+6.2 ptsvs 80.8 average · 404 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
132 of 404tied with 15 others
Score vs similar-size group
+6.7 ptsvs 80.3 average · 427 similarly sized rated charter campuses
Similar size placement
122 of 427tied with 17 others
Score vs state
+5.3 ptsvs 81.7 average · 829 rated Texas charter campuses
Texas charter placement
297 of 829tied with 37 others
B87
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 84 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 80.8 average for 404 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 80.3 average for 427 similarly sized rated charter campuses.The current score is above the 81.7 average for 829 rated Texas charter campuses.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
Science above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
60%vs 39.9% avg · +20.1 pts
Masters
19%vs 15.5% avg · +3.5 pts
Among 390 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Uplift Heights Healthcare Institute is rated B by TEA, scoring 87 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.8 average for 404 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context. It is up 8 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 132nd of 404 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context (tied with 15 others).
Uplift Heights Healthcare Institute is rated B by TEA, scoring 87 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.3 average for 427 similarly sized rated charter campuses. It is up 8 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 122nd of 427 similarly sized rated charter campuses (tied with 17 others).
Uplift Heights Healthcare Institute is rated B by TEA, scoring 87 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.7 average for 829 rated Texas charter campuses. It is up 8 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 84 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement83 B+7.7 vs similar economic context · 404 reporting
School Progress87 B+5.1 vs similar economic context · 404 reporting
Closing the Gaps87 B+9.5 vs similar economic context · 400 reporting
Academic Growth70 C−3.2 vs similar economic context · 385 reporting
Relative Performance87 B+6.8 vs similar economic context · 402 reporting
Uplift Heights Healthcare Institute
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (404 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
83
B
7
School Progress
87
B
3
Closing the Gaps
87
B
3
Academic Growth
70
C
10
Relative Performance
87
B
3
Closest to moving up: School Progress, 3 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (87), so
Student Achievement (83) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 87.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level80%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 404 reporting
Meets grade level49%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 404 reporting
Masters grade level9%−7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 404 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level74%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 404 reporting
Meets grade level52%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 404 reporting
Masters grade level4%−13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 404 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level67%−0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 403 reporting
Meets grade level15%−20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 403 reporting
Masters grade level4%−9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 403 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level94%+22 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 390 reporting
Meets grade level60%+20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 390 reporting
Masters grade level19%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 390 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
Approaches grade level89%+18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 265 reporting
Meets grade level49%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 265 reporting
Masters grade level16%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 265 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (404 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Graduation
Four-Year
96.3%+33.7 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 130 rated charter campuses reporting
Five-Year
94.7%+37.2 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 130 rated charter campuses reporting
Six-Year
97.6%+47.6 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 129 rated charter campuses reporting
Dropout Rate
1.4%+0.4 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 130 rated charter campuses reporting
These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only charter campuses in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported charter campus rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.
College, career and military readiness
Total credit for CCMR criteria
89.0%+5.1 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
Criterion
This school% of graduates
Averagesimilar economic context
Differencepercentage points
Reportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria
89.0%
83.9%
+5.1
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 151 rated charter campuses reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course
71.4%
69.4%
+2.0
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 153 rated charter campuses reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA
60.0%
36.5%
+23.5
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 153 rated charter campuses reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)
51.4%
29.7%
+21.7
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 153 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course
0.0%
11.1%
−11.1
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 153 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned an industry-based certification
7.6%
13.4%
−5.8
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 153 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate
0.0%
0.4%
−0.4
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 153 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned an associate degree
0.0%
1.7%
−1.7
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 153 rated charter campuses reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit
0.0%
3.5%
−3.5
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 153 rated charter campuses reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness
1.0%
1.4%
−0.4
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 153 rated charter campuses reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student
8.6%
8.1%
+0.5
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 153 rated charter campuses reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces
1.9%
2.0%
−0.1
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 153 rated charter campuses reporting
Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of
meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this
school minus the average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate,
counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that
criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported charter campus percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only charter campuses for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
After high school: the following fall
Where school graduates appeared in Texas public higher-education records the fall after graduation. This is a limited next-step measure, not an eventual college-going or completion rate.
Graduates in the report
109
Class of 2023–24
Enrolled in Texas public higher education
78
71.6% of graduates
Not found in Texas public higher-ed records
27
24.8% of graduates
Not trackable
4
Fall 2024
Graduates in the report
This school
109
Selected comparison
80.1
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 122 rated charter campuses reporting
Enrolled in Texas public higher education
This school
78
Selected comparison
40
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 122 rated charter campuses reporting
Texas-public enrollment rate
This school
71.6%
Selected comparison
46.8%
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 122 rated charter campuses reporting
+24.8 pts vs similar economic context
Not-found rate
This school
24.8%
Selected comparison
47.8%
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 122 rated charter campuses reporting
−23.0 pts vs similar economic context
Not-trackable rate
This school
3.7%
Selected comparison
5.4%
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 122 rated charter campuses reporting
−1.7 pts vs similar economic context
Most common named Texas public destinations
DALLAS COLLEGE DISTRICT (009331)41
STEPHEN F. AUSTIN STATE UNIV (003624)8
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS (003594)7
Selected comparison counts are neutral cohort scale context. The percentages put differently sized graduating classes on the same basis, but still cover only the limited Texas-public system observed by this report.
Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, high-school graduates enrolled in higher education, fetched 24 August 2026. The report covers graduates who enrolled in a Texas public college or university the following fall and includes only districts or campuses with more than 25 graduates.
“Not found” does not mean a graduate did not continue their education. It can include private or out-of-state college, work, military service, enrollment after the fall term, or another path the Texas public system does not observe.
“Not trackable” is not an outcome. THECB uses it for graduates with a non-standard identifier that could not be matched to higher-education records.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
491
Economically disadvantaged
85.3%−1.0 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
48.7%+7.0 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
11.0%−1.9 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
90.5%−2.0 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
30.8%+5.8 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Uplift Heights Healthcare Institute
African American 11.2%
Hispanic 86.2%
White 0.4%
American Indian 0.2%
Asian 1.6%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 0.2%
Selected comparison averageFor charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 404 reporting for every category shown · 404 in full cohort
African American 17.8%
Hispanic 74.8%
White 4.2%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 1.5%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 1.4%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized charter campuses · 427 reporting for every category shown · 427 in full cohort
African American 16.6%
Hispanic 65.6%
White 9.7%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.7%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.1%
Texas charter average829 reporting for every category shown · 829 Texas charter campuses in full cohort
African American 17.5%
Hispanic 61.8%
White 12.2%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.5%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.5%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
491
Economically disadvantaged students
419
Emergent bilingual students
239
Special education students
54
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
28
Students in TEA mobility denominator
510
TEA-published mobility rate
5.5%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 491 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 6 (1.2%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
491
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
−6
Decrease · −1.2%
Change since 2021–22
−56
Decrease · −10.2%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
491
Selected comparison
520.9
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 404 rated charter campuses reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Uplift Heights Healthcare Institute
School year
Students enrolledUplift Heights Healthcare Institute
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
547
First available year
497.3
2022–23
537
Decrease of 10 (1.8%)
515
2023–24
495
Decrease of 42 (7.8%)
520.3
2024–25
497
Increase of 2 (0.4%)
522.3
2025–26
491
Decrease of 6 (1.2%)
520.9
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting charter campuses in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
21
4.1% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
30
5.92 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
507
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
4.1%
Selected comparison
10.6%
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 264 rated charter campuses reporting
−6.5 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
5.92
Selected comparison
17.5
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 277 rated charter campuses reporting
−11.6 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Uplift Heights Healthcare Institute
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
570
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2021–22
557
116
20.8%
221
39.68
10.6%
17
2022–23
561
66
11.8%
127
22.64
11.5%
19.6
2023–24
509
55
10.8%
98
19.25
11.2%
18.5
2024–25
507
21
4.1%
30
5.92
10.6%
17.5
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Uplift Heights Healthcare Institute in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
21
4.1%
30
5.92
10.6%
17.5
In-school suspensions
10
2.0%
16
3.16
7.1%
10.1
Out-of-school suspensions
14
2.8%
14
2.76
8.5%
11.8
DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized charter campuses can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Uplift Heights Healthcare Institute
Parent district: Uplift Education
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$11,537
Selected comparison
$11,790
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 400 rated charter campuses reporting
−$253 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $11,537 per student for this campus, $14,065 per student for its parent district, Uplift Education, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Uplift Heights Healthcare Institute
Parent district: Uplift Education
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$7,712
$10,216
$13,054
$8,442
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 249 rated charter campuses reporting
2019
$7,926
$10,675
$13,108
$8,688
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 294 rated charter campuses reporting
2020
$8,683
$11,069
$14,058
$9,313
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 316 rated charter campuses reporting
2021
$9,138
$11,806
$14,797
$9,536
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 348 rated charter campuses reporting
2022
$10,293
$12,887
$15,708
$11,191
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 366 rated charter campuses reporting
2023
$9,955
$12,994
$16,792
$11,299
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 377 rated charter campuses reporting
2024
$11,381
$13,830
$18,125
$11,621
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 386 rated charter campuses reporting
2025
$11,537
$14,065
$18,972
$11,790
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 400 rated charter campuses reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$67,302+$3,616 vs similar economic context
Teachers
30−0.6 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
16.6−1.3 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Uplift Heights Healthcare Institute
Beginning 7.8%
1 to 5 years 44.9%
6 to 10 years 13.5%
11 to 20 years 19.6%
21 to 30 years 14.2%
Selected comparison averageFor charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 404 reporting for every category shown · 404 in full cohort
Beginning 13.3%
1 to 5 years 47.4%
6 to 10 years 20%
11 to 20 years 14.6%
21 to 30 years 4.1%
Over 30 years 0.7%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized charter campuses · 427 reporting for every category shown · 427 in full cohort
Beginning 13.4%
1 to 5 years 46.8%
6 to 10 years 19.7%
11 to 20 years 13.6%
21 to 30 years 4%
Over 30 years 0.6%
Texas charter average829 reporting for every category shown · 829 Texas charter campuses in full cohort
Beginning 13%
1 to 5 years 44.3%
6 to 10 years 19.6%
11 to 20 years 15.4%
21 to 30 years 4.8%
Over 30 years 0.9%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Uplift Heights Healthcare Institute in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classUplift Heights Healthcare Institute · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Secondary English
24.1
18.7
Secondary languages other than English
22.2
17.8
Secondary math
22.3
18.9
Secondary science
23.6
19.9
Secondary social studies
26
20.1
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 057803006.