Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Open-enrollment charter campus · Alternative Education Accountability

Triumph Public High Schools-San Benito

Triumph Public High Schools-Rio Grande Valley · San Benito · 110 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
91/1002025-26
Change
+3 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+10.7 ptsvs 80.3 average · 353 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
59 of 353tied with 13 others
A91

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 100 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 80.3 average for 353 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Recent movement

Overall score rose 2 points

89 to 91 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 91 is 10.7 points above the 80.3 average among 353 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Recent domain gain

Academic Growth rose 21 points

72 to 93 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 93 is 19.9 points above the 73.1 average among 337 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Current strength

Relative Performance above the similar-context average

96 +16.5 pts vs 79.5

  • 96 is 16.5 points above the 79.5 average among 349 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
  • Tied for 1st of 349 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure; 7 charter campuses share that value.
See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Triumph Public High Schools-San Benito is rated A by TEA, scoring 91 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.3 average for 353 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context. It is up 3 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 59th of 353 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context (tied with 13 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this school ranks best
  12. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas charter averageTriumph Public High Schools-San Benito 8889888991 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 100 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas charter average
2025-26A9180.3 353 reporting81.7 829 reporting
2024-25B8978.9 347 reporting81.3 797 reporting
2023-24B8876.6 339 reporting79.5 776 reporting
2022-23B8975.9 329 reporting79.6 749 reporting
2021-22B8883.5 310 reporting84.5 700 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement91 A+16.7 vs similar economic context · 353 reporting
  • School Progress96 A+14.7 vs similar economic context · 353 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps78 C+1.0 vs similar economic context · 347 reporting
  • Academic Growth93 A+19.9 vs similar economic context · 337 reporting
  • Relative Performance96 A+16.5 vs similar economic context · 349 reporting
  • Triumph Public High Schools-San Benito
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (353 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement91A—
School Progress96A—
Closing the Gaps78C2
Academic Growth93A—
Relative Performance96A—

Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 2 points below B in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (96), so Student Achievement (91) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 96.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level82%+14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 353 reporting
  • Meets grade level45%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 353 reporting
  • Masters grade level7%−8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 353 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level73%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 353 reporting
  • Meets grade level47%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 353 reporting
  • Masters grade level3%−13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 353 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level81%+14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 351 reporting
  • Meets grade level19%−16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 351 reporting
  • Masters grade level4%−9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 351 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level82%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 331 reporting
  • Meets grade level41%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 331 reporting
  • Masters grade level6%−9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 331 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level100%+31 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 223 reporting
  • Meets grade level63%+25 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 223 reporting
  • Masters grade level17%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 223 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (353 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Completion

Four-Year
56.6%+8.0 pts vs similar economic context average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 42 rated charter campuses reporting
Five-Year
90.3%+35.0 pts vs similar economic context average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 42 rated charter campuses reporting
Six-Year
93.8%+35.9 pts vs similar economic context average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 42 rated charter campuses reporting
Dropout Rate
1.4%−9.6 pts vs similar economic context average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 42 rated charter campuses reporting

These measures use TEA's alternative-education accountability population. Each comparison average includes only charter campuses in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported charter campus rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.

College, career and military readiness

Total credit for CCMR criteria
52.0%−31.0 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
CriterionThis school% of graduatesAveragesimilar economic contextDifferencepercentage pointsReportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria52.0%83.0%−31.0 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 122 rated charter campuses reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course2.0%66.0%−64.0 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 123 rated charter campuses reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA2.0%33.7%−31.7 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 123 rated charter campuses reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)10.0%28.8%−18.8 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 123 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course0.0%10.0%−10.0 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 123 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned an industry-based certification30.0%14.7%+15.3 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 123 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate0.0%0.4%−0.4 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 123 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned an associate degree0.0%1.8%−1.8 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 123 rated charter campuses reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit0.0%4.1%−4.1 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 123 rated charter campuses reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness4.0%2.1%+1.9 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 123 rated charter campuses reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student4.0%8.6%−4.6 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 123 rated charter campuses reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces6.0%1.9%+4.1 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 123 rated charter campuses reporting

Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this school minus the average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate, counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported charter campus percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only charter campuses for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
110
Economically disadvantaged
93.6%+2.4 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
30.0%−14.5 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
17.3%+4.6 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
85.1%−7.6 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
61.0%+37.0 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Triumph Public High Schools-San Benito

Hispanic: 97.3%White: 2.7%
  • Hispanic 97.3%
  • White 2.7%

Selected comparison average For charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 353 reporting for every category shown · 353 in full cohort

