+6.4 ptsvs 82.6 average · 1,581 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
385 of 1,581tied with 53 others
Score vs region
+3.3 ptsvs 85.7 average · 505 rated schools in Region 01: Edinburg
Region 01: Edinburg placement
185 of 505tied with 32 others
Score vs county
+0.7 ptsvs 88.3 average · 76 rated schools in Webb County
Webb County placement
36 of 76tied with 3 others
Score vs similar-size group
+7.4 ptsvs 81.6 average · 2,640 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
705 of 2,640tied with 99 others
Score vs state
+7.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
1,913 of 7,646tied with 285 others
B89
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 94 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 82.6 average for 1,581 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 85.7 average for 505 rated schools in Region 01: Edinburg.The current score is above the 88.3 average for 76 rated schools in Webb County.The current score is above the 81.6 average for 2,640 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
66%vs 54.8% avg · +11.2 pts
Masters
37%vs 24.2% avg · +12.8 pts
Among 1,533 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
United MS is rated B by TEA, scoring 89 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 82.6 average for 1,581 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 3 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 385th of 1,581 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 53 others).
United MS is rated B by TEA, scoring 89 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 85.7 average for 505 rated schools in Region 01: Edinburg. It is down 3 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 185th of 505 rated schools in Region 01: Edinburg (tied with 32 others).
United MS is rated B by TEA, scoring 89 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 88.3 average for 76 rated schools in Webb County. It is down 3 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 36th of 76 rated schools in Webb County (tied with 3 others).
United MS is rated B by TEA, scoring 89 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.6 average for 2,640 similarly sized rated schools. It is down 3 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 705th of 2,640 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 99 others).
United MS is rated B by TEA, scoring 89 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is down 3 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 94 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement91 A+8.3 vs similar economic context · 1,533 reporting
School Progress91 A+9.2 vs similar economic context · 1,529 reporting
Closing the Gaps83 B+3.1 vs similar economic context · 1,518 reporting
Academic Growth83 B+6.7 vs similar economic context · 1,501 reporting
Relative Performance91 A+11.7 vs similar economic context · 1,529 reporting
United MS
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,581 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
91
A
—
School Progress
91
A
—
Closing the Gaps
83
B
7
Academic Growth
83
B
7
Relative Performance
91
A
—
Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 7 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level85%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,533 reporting
Meets grade level66%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,533 reporting
Masters grade level37%+13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,533 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level88%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,531 reporting
Meets grade level72%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,531 reporting
Masters grade level45%+19 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,531 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level83%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,526 reporting
Meets grade level62%+14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,526 reporting
Masters grade level29%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,526 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level87%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,418 reporting
Meets grade level72%+18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,418 reporting
Masters grade level46%+20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,418 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
Approaches grade level76%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 799 reporting
Meets grade level53%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 799 reporting
Masters grade level31%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 799 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,581 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
998
Economically disadvantaged
46.8%−0.6 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
18.4%+6.0 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
13.3%−5.1 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.2%+0.5 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
10.3%−3.4 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
United MS
African American 0.2%
Hispanic 97.4%
White 1.7%
Asian 0.6%
Two or More Races 0.1%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,581 reporting for every category shown · 1,581 in full cohort
African American 9.3%
Hispanic 39%
White 43.5%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 3.4%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 4.3%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 01: Edinburg · 505 reporting for every category shown · 505 in full cohort
African American 0.2%
Hispanic 97.5%
White 1.9%
Asian 0.3%
Two or More Races 0.1%
Selected comparison averageFor Webb County · 76 reporting for every category shown · 76 in full cohort
African American 0.1%
Hispanic 98.3%
White 1.3%
Asian 0.2%
