Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Tuloso-Midway MS

Nueces County · Region 02: Corpus Christi · 920 students

Current score
85/1002025-26
Change
+3 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+3.8 ptsvs 81.2 average · 1,860 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
662 of 1,860tied with 65 others
B85

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 83 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 81.2 average for 1,860 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

STAAR result

Science above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
62%vs 49.9% avg · +12.1 pts
Masters
30%vs 23% avg · +7 pts

Among 1,638 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Current strength

Overall score above the similar-context average

85 +3.8 pts vs 81.2

  • 85 is 3.8 points above the 81.2 average among 1,860 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Current strength

Closing the Gaps above the similar-context average

85 +6.6 pts vs 78.4

  • 85 is 6.6 points above the 78.4 average among 1,766 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Tuloso-Midway MS is rated B by TEA, scoring 85 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.2 average for 1,860 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 3 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 662nd of 1,860 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 65 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageTuloso-Midway MS 8290848785 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 83 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26B8581.2 1,860 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25B8781.2 1,835 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24B8479.2 1,807 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23A9079.9 1,775 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22B8282.7 1,748 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement82 B+1.7 vs similar economic context · 1,789 reporting
  • School Progress85 B+3.6 vs similar economic context · 1,781 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps85 B+6.6 vs similar economic context · 1,766 reporting
  • Academic Growth79 C+4.2 vs similar economic context · 1,734 reporting
  • Relative Performance85 B+5.5 vs similar economic context · 1,781 reporting
  • Tuloso-Midway MS
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,860 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement82B8
School Progress85B5
Closing the Gaps85B5
Academic Growth79C1
Relative Performance85B5

Closest to moving up: School Progress, 5 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (85), so Student Achievement (82) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 85.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level80%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,789 reporting
  • Meets grade level51%−0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,789 reporting
  • Masters grade level21%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,789 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level80%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,786 reporting
  • Meets grade level54%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,786 reporting
  • Masters grade level25%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,786 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level82%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,776 reporting
  • Meets grade level48%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,776 reporting
  • Masters grade level16%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,776 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level82%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,638 reporting
  • Meets grade level62%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,638 reporting
  • Masters grade level30%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,638 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level71%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 932 reporting
  • Meets grade level44%−4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 932 reporting
  • Masters grade level20%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 932 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,860 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
920
Economically disadvantaged
55.8%−0.5 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
4.6%−9.8 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
15.0%−3.8 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
93.3%−1.1 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
23.4%+8.1 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Tuloso-Midway MS

African American: 0.5%Hispanic: 84%White: 13.9%Asian: 0.3%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 1%
  • African American 0.5%
  • Hispanic 84%
  • White 13.9%
  • Asian 0.3%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 1%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,860 reporting for every category shown · 1,860 in full cohort

African American: 10%Hispanic: 45%White: 37.9%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 2.5%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 4%
  • African American 10%
  • Hispanic 45%
  • White 37.9%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 2.5%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 4%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
920
Economically disadvantaged students
513
Emergent bilingual students
42
Special education students
138

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
87
Students in TEA mobility denominator
912
TEA-published mobility rate
9.5%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 920 students in 2025–26, an increase of 44 (5.0%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
920

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
+44

Increase · +5.0%

Change since 2021–22
+62

Increase · +7.2%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
920
Selected comparison
636.2

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,822 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Tuloso-Midway MS
School yearStudents enrolledTuloso-Midway MSChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 858 First available year 640.8
2022–23 801 Decrease of 57 (6.6%) 646.6
2023–24 825 Increase of 24 (3.0%) 645
2024–25 876 Increase of 51 (6.2%) 641.4
2025–26 920 Increase of 44 (5.0%) 636.2

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
178

19.5% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
365

40.07 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
911

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
19.5%
Selected comparison
12.5%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,434 rated schools reporting

+7.0 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
40.07
Selected comparison
28.1

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,552 rated schools reporting

+12.0 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Tuloso-Midway MS
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 980 123 12.6% 267 27.24 9.7% 18.9
2021–22 912 178 19.5% 365 40.02 12.5% 28.2
2022–23 858 165 19.2% 375 43.71 12.9% 29.8
2023–24 885 161 18.2% 342 38.64 12.8% 29.9
2024–25 911 178 19.5% 365 40.07 12.5% 28.1
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Tuloso-Midway MS in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 178 19.5% 365 40.07 12.5% 28.1
In-school suspensions 157 17.2% 247 27.11 11.3% 21.9
Out-of-school suspensions 56 6.2% 67 7.35 6.4% 9.1
DAEP placements 44 4.8% 51 5.60 4.7% 5.6
Mandatory DAEP placements 22 2.4% 23 2.52 3.3% 3.9
Discretionary DAEP placements 27 3.0% 28 3.07 2.7% 3.1
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$7k$13k$20k20182020202220242025
  • Tuloso-Midway MS
  • Parent district: Tuloso-Midway ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$9,996
Selected comparison
$12,290

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,832 rated schools reporting

−$2,294 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $9,996 per student for this campus, $17,922 per student for its parent district, Tuloso-Midway ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearTuloso-Midway MSParent district: Tuloso-Midway ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$7,356$12,578$13,054$7,930 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,683 rated schools reporting
2019$7,552$12,247$13,108$8,095 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,699 rated schools reporting
2020$8,588$12,432$14,058$8,671 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,717 rated schools reporting
2021$8,233$12,445$14,797$9,046 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,733 rated schools reporting
2022$8,261$13,873$15,708$10,461 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,750 rated schools reporting
2023$10,033$17,806$16,792$10,924 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,775 rated schools reporting
2024$9,465$18,136$18,125$11,756 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,804 rated schools reporting
2025$9,996$17,922$18,972$12,290 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,832 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$67,747+$1,211 vs similar economic context
Teachers
58+15.7 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
15.9−3.4 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Tuloso-Midway MS

1 to 5 years: 28.8%6 to 10 years: 15.9%11 to 20 years: 34.3%21 to 30 years: 17.3%Over 30 years: 3.8%
  • 1 to 5 years 28.8%
  • 6 to 10 years 15.9%
  • 11 to 20 years 34.3%
  • 21 to 30 years 17.3%
  • Over 30 years 3.8%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,860 reporting for every category shown · 1,860 in full cohort

Beginning: 5.8%1 to 5 years: 24.9%6 to 10 years: 19.4%11 to 20 years: 28.7%21 to 30 years: 16.4%Over 30 years: 4.4%
  • Beginning 5.8%
  • 1 to 5 years 24.9%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.4%
  • 11 to 20 years 28.7%
  • 21 to 30 years 16.4%
  • Over 30 years 4.4%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Tuloso-Midway MS in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classTuloso-Midway MS · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Grade 622.217.6
Secondary English1914.9
Secondary languages other than English17.517.4
Secondary math20.315.8
Secondary science20.317.3
Secondary social studies20.317.2

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 178912041.