Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

United South HS

Webb County · Region 01: Edinburg · 3,151 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
93/1002025-26
Change
+7 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+15.5 ptsvs 77.5 average · 2,228 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
80 of 2,228tied with 22 others
A93

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 88 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 77.5 average for 2,228 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Recent domain gain

Academic Growth rose 5 points

77 to 82 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 82 is 9.8 points above the 72.2 average among 2,005 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

STAAR result

All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
61%vs 41.7% avg · +19.3 pts
Masters
22%vs 16.3% avg · +5.7 pts

Among 2,058 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

STAAR result

Math above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
68%vs 38% avg · +30 pts
Masters
41%vs 14.2% avg · +26.8 pts

Among 2,046 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

United South HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 93 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 77.5 average for 2,228 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 7 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 80th of 2,228 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 22 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. After high school: the following fall
  6. Who this school serves
  7. Student counts behind the percentages
  8. Enrollment over time
  9. Discipline and removal from class
  10. Spending per student
  11. Teachers and actual class size
  12. Where this school ranks best
  13. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageUnited South HS 8689939393 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 88 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26A9377.5 2,228 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25A9377.1 2,213 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24A9374.5 2,196 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23B8974.9 2,180 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22B8681.7 2,159 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement89 B+17.0 vs similar economic context · 2,058 reporting
  • School Progress94 A+15.3 vs similar economic context · 2,051 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps92 A+17.4 vs similar economic context · 2,037 reporting
  • Academic Growth82 B+9.8 vs similar economic context · 2,005 reporting
  • Relative Performance94 A+17.0 vs similar economic context · 2,051 reporting
  • United South HS
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,228 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement89B1
School Progress94A—
Closing the Gaps92A—
Academic Growth82B8
Relative Performance94A—

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (94), so Student Achievement (89) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 94.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level87%+19 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,058 reporting
  • Meets grade level61%+19 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,058 reporting
  • Masters grade level22%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,058 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level76%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,056 reporting
  • Meets grade level57%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,056 reporting
  • Masters grade level11%−7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,056 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level91%+25 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,046 reporting
  • Meets grade level68%+30 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,046 reporting
  • Masters grade level41%+27 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,046 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level96%+30 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,902 reporting
  • Meets grade level59%+22 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,902 reporting
  • Masters grade level21%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,902 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level97%+31 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 807 reporting
  • Meets grade level67%+29 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 807 reporting
  • Masters grade level30%+14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 807 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,228 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Graduation

Four-Year
96.0%+3.7 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 325 rated schools reporting
Five-Year
95.9%+3.8 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 326 rated schools reporting
Six-Year
96.6%+5.3 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 326 rated schools reporting
Dropout Rate
0.8%−0.6 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 328 rated schools reporting

These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only schools in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported school rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.

College, career and military readiness

Total credit for CCMR criteria
95.0%+10.6 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
CriterionThis school% of graduatesAveragesimilar economic contextDifferencepercentage pointsReportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria95.0%84.4%+10.6 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 370 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course74.3%56.5%+17.8 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 373 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA25.5%22.3%+3.2 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 373 rated schools reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)13.5%11.6%+1.9 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 373 rated schools reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course32.9%29.8%+3.1 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 373 rated schools reporting
Earned an industry-based certification77.5%35.1%+42.4 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 373 rated schools reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate5.9%2.8%+3.1 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 373 rated schools reporting
Earned an associate degree10.9%6.7%+4.2 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 373 rated schools reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit1.3%5.5%−4.2 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 373 rated schools reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness7.1%3.2%+3.9 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 373 rated schools reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student7.8%8.1%−0.3 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 373 rated schools reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces3.4%2.7%+0.7 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 373 rated schools reporting

Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this school minus the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate, counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported school percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

After high school: the following fall

Where school graduates appeared in Texas public higher-education records the fall after graduation. This is a limited next-step measure, not an eventual college-going or completion rate.

