+15.8 ptsvs 81.2 average · 267 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
2 of 267tied with 4 others
Score vs similar-size group
+14.6 ptsvs 82.4 average · 129 similarly sized rated charter campuses
Similar size placement
1 of 129tied with 2 others
Score vs state
+15.3 ptsvs 81.7 average · 829 rated Texas charter campuses
Texas charter placement
9 of 829tied with 13 others
A97
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 87 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 81.2 average for 267 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 82.4 average for 129 similarly sized rated charter campuses.The current score is above the 81.7 average for 829 rated Texas charter campuses.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
Recent movement
Overall score rose 27 points
70 to 972024-25 to 2025-26
97 is 15.8 points above
the 81.2 average among 267 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
Tied for 2nd of 267 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure; 5 charter campuses share that value.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Triumph Public High Schools-Laredo North is rated A by TEA, scoring 97 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.2 average for 267 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context. It is up 4 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 2nd of 267 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context (tied with 4 others).
Triumph Public High Schools-Laredo North is rated A by TEA, scoring 97 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 82.4 average for 129 similarly sized rated charter campuses. It is up 4 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 1st of 129 similarly sized rated charter campuses (tied with 2 others).
Triumph Public High Schools-Laredo North is rated A by TEA, scoring 97 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.7 average for 829 rated Texas charter campuses. It is up 4 points since 2021-22.
Official state and federal designations can carry support, reporting requirements or a family transfer option that a single A–F rating does not explain.
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 267 rated charter campuses reporting
Schools on the PEG list
This school
Not listed
Selected comparison
0.0%
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 267 rated charter campuses reporting
Selected comparison percentages are the share of reporting schools in that group found on each dated list. They are neutral prevalence context; changing the comparison never changes this school's official status.
These are dated TEA statuses, fetched 24 August 2026; they are not added to or subtracted from this site's rating.
5 years of ratings
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 87 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement94 A+16.7 vs similar economic context · 267 reporting
School Progress100 A+17.9 vs similar economic context · 266 reporting
Closing the Gaps91 A+13.2 vs similar economic context · 261 reporting
Academic Growth100 A+26.5 vs similar economic context · 250 reporting
Relative Performance91 A+10.5 vs similar economic context · 264 reporting
Triumph Public High Schools-Laredo North
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (267 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
94
A
—
School Progress
100
A
—
Closing the Gaps
91
A
—
Academic Growth
100
A
—
Relative Performance
91
A
—
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (100), so
Student Achievement (94) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 100.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level74%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 267 reporting
Meets grade level23%−19 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 267 reporting
Masters grade level3%−13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 267 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level65%−7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 267 reporting
Meets grade level19%−28 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 267 reporting
Masters grade level0%−17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 267 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level82%+14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 266 reporting
Meets grade level18%−17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 266 reporting
Masters grade level6%−7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 266 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level86%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 260 reporting
Meets grade level43%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 260 reporting
Masters grade level7%−8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 260 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
Approaches grade level86%+13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 182 reporting
Meets grade level25%−16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 182 reporting
Masters grade level7%−11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 182 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (267 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Completion
Four-Year
67.6%+19.4 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 44 rated charter campuses reporting
Five-Year
75.0%+18.3 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 44 rated charter campuses reporting
Six-Year
85.7%+29.0 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 44 rated charter campuses reporting
Dropout Rate
0.6%−10.5 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 44 rated charter campuses reporting
These measures use TEA's alternative-education accountability population. Each comparison average includes only charter campuses in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported charter campus rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.