Two or More Races 0.1%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 2,640 reporting for every category shown · 2,640 in full cohort
African American 12.6%
Hispanic 52%
White 24.5%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 6.7%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.7%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
998
Economically disadvantaged students
467
Emergent bilingual students
184
Special education students
133
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
65
Students in TEA mobility denominator
1,040
TEA-published mobility rate
6.3%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 998 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 1 (0.1%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
998
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
−1
Decrease · −0.1%
Change since 2021–22
−95
Decrease · −8.7%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
998
Selected comparison
667
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,541 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for United MS
School year
Students enrolledUnited MS
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
1,093
First available year
664.2
2022–23
1,092
Decrease of 1 (0.1%)
669.5
2023–24
999
Decrease of 93 (8.5%)
669.7
2024–25
999
No change
666.9
2025–26
998
Decrease of 1 (0.1%)
667
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
68
6.6% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
145
14.08 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
1,030
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
6.6%
Selected comparison
11.8%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,233 rated schools reporting
−5.2 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
14.08
Selected comparison
26
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,323 rated schools reporting
−11.9 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for United MS
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
1,154
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2021–22
1,135
94
8.3%
153
13.48
11.7%
25.5
2022–23
1,116
102
9.1%
211
18.91
12.1%
27
2023–24
1,016
114
11.2%
206
20.28
12.1%
27.6
2024–25
1,030
68
6.6%
145
14.08
11.8%
26
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for United MS in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
68
6.6%
145
14.08
11.8%
26
In-school suspensions
41
4.0%
66
6.41
10.6%
20
Out-of-school suspensions
41
4.0%
67
6.50
5.8%
8.2
DAEP placements
12
1.2%
12
1.17
4.3%
5
Mandatory DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
United MS
Parent district: United ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$8,591
Selected comparison
$11,910
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,551 rated schools reporting
−$3,319 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $8,591 per student for this campus, $14,348 per student for its parent district, United ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
United MS
Parent district: United ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$7,319
$13,187
$13,054
$7,818
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,430 rated schools reporting
2019
$6,958
$12,568
$13,108
$7,999
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,449 rated schools reporting
2020
$6,838
$12,004
$14,058
$8,484
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,461 rated schools reporting
2021
$7,345
$13,076
$14,797
$8,888
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,480 rated schools reporting
2022
$7,600
$15,006
$15,708
$10,146
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,493 rated schools reporting
2023
$7,729
$14,779
$16,792
$10,606
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,510 rated schools reporting
2024
$7,854
$15,029
$18,125
$11,555
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,526 rated schools reporting
2025
$8,591
$14,348
$18,972
$11,910
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,551 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$65,587−$1,508 vs similar economic context
Teachers
57+13.6 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
17.5−2.9 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
United MS
Beginning 1.8%
1 to 5 years 21.1%
6 to 10 years 10.5%
11 to 20 years 33.3%
21 to 30 years 28.1%
Over 30 years 5.3%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,581 reporting for every category shown · 1,581 in full cohort
Beginning 5.5%
1 to 5 years 24%
6 to 10 years 19.4%
11 to 20 years 29.9%
21 to 30 years 16.8%
Over 30 years 4.1%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 01: Edinburg · 505 reporting for every category shown · 505 in full cohort
Beginning 2.7%
1 to 5 years 19.3%
6 to 10 years 16.2%
11 to 20 years 35%
21 to 30 years 22.6%
Over 30 years 4.2%
Selected comparison averageFor Webb County · 76 reporting for every category shown · 76 in full cohort
Beginning 2.5%
1 to 5 years 18.4%
6 to 10 years 16%
11 to 20 years 32.7%
21 to 30 years 25.1%
Over 30 years 5.2%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 2,640 reporting for every category shown · 2,640 in full cohort
Beginning 6.3%
1 to 5 years 27%
6 to 10 years 20.4%
11 to 20 years 28.8%
21 to 30 years 14.6%
Over 30 years 2.7%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for United MS in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classUnited MS · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Grade 6
19.8
17.8
Secondary English
18.8
15.2
Secondary math
18.1
16.2
Secondary science
19.5
17.7
Secondary social studies
18
17.7
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 120 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
2 measures
4of 27
Social Studies — Masters
Webb County · of the 27 that report this measure
8of 27
Social Studies — Meets
Webb County · of the 27 that report this measure
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 240903041.