−6.2 ptsvs 80.2 average · 387 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
289 of 387tied with 8 others
Score vs similar-size group
−12.9 ptsvs 86.9 average · 60 similarly sized rated charter campuses
Similar size placement
54 of 60tied with 1 other
Score vs state
−7.7 ptsvs 81.7 average · 829 rated Texas charter campuses
Texas charter placement
642 of 829tied with 13 others
C74
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 76 in 2021-22. The current score is below the 80.2 average for 387 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context.The current score is below the 86.9 average for 60 similarly sized rated charter campuses.The current score is below the 81.7 average for 829 rated Texas charter campuses.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
Reading above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
47%vs 44.3% avg · +2.7 pts
Masters
22%vs 16.3% avg · +5.7 pts
Among 387 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
Chronically absent lower than the similar-context average
13.7%−10.4 pts vs 24.1%
13.7% is 10.4 percentage points lower than
the 24.1% average among 384 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Trinity Basin Preparatory - Dallas is rated C by TEA, scoring 74 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 80.2 average for 387 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context. It is down 3 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 289th of 387 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context (tied with 8 others).
Trinity Basin Preparatory - Dallas is rated C by TEA, scoring 74 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 86.9 average for 60 similarly sized rated charter campuses. It is down 3 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 54th of 60 similarly sized rated charter campuses (tied with 1 other).
Trinity Basin Preparatory - Dallas is rated C by TEA, scoring 74 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 81.7 average for 829 rated Texas charter campuses. It is down 3 points since 2021-22.
Official state and federal designations can carry support, reporting requirements or a family transfer option that a single A–F rating does not explain.
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 387 rated charter campuses reporting
Schools on the PEG list
This school
Not listed
Selected comparison
0.0%
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 387 rated charter campuses reporting
Selected comparison percentages are the share of reporting schools in that group found on each dated list. They are neutral prevalence context; changing the comparison never changes this school's official status.
These are dated TEA statuses, fetched 24 August 2026; they are not added to or subtracted from this site's rating.
5 years of ratings
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated C with 76 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement69 D−5.2 vs similar economic context · 387 reporting
School Progress75 C−6.2 vs similar economic context · 387 reporting
Closing the Gaps70 C−7.0 vs similar economic context · 381 reporting
Academic Growth70 C−3.3 vs similar economic context · 370 reporting
Relative Performance75 C−4.4 vs similar economic context · 383 reporting
Trinity Basin Preparatory - Dallas
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (387 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
69
D
1
School Progress
75
C
5
Closing the Gaps
70
C
10
Academic Growth
70
C
10
Relative Performance
75
C
5
Closest to moving up: School Progress, 5 points below B in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (75), so
Student Achievement (69) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 75.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level66%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 387 reporting
Meets grade level38%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 387 reporting
Masters grade level15%−0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 387 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level74%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 387 reporting
Meets grade level47%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 387 reporting
Masters grade level22%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 387 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level61%−6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 385 reporting
Meets grade level31%−4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 385 reporting
Masters grade level9%−4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 385 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level63%−8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 365 reporting
Meets grade level38%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 365 reporting
Masters grade level17%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 365 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
Approaches grade level54%−14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 248 reporting
Meets grade level27%−10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 248 reporting
Masters grade level11%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 248 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (387 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only charter campuses for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
1,654
Economically disadvantaged
91.7%+1.2 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
49.6%+5.7 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
14.9%+2.2 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
94.9%+2.3 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
13.7%−10.4 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Trinity Basin Preparatory - Dallas
African American 10.6%
Hispanic 78.5%
White 8.3%
American Indian 1.8%
Asian 0.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 0.5%
Selected comparison averageFor charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 387 reporting for every category shown · 387 in full cohort
African American 18.5%
Hispanic 74.9%
White 3.5%
American Indian 0.2%
Asian 1.5%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 1.4%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized charter campuses · 60 reporting for every category shown · 60 in full cohort
African American 13.5%