College, career and military readiness
Total credit for CCMR criteria
91.0%+8.1 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
Criterion
This school% of graduates
Averagesimilar economic context
Differencepercentage points
Reportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria
91.0%
82.9%
+8.1
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 113 rated charter campuses reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course
2.3%
70.5%
−68.2
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 114 rated charter campuses reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA
0.0%
37.0%
−37.0
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 114 rated charter campuses reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)
15.9%
25.8%
−9.9
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 114 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course
4.5%
14.7%
−10.2
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 114 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned an industry-based certification
75.0%
13.0%
+62.0
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 114 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate
0.0%
0.3%
−0.3
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 114 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned an associate degree
0.0%
1.4%
−1.4
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 114 rated charter campuses reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit
0.0%
4.3%
−4.3
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 114 rated charter campuses reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness
0.0%
1.2%
−1.2
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 114 rated charter campuses reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student
11.4%
7.1%
+4.3
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 114 rated charter campuses reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces
0.0%
1.9%
−1.9
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 114 rated charter campuses reporting
Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of
meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this
school minus the average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate,
counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that
criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported charter campus percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only charter campuses for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
105
Economically disadvantaged
75.2%−2.3 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
61.9%+28.9 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
11.4%−1.5 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
89.3%−3.0 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
49.0%+23.7 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Triumph Public High Schools-Laredo North
Hispanic 100%
Selected comparison averageFor charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 267 reporting for every category shown · 267 in full cohort
African American 19.1%
Hispanic 68.4%
White 7.5%
American Indian 0.2%
Asian 2.5%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.2%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized charter campuses · 129 reporting for every category shown · 129 in full cohort
African American 17.3%
Hispanic 61.9%
White 15.1%
American Indian 0.2%
Asian 2.1%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.2%
Texas charter average829 reporting for every category shown · 829 Texas charter campuses in full cohort
African American 17.5%
Hispanic 61.8%
White 12.2%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.5%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.5%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
105
Economically disadvantaged students
79
Emergent bilingual students
65
Special education students
12
TEA context labels
Alternative education campus under AEA procedures
Alternative education type: dropout recovery school
Rated under AEA procedures
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
136
Students in TEA mobility denominator
211
TEA-published mobility rate
64.5%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 105 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 26 (19.8%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
105
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
−26
Decrease · −19.8%
Change since 2021–22
−5
Decrease · −4.5%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
105
Selected comparison
502.5
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 267 rated charter campuses reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Triumph Public High Schools-Laredo North
School year
Students enrolledTriumph Public High Schools-Laredo North
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
110
First available year
493.5
2022–23
125
Increase of 15 (13.6%)
507.6
2023–24
148
Increase of 23 (18.4%)
505
2024–25
131
Decrease of 17 (11.5%)
506.9
2025–26
105
Decrease of 26 (19.8%)
502.5
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting charter campuses in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Not reported
Rate not available
Disciplinary actions
Not reported
Rate not available
Cumulative year-end enrollment
206
2024–25
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Triumph Public High Schools-Laredo North
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
186
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
2021–22
202
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
2022–23
234
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
2023–24
236
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
2024–25
206
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Triumph Public High Schools-Laredo North in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
In-school suspensions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Out-of-school suspensions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized charter campuses can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Triumph Public High Schools-Laredo North
Parent district: Triumph Public High Schools Central Texas
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$12,369
Selected comparison
$11,435
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 260 rated charter campuses reporting
+$934 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $12,369 per student for this campus, $16,658 per student for its parent district, Triumph Public High Schools Central Texas, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Triumph Public High Schools-Laredo North
Parent district: Triumph Public High Schools Central Texas
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$11,076
$12,974
$13,054
$8,212
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 184 rated charter campuses reporting
2019
$11,175
$13,027
$13,108
$8,615
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 199 rated charter campuses reporting
2020
$14,388
$14,990
$14,058
$9,337
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 213 rated charter campuses reporting
2021
$12,004
$14,291
$14,797
$9,289
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 232 rated charter campuses reporting
2022
$16,587
$21,036
$15,708
$10,694
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 240 rated charter campuses reporting
2023
$12,079
$17,280
$16,792
$11,032
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 246 rated charter campuses reporting
2024
$11,764
$17,411
$18,125
$11,520
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 252 rated charter campuses reporting
2025
$12,369
$16,658
$18,972
$11,435
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 260 rated charter campuses reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$53,842−$8,659 vs similar economic context
Teachers
5−24.4 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
21+2.7 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Triumph Public High Schools-Laredo North
1 to 5 years 40%
11 to 20 years 20%
21 to 30 years 40%
Selected comparison averageFor charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 267 reporting for every category shown · 267 in full cohort
Beginning 12.8%
1 to 5 years 46.6%
6 to 10 years 20%
11 to 20 years 15.3%
21 to 30 years 4.5%
Over 30 years 0.7%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized charter campuses · 129 reporting for every category shown · 129 in full cohort
Beginning 14.1%
1 to 5 years 42.7%
6 to 10 years 18.5%
11 to 20 years 16.6%
21 to 30 years 5.8%
Over 30 years 1.5%
Texas charter average829 reporting for every category shown · 829 Texas charter campuses in full cohort
Beginning 13%
1 to 5 years 44.3%
6 to 10 years 19.6%
11 to 20 years 15.4%
21 to 30 years 4.8%
Over 30 years 0.9%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Triumph Public High Schools-Laredo North in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classTriumph Public High Schools-Laredo North · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Secondary English
4.6
17.6
Secondary languages other than English
3.7
17.1
Secondary math
4.4
17.7
Secondary science
5.2
18.4
Secondary social studies
6
18.8
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 120 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#1 rankings
First-place results
3 measures
1of 823
School Progress
Texas charter average · of the 823 that report this measure · tied with 1 · full ranking
1of 784
Academic Growth
Texas charter average · of the 784 that report this measure · tied with 1
1of 129
Overall score
Similar size · of the 129 that report this measure · tied with 2
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
1 measure
3of 114
Earned an industry-based certification
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 114 that report this measure · tied with 1
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
3 measures
4of 83
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)
Similar size · of the 83 that report this measure
7of 44
Dropout Rate (lowest is best)
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (alternative-education accountability only) · of the 44 that report this measure
10of 267
Student Achievement
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 267 that report this measure · tied with 3
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 240801001.