+8.9 ptsvs 84.1 average · 79 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
15 of 79tied with 1 other
Score vs similar-size group
+12.8 ptsvs 80.2 average · 221 similarly sized rated charter campuses
Similar size placement
17 of 221tied with 6 others
Score vs state
+11.3 ptsvs 81.7 average · 829 rated Texas charter campuses
Texas charter placement
105 of 829tied with 30 others
A93
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 95 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 84.1 average for 79 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 80.2 average for 221 similarly sized rated charter campuses.The current score is above the 81.7 average for 829 rated Texas charter campuses.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
Top placement
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course
100%Tied for 1st of 44 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure · 2025-26 · 3 share this value
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
UT Tyler University Academy-Palestine is rated A by TEA, scoring 93 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 84.1 average for 79 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context. It is down 3 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 15th of 79 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context (tied with 1 other).
UT Tyler University Academy-Palestine is rated A by TEA, scoring 93 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.2 average for 221 similarly sized rated charter campuses. It is down 3 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 17th of 221 similarly sized rated charter campuses (tied with 6 others).
UT Tyler University Academy-Palestine is rated A by TEA, scoring 93 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.7 average for 829 rated Texas charter campuses. It is down 3 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 95 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement93 A+9.4 vs similar economic context · 79 reporting
School Progress89 B+7.2 vs similar economic context · 78 reporting
Closing the Gaps92 A+9.3 vs similar economic context · 76 reporting
Academic Growth59 F−16.4 vs similar economic context · 76 reporting
Relative Performance89 B+8.9 vs similar economic context · 78 reporting
UT Tyler University Academy-Palestine
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (79 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
93
A
—
School Progress
89
B
1
Closing the Gaps
92
A
—
Academic Growth
59
F
1
Relative Performance
89
B
1
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (93), so
School Progress (89) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 93.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level80%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 79 reporting
Meets grade level57%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 79 reporting
Masters grade level28%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 79 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level88%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 79 reporting
Meets grade level75%+17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 79 reporting
Masters grade level36%+13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 79 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level70%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 78 reporting
Meets grade level34%−8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 78 reporting
Masters grade level15%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 78 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level81%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 76 reporting
Meets grade level66%+15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 76 reporting
Masters grade level41%+17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 76 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
Approaches grade level82%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 56 reporting
Meets grade level49%+0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 56 reporting
Masters grade level18%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 56 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (79 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Graduation
Four-Year
100.0%+34.3 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 33 rated charter campuses reporting
Five-Year
100.0%+44.1 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 32 rated charter campuses reporting
Six-Year
100.0%+43.5 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 33 rated charter campuses reporting
Dropout Rate
0.0%−0.3 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 33 rated charter campuses reporting
These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only charter campuses in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported charter campus rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.
College, career and military readiness
Total credit for CCMR criteria
100.0%+19.3 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
Criterion
This school% of graduates
Averagesimilar economic context
Differencepercentage points
Reportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria
100.0%
80.7%
+19.3
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 41 rated charter campuses reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course
100.0%
60.5%
+39.5
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 44 rated charter campuses reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA
90.0%
30.9%
+59.1
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 44 rated charter campuses reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)
0.0%
13.8%
−13.8
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 44 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course
100.0%
24.7%
+75.3
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 44 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned an industry-based certification
0.0%
8.3%
−8.3
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 44 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate
0.0%
0.2%
−0.2
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 44 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned an associate degree
0.0%
4.0%
−4.0
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 44 rated charter campuses reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit
0.0%
6.3%
−6.3
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 44 rated charter campuses reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness
0.0%
5.3%
−5.3
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 44 rated charter campuses reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student
10.0%
6.8%
+3.2
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 44 rated charter campuses reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces
0.0%
2.1%
−2.1
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 44 rated charter campuses reporting
Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of
meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this
school minus the average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate,
counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that
criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported charter campus percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only charter campuses for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
281
Economically disadvantaged
45.6%−1.6 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
5.7%−10.1 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
20.6%+7.5 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
96.2%+2.8 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
7.9%−12.2 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
UT Tyler University Academy-Palestine
