Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Open-enrollment charter campus

Uplift Ascend Prep HS

Uplift Education · Fort Worth · 302 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
87/1002025-26
Change
−3 ptssince 2023-24
Score vs similar economic context
+6.3 ptsvs 80.7 average · 406 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
131 of 406tied with 15 others
B87

At a glance

The available rating history is moving down. The current score is above the 80.7 average for 406 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Recent movement

Overall score rose 5 points

82 to 87 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 87 is 6.3 points above the 80.7 average among 406 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Recent domain gain

Student Achievement rose 13 points

75 to 88 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 88 is 12.8 points above the 75.2 average among 406 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Top placement

Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness

12.3% 2nd of 152 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure · 2025-26

See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Uplift Ascend Prep HS is rated B by TEA, scoring 87 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.7 average for 406 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context. It is down 3 points since 2023-24.

Ranks 131st of 406 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context (tied with 15 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 3 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this school ranks best
  12. Where this comes from

3 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas charter averageUplift Ascend Prep HS 908287 2023-242024-252025-26

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas charter average
2025-26B8780.7 406 reporting81.7 829 reporting
2024-25B8279.3 400 reporting81.3 797 reporting
2023-24A9077.3 391 reporting79.5 776 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement88 B+12.8 vs similar economic context · 406 reporting
  • School Progress89 B+7.2 vs similar economic context · 406 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps83 B+5.6 vs similar economic context · 403 reporting
  • Academic Growth83 B+9.8 vs similar economic context · 388 reporting
  • Relative Performance89 B+8.9 vs similar economic context · 404 reporting
  • Uplift Ascend Prep HS
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (406 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement88B2
School Progress89B1
Closing the Gaps83B7
Academic Growth83B7
Relative Performance89B1

Closest to moving up: School Progress, 1 point below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (89), so Student Achievement (88) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 89.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level80%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 406 reporting
  • Meets grade level49%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 406 reporting
  • Masters grade level11%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 406 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level71%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 406 reporting
  • Meets grade level51%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 406 reporting
  • Masters grade level7%−10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 406 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level88%+21 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 405 reporting
  • Meets grade level34%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 405 reporting
  • Masters grade level5%−8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 405 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level89%+17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 390 reporting
  • Meets grade level59%+19 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 390 reporting
  • Masters grade level21%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 390 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level84%+13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 264 reporting
  • Meets grade level46%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 264 reporting
  • Masters grade level16%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 264 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (406 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Graduation

Four-Year
0.0%−62.6 pts vs similar economic context average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 130 rated charter campuses reporting
Five-Year
0.0%−57.5 pts vs similar economic context average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 130 rated charter campuses reporting
Six-Year
0.0%−50.0 pts vs similar economic context average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 129 rated charter campuses reporting
Dropout Rate
0.0%−1.0 pts vs similar economic context average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 130 rated charter campuses reporting

These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only charter campuses in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported charter campus rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.

College, career and military readiness

Total credit for CCMR criteria
93.0%+9.1 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
CriterionThis school% of graduatesAveragesimilar economic contextDifferencepercentage pointsReportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria93.0%83.9%+9.1 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 150 rated charter campuses reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course71.2%69.2%+2.0 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 152 rated charter campuses reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA67.1%36.8%+30.3 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 152 rated charter campuses reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)60.3%29.9%+30.4 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 152 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course0.0%11.1%−11.1 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 152 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned an industry-based certification15.1%13.4%+1.7 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 152 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate0.0%0.4%−0.4 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 152 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned an associate degree0.0%1.7%−1.7 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 152 rated charter campuses reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit0.0%3.5%−3.5 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 152 rated charter campuses reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness12.3%1.4%+10.9 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 152 rated charter campuses reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student13.7%8.1%+5.6 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 152 rated charter campuses reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces1.4%2.0%−0.6 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 152 rated charter campuses reporting

Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this school minus the average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate, counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported charter campus percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only charter campuses for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
302
Economically disadvantaged
85.4%−1.0 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
35.5%−6.3 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
14.6%+1.7 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
91.4%−1.1 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
32.5%+7.6 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Uplift Ascend Prep HS

