Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Open-enrollment charter campus · Alternative Education Accountability

Triumph Public High Schools-El Paso East

Triumph Public High Schools-West Texas · El Paso · 120 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
87/1002025-26
Change
−7 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+6.6 ptsvs 80.4 average · 338 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
108 of 338tied with 15 others
B87

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 100 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 80.4 average for 338 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Recent movement

Overall score rose 6 points

81 to 87 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 87 is 6.6 points above the 80.4 average among 338 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Current strength

School Progress above the similar-context average

92 +10.6 pts vs 81.4

  • 92 is 10.6 points above the 81.4 average among 338 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Triumph Public High Schools-El Paso East is rated B by TEA, scoring 87 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.4 average for 338 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context. It is down 7 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 108th of 338 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context (tied with 15 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. After high school: the following fall
  6. Who this school serves
  7. Student counts behind the percentages
  8. Enrollment over time
  9. Discipline and removal from class
  10. Spending per student
  11. Teachers and actual class size
  12. Where this school ranks best
  13. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas charter averageTriumph Public High Schools-El Paso East 9490948187 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 100 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas charter average
2025-26B8780.4 338 reporting81.7 829 reporting
2024-25B8178.7 332 reporting81.3 797 reporting
2023-24A9476.5 324 reporting79.5 776 reporting
2022-23A9075.9 314 reporting79.6 749 reporting
2021-22A9483.6 296 reporting84.5 700 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement90 A+15.7 vs similar economic context · 338 reporting
  • School Progress92 A+10.6 vs similar economic context · 338 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps75 C−2.1 vs similar economic context · 333 reporting
  • Academic Growth—Not reported · similar economic context 73.4 · 323 reporting
  • Relative Performance92 A+12.5 vs similar economic context · 334 reporting
  • Triumph Public High Schools-El Paso East
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (338 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement90A—
School Progress92A—
Closing the Gaps75C5
Academic Growth—Not rated—
Relative Performance92A—

Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 5 points below B in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (92), so Student Achievement (90) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 92.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level70%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 338 reporting
  • Meets grade level31%−10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 338 reporting
  • Masters grade level2%−13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 338 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level61%−7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 338 reporting
  • Meets grade level34%−10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 338 reporting
  • Masters grade level0%−16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 338 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level60%−7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 336 reporting
  • Meets grade level5%−30 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 336 reporting
  • Masters grade level0%−13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 336 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level86%+15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 316 reporting
  • Meets grade level14%−25 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 316 reporting
  • Masters grade level0%−15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 316 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level88%+20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 215 reporting
  • Meets grade level40%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 215 reporting
  • Masters grade level8%−8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 215 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (338 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Completion

Four-Year
75.0%+25.7 pts vs similar economic context average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 41 rated charter campuses reporting
Five-Year
91.7%+37.0 pts vs similar economic context average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 41 rated charter campuses reporting
Six-Year
100.0%+42.4 pts vs similar economic context average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 41 rated charter campuses reporting
Dropout Rate
1.4%−9.7 pts vs similar economic context average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 41 rated charter campuses reporting

These measures use TEA's alternative-education accountability population. Each comparison average includes only charter campuses in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported charter campus rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.

College, career and military readiness

Total credit for CCMR criteria
58.0%−24.9 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
CriterionThis school% of graduatesAveragesimilar economic contextDifferencepercentage pointsReportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria58.0%82.9%−24.9 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 116 rated charter campuses reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course9.4%65.0%−55.6 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 117 rated charter campuses reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA7.5%33.9%−26.4 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 117 rated charter campuses reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)0.0%29.1%−29.1 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 117 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course11.3%9.9%+1.4 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 117 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned an industry-based certification32.1%15.1%+17.0 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 117 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate0.0%0.4%−0.4 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 117 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned an associate degree0.0%1.8%−1.8 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 117 rated charter campuses reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit0.0%4.3%−4.3 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 117 rated charter campuses reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness7.5%2.2%+5.3 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 117 rated charter campuses reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student5.7%8.6%−2.9 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 117 rated charter campuses reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces1.9%1.8%+0.1 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 117 rated charter campuses reporting

Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this school minus the average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate, counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported charter campus percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only charter campuses for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

After high school: the following fall

Where school graduates appeared in Texas public higher-education records the fall after graduation. This is a limited next-step measure, not an eventual college-going or completion rate.

Graduates in the report
59

Class of 2023–24

Enrolled in Texas public higher education
13

22.0% of graduates

Not found in Texas public higher-ed records
46

78.0% of graduates

Not trackable
0

Fall 2024

Graduates in the report

This school
59
Selected comparison
82.6

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 96 rated charter campuses reporting

Enrolled in Texas public higher education

This school
13
Selected comparison
39.8

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 96 rated charter campuses reporting

Texas-public enrollment rate

This school
22.0%
Selected comparison
44.9%

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 96 rated charter campuses reporting

−22.9 pts vs similar economic context

Not-found rate

This school
78.0%
Selected comparison
49.6%

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 96 rated charter campuses reporting

+28.4 pts vs similar economic context

Not-trackable rate

This school
0.0%
Selected comparison
5.6%

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 96 rated charter campuses reporting

−5.6 pts vs similar economic context

Most common named Texas public destinations

  1. EL PASO COMMUNITY COLLEGE DIST (010387)12

Selected comparison counts are neutral cohort scale context. The percentages put differently sized graduating classes on the same basis, but still cover only the limited Texas-public system observed by this report.

Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, high-school graduates enrolled in higher education, fetched 24 August 2026. The report covers graduates who enrolled in a Texas public college or university the following fall and includes only districts or campuses with more than 25 graduates.

“Not found” does not mean a graduate did not continue their education. It can include private or out-of-state college, work, military service, enrollment after the fall term, or another path the Texas public system does not observe.

“Not trackable” is not an outcome. THECB uses it for graduates with a non-standard identifier that could not be matched to higher-education records.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
120
Economically disadvantaged
94.1%+2.6 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
25.2%−19.9 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
16.0%+3.4 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
86.0%−6.7 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
54.8%+30.8 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Triumph Public High Schools-El Paso East

African American: 0.8%Hispanic: 99.2%
  • African American 0.8%
  • Hispanic 99.2%

Selected comparison average For charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 338 reporting for every category shown · 338 in full cohort

African American: 18.1%Hispanic: 75.6%White: 3.1%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 1.5%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 1.3%
  • African American 18.1%
  • Hispanic 75.6%
  • White 3.1%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 1.5%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 1.3%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
119
Economically disadvantaged students
112
Emergent bilingual students
30
Special education students
19

TEA context labels

  • Alternative education campus under AEA procedures
  • Alternative education type: dropout recovery school
  • Rated under AEA procedures

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
139
Students in TEA mobility denominator
224
TEA-published mobility rate
62.1%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 120 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 9 (7.0%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
120

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
−9

Decrease · −7.0%

Change since 2021–22
−9

Decrease · −7.0%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
120
Selected comparison
513.2

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 336 rated charter campuses reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Triumph Public High Schools-El Paso East
School yearStudents enrolledTriumph Public High Schools-El Paso EastChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 129 First available year 483
2022–23 109 Decrease of 20 (15.5%) 498.7
2023–24 133 Increase of 24 (22.0%) 511
2024–25 129 Decrease of 4 (3.0%) 513.4
2025–26 120 Decrease of 9 (7.0%) 513.2

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting charter campuses in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Suppressed

Rate not available

Disciplinary actions
Suppressed

Rate not available

Cumulative year-end enrollment
218

2024–25

TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Triumph Public High Schools-El Paso East
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 174 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2021–22 183 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2022–23 191 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2023–24 214 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2024–25 218 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Triumph Public High Schools-El Paso East in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
In-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Out-of-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Mandatory expulsions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized charter campuses can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$7k$13k$20k20182020202220242025
  • Triumph Public High Schools-El Paso East
  • Parent district: Triumph Public High Schools-West Texas
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$10,141
Selected comparison
$11,991

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 335 rated charter campuses reporting

−$1,850 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $10,141 per student for this campus, $14,283 per student for its parent district, Triumph Public High Schools-West Texas, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearTriumph Public High Schools-El Paso EastParent district: Triumph Public High Schools-West TexasTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$8,835$10,626$13,054$8,653 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 198 rated charter campuses reporting
2019$7,863$10,313$13,108$8,640 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 253 rated charter campuses reporting
2020$8,759$12,136$14,058$9,225 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 268 rated charter campuses reporting
2021$8,759$13,202$14,797$9,593 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 290 rated charter campuses reporting
2022$10,095$14,378$15,708$11,561 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 308 rated charter campuses reporting
2023$15,158$18,856$16,792$11,566 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 317 rated charter campuses reporting
2024$10,888$15,361$18,125$11,554 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 325 rated charter campuses reporting
2025$10,141$14,283$18,972$11,991 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 335 rated charter campuses reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$48,306−$15,913 vs similar economic context
Teachers
6−23.4 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
20+2.1 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Triumph Public High Schools-El Paso East

Beginning: 15.3%1 to 5 years: 67.8%11 to 20 years: 16.9%
  • Beginning 15.3%
  • 1 to 5 years 67.8%
  • 11 to 20 years 16.9%

Selected comparison average For charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 338 reporting for every category shown · 338 in full cohort

Beginning: 13.1%1 to 5 years: 47.3%6 to 10 years: 19.8%11 to 20 years: 14.8%21 to 30 years: 4.2%Over 30 years: 0.9%
  • Beginning 13.1%
  • 1 to 5 years 47.3%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.8%
  • 11 to 20 years 14.8%
  • 21 to 30 years 4.2%
  • Over 30 years 0.9%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Triumph Public High Schools-El Paso East in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classTriumph Public High Schools-El Paso East · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Secondary English3.518.8
Secondary languages other than English1.517.9
Secondary math4.819.3
Secondary science4.620
Secondary social studies3.920.2

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 117 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

3 measures

  • 6of 90

    Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness

    Similar size · of the 90 that report this measure

  • 6of 41

    Five-Year Completion Rate

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate (alternative-education accountability only) · of the 41 that report this measure

  • 9of 90

    Earned an industry-based certification

    Similar size · of the 90 that report this measure

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 071803002.