Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Valor MS

Bexar County · Region 20: San Antonio · 87 students

Current score
81/1002025-26
Score vs similar economic context
−1.2 ptsvs 82.2 average · 1,685 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
950 of 1,685tied with 64 others
B81

At a glance

The current score is below the 82.2 average for 1,685 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

STAAR result

Reading above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
69%vs 58.6% avg · +10.4 pts
Masters
36%vs 25.2% avg · +10.8 pts

Among 1,625 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Current strength

Academic Growth above the similar-context average

83 +7.1 pts vs 75.9

  • 83 is 7.1 points above the 75.9 average among 1,593 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Current strength

Relative Performance above the similar-context average

82 +2.7 pts vs 79.3

  • 82 is 2.7 points above the 79.3 average among 1,622 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Valor MS is rated B by TEA, scoring 81 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 82.2 average for 1,685 rated schools serving a similar economic context. TEA has published 1 year of scores for this school, so there is no trend to read yet.

Ranks 950th of 1,685 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 64 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 1 year of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Teachers
  8. Where this school ranks best
  9. Where this comes from

1 year of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 81 2025-26

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26B8182.2 1,685 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement83 B+1.1 vs similar economic context · 1,627 reporting
  • School Progress83 B+1.3 vs similar economic context · 1,622 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps77 C−2.5 vs similar economic context · 1,608 reporting
  • Academic Growth83 B+7.1 vs similar economic context · 1,593 reporting
  • Relative Performance82 B+2.7 vs similar economic context · 1,622 reporting
  • Valor MS
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,685 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement83B7
School Progress83B7
Closing the Gaps77C3
Academic Growth83B7
Relative Performance82B8

Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 3 points below B in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level82%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,627 reporting
  • Meets grade level52%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,627 reporting
  • Masters grade level23%−0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,627 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level92%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,625 reporting
  • Meets grade level69%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,625 reporting
  • Masters grade level36%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,625 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level72%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,619 reporting
  • Meets grade level36%−11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,619 reporting
  • Masters grade level11%−8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,619 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,685 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
87
Economically disadvantaged
49.4%−0.5 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
1.1%−11.8 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
12.6%−6.1 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
—
Chronically absent
—

Student demographics

Valor MS

African American: 24.1%Hispanic: 46%White: 19.5%American Indian: 1.1%Asian: 2.3%Two or More Races: 6.9%
  • African American 24.1%
  • Hispanic 46%
  • White 19.5%
  • American Indian 1.1%
  • Asian 2.3%
  • Two or More Races 6.9%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,685 reporting for every category shown · 1,685 in full cohort

African American: 9.5%Hispanic: 40.4%White: 42.2%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 3.2%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 4.2%
  • African American 9.5%
  • Hispanic 40.4%
  • White 42.2%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 3.2%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 4.2%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
87
Economically disadvantaged students
43
Emergent bilingual students
1
Special education students
11

TEA context labels

  • New campus compared with last year’s fall enrollment

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
Not reported
Students in TEA mobility denominator
Not reported
TEA-published mobility rate
Not reported

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Teachers

Average salary
$68,743+$1,792 vs similar economic context
Teachers
4−38.6 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
21.7+1.8 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Valor MS

1 to 5 years: 25%6 to 10 years: 50%11 to 20 years: 25%
  • 1 to 5 years 25%
  • 6 to 10 years 50%
  • 11 to 20 years 25%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,685 reporting for every category shown · 1,685 in full cohort

Beginning: 5.6%1 to 5 years: 24.3%6 to 10 years: 19.3%11 to 20 years: 29.5%21 to 30 years: 16.7%Over 30 years: 4.2%
  • Beginning 5.6%
  • 1 to 5 years 24.3%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.3%
  • 11 to 20 years 29.5%
  • 21 to 30 years 16.7%
  • Over 30 years 4.2%

Where this school ranks best

Out of 75 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

Other top-5% rankings

High placements in larger reporting groups

1 measure

  • 20of 386

    Reading — Approaches

    Bexar County · of the 386 that report this measure · tied with 3

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 015911045.