Graduates in the report
755

Class of 2023–24

Enrolled in Texas public higher education
444

58.8% of graduates

Not found in Texas public higher-ed records
295

39.1% of graduates

Not trackable
16

Fall 2024

Graduates in the report

This school
755
Selected comparison
264.6

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 325 rated schools reporting

Enrolled in Texas public higher education

This school
444
Selected comparison
106.5

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 325 rated schools reporting

Texas-public enrollment rate

This school
58.8%
Selected comparison
39.9%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 325 rated schools reporting

+18.9 pts vs similar economic context

Not-found rate

This school
39.1%
Selected comparison
53.8%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 325 rated schools reporting

−14.7 pts vs similar economic context

Not-trackable rate

This school
2.1%
Selected comparison
6.3%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 325 rated schools reporting

−4.2 pts vs similar economic context

Most common named Texas public destinations

  1. LAREDO COLLEGE (003582)227
  2. TEXAS A&M INTERNATIONAL UNIV (009651)165
  3. U. OF TEXAS AT SAN ANTONIO (010115)12

Selected comparison counts are neutral cohort scale context. The percentages put differently sized graduating classes on the same basis, but still cover only the limited Texas-public system observed by this report.

Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, high-school graduates enrolled in higher education, fetched 24 August 2026. The report covers graduates who enrolled in a Texas public college or university the following fall and includes only districts or campuses with more than 25 graduates.

“Not found” does not mean a graduate did not continue their education. It can include private or out-of-state college, work, military service, enrollment after the fall term, or another path the Texas public system does not observe.

“Not trackable” is not an outcome. THECB uses it for graduates with a non-standard identifier that could not be matched to higher-education records.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
3,151
Economically disadvantaged
81.4%−0.7 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
33.0%+2.2 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
13.1%−5.5 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
92.0%−1.3 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
29.2%+8.2 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

United South HS

African American: 0.1%Hispanic: 99.4%White: 0.3%Asian: 0.2%
  • African American 0.1%
  • Hispanic 99.4%
  • White 0.3%
  • Asian 0.2%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,228 reporting for every category shown · 2,228 in full cohort

African American: 14.2%Hispanic: 69.1%White: 12.2%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 1.6%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 2.5%
  • African American 14.2%
  • Hispanic 69.1%
  • White 12.2%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 1.6%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 2.5%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
3,150
Economically disadvantaged students
2,564
Emergent bilingual students
1,041
Special education students
412

Early college pathways

Early College High School
299

TEA-published share: 9.5%

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
339
Students in TEA mobility denominator
3,408
TEA-published mobility rate
9.9%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 3,151 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 101 (3.1%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
3,151

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
−101

Decrease · −3.1%

Change since 2021–22
−24

Decrease · −0.8%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
3,151
Selected comparison
625.4

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,198 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for United South HS
School yearStudents enrolledUnited South HSChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 3,175 First available year 653.2
2022–23 3,243 Increase of 68 (2.1%) 654.7
2023–24 3,252 Increase of 9 (0.3%) 648.3
2024–25 3,252 No change 644.7
2025–26 3,151 Decrease of 101 (3.1%) 625.4

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
409

12.2% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
1,040

30.95 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
3,360

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
12.2%
Selected comparison
13.4%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,610 rated schools reporting

−1.2 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
30.95
Selected comparison
32.5

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,720 rated schools reporting

−1.6 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for United South HS
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 3,302 13 0.4% 22 0.67 8.3% 16.4
2021–22 3,320 388 11.7% 894 26.93 13.0% 31.1
2022–23 3,411 416 12.2% 1,070 31.37 13.8% 34.4
2023–24 3,408 367 10.8% 883 25.91 13.8% 34.3
2024–25 3,360 409 12.2% 1,040 30.95 13.4% 32.5
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for United South HS in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 409 12.2% 1,040 30.95 13.4% 32.5
In-school suspensions 212 6.3% 357 10.63 11.8% 23.5
Out-of-school suspensions 309 9.2% 512 15.24 8.4% 13.4
DAEP placements 152 4.5% 170 5.06 5.4% 6.5
Mandatory DAEP placements 120 3.6% 130 3.87 3.9% 4.6
Discretionary DAEP placements 37 1.1% 40 1.19 3.4% 4
JJAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$7k$13k$20k20182020202220242025
  • United South HS
  • Parent district: United ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$9,759
Selected comparison
$13,152

