Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Open-enrollment charter campus

Universal Academy-Bartonville

Universal Academy · Coppell · 83 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
89/1002025-26
Change
−2 ptssince 2023-24
Score vs similar economic context
+2.1 ptsvs 86.9 average · 59 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
25 of 59tied with 4 others
B89

At a glance

The available rating history is moving down. The current score is above the 86.9 average for 59 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Recent domain gain

Relative Performance rose 12 points

69 to 81 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 81 is 8.4 points above the 72.6 average among 56 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

STAAR result

All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
74%vs 62.7% avg · +11.3 pts
Masters
49%vs 31% avg · +18 pts

Among 59 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

STAAR result

Math above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
73%vs 54.6% avg · +18.4 pts
Masters
50%vs 25.7% avg · +24.3 pts

Among 57 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Universal Academy-Bartonville is rated B by TEA, scoring 89 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 86.9 average for 59 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context. It is down 2 points since 2023-24.

Ranks 25th of 59 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context (tied with 4 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 3 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this school ranks best
  12. Where this comes from

3 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas charter averageUniversal Academy-Bartonville 918989 2023-242024-252025-26

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas charter average
2025-26B8986.9 59 reporting81.7 829 reporting
2024-25B8988.0 51 reporting81.3 797 reporting
2023-24A9187.4 51 reporting79.5 776 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement92 A+4.8 vs similar economic context · 59 reporting
  • School Progress81 B+1.2 vs similar economic context · 56 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps81 B−3.4 vs similar economic context · 55 reporting
  • Academic Growth81 B+3.8 vs similar economic context · 55 reporting
  • Relative Performance81 B+8.4 vs similar economic context · 56 reporting
  • Universal Academy-Bartonville
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (59 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement92A—
School Progress81B9
Closing the Gaps81B9
Academic Growth81B9
Relative Performance81B9

Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 9 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (92), so School Progress (81) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 92.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level85%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 59 reporting
  • Meets grade level74%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 59 reporting
  • Masters grade level49%+18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 59 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level89%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 58 reporting
  • Meets grade level77%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 58 reporting
  • Masters grade level57%+20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 58 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level84%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 57 reporting
  • Meets grade level73%+18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 57 reporting
  • Masters grade level50%+24 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 57 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level76%−4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 54 reporting
  • Meets grade level71%+13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 54 reporting
  • Masters grade level24%−4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 54 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (59 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only charter campuses for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
83
Economically disadvantaged
16.9%+0.6 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
32.5%+20.5 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
4.8%−9.4 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
96.8%+1.6 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
4.1%−7.1 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Universal Academy-Bartonville

African American: 26.5%Hispanic: 1.2%American Indian: 3.6%Asian: 66.3%Two or More Races: 2.4%
  • African American 26.5%
  • Hispanic 1.2%
  • American Indian 3.6%
  • Asian 66.3%
  • Two or More Races 2.4%

Selected comparison average For charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 59 reporting for every category shown · 59 in full cohort

African American: 9.1%Hispanic: 29.2%White: 36%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 19.4%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 5.8%
  • African American 9.1%
  • Hispanic 29.2%
  • White 36%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 19.4%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 5.8%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
83
Economically disadvantaged students
14
Emergent bilingual students
27
Special education students
4

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
13
Students in TEA mobility denominator
100
TEA-published mobility rate
13%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 83 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 28 (25.2%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
83

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
−28

Decrease · −25.2%

Change since 2023–24
−52

Decrease · −38.5%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
83
Selected comparison
583.6

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 59 rated charter campuses reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Universal Academy-Bartonville
School yearStudents enrolledUniversal Academy-BartonvilleChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2023–24 135 First available year 565.2
2024–25 111 Decrease of 24 (17.8%) 571.9
2025–26 83 Decrease of 28 (25.2%) 583.6

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting charter campuses in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Suppressed

Rate not available

Disciplinary actions
Suppressed

Rate not available

Cumulative year-end enrollment
116

2024–25

TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Universal Academy-Bartonville
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2023–24 136 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2024–25 116 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Universal Academy-Bartonville in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
In-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Out-of-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized charter campuses can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$1k$11k$20k20242025
  • Universal Academy-Bartonville
  • Parent district: Universal Academy
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$2,158
Selected comparison
$10,465

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 55 rated charter campuses reporting

−$8,307 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $2,158 per student for this campus, $11,045 per student for its parent district, Universal Academy, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearUniversal Academy-BartonvilleParent district: Universal AcademyTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2024$1,224$10,836$18,125$10,141 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 52 rated charter campuses reporting
2025$2,158$11,045$18,972$10,465 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 55 rated charter campuses reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$59,318−$226 vs similar economic context
Teachers
20−15.1 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
4.2−32.4 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Universal Academy-Bartonville

Beginning: 19.3%1 to 5 years: 53.8%6 to 10 years: 14.7%11 to 20 years: 7.6%21 to 30 years: 5.1%
  • Beginning 19.3%
  • 1 to 5 years 53.8%
  • 6 to 10 years 14.7%
  • 11 to 20 years 7.6%
  • 21 to 30 years 5.1%

Selected comparison average For charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 59 reporting for every category shown · 59 in full cohort

Beginning: 10%1 to 5 years: 36.6%6 to 10 years: 17.2%11 to 20 years: 16.4%21 to 30 years: 6.9%Over 30 years: 1.1%
  • Beginning 10%
  • 1 to 5 years 36.6%
  • 6 to 10 years 17.2%
  • 11 to 20 years 16.4%
  • 21 to 30 years 6.9%
  • Over 30 years 1.1%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Universal Academy-Bartonville in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classUniversal Academy-Bartonville · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten3.321.2
Grade 12.822
Grade 23.822.3
Grade 33.323.7
Grade 43.623.4
Grade 54.123

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 63 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#1 rankings

First-place results

2 measures

  • 1of 90

    All Subjects — Masters

    Similar size · of the 90 that report this measure

  • 1of 90

    Reading — Masters

    Similar size · of the 90 that report this measure

#2–3 rankings

Second- and third-place results

3 measures

  • 2of 88

    Math — Masters

    Similar size · of the 88 that report this measure

  • 3of 90

    All Subjects — Meets

    Similar size · of the 90 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 3of 85

    Attendance

    Similar size · of the 85 that report this measure · tied with 2

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

5 measures

  • 4of 90

    Reading — Meets

    Similar size · of the 90 that report this measure

  • 4of 88

    Math — Meets

    Similar size · of the 88 that report this measure

  • 5of 90

    Reading — Approaches

    Similar size · of the 90 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 5of 81

    Science — Meets

    Similar size · of the 81 that report this measure

  • 6of 85

    Chronically absent (lowest is best)

    Similar size · of the 85 that report this measure

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 057808104.