African American: 18.2%Hispanic: 75.4%White: 3.3%American Indian: 0.2%Asian: 1.5%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 1.3%
  • African American 18.2%
  • Hispanic 75.4%
  • White 3.3%
  • American Indian 0.2%
  • Asian 1.5%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 1.3%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
110
Economically disadvantaged students
103
Emergent bilingual students
33
Special education students
19

TEA context labels

  • Alternative education campus under AEA procedures
  • Alternative education type: dropout recovery school
  • Rated under AEA procedures

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
177
Students in TEA mobility denominator
243
TEA-published mobility rate
72.8%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 110 students in 2025–26, an increase of 2 (1.9%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
110

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
+2

Increase · +1.9%

Change since 2021–22
−27

Decrease · −19.7%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
110
Selected comparison
514.5

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 351 rated charter campuses reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Triumph Public High Schools-San Benito
School yearStudents enrolledTriumph Public High Schools-San BenitoChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 137 First available year 485.3
2022–23 113 Decrease of 24 (17.5%) 501.2
2023–24 107 Decrease of 6 (5.3%) 512.3
2024–25 108 Increase of 1 (0.9%) 514.8
2025–26 110 Increase of 2 (1.9%) 514.5

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting charter campuses in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Not reported

Rate not available

Disciplinary actions
Not reported

Rate not available

Cumulative year-end enrollment
238

2024–25

TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Triumph Public High Schools-San Benito
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 214 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2021–22 209 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2022–23 187 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2023–24 201 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2024–25 238 Not reported — Not reported — — —
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Triumph Public High Schools-San Benito in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline Not reported — Not reported — — —
In-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Out-of-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized charter campuses can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$6k$13k$20k20182020202220242025
  • Triumph Public High Schools-San Benito
  • Parent district: Triumph Public High Schools-Rio Grande Valley
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$12,278
Selected comparison
$12,013

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 350 rated charter campuses reporting

+$265 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $12,278 per student for this campus, $15,259 per student for its parent district, Triumph Public High Schools-Rio Grande Valley, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearTriumph Public High Schools-San BenitoParent district: Triumph Public High Schools-Rio Grande ValleyTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$8,037$10,576$13,054$8,619 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 210 rated charter campuses reporting
2019$8,956$12,856$13,108$8,615 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 265 rated charter campuses reporting
2020$6,697$9,957$14,058$9,246 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 281 rated charter campuses reporting
2021$7,797$10,538$14,797$9,663 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 304 rated charter campuses reporting
2022$10,648$13,006$15,708$11,611 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 322 rated charter campuses reporting
2023$12,137$13,384$16,792$11,579 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 331 rated charter campuses reporting
2024$12,967$14,692$18,125$11,596 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 340 rated charter campuses reporting
2025$12,278$15,259$18,972$12,013 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 350 rated charter campuses reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$54,053−$10,105 vs similar economic context
Teachers
6−23.5 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
18.3+0.5 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Triumph Public High Schools-San Benito

1 to 5 years: 50%6 to 10 years: 50%
  • 1 to 5 years 50%
  • 6 to 10 years 50%

Selected comparison average For charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 353 reporting for every category shown · 353 in full cohort

Beginning: 13.1%1 to 5 years: 47.4%6 to 10 years: 19.8%11 to 20 years: 14.6%21 to 30 years: 4.3%Over 30 years: 0.8%
  • Beginning 13.1%
  • 1 to 5 years 47.4%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.8%
  • 11 to 20 years 14.6%
  • 21 to 30 years 4.3%
  • Over 30 years 0.8%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Triumph Public High Schools-San Benito in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classTriumph Public High Schools-San Benito · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Secondary English4.218.8
Secondary languages other than English3.717.8
Secondary math3.219.3
Secondary science4.220
Secondary social studies5.720.2

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 120 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#1 rankings

First-place results

1 measure

  • 1of 349

    Relative Performance

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 349 that report this measure · tied with 6

#2–3 rankings

Second- and third-place results

1 measure

  • 2of 353

    School Progress

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 353 that report this measure · tied with 6

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

5 measures

  • 7of 337

    Academic Growth

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 337 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 7of 87

    Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)

    Similar size · of the 87 that report this measure

  • 7of 87

    Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces

    Similar size · of the 87 that report this measure

  • 9of 87

    Earned an industry-based certification

    Similar size · of the 87 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 10of 42

    Five-Year Completion Rate

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate (alternative-education accountability only) · of the 42 that report this measure

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 108804003.