Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Open-enrollment charter campus

Vanguard Mozart

Vanguard Academy · Alamo · 1,130 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
89/1002025-26
Change
−4 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+8.4 ptsvs 80.6 average · 428 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
99 of 428tied with 17 others
B89

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 90 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 80.6 average for 428 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Top placement

Earned college credit for a dual credit course

80.3% 3rd of 154 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure · 2025-26

See the full measure

Top placement

Earned an associate degree

39.3% 3rd of 154 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure · 2025-26

See the full measure

STAAR result

All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
42%vs 40.9% avg · +1.1 pts
Masters
17%vs 15.5% avg · +1.5 pts

Among 428 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Vanguard Mozart is rated B by TEA, scoring 89 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.6 average for 428 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context. It is down 4 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 99th of 428 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context (tied with 17 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. After high school: the following fall
  6. Who this school serves
  7. Student counts behind the percentages
  8. Enrollment over time
  9. Discipline and removal from class
  10. Spending per student
  11. Teachers and actual class size
  12. Where this school ranks best
  13. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas charter averageVanguard Mozart 9395949289 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 90 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas charter average
2025-26B8980.6 428 reporting81.7 829 reporting
2024-25A9279.2 420 reporting81.3 797 reporting
2023-24A9477.0 411 reporting79.5 776 reporting
2022-23A9576.7 400 reporting79.6 749 reporting
2021-22A9383.8 376 reporting84.5 700 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement89 B+14.1 vs similar economic context · 428 reporting
  • School Progress89 B+7.3 vs similar economic context · 428 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps90 A+12.8 vs similar economic context · 424 reporting
  • Academic Growth59 F−14.2 vs similar economic context · 409 reporting
  • Relative Performance89 B+9.0 vs similar economic context · 425 reporting
  • Vanguard Mozart
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (428 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement89B1
School Progress89B1
Closing the Gaps90A—
Academic Growth59F1
Relative Performance89B1

Closest to moving up: Student Achievement, 1 point below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level69%+0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 428 reporting
  • Meets grade level42%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 428 reporting
  • Masters grade level17%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 428 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level76%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 428 reporting
  • Meets grade level56%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 428 reporting
  • Masters grade level23%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 428 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level64%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 427 reporting
  • Meets grade level32%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 427 reporting
  • Masters grade level11%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 427 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level71%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 404 reporting
  • Meets grade level37%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 404 reporting
  • Masters grade level15%−0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 404 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level55%−15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 275 reporting
  • Meets grade level29%−10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 275 reporting
  • Masters grade level15%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 275 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (428 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Graduation

Four-Year
100.0%+37.9 pts vs similar economic context average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 131 rated charter campuses reporting
Five-Year
100.0%+42.1 pts vs similar economic context average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 131 rated charter campuses reporting
Six-Year
100.0%+49.6 pts vs similar economic context average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 130 rated charter campuses reporting
Dropout Rate
0.0%−1.1 pts vs similar economic context average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 131 rated charter campuses reporting

These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only charter campuses in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported charter campus rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.

College, career and military readiness

Total credit for CCMR criteria
100.0%+16.0 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
CriterionThis school% of graduatesAveragesimilar economic contextDifferencepercentage pointsReportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria100.0%84.0%+16.0 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 152 rated charter campuses reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course75.4%68.5%+6.9 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 154 rated charter campuses reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA50.8%36.1%+14.7 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 154 rated charter campuses reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)34.4%29.5%+4.9 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 154 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course80.3%11.2%+69.1 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 154 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned an industry-based certification54.1%14.4%+39.7 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 154 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate8.2%0.4%+7.8 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 154 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned an associate degree39.3%1.8%+37.5 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 154 rated charter campuses reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit0.0%3.8%−3.8 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 154 rated charter campuses reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness3.3%1.3%+2.0 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 154 rated charter campuses reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student13.1%7.9%+5.2 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 154 rated charter campuses reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces1.6%1.9%−0.3 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 154 rated charter campuses reporting

Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this school minus the average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate, counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported charter campus percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only charter campuses for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

After high school: the following fall

Where school graduates appeared in Texas public higher-education records the fall after graduation. This is a limited next-step measure, not an eventual college-going or completion rate.

Graduates in the report
57

Class of 2023–24

Enrolled in Texas public higher education
33

57.9% of graduates

Not found in Texas public higher-ed records
20

35.1% of graduates

Not trackable
4

Fall 2024

Graduates in the report

This school
57
Selected comparison
79.1

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 122 rated charter campuses reporting

Enrolled in Texas public higher education

This school
33
Selected comparison
39.6

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 122 rated charter campuses reporting

Texas-public enrollment rate

This school
57.9%
Selected comparison
46.7%

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 122 rated charter campuses reporting

+11.2 pts vs similar economic context

Not-found rate

This school
35.1%
Selected comparison
47.8%

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 122 rated charter campuses reporting

−12.7 pts vs similar economic context

Not-trackable rate

This school
7.0%
Selected comparison
5.6%

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 122 rated charter campuses reporting

+1.4 pts vs similar economic context

Most common named Texas public destinations

  1. U. OF TEXAS-RIO GRANDE VALLEY (003599)15
  2. SOUTH TEXAS COLLEGE (031034)10

Selected comparison counts are neutral cohort scale context. The percentages put differently sized graduating classes on the same basis, but still cover only the limited Texas-public system observed by this report.

Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, high-school graduates enrolled in higher education, fetched 24 August 2026. The report covers graduates who enrolled in a Texas public college or university the following fall and includes only districts or campuses with more than 25 graduates.

