+10.9 ptsvs 81.1 average · 1,875 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
153 of 1,875tied with 50 others
Score vs region
+6.3 ptsvs 85.7 average · 505 rated schools in Region 01: Edinburg
Region 01: Edinburg placement
63 of 505tied with 27 others
Score vs county
+3.7 ptsvs 88.3 average · 76 rated schools in Webb County
Webb County placement
17 of 76tied with 6 others
Score vs similar-size group
+11.3 ptsvs 80.7 average · 4,147 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
360 of 4,147tied with 171 others
Score vs state
+10.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
838 of 7,646tied with 318 others
A92
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is flat; under the rules in force back then it scored 93 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 81.1 average for 1,875 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 85.7 average for 505 rated schools in Region 01: Edinburg.The current score is above the 88.3 average for 76 rated schools in Webb County.The current score is above the 80.7 average for 4,147 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
68%vs 50.9% avg · +17.1 pts
Masters
37%vs 21.4% avg · +15.6 pts
Among 1,803 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Trautmann MS is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.1 average for 1,875 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is unchanged since 2021-22.
Ranks 153rd of 1,875 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 50 others).
Trautmann MS is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 85.7 average for 505 rated schools in Region 01: Edinburg. It is unchanged since 2021-22.
Ranks 63rd of 505 rated schools in Region 01: Edinburg (tied with 27 others).
Trautmann MS is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 88.3 average for 76 rated schools in Webb County. It is unchanged since 2021-22.
Ranks 17th of 76 rated schools in Webb County (tied with 6 others).
Trautmann MS is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.7 average for 4,147 similarly sized rated schools. It is unchanged since 2021-22.
Ranks 360th of 4,147 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 171 others).
Trautmann MS is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is unchanged since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 93 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement91 A+10.8 vs similar economic context · 1,803 reporting
School Progress92 A+10.7 vs similar economic context · 1,795 reporting
Closing the Gaps93 A+14.7 vs similar economic context · 1,779 reporting
Academic Growth86 B+11.3 vs similar economic context · 1,747 reporting
Relative Performance92 A+12.6 vs similar economic context · 1,795 reporting
Trautmann MS
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,875 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
91
A
—
School Progress
92
A
—
Closing the Gaps
93
A
—
Academic Growth
86
B
4
Relative Performance
92
A
—
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (92), so
Student Achievement (91) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 92.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level89%+13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,803 reporting
Meets grade level68%+17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,803 reporting
Masters grade level37%+16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,803 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level92%+14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,800 reporting
Meets grade level75%+19 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,800 reporting
Masters grade level46%+23 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,800 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level88%+15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,790 reporting
Meets grade level63%+19 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,790 reporting
Masters grade level26%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,790 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level91%+14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,650 reporting
Meets grade level77%+27 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,650 reporting
Masters grade level51%+28 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,650 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
Approaches grade level81%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 936 reporting
Meets grade level52%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 936 reporting
Masters grade level30%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 936 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,875 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
735
Economically disadvantaged
56.1%−0.5 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
20.8%+6.3 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
14.8%−4.0 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.2%+0.8 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
9.7%−5.6 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Trautmann MS
Hispanic 98.9%
White 0.7%
Asian 0.3%
Two or More Races 0.1%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,875 reporting for every category shown · 1,875 in full cohort
African American 9.9%
Hispanic 45.3%
White 37.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 2.5%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 4%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 01: Edinburg · 505 reporting for every category shown · 505 in full cohort
African American 0.2%
Hispanic 97.5%
White 1.9%
Asian 0.3%
Two or More Races 0.1%
Selected comparison averageFor Webb County · 76 reporting for every category shown · 76 in full cohort
African American 0.1%
Hispanic 98.3%
White 1.3%
Asian 0.2%
Two or More Races 0.1%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,147 reporting for every category shown · 4,147 in full cohort
African American 12.3%
Hispanic 53.8%
White 24.3%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.5%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.6%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
735
Economically disadvantaged students
412
Emergent bilingual students
153
Special education students
109
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
