Districts, charter school systems & campuses · Source: Texas Education Agency
Tyler ISD Early College HSA99vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Traditional public school campus
Tyler ISD Early College HS
Smith County · Region 07: Kilgore · 465 students
Current score
99/1002025-26
Change
+1 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+19.7 ptsvs 79.3 average · 2,033 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
2 of 2,033tied with 7 others
Score vs region
+19.0 ptsvs 80 average · 352 rated schools in Region 07: Kilgore
Region 07: Kilgore placement
1 of 352among reporting schools
Score vs county
+16.6 ptsvs 82.4 average · 59 rated schools in Smith County
Smith County placement
1 of 59among reporting schools
Score vs similar-size group
+18.9 ptsvs 80.1 average · 4,563 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
3 of 4,563tied with 23 others
Score vs state
+17.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
5 of 7,646tied with 29 others
A99
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 98 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 79.3 average for 2,033 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 80 average for 352 rated schools in Region 07: Kilgore.The current score is above the 82.4 average for 59 rated schools in Smith County.The current score is above the 80.1 average for 4,563 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
Current strength
Closing the Gaps above the similar-context average
100+23.4 pts vs 76.6
100 is 23.4 points above
the 76.6 average among 1,899 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
Tied for 1st of 1,899 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure; 11 schools share that value.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Tyler ISD Early College HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 99 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 79.3 average for 2,033 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 2nd of 2,033 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 7 others).
Tyler ISD Early College HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 99 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80 average for 352 rated schools in Region 07: Kilgore. It is up 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 1st of 352 rated schools in Region 07: Kilgore.
Tyler ISD Early College HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 99 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 82.4 average for 59 rated schools in Smith County. It is up 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 1st of 59 rated schools in Smith County.
Tyler ISD Early College HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 99 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.1 average for 4,563 similarly sized rated schools. It is up 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 3rd of 4,563 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 23 others).
Tyler ISD Early College HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 99 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is up 1 point since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 98 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement98 A+21.5 vs similar economic context · 1,920 reporting
School Progress98 A+17.6 vs similar economic context · 1,913 reporting
Closing the Gaps100 A+23.4 vs similar economic context · 1,899 reporting
Academic Growth82 B+8.6 vs similar economic context · 1,853 reporting
Relative Performance98 A+19.3 vs similar economic context · 1,913 reporting
Tyler ISD Early College HS
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,033 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
98
A
—
School Progress
98
A
—
Closing the Gaps
100
A
—
Academic Growth
82
B
8
Relative Performance
98
A
—
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level99%+26 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,920 reporting
Meets grade level89%+42 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,920 reporting
Masters grade level43%+24 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,920 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level99%+24 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,918 reporting
Meets grade level94%+43 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,918 reporting
Masters grade level29%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,918 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level98%+28 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,910 reporting
Meets grade level70%+29 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,910 reporting
Masters grade level29%+13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,910 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level100%+28 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,768 reporting
Meets grade level97%+53 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,768 reporting
Masters grade level67%+48 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,768 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
Approaches grade level100%+27 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 911 reporting
Meets grade level90%+45 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 911 reporting
Masters grade level62%+42 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 911 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,033 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Graduation
Four-Year
98.9%+5.4 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 446 rated schools reporting
Five-Year
100.0%+6.7 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 444 rated schools reporting
Six-Year
100.0%+7.6 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 444 rated schools reporting
Dropout Rate
0.0%−0.8 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 449 rated schools reporting
These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only schools in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported school rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.
College, career and military readiness
Total credit for CCMR criteria
100.0%+12.4 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
Criterion
This school% of graduates
Averagesimilar economic context
Differencepercentage points
Reportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria
100.0%
87.6%
+12.4
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 480 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course
60.4%
59.4%
+1.0
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 484 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA
60.4%
27.0%
+33.4
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 484 rated schools reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)
39.6%
11.1%
+28.5
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 484 rated schools reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course
100.0%
33.8%
+66.2
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 484 rated schools reporting
Earned an industry-based certification
0.0%
37.3%
−37.3
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 484 rated schools reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate
0.0%
2.0%
−2.0
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 484 rated schools reporting
Earned an associate degree
98.9%
7.2%
+91.7
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 484 rated schools reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit
0.0%
4.1%
−4.1
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 484 rated schools reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness
0.0%
3.3%
−3.3
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 484 rated schools reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student
0.0%
8.3%
−8.3
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 484 rated schools reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces
7.7%
3.1%
+4.6
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 484 rated schools reporting
Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of
meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this
school minus the average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate,
counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that
criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported school percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
After high school: the following fall
Where school graduates appeared in Texas public higher-education records the fall after graduation. This is a limited next-step measure, not an eventual college-going or completion rate.