African American 8.5%
Hispanic 27%
White 50.9%
Asian 7.5%
Two or More Races 6%
Selected comparison averageFor charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 79 reporting for every category shown · 79 in full cohort
African American 18.3%
Hispanic 43.1%
White 27.3%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 6.7%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 4%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized charter campuses · 221 reporting for every category shown · 221 in full cohort
African American 21.8%
Hispanic 57.8%
White 13%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.4%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.7%
Texas charter average829 reporting for every category shown · 829 Texas charter campuses in full cohort
African American 17.5%
Hispanic 61.8%
White 12.2%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.5%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.5%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
281
Economically disadvantaged students
128
Emergent bilingual students
16
Special education students
58
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
18
Students in TEA mobility denominator
253
TEA-published mobility rate
7.1%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 281 students in 2025–26, an increase of 18 (6.8%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
281
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
+18
Increase · +6.8%
Change since 2021–22
+42
Increase · +17.6%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
281
Selected comparison
549
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 79 rated charter campuses reporting
Student enrollment by school year for UT Tyler University Academy-Palestine
School year
Students enrolledUT Tyler University Academy-Palestine
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
239
First available year
477.1
2022–23
228
Decrease of 11 (4.6%)
495.4
2023–24
233
Increase of 5 (2.2%)
517.9
2024–25
263
Increase of 30 (12.9%)
521.5
2025–26
281
Increase of 18 (6.8%)
549
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting charter campuses in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
11
4.0% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
11
4.03 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
273
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
4.0%
Selected comparison
8.2%
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 54 rated charter campuses reporting
−4.2 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
4.03
Selected comparison
13.1
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 55 rated charter campuses reporting
−9.1 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for UT Tyler University Academy-Palestine
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
265
11
4.2%
12
4.53
3.8%
6.6
2021–22
259
Suppressed
—
15
5.79
—
13.8
2022–23
246
Suppressed
—
11
4.47
—
15.1
2023–24
249
11
4.4%
11
4.42
8.5%
14.6
2024–25
273
11
4.0%
11
4.03
8.2%
13.1
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for UT Tyler University Academy-Palestine in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
11
4.0%
11
4.03
8.2%
13.1
In-school suspensions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Out-of-school suspensions
11
4.0%
11
4.03
6.7%
9.3
DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized charter campuses can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
UT Tyler University Academy-Palestine
Parent district: UT Tyler University Academy
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$10,063
Selected comparison
$12,712
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 77 rated charter campuses reporting
−$2,649 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $10,063 per student for this campus, $10,802 per student for its parent district, UT Tyler University Academy, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
UT Tyler University Academy-Palestine
Parent district: UT Tyler University Academy
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$5,975
$8,199
$13,054
$7,532
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 50 rated charter campuses reporting
2019
$8,372
$9,110
$13,108
$8,360
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 55 rated charter campuses reporting
2020
$7,258
$9,620
$14,058
$8,617
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 57 rated charter campuses reporting
2021
$6,705
$9,265
$14,797
$9,003
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 60 rated charter campuses reporting
2022
$8,477
$10,232
$15,708
$10,260
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 64 rated charter campuses reporting
2023
$9,439
$11,079
$16,792
$10,307
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 68 rated charter campuses reporting
2024
$10,529
$11,459
$18,125
$11,547
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 72 rated charter campuses reporting
2025
$10,063
$10,802
$18,972
$12,712
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 77 rated charter campuses reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$56,067−$5,948 vs similar economic context
Teachers
20−12.9 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
13.9−6.0 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
UT Tyler University Academy-Palestine
Beginning 9.9%
1 to 5 years 24.8%
6 to 10 years 35.1%
11 to 20 years 26.7%
21 to 30 years 3.5%
Selected comparison averageFor charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 79 reporting for every category shown · 79 in full cohort
Beginning 12.6%
1 to 5 years 41.7%
6 to 10 years 19.9%
11 to 20 years 17.9%
21 to 30 years 6.6%
Over 30 years 1.4%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized charter campuses · 221 reporting for every category shown · 221 in full cohort
Beginning 12.1%
1 to 5 years 41.2%
6 to 10 years 20.3%
11 to 20 years 16.7%
21 to 30 years 5.7%
Over 30 years 1.3%
Texas charter average829 reporting for every category shown · 829 Texas charter campuses in full cohort
Beginning 13%
1 to 5 years 44.3%
6 to 10 years 19.6%
11 to 20 years 15.4%
21 to 30 years 4.8%
Over 30 years 0.9%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for UT Tyler University Academy-Palestine in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classUT Tyler University Academy-Palestine · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten
20
20.5
Grade 1
20
20.7
Grade 2
20
21.8
Grade 3
23
21.1
Grade 4
24
22.2
Grade 5
24
21.6
Grade 6
25
19.9
Secondary English
10.4
15.8
Secondary languages other than English
2.2
15
Secondary math
12
15.6
Secondary science
11.7
16.5
Secondary social studies
8
16.2
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 12 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 120 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#1 rankings
First-place results
2 measures
1of 331
Earned college credit for a dual credit course
Texas charter average · of the 331 that report this measure · tied with 3
1of 44
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 44 that report this measure · tied with 2
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
1 measure
3of 63
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA
Similar size · of the 63 that report this measure
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
3 measures
7of 77
Attendance
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 77 that report this measure
8of 77
Chronically absent (lowest is best)
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 77 that report this measure · tied with 1
9of 44
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 44 that report this measure · tied with 1
Other top-5% rankings
High placements in larger reporting groups
1 measure
12of 221
Student Achievement
Similar size · of the 221 that report this measure · tied with 4
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 212804103.