Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Open-enrollment charter campus

Uplift Atlas Prep HS

Uplift Education · Dallas · 491 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
87/1002025-26
Change
+6 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+5.6 ptsvs 81.4 average · 309 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
108 of 309tied with 11 others
B87

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 85 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 81.4 average for 309 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Current strength

Overall score above the similar-context average

87 +5.6 pts vs 81.4

  • 87 is 5.6 points above the 81.4 average among 309 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Current strength

Closing the Gaps above the similar-context average

82 +3.9 pts vs 78.1

  • 82 is 3.9 points above the 78.1 average among 303 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Current strength

School Progress above the similar-context average

89 +6.7 pts vs 82.3

  • 89 is 6.7 points above the 82.3 average among 308 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Uplift Atlas Prep HS is rated B by TEA, scoring 87 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.4 average for 309 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context. It is up 6 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 108th of 309 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context (tied with 11 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. After high school: the following fall
  6. Who this school serves
  7. Student counts behind the percentages
  8. Enrollment over time
  9. Discipline and removal from class
  10. Spending per student
  11. Teachers and actual class size
  12. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas charter averageUplift Atlas Prep HS 8181868887 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 85 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas charter average
2025-26B8781.4 309 reporting81.7 829 reporting
2024-25B8881.0 303 reporting81.3 797 reporting
2023-24B8679.4 296 reporting79.5 776 reporting
2022-23B8179.4 290 reporting79.6 749 reporting
2021-22B8184.4 278 reporting84.5 700 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement86 B+9.1 vs similar economic context · 309 reporting
  • School Progress89 B+6.7 vs similar economic context · 308 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps82 B+3.9 vs similar economic context · 303 reporting
  • Academic Growth69 D−4.5 vs similar economic context · 291 reporting
  • Relative Performance89 B+8.3 vs similar economic context · 306 reporting
  • Uplift Atlas Prep HS
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (309 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement86B4
School Progress89B1
Closing the Gaps82B8
Academic Growth69D1
Relative Performance89B1

Closest to moving up: School Progress, 1 point below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (89), so Student Achievement (86) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 89.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level77%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 309 reporting
  • Meets grade level46%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 309 reporting
  • Masters grade level7%−9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 309 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level66%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 309 reporting
  • Meets grade level43%−4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 309 reporting
  • Masters grade level4%−13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 309 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level87%+19 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 308 reporting
  • Meets grade level38%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 308 reporting
  • Masters grade level1%−12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 308 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level89%+15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 300 reporting
  • Meets grade level53%+13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 300 reporting
  • Masters grade level11%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 300 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level90%+17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 212 reporting
  • Meets grade level51%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 212 reporting
  • Masters grade level15%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 212 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (309 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Graduation

Four-Year
94.7%+24.5 pts vs similar economic context average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 102 rated charter campuses reporting
Five-Year
96.3%+32.3 pts vs similar economic context average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 101 rated charter campuses reporting
Six-Year
97.2%+38.4 pts vs similar economic context average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 101 rated charter campuses reporting
Dropout Rate
1.2%+0.4 pts vs similar economic context average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 102 rated charter campuses reporting

These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only charter campuses in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported charter campus rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.

College, career and military readiness

Total credit for CCMR criteria
100.0%+16.3 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
CriterionThis school% of graduatesAveragesimilar economic contextDifferencepercentage pointsReportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria100.0%83.7%+16.3 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 129 rated charter campuses reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course97.3%70.2%+27.1 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 130 rated charter campuses reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA90.1%38.9%+51.2 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 130 rated charter campuses reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)58.6%29.5%+29.1 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 130 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course0.0%14.2%−14.2 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 130 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned an industry-based certification0.9%13.5%−12.6 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 130 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate0.0%0.5%−0.5 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 130 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned an associate degree0.0%2.2%−2.2 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 130 rated charter campuses reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit0.0%4.3%−4.3 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 130 rated charter campuses reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness2.7%1.4%+1.3 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 130 rated charter campuses reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student8.1%7.6%+0.5 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 130 rated charter campuses reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces0.9%1.8%−0.9 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 130 rated charter campuses reporting

Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this school minus the average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate, counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported charter campus percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only charter campuses for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

After high school: the following fall

Where school graduates appeared in Texas public higher-education records the fall after graduation. This is a limited next-step measure, not an eventual college-going or completion rate.

Graduates in the report
105

Class of 2023–24

Enrolled in Texas public higher education
72

68.6% of graduates

Not found in Texas public higher-ed records
30

28.6% of graduates

Not trackable
3

Fall 2024

Graduates in the report

This school
105
Selected comparison
74

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 103 rated charter campuses reporting

Enrolled in Texas public higher education

This school
72
Selected comparison
38.3

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 103 rated charter campuses reporting

Texas-public enrollment rate

This school
68.6%
Selected comparison
48.3%

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 103 rated charter campuses reporting

+20.3 pts vs similar economic context

Not-found rate

This school
28.6%
Selected comparison
46.5%

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 103 rated charter campuses reporting

−17.9 pts vs similar economic context

Not-trackable rate

This school
2.9%
Selected comparison
5.2%

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 103 rated charter campuses reporting

−2.3 pts vs similar economic context

Most common named Texas public destinations

  1. DALLAS COLLEGE DISTRICT (009331)34
  2. U. OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON (003656)15
  3. U. OF TEXAS AT DALLAS (009741)7

Selected comparison counts are neutral cohort scale context. The percentages put differently sized graduating classes on the same basis, but still cover only the limited Texas-public system observed by this report.

Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, high-school graduates enrolled in higher education, fetched 24 August 2026. The report covers graduates who enrolled in a Texas public college or university the following fall and includes only districts or campuses with more than 25 graduates.

“Not found” does not mean a graduate did not continue their education. It can include private or out-of-state college, work, military service, enrollment after the fall term, or another path the Texas public system does not observe.

“Not trackable” is not an outcome. THECB uses it for graduates with a non-standard identifier that could not be matched to higher-education records.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
491
Economically disadvantaged
78.2%−2.0 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
42.2%+7.4 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
15.9%+2.8 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
92.5%+0.2 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
22.5%−3.1 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Uplift Atlas Prep HS

African American: 7.7%Hispanic: 90%White: 1%Two or More Races: 1.2%
  • African American 7.7%
  • Hispanic 90%
  • White 1%
  • Two or More Races 1.2%

Selected comparison average For charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 309 reporting for every category shown · 309 in full cohort

African American: 19%Hispanic: 70.7%White: 6.3%American Indian: 0.2%Asian: 1.9%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 1.9%
  • African American 19%
  • Hispanic 70.7%
  • White 6.3%
  • American Indian 0.2%
  • Asian 1.9%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 1.9%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
491
Economically disadvantaged students
384
Emergent bilingual students
207
Special education students
78

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
37
Students in TEA mobility denominator
524
TEA-published mobility rate
7.1%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 491 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 12 (2.4%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
491

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
−12

Decrease · −2.4%

Change since 2021–22
−4

Decrease · −0.8%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
491
Selected comparison
510.4

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 309 rated charter campuses reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Uplift Atlas Prep HS
School yearStudents enrolledUplift Atlas Prep HSChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 495 First available year 490.8
2022–23 501 Increase of 6 (1.2%) 506.8
2023–24 499 Decrease of 2 (0.4%) 507.2
2024–25 503 Increase of 4 (0.8%) 513.5
2025–26 491 Decrease of 12 (2.4%) 510.4

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting charter campuses in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
64

12.3% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
89

17.12 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
520

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
12.3%
Selected comparison
10.2%

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 210 rated charter campuses reporting

+2.1 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
17.12
Selected comparison
16.7

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 221 rated charter campuses reporting

+0.4 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Uplift Atlas Prep HS
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 500 Suppressed — 11 2.20 — 5.3
2021–22 503 94 18.7% 188 37.38 10.5% 17.2
2022–23 529 122 23.1% 262 49.53 11.2% 18.9
2023–24 513 80 15.6% 133 25.93 11.0% 18.7
2024–25 520 64 12.3% 89 17.12 10.2% 16.7
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Uplift Atlas Prep HS in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 64 12.3% 89 17.12 10.2% 16.7
In-school suspensions 47 9.0% 56 10.77 6.2% 8.6
Out-of-school suspensions 30 5.8% 33 6.35 8.5% 12
DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized charter campuses can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$7k$14k$20k20182020202220242025
  • Uplift Atlas Prep HS
  • Parent district: Uplift Education
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$10,981
Selected comparison
$11,661

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 303 rated charter campuses reporting

−$680 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $10,981 per student for this campus, $14,065 per student for its parent district, Uplift Education, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearUplift Atlas Prep HSParent district: Uplift EducationTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$9,757$10,216$13,054$8,256 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 209 rated charter campuses reporting
2019$10,889$10,675$13,108$8,755 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 228 rated charter campuses reporting
2020$11,723$11,069$14,058$9,480 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 248 rated charter campuses reporting
2021$9,104$11,806$14,797$9,420 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 268 rated charter campuses reporting
2022$10,822$12,887$15,708$10,965 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 280 rated charter campuses reporting
2023$10,444$12,994$16,792$11,279 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 287 rated charter campuses reporting
2024$10,987$13,830$18,125$11,720 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 294 rated charter campuses reporting
2025$10,981$14,065$18,972$11,661 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 303 rated charter campuses reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$71,213+$8,361 vs similar economic context
Teachers
33+2.6 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
15−3.0 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Uplift Atlas Prep HS

Beginning: 5.5%1 to 5 years: 21.3%6 to 10 years: 30.5%11 to 20 years: 33.5%21 to 30 years: 9.1%
  • Beginning 5.5%
  • 1 to 5 years 21.3%
  • 6 to 10 years 30.5%
  • 11 to 20 years 33.5%
  • 21 to 30 years 9.1%

Selected comparison average For charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 309 reporting for every category shown · 309 in full cohort

Beginning: 12.9%1 to 5 years: 46.8%6 to 10 years: 20%11 to 20 years: 14.9%21 to 30 years: 4.6%Over 30 years: 0.8%
  • Beginning 12.9%
  • 1 to 5 years 46.8%
  • 6 to 10 years 20%
  • 11 to 20 years 14.9%
  • 21 to 30 years 4.6%
  • Over 30 years 0.8%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Uplift Atlas Prep HS in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classUplift Atlas Prep HS · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Secondary English25.417.7
Secondary languages other than English24.617.2
Secondary math1917.7
Secondary science25.618.6
Secondary social studies27.119

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 057803010.