Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Open-enrollment charter campus

UT Tyler University Academy-Palestine

UT Tyler University Academy · Palestine · 281 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
93/1002025-26
Change
−3 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+8.9 ptsvs 84.1 average · 79 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
15 of 79tied with 1 other
A93

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 95 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 84.1 average for 79 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Top placement

Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course

100% Tied for 1st of 44 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure · 2025-26 · 3 share this value

See the full measure

Top placement

Earned college credit for a dual credit course

100% Tied for 1st of 44 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure · 2025-26 · 2 share this value

See the full measure

Top placement

Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA

90% 3rd of 44 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure · 2025-26

See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

UT Tyler University Academy-Palestine is rated A by TEA, scoring 93 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 84.1 average for 79 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context. It is down 3 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 15th of 79 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context (tied with 1 other).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this school ranks best
  12. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas charter averageUT Tyler University Academy-Palestine 9696929393 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 95 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas charter average
2025-26A9384.1 79 reporting81.7 829 reporting
2024-25A9384.0 76 reporting81.3 797 reporting
2023-24A9282.6 71 reporting79.5 776 reporting
2022-23A9683.2 68 reporting79.6 749 reporting
2021-22A9683.2 63 reporting84.5 700 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement93 A+9.4 vs similar economic context · 79 reporting
  • School Progress89 B+7.2 vs similar economic context · 78 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps92 A+9.3 vs similar economic context · 76 reporting
  • Academic Growth59 F−16.4 vs similar economic context · 76 reporting
  • Relative Performance89 B+8.9 vs similar economic context · 78 reporting
  • UT Tyler University Academy-Palestine
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (79 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement93A—
School Progress89B1
Closing the Gaps92A—
Academic Growth59F1
Relative Performance89B1

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (93), so School Progress (89) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 93.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level80%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 79 reporting
  • Meets grade level57%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 79 reporting
  • Masters grade level28%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 79 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level88%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 79 reporting
  • Meets grade level75%+17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 79 reporting
  • Masters grade level36%+13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 79 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level70%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 78 reporting
  • Meets grade level34%−8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 78 reporting
  • Masters grade level15%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 78 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level81%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 76 reporting
  • Meets grade level66%+15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 76 reporting
  • Masters grade level41%+17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 76 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level82%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 56 reporting
  • Meets grade level49%+0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 56 reporting
  • Masters grade level18%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 56 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (79 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Graduation

Four-Year
100.0%+34.3 pts vs similar economic context average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 33 rated charter campuses reporting
Five-Year
100.0%+44.1 pts vs similar economic context average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 32 rated charter campuses reporting
Six-Year
100.0%+43.5 pts vs similar economic context average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 33 rated charter campuses reporting
Dropout Rate
0.0%−0.3 pts vs similar economic context average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 33 rated charter campuses reporting

These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only charter campuses in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported charter campus rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.

College, career and military readiness

Total credit for CCMR criteria
100.0%+19.3 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
CriterionThis school% of graduatesAveragesimilar economic contextDifferencepercentage pointsReportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria100.0%80.7%+19.3 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 41 rated charter campuses reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course100.0%60.5%+39.5 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 44 rated charter campuses reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA90.0%30.9%+59.1 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 44 rated charter campuses reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)0.0%13.8%−13.8 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 44 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course100.0%24.7%+75.3 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 44 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned an industry-based certification0.0%8.3%−8.3 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 44 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate0.0%0.2%−0.2 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 44 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned an associate degree0.0%4.0%−4.0 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 44 rated charter campuses reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit0.0%6.3%−6.3 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 44 rated charter campuses reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness0.0%5.3%−5.3 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 44 rated charter campuses reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student10.0%6.8%+3.2 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 44 rated charter campuses reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces0.0%2.1%−2.1 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 44 rated charter campuses reporting

Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this school minus the average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate, counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported charter campus percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only charter campuses for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
281
Economically disadvantaged
45.6%−1.6 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
5.7%−10.1 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
20.6%+7.5 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
96.2%+2.8 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
7.9%−12.2 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

UT Tyler University Academy-Palestine

African American: 8.5%Hispanic: 27%White: 50.9%Asian: 7.5%Two or More Races: 6%
  • African American 8.5%
  • Hispanic 27%
  • White 50.9%
  • Asian 7.5%
  • Two or More Races 6%

Selected comparison average For charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 79 reporting for every category shown · 79 in full cohort

African American: 18.3%Hispanic: 43.1%White: 27.3%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 6.7%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 4%
  • African American 18.3%
  • Hispanic 43.1%
  • White 27.3%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 6.7%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 4%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
281
Economically disadvantaged students
128
Emergent bilingual students
16
Special education students
58