52
Students in TEA mobility denominator
780
TEA-published mobility rate
6.7%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 735 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 21 (2.8%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
735
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
−21
Decrease · −2.8%
Change since 2021–22
+112
Increase · +18.0%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
735
Selected comparison
635.4
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,835 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Trautmann MS
School year
Students enrolledTrautmann MS
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
623
First available year
639.4
2022–23
683
Increase of 60 (9.6%)
645.8
2023–24
744
Increase of 61 (8.9%)
644.3
2024–25
756
Increase of 12 (1.6%)
641.2
2025–26
735
Decrease of 21 (2.8%)
635.4
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
90
11.8% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
197
25.82 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
763
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
11.8%
Selected comparison
12.5%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,439 rated schools reporting
−0.7 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
25.82
Selected comparison
28
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,559 rated schools reporting
−2.2 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Trautmann MS
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
585
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2021–22
653
78
11.9%
155
23.74
12.4%
28
2022–23
700
77
11.0%
152
21.71
12.9%
29.7
2023–24
766
90
11.8%
225
29.37
12.8%
29.8
2024–25
763
90
11.8%
197
25.82
12.5%
28
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Trautmann MS in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
90
11.8%
197
25.82
12.5%
28
In-school suspensions
71
9.3%
113
14.81
11.3%
21.8
Out-of-school suspensions
42
5.5%
70
9.17
6.4%
9.1
DAEP placements
13
1.7%
14
1.83
4.7%
5.6
Mandatory DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Trautmann MS
Parent district: United ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$7,933
Selected comparison
$12,298
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,845 rated schools reporting
−$4,365 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $7,933 per student for this campus, $14,348 per student for its parent district, United ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Trautmann MS
Parent district: United ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$6,588
$13,187
$13,054
$7,931
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,697 rated schools reporting
2019
$7,154
$12,568
$13,108
$8,094
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,715 rated schools reporting
2020
$6,629
$12,004
$14,058
$8,678
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,734 rated schools reporting
2021
$9,176
$13,076
$14,797
$9,055
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,749 rated schools reporting
2022
$8,562
$15,006
$15,708
$10,474
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,766 rated schools reporting
2023
$8,287
$14,779
$16,792
$10,978
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,791 rated schools reporting
2024
$7,350
$15,029
$18,125
$11,799
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,819 rated schools reporting
2025
$7,933
$14,348
$18,972
$12,298
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,845 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$64,937−$1,596 vs similar economic context
Teachers
41−0.9 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
17.9−1.5 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Trautmann MS
1 to 5 years 19.5%
6 to 10 years 17.1%
11 to 20 years 31.7%
21 to 30 years 29.3%
Over 30 years 2.4%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,875 reporting for every category shown · 1,875 in full cohort
Beginning 5.8%
1 to 5 years 24.9%
6 to 10 years 19.4%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 16.4%
Over 30 years 4.4%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 01: Edinburg · 505 reporting for every category shown · 505 in full cohort
Beginning 2.7%
1 to 5 years 19.3%
6 to 10 years 16.2%
11 to 20 years 35%
21 to 30 years 22.6%
Over 30 years 4.2%
Selected comparison averageFor Webb County · 76 reporting for every category shown · 76 in full cohort
Beginning 2.5%
1 to 5 years 18.4%
6 to 10 years 16%
11 to 20 years 32.7%
21 to 30 years 25.1%
Over 30 years 5.2%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,147 reporting for every category shown · 4,147 in full cohort
Beginning 6.1%
1 to 5 years 26.6%
6 to 10 years 20%
11 to 20 years 29%
21 to 30 years 15.1%
Over 30 years 2.9%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Trautmann MS in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classTrautmann MS · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Grade 6
19.2
17.5
Secondary English
18.9
14.9
Secondary math
20.2
15.8
Secondary science
22
17.3
Secondary social studies
24.1
17.2
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 120 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
6 measures
5of 27
Social Studies — Masters
Webb County · of the 27 that report this measure · tied with 1
9of 76
Science — Masters
Webb County · of the 76 that report this measure · tied with 1
9of 27
Social Studies — Meets
Webb County · of the 27 that report this measure · tied with 1
10of 76
Reading — Approaches
Webb County · of the 76 that report this measure · tied with 1
10of 76
Science — Meets
Webb County · of the 76 that report this measure
10of 27
Social Studies — Approaches
Webb County · of the 27 that report this measure
Other top-5% rankings
High placements in larger reporting groups
4 measures
28of 492
Reading — Masters
Region 01: Edinburg · of the 492 that report this measure · tied with 2
83of 1,803
All Subjects — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,803 that report this measure · tied with 14
100of 1,800
Reading — Meets
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,800 that report this measure · tied with 10
121of 4,040
Relative Performance
Similar size · of the 4,040 that report this measure · tied with 69
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 240903048.