African American: 23.3%Hispanic: 72.8%White: 1.3%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 0.3%Two or More Races: 2%
  • African American 23.3%
  • Hispanic 72.8%
  • White 1.3%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 0.3%
  • Two or More Races 2%

Selected comparison average For charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 406 reporting for every category shown · 406 in full cohort

African American: 17.9%Hispanic: 74.8%White: 4.2%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 1.5%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 1.3%
  • African American 17.9%
  • Hispanic 74.8%
  • White 4.2%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 1.5%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 1.3%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
301
Economically disadvantaged students
257
Emergent bilingual students
107
Special education students
44

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
29
Students in TEA mobility denominator
330
TEA-published mobility rate
8.8%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 302 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 16 (5.0%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
302

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
−16

Decrease · −5.0%

Change since 2023–24
+22

Increase · +7.9%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
302
Selected comparison
522.5

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 406 rated charter campuses reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Uplift Ascend Prep HS
School yearStudents enrolledUplift Ascend Prep HSChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2023–24 280 First available year 522.5
2024–25 318 Increase of 38 (13.6%) 524.1
2025–26 302 Decrease of 16 (5.0%) 522.5

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting charter campuses in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
36

10.9% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
56

16.97 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
330

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
10.9%
Selected comparison
10.5%

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 266 rated charter campuses reporting

+0.4 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
16.97
Selected comparison
17.4

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 279 rated charter campuses reporting

−0.4 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Uplift Ascend Prep HS
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2023–24 300 24 8.0% 32 10.67 11.2% 18.5
2024–25 330 36 10.9% 56 16.97 10.5% 17.4
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Uplift Ascend Prep HS in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 36 10.9% 56 16.97 10.5% 17.4
In-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Out-of-school suspensions 36 10.9% 56 16.97 8.5% 11.8
DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized charter campuses can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$10k$15k$20k20242025
  • Uplift Ascend Prep HS
  • Parent district: Uplift Education
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$12,013
Selected comparison
$11,766

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 402 rated charter campuses reporting

+$247 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $12,013 per student for this campus, $14,065 per student for its parent district, Uplift Education, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearUplift Ascend Prep HSParent district: Uplift EducationTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2024$11,345$13,830$18,125$11,601 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 388 rated charter campuses reporting
2025$12,013$14,065$18,972$11,766 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 402 rated charter campuses reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$60,712−$2,988 vs similar economic context
Teachers
20−10.2 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
15−3.0 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Uplift Ascend Prep HS

Beginning: 34.3%1 to 5 years: 33.3%6 to 10 years: 19.9%11 to 20 years: 12.4%
  • Beginning 34.3%
  • 1 to 5 years 33.3%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.9%
  • 11 to 20 years 12.4%

Selected comparison average For charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 406 reporting for every category shown · 406 in full cohort

Beginning: 13.4%1 to 5 years: 47.3%6 to 10 years: 20%11 to 20 years: 14.6%21 to 30 years: 4%Over 30 years: 0.7%
  • Beginning 13.4%
  • 1 to 5 years 47.3%
  • 6 to 10 years 20%
  • 11 to 20 years 14.6%
  • 21 to 30 years 4%
  • Over 30 years 0.7%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Uplift Ascend Prep HS in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classUplift Ascend Prep HS · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Secondary English15.318.7
Secondary languages other than English17.717.8
Secondary math15.318.9
Secondary science16.719.9
Secondary social studies20.720.1

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 120 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#2–3 rankings

Second- and third-place results

1 measure

  • 2of 152

    Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 152 that report this measure

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

2 measures

  • 8of 63

    Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA

    Similar size · of the 63 that report this measure

  • 9of 63

    Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)

    Similar size · of the 63 that report this measure

Other top-5% rankings

High placements in larger reporting groups

1 measure

  • 18of 405

    Math — Approaches

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 405 that report this measure · tied with 3

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 057803020.