Graduates in the report
99
Class of 2023–24
Enrolled in Texas public higher education
71
71.7% of graduates
Not found in Texas public higher-ed records
25
25.3% of graduates
Not trackable
3
Fall 2024
Graduates in the report
This school
99
Selected comparison
247
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 389 rated schools reporting
Enrolled in Texas public higher education
This school
71
Selected comparison
108.3
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 389 rated schools reporting
Texas-public enrollment rate
This school
71.7%
Selected comparison
43.9%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 389 rated schools reporting
+27.8 pts vs similar economic context
Not-found rate
This school
25.3%
Selected comparison
50.6%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 389 rated schools reporting
−25.3 pts vs similar economic context
Not-trackable rate
This school
3.0%
Selected comparison
5.6%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 389 rated schools reporting
−2.6 pts vs similar economic context
Most common named Texas public destinations
U. OF TEXAS AT TYLER (011163)46
TYLER JUNIOR COLLEGE (003648)12
Selected comparison counts are neutral cohort scale context. The percentages put differently sized graduating classes on the same basis, but still cover only the limited Texas-public system observed by this report.
Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, high-school graduates enrolled in higher education, fetched 24 August 2026. The report covers graduates who enrolled in a Texas public college or university the following fall and includes only districts or campuses with more than 25 graduates.
“Not found” does not mean a graduate did not continue their education. It can include private or out-of-state college, work, military service, enrollment after the fall term, or another path the Texas public system does not observe.
“Not trackable” is not an outcome. THECB uses it for graduates with a non-standard identifier that could not be matched to higher-education records.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
465
Economically disadvantaged
68.6%±0.0 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
8.8%−11.1 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
1.5%−17.3 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
96.8%+2.8 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
4.9%−12.6 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Tyler ISD Early College HS
African American 15.9%
Hispanic 58.3%
White 20%
American Indian 0.4%
Asian 2.6%
Two or More Races 2.8%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,033 reporting for every category shown · 2,033 in full cohort
African American 12.1%
Hispanic 55.4%
White 26.3%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 2.1%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.5%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 07: Kilgore · 352 reporting for every category shown · 352 in full cohort
African American 13.6%
Hispanic 28.4%
White 52.2%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 0.8%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 4.7%
Selected comparison averageFor Smith County · 59 reporting for every category shown · 59 in full cohort
African American 17.9%
Hispanic 35.7%
White 40.6%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 1.3%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 4.2%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,563 reporting for every category shown · 4,563 in full cohort
African American 12%
Hispanic 55.1%
White 25.3%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 3.8%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
465
Economically disadvantaged students
319
Emergent bilingual students
41
Special education students
7
Early college pathways
Early College High School
465
TEA-published share: 100%
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
13
Students in TEA mobility denominator
451
TEA-published mobility rate
2.9%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 465 students in 2025–26, an increase of 18 (4.0%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
465
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
+18
Increase · +4.0%
Change since 2021–22
+93
Increase · +25.0%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
465
Selected comparison
640.6
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,997 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Tyler ISD Early College HS
School year
Students enrolledTyler ISD Early College HS
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
372
First available year
653.8
2022–23
402
Increase of 30 (8.1%)
660.4
2023–24
444
Increase of 42 (10.4%)
659.3
2024–25
447
Increase of 3 (0.7%)
656.6
2025–26
465
Increase of 18 (4.0%)
640.6
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Suppressed
Rate not available
Disciplinary actions
Suppressed
Rate not available
Cumulative year-end enrollment
444
2024–25
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Tyler ISD Early College HS
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
370
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2021–22
350
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2022–23
387
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2023–24
429
Suppressed
—
11
2.56
—
32.3
2024–25
444
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Tyler ISD Early College HS in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
In-school suspensions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Out-of-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Tyler ISD Early College HS
Parent district: Tyler ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$6,765
Selected comparison
$13,239
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,011 rated schools reporting
−$6,474 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $6,765 per student for this campus, $14,333 per student for its parent district, Tyler ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Tyler ISD Early College HS