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,212 rated schools reporting

−$3,393 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $9,759 per student for this campus, $14,348 per student for its parent district, United ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearUnited South HSParent district: United ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$7,654$13,187$13,054$8,199 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,091 rated schools reporting
2019$7,644$12,568$13,108$8,302 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,117 rated schools reporting
2020$7,706$12,004$14,058$8,804 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,132 rated schools reporting
2021$7,850$13,076$14,797$9,477 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,142 rated schools reporting
2022$8,833$15,006$15,708$10,912 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,160 rated schools reporting
2023$8,702$14,779$16,792$11,443 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,180 rated schools reporting
2024$9,058$15,029$18,125$12,421 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,196 rated schools reporting
2025$9,759$14,348$18,972$13,152 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,212 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$63,930−$3,361 vs similar economic context
Teachers
191+148.3 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
16.5+2.2 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

United South HS

Beginning: 7.9%1 to 5 years: 17%6 to 10 years: 23.3%11 to 20 years: 33.3%21 to 30 years: 16.3%Over 30 years: 2.2%
  • Beginning 7.9%
  • 1 to 5 years 17%
  • 6 to 10 years 23.3%
  • 11 to 20 years 33.3%
  • 21 to 30 years 16.3%
  • Over 30 years 2.2%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,228 reporting for every category shown · 2,228 in full cohort

Beginning: 6.9%1 to 5 years: 27.7%6 to 10 years: 19%11 to 20 years: 27%21 to 30 years: 15%Over 30 years: 3.6%
  • Beginning 6.9%
  • 1 to 5 years 27.7%
  • 6 to 10 years 19%
  • 11 to 20 years 27%
  • 21 to 30 years 15%
  • Over 30 years 3.6%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for United South HS in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classUnited South HS · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Secondary English18.715.3
Secondary languages other than English2218.2
Secondary math17.916.5
Secondary science19.117.7
Secondary social studies20.517.7

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 184 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#2–3 rankings

Second- and third-place results

1 measure

  • 2of 336

    Earned an industry-based certification

    Similar size · of the 336 that report this measure

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

6 measures

  • 4of 86

    Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness

    Region 01: Edinburg · of the 86 that report this measure

  • 5of 27

    Social Studies — Approaches

    Webb County · of the 27 that report this measure

  • 5of 27

    Social Studies — Meets

    Webb County · of the 27 that report this measure

  • 5of 27

    Social Studies — Masters

    Webb County · of the 27 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 8of 76

    Math — Masters

    Webb County · of the 76 that report this measure

  • 9of 86

    Earned a level I or level II certificate

    Region 01: Edinburg · of the 86 that report this measure

Other top-5% rankings

High placements in larger reporting groups

8 measures

  • 46of 2,046

    Math — Meets

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,046 that report this measure · tied with 4

  • 52of 2,051

    Relative Performance

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,051 that report this measure · tied with 17

  • 56of 2,046

    Math — Approaches

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,046 that report this measure · tied with 6

  • 57of 2,051

    School Progress

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,051 that report this measure · tied with 19

  • 60of 1,902

    Science — Approaches

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,902 that report this measure · tied with 13

  • 74of 2,058

    All Subjects — Approaches

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,058 that report this measure · tied with 8

  • 80of 2,228

    Overall score

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,228 that report this measure · tied with 22

  • 106of 2,058

    All Subjects — Meets

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,058 that report this measure · tied with 8

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 240903002.