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
18
Students in TEA mobility denominator
253
TEA-published mobility rate
7.1%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 281 students in 2025–26, an increase of 18 (6.8%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
281

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
+18

Increase · +6.8%

Change since 2021–22
+42

Increase · +17.6%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
281
Selected comparison
549

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 79 rated charter campuses reporting

Student enrollment by school year for UT Tyler University Academy-Palestine
School yearStudents enrolledUT Tyler University Academy-PalestineChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 239 First available year 477.1
2022–23 228 Decrease of 11 (4.6%) 495.4
2023–24 233 Increase of 5 (2.2%) 517.9
2024–25 263 Increase of 30 (12.9%) 521.5
2025–26 281 Increase of 18 (6.8%) 549

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting charter campuses in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
11

4.0% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
11

4.03 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
273

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
4.0%
Selected comparison
8.2%

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 54 rated charter campuses reporting

−4.2 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
4.03
Selected comparison
13.1

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 55 rated charter campuses reporting

−9.1 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for UT Tyler University Academy-Palestine
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 265 11 4.2% 12 4.53 3.8% 6.6
2021–22 259 Suppressed — 15 5.79 — 13.8
2022–23 246 Suppressed — 11 4.47 — 15.1
2023–24 249 11 4.4% 11 4.42 8.5% 14.6
2024–25 273 11 4.0% 11 4.03 8.2% 13.1
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for UT Tyler University Academy-Palestine in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 11 4.0% 11 4.03 8.2% 13.1
In-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Out-of-school suspensions 11 4.0% 11 4.03 6.7% 9.3
DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized charter campuses can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$5k$13k$20k20182020202220242025
  • UT Tyler University Academy-Palestine
  • Parent district: UT Tyler University Academy
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$10,063
Selected comparison
$12,712

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 77 rated charter campuses reporting

−$2,649 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $10,063 per student for this campus, $10,802 per student for its parent district, UT Tyler University Academy, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearUT Tyler University Academy-PalestineParent district: UT Tyler University AcademyTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$5,975$8,199$13,054$7,532 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 50 rated charter campuses reporting
2019$8,372$9,110$13,108$8,360 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 55 rated charter campuses reporting
2020$7,258$9,620$14,058$8,617 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 57 rated charter campuses reporting
2021$6,705$9,265$14,797$9,003 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 60 rated charter campuses reporting
2022$8,477$10,232$15,708$10,260 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 64 rated charter campuses reporting
2023$9,439$11,079$16,792$10,307 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 68 rated charter campuses reporting
2024$10,529$11,459$18,125$11,547 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 72 rated charter campuses reporting
2025$10,063$10,802$18,972$12,712 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 77 rated charter campuses reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$56,067−$5,948 vs similar economic context
Teachers
20−12.9 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
13.9−6.0 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

UT Tyler University Academy-Palestine

Beginning: 9.9%1 to 5 years: 24.8%6 to 10 years: 35.1%11 to 20 years: 26.7%21 to 30 years: 3.5%
  • Beginning 9.9%
  • 1 to 5 years 24.8%
  • 6 to 10 years 35.1%
  • 11 to 20 years 26.7%
  • 21 to 30 years 3.5%

Selected comparison average For charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 79 reporting for every category shown · 79 in full cohort

Beginning: 12.6%1 to 5 years: 41.7%6 to 10 years: 19.9%11 to 20 years: 17.9%21 to 30 years: 6.6%Over 30 years: 1.4%
  • Beginning 12.6%
  • 1 to 5 years 41.7%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.9%
  • 11 to 20 years 17.9%
  • 21 to 30 years 6.6%
  • Over 30 years 1.4%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for UT Tyler University Academy-Palestine in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classUT Tyler University Academy-Palestine · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten2020.5
Grade 12020.7
Grade 22021.8
Grade 32321.1
Grade 42422.2
Grade 52421.6
Grade 62519.9
Secondary English10.415.8
Secondary languages other than English2.215
Secondary math1215.6
Secondary science11.716.5
Secondary social studies816.2

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 12 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 120 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#1 rankings

First-place results

2 measures

  • 1of 331

    Earned college credit for a dual credit course

    Texas charter average · of the 331 that report this measure · tied with 3

  • 1of 44

    Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 44 that report this measure · tied with 2

#2–3 rankings

Second- and third-place results

1 measure

  • 3of 63

    Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA

    Similar size · of the 63 that report this measure

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

3 measures

  • 7of 77

    Attendance

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 77 that report this measure

  • 8of 77

    Chronically absent (lowest is best)

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 77 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 9of 44

    Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 44 that report this measure · tied with 1

Other top-5% rankings

High placements in larger reporting groups

1 measure

  • 12of 221

    Student Achievement

    Similar size · of the 221 that report this measure · tied with 4

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 212804103.