Parent district: Tyler ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$5,612
$12,660
$13,054
$8,014
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,874 rated schools reporting
2019
$5,539
$16,047
$13,108
$8,185
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,891 rated schools reporting
2020
$6,118
$14,755
$14,058
$8,725
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,911 rated schools reporting
2021
$5,535
$15,099
$14,797
$9,213
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,924 rated schools reporting
2022
$10,041
$14,624
$15,708
$10,483
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,947 rated schools reporting
2023
$39,894
$16,225
$16,792
$11,198
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,969 rated schools reporting
2024
$27,150
$16,622
$18,125
$12,401
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,996 rated schools reporting
2025
$6,765
$14,333
$18,972
$13,239
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,011 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$68,574+$2,096 vs similar economic context
Teachers
23−20.6 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
20.5+6.6 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Tyler ISD Early College HS
Beginning 3.1%
1 to 5 years 4.4%
6 to 10 years 35.2%
11 to 20 years 22%
21 to 30 years 22%
Over 30 years 13.2%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,033 reporting for every category shown · 2,033 in full cohort
Beginning 6.4%
1 to 5 years 26.8%
6 to 10 years 19%
11 to 20 years 27.7%
21 to 30 years 15.5%
Over 30 years 3.9%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 07: Kilgore · 352 reporting for every category shown · 352 in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 24.6%
6 to 10 years 17.7%
11 to 20 years 28%
21 to 30 years 17.3%
Over 30 years 6%
Selected comparison averageFor Smith County · 59 reporting for every category shown · 59 in full cohort
Beginning 7.5%
1 to 5 years 28%
6 to 10 years 18.3%
11 to 20 years 27%
21 to 30 years 15.3%
Over 30 years 3.8%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,563 reporting for every category shown · 4,563 in full cohort
Beginning 6.1%
1 to 5 years 26%
6 to 10 years 19.3%
11 to 20 years 28.9%
21 to 30 years 16%
Over 30 years 3.3%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Tyler ISD Early College HS in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classTyler ISD Early College HS · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Secondary English
16.6
15.2
Secondary languages other than English
14.5
17.8
Secondary math
14.4
16.1
Secondary science
16.2
17.4
Secondary social studies
12.6
17.4
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 200 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#1 rankings
First-place results
24 measures
1of 7,185
Closing the Gaps
Texas average · of the 7,185 that report this measure · tied with 39 · full ranking
1of 3,926
Science — Approaches
Similar size · of the 3,926 that report this measure · tied with 62
1of 1,920
Student Achievement
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,920 that report this measure · tied with 12
1of 1,913
Relative Performance
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,913 that report this measure · tied with 11
1of 484
Earned an associate degree
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 484 that report this measure
1of 352
Overall score
Region 07: Kilgore · of the 352 that report this measure
1of 314
School Progress
Region 07: Kilgore · of the 314 that report this measure
1of 281
Science — Meets
Region 07: Kilgore · of the 281 that report this measure
1of 101
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)
Region 07: Kilgore · of the 101 that report this measure
1of 101
Earned college credit for a dual credit course
Region 07: Kilgore · of the 101 that report this measure
1of 55
All Subjects — Approaches
Smith County · of the 55 that report this measure
1of 55
All Subjects — Meets
Smith County · of the 55 that report this measure
1of 55
Reading — Approaches
Smith County · of the 55 that report this measure
1of 55
Reading — Meets
Smith County · of the 55 that report this measure
1of 55
Math — Approaches
Smith County · of the 55 that report this measure · tied with 1
1of 48
Science — Masters
Smith County · of the 48 that report this measure
1of 24
Social Studies — Approaches
Smith County · of the 24 that report this measure · tied with 1
1of 24
Social Studies — Meets
Smith County · of the 24 that report this measure
1of 24
Social Studies — Masters
Smith County · of the 24 that report this measure
1of 11
College, career or military ready
Smith County · of the 11 that report this measure
1of 11
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA
Smith County · of the 11 that report this measure
1of 11
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces
Smith County · of the 11 that report this measure
1of 10
Five-Year Graduation Rate
Smith County (standard accountability only) · of the 10 that report this measure · tied with 2
1of 10
Six-Year Graduation Rate
Smith County (standard accountability only) · of the 10 that report this measure · tied with 2
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
3 measures
3of 57
Attendance
Smith County · of the 57 that report this measure
3of 57
Chronically absent (lowest is best)
Smith County · of the 57 that report this measure
3of 10
Four-Year Graduation Rate
Smith County (standard accountability only) · of the 10 that report this measure
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
4 measures
5of 11
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course
Smith County · of the 11 that report this measure
7of 55
All Subjects — Masters
Smith County · of the 55 that report this measure
8of 55
Math — Meets
Smith County · of the 55 that report this measure
9of 11
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student
Smith County · of the 11 that report this measure · tied with 2
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 212905006.