“Not found” does not mean a graduate did not continue their education. It can include private or out-of-state college, work, military service, enrollment after the fall term, or another path the Texas public system does not observe.

“Not trackable” is not an outcome. THECB uses it for graduates with a non-standard identifier that could not be matched to higher-education records.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
1,130
Economically disadvantaged
88.0%−0.3 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
47.6%+4.7 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
16.0%+3.4 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
94.2%+1.6 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
16.7%−7.5 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Vanguard Mozart

Hispanic: 98.8%White: 1.2%
  • Hispanic 98.8%
  • White 1.2%

Selected comparison average For charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 428 reporting for every category shown · 428 in full cohort

African American: 18%Hispanic: 74.9%White: 3.8%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 1.6%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 1.3%
  • African American 18%
  • Hispanic 74.9%
  • White 3.8%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 1.6%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 1.3%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
1,130
Economically disadvantaged students
994
Emergent bilingual students
538
Special education students
181

Early college pathways

Early College High School
110

TEA-published share: 9.7%

Pathways in Technology Early College High School (P-TECH)
29

TEA-published share: 2.6%

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
67
Students in TEA mobility denominator
1,045
TEA-published mobility rate
6.4%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 1,130 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 106 (8.6%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
1,130

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
−106

Decrease · −8.6%

Change since 2021–22
−31

Decrease · −2.7%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
1,130
Selected comparison
514.6

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 428 rated charter campuses reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Vanguard Mozart
School yearStudents enrolledVanguard MozartChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 1,161 First available year 499.2
2022–23 1,178 Increase of 17 (1.5%) 512.3
2023–24 1,209 Increase of 31 (2.6%) 516.6
2024–25 1,236 Increase of 27 (2.2%) 518.5
2025–26 1,130 Decrease of 106 (8.6%) 514.6

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting charter campuses in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
22

1.7% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
24

1.89 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
1,268

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
1.7%
Selected comparison
10.7%

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 269 rated charter campuses reporting

−9.0 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
1.89
Selected comparison
17.7

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 285 rated charter campuses reporting

−15.8 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Vanguard Mozart
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 1,106 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2021–22 1,229 31 2.5% 41 3.34 10.7% 17.4
2022–23 1,217 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2023–24 1,248 23 1.8% 25 2.00 11.3% 18.8
2024–25 1,268 22 1.7% 24 1.89 10.7% 17.7
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Vanguard Mozart in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 22 1.7% 24 1.89 10.7% 17.7
In-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Out-of-school suspensions 21 1.7% 22 1.74 8.5% 12
DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized charter campuses can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$7k$14k$20k20182020202220242025
  • Vanguard Mozart
  • Parent district: Vanguard Academy
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$12,239
Selected comparison
$11,820

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 422 rated charter campuses reporting

+$419 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $12,239 per student for this campus, $13,521 per student for its parent district, Vanguard Academy, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearVanguard MozartParent district: Vanguard AcademyTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$10,655$9,651$13,054$8,477 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 254 rated charter campuses reporting
2019$9,590$9,868$13,108$8,674 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 315 rated charter campuses reporting
2020$10,668$10,834$14,058$9,257 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 336 rated charter campuses reporting
2021$10,943$11,473$14,797$9,536 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 365 rated charter campuses reporting
2022$12,026$14,302$15,708$11,352 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 385 rated charter campuses reporting
2023$13,848$15,228$16,792$11,381 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 398 rated charter campuses reporting
2024$11,563$13,021$18,125$11,549 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 408 rated charter campuses reporting
2025$12,239$13,521$18,972$11,820 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 422 rated charter campuses reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$67,348+$3,483 vs similar economic context
Teachers
77+47.1 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
14.7−3.2 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Vanguard Mozart

Beginning: 3.5%1 to 5 years: 34.5%6 to 10 years: 23.8%11 to 20 years: 19.8%21 to 30 years: 18.2%
  • Beginning 3.5%
  • 1 to 5 years 34.5%
  • 6 to 10 years 23.8%
  • 11 to 20 years 19.8%
  • 21 to 30 years 18.2%

Selected comparison average For charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 428 reporting for every category shown · 428 in full cohort

Beginning: 13.2%1 to 5 years: 47.6%6 to 10 years: 19.9%11 to 20 years: 14.7%21 to 30 years: 4%Over 30 years: 0.7%
  • Beginning 13.2%
  • 1 to 5 years 47.6%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.9%
  • 11 to 20 years 14.7%
  • 21 to 30 years 4%
  • Over 30 years 0.7%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Vanguard Mozart in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classVanguard Mozart · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten2621.5
Grade 12622.1
Grade 22623.3
Grade 325.524.3
Grade 42524.5
Grade 525.324.1
Grade 625.323.5
Secondary English20.418.9
Secondary languages other than English14.618
Secondary math20.219.3
Secondary science23.120.1
Secondary social studies22.220.3

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 12 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 120 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#1 rankings

First-place results

1 measure

  • 1of 104

    Earned an associate degree

    Similar size · of the 104 that report this measure

#2–3 rankings

Second- and third-place results

2 measures

  • 2of 104

    Earned college credit for a dual credit course

    Similar size · of the 104 that report this measure

  • 3of 104

    Earned a level I or level II certificate

    Similar size · of the 104 that report this measure

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

2 measures

  • 6of 104

    Earned an industry-based certification

    Similar size · of the 104 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 10of 104

    Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student

    Similar size · of the 104 that report this measure

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 108808104.