
Decrease · −11.0%
Change since 2021–22
+13
Increase · +1.8%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
725
Selected comparison
568.7
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,007 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Veterans Memorial Elem
School year
Students enrolledVeterans Memorial Elem
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
712
First available year
614.5
2022–23
779
Increase of 67 (9.4%)
610.6
2023–24
807
Increase of 28 (3.6%)
600.8
2024–25
815
Increase of 8 (1.0%)
594.1
2025–26
725
Decrease of 90 (11.0%)
568.7
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Suppressed
Rate not available
Disciplinary actions
Suppressed
Rate not available
Cumulative year-end enrollment
838
2024–25
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Veterans Memorial Elem
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
811
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
2021–22
779
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
2022–23
819
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
2023–24
826
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2024–25
838
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Veterans Memorial Elem in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
In-school suspensions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Out-of-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Veterans Memorial Elem
Parent district: United ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$8,881
Selected comparison
$13,188
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,008 rated schools reporting
−$4,307 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $8,881 per student for this campus, $14,348 per student for its parent district, United ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Veterans Memorial Elem
Parent district: United ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$7,368
$13,187
$13,054
$8,328
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,913 rated schools reporting
2019
$6,969
$12,568
$13,108
$8,347
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,938 rated schools reporting
2020
$6,971
$12,004
$14,058
$8,846
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,942 rated schools reporting
2021
$7,863
$13,076
$14,797
$9,662
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,944 rated schools reporting
2022
$8,201
$15,006
$15,708
$11,250
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,961 rated schools reporting
2023
$8,216
$14,779
$16,792
$11,782
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,985 rated schools reporting
2024
$8,092
$15,029
$18,125
$12,656
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,995 rated schools reporting
2025
$8,881
$14,348
$18,972
$13,188
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,008 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$64,159−$4,185 vs similar economic context
Teachers
50+9.7 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
14.5−0.2 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Veterans Memorial Elem
Beginning 2%
1 to 5 years 11.5%
6 to 10 years 22.2%
11 to 20 years 44.4%
21 to 30 years 20.2%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,028 reporting for every category shown · 2,028 in full cohort
Beginning 7.5%
1 to 5 years 27.1%
6 to 10 years 18.8%
11 to 20 years 27.2%
21 to 30 years 14.8%
Over 30 years 3.4%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 01: Edinburg · 505 reporting for every category shown · 505 in full cohort
Beginning 2.7%
1 to 5 years 19.3%
6 to 10 years 16.2%
11 to 20 years 35%
21 to 30 years 22.6%
Over 30 years 4.2%
Selected comparison averageFor Webb County · 76 reporting for every category shown · 76 in full cohort
Beginning 2.5%
1 to 5 years 18.4%
6 to 10 years 16%
11 to 20 years 32.7%
21 to 30 years 25.1%
Over 30 years 5.2%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,201 reporting for every category shown · 4,201 in full cohort
Beginning 6.1%
1 to 5 years 26.6%
6 to 10 years 20%
11 to 20 years 29%
21 to 30 years 15.2%
Over 30 years 2.9%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Veterans Memorial Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classVeterans Memorial Elem · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten
17.2
18
Grade 1
17.1
18.3
Grade 2
16.3
18.3
Grade 3
18.4
18.5
Grade 4
17.2
18.4
Grade 5
22.1
19.2
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 240903133.