Hispanic 57.9%
White 14.1%
American Indian 0.4%
Asian 11.5%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.4%
Texas charter average829 reporting for every category shown · 829 Texas charter campuses in full cohort
African American 17.5%
Hispanic 61.8%
White 12.2%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.5%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.5%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
1,654
Economically disadvantaged students
1,517
Emergent bilingual students
820
Special education students
247
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
207
Students in TEA mobility denominator
1,572
TEA-published mobility rate
13.2%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 1,654 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 219 (11.7%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
1,654
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
−219
Decrease · −11.7%
Change since 2021–22
−486
Decrease · −22.7%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
1,654
Selected comparison
507.2
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 385 rated charter campuses reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Trinity Basin Preparatory - Dallas
School year
Students enrolledTrinity Basin Preparatory - Dallas
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
2,140
First available year
484.7
2022–23
2,089
Decrease of 51 (2.4%)
500.3
2023–24
2,017
Decrease of 72 (3.4%)
508.4
2024–25
1,873
Decrease of 144 (7.1%)
508.9
2025–26
1,654
Decrease of 219 (11.7%)
507.2
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting charter campuses in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
62
3.1% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
80
4.00 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
1,998
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
3.1%
Selected comparison
10.8%
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 238 rated charter campuses reporting
−7.7 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
4
Selected comparison
18.3
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 253 rated charter campuses reporting
−14.3 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Trinity Basin Preparatory - Dallas
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
2,453
100
4.1%
150
6.11
4.7%
5.9
2021–22
2,305
194
8.4%
350
15.18
11.0%
18
2022–23
2,255
149
6.6%
230
10.20
11.4%
19.5
2023–24
2,194
151
6.9%
225
10.26
11.2%
19.2
2024–25
1,998
62
3.1%
80
4.00
10.8%
18.3
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Trinity Basin Preparatory - Dallas in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
62
3.1%
80
4.00
10.8%
18.3
In-school suspensions
31
1.6%
38
1.90
7.2%
10.6
Out-of-school suspensions
33
1.6%
35
1.75
8.7%
12.3
DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized charter campuses can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Trinity Basin Preparatory - Dallas
Parent district: Trinity Basin Preparatory
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$19,333
Selected comparison
$11,899
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 383 rated charter campuses reporting
+$7,434 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $19,333 per student for this campus, $12,558 per student for its parent district, Trinity Basin Preparatory, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Trinity Basin Preparatory - Dallas
Parent district: Trinity Basin Preparatory
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$6,905
$8,449
$13,054
$8,584
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 232 rated charter campuses reporting
2019
$8,550
$9,308
$13,108
$8,590
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 290 rated charter campuses reporting
2020
$7,390
$9,384
$14,058
$9,182
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 307 rated charter campuses reporting
2021
$7,876
$10,442
$14,797
$9,548
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 332 rated charter campuses reporting
2022
$10,840
$12,351
$15,708
$11,467
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 351 rated charter campuses reporting
2023
$14,674
$14,020
$16,792
$11,481
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 361 rated charter campuses reporting
2024
$15,989
$13,460
$18,125
$11,517
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 371 rated charter campuses reporting
2025
$19,333
$12,558
$18,972
$11,899
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 383 rated charter campuses reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$65,132+$1,118 vs similar economic context
Teachers
76+47.1 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
21.7+3.9 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Trinity Basin Preparatory - Dallas
Beginning 12.6%
1 to 5 years 53.9%
6 to 10 years 20.6%
11 to 20 years 7.7%
21 to 30 years 2.6%
Over 30 years 2.6%
Selected comparison averageFor charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 387 reporting for every category shown · 387 in full cohort
Beginning 13.2%
1 to 5 years 47.4%
6 to 10 years 19.7%
11 to 20 years 14.6%
21 to 30 years 4.4%
Over 30 years 0.8%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized charter campuses · 60 reporting for every category shown · 60 in full cohort
Beginning 13.1%
1 to 5 years 40%
6 to 10 years 20%
11 to 20 years 16.9%
21 to 30 years 4.3%
Over 30 years 0.7%
Texas charter average829 reporting for every category shown · 829 Texas charter campuses in full cohort
Beginning 13%
1 to 5 years 44.3%
6 to 10 years 19.6%
11 to 20 years 15.4%
21 to 30 years 4.8%
Over 30 years 0.9%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Trinity Basin Preparatory - Dallas in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classTrinity Basin Preparatory - Dallas · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten
18.6
21.6
Grade 1
19.9
22
Grade 2
21.2
22.9
Grade 3
17.7
24.2
Grade 4
20
24.3
Grade 5
22.1
23.8
Grade 6
19.3
23.2
Secondary English
20.6
18.9
Secondary math
20.6
19.4
Secondary science
20.6
20.1
Secondary social studies
20.6
20.3
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 11 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 72 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
1 measure
2of 60
Per-student spending
Similar size · of the 60 that report this measure
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 057813101.