+2.8 ptsvs 77.2 average · 2,375 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
993 of 2,375tied with 95 others
Score vs region
−2.2 ptsvs 82.2 average · 1,157 rated schools in Region 10: Richardson
Region 10: Richardson placement
709 of 1,157tied with 25 others
Score vs county
−1.4 ptsvs 81.4 average · 563 rated schools in Dallas County
Dallas County placement
326 of 563tied with 15 others
Score vs similar-size group
−0.3 ptsvs 80.3 average · 4,738 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
2,522 of 4,738tied with 161 others
Score vs state
−1.3 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
4,402 of 7,646tied with 276 others
B80
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is flat; under the rules in force back then it scored 80 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 77.2 average for 2,375 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is below the 82.2 average for 1,157 rated schools in Region 10: Richardson.The current score is below the 81.4 average for 563 rated schools in Dallas County.The current score is level with the 80.3 average for 4,738 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is below the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
49%vs 40.8% avg · +8.2 pts
Masters
23%vs 15.9% avg · +7.1 pts
Among 2,212 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Tosch Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 80 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 77.2 average for 2,375 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is unchanged since 2021-22.
Ranks 993rd of 2,375 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 95 others).
Tosch Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 80 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 82.2 average for 1,157 rated schools in Region 10: Richardson. It is unchanged since 2021-22.
Ranks 709th of 1,157 rated schools in Region 10: Richardson (tied with 25 others).
Tosch Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 80 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 81.4 average for 563 rated schools in Dallas County. It is unchanged since 2021-22.
Ranks 326th of 563 rated schools in Dallas County (tied with 15 others).
Tosch Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 80 out of 100 for 2025-26 — level with the 80.3 average for 4,738 similarly sized rated schools. It is unchanged since 2021-22.
Ranks 2,522nd of 4,738 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 161 others).
Tosch Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 80 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is unchanged since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 80 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement75 C+4.1 vs similar economic context · 2,212 reporting
School Progress83 B+4.6 vs similar economic context · 2,205 reporting
Closing the Gaps74 C−0.4 vs similar economic context · 2,191 reporting
Academic Growth75 C+2.8 vs similar economic context · 2,162 reporting
Relative Performance83 B+6.4 vs similar economic context · 2,205 reporting
Tosch Elem
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,375 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
75
C
5
School Progress
83
B
7
Closing the Gaps
74
C
6
Academic Growth
75
C
5
Relative Performance
83
B
7
Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 6 points below B in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (83), so
Student Achievement (75) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 83.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level69%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,212 reporting
Meets grade level49%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,212 reporting
Masters grade level23%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,212 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level67%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,211 reporting
Meets grade level47%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,211 reporting
Masters grade level22%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,211 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level69%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,201 reporting
Meets grade level52%+14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,201 reporting
Masters grade level25%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,201 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level71%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,058 reporting
Meets grade level42%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,058 reporting
Masters grade level21%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,058 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,375 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
572
Economically disadvantaged
85.7%−0.6 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
42.7%+7.4 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
27.4%+9.0 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
94.9%+1.8 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
14.3%−7.8 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Tosch Elem
African American 22.2%
Hispanic 68.5%
White 6.1%
Asian 0.9%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 2.1%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,375 reporting for every category shown · 2,375 in full cohort
African American 14.2%
Hispanic 73.1%
White 8.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 1.4%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 10: Richardson · 1,157 reporting for every category shown · 1,157 in full cohort
African American 17.4%
Hispanic 43.5%
White 24.5%
American Indian 0.6%
Asian 9.9%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 4%
Selected comparison averageFor Dallas County · 563 reporting for every category shown · 563 in full cohort
African American 21.3%
Hispanic 59%
White 10.9%
American Indian 0.6%
Asian 5.4%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.6%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,738 reporting for every category shown · 4,738 in full cohort
African American 12.2%
Hispanic 54.7%
White 24.6%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.6%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.5%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
572
Economically disadvantaged students
490
Emergent bilingual students
244
Special education students
157
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
64
Students in TEA mobility denominator
505
TEA-published mobility rate
12.7%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 572 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 53 (8.5%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
572
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
−53
Decrease · −8.5%
Change since 2021–22
−29
Decrease · −4.8%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
572
Selected comparison
607.7
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,346 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Tosch Elem
School year
Students enrolledTosch Elem
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
601
First available year
642.5
2022–23
604
Increase of 3 (0.5%)
639.8
2023–24
622
Increase of 18 (3.0%)
631.8
2024–25
625
Increase of 3 (0.5%)
628
2025–26
572
Decrease of 53 (8.5%)
607.7
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
20
3.0% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
37
5.58 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
663
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
3.0%
Selected comparison
13.3%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,621 rated schools reporting
−10.3 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
5.58
Selected comparison
32.1
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,742 rated schools reporting
−26.5 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Tosch Elem
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
672
Suppressed
—
11
1.64
—
15
2021–22
657
16
2.4%
21
3.20
12.6%
30.2
2022–23
670
16
2.4%
36
5.37
13.6%
33.7
2023–24
676
18
2.7%
35
5.18
13.7%
33.9
2024–25
663
20
3.0%
37
5.58
13.3%
32.1
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Tosch Elem in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
20
3.0%
37
5.58
13.3%
32.1
In-school suspensions
20
3.0%
35
5.28
11.7%
23.1
Out-of-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Tosch Elem
Parent district: Mesquite ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$10,824
Selected comparison
$13,278
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,360 rated schools reporting
−$2,454 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $10,824 per student for this campus, $15,844 per student for its parent district, Mesquite ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Tosch Elem
Parent district: Mesquite ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$6,641
$13,769
$13,054
$8,265
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,237 rated schools reporting
2019
$6,916
$13,140
$13,108
$8,323
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,268 rated schools reporting
2020
$8,167
$14,912
$14,058
$8,849
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,278 rated schools reporting
2021
$7,840
$11,625
$14,797
$9,547
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,284 rated schools reporting
2022
$9,447
$15,447
$15,708
$11,027
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,304 rated schools reporting
2023
$8,838
$16,822
$16,792
$11,569
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,330 rated schools reporting
2024
$10,438
$16,875
$18,125
$12,521
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,345 rated schools reporting
2025
$10,824
$15,844
$18,972
$13,278
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,360 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$70,357+$2,726 vs similar economic context
Teachers
42−0.5 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
13.8−0.6 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Tosch Elem
Beginning 4.8%
1 to 5 years 38.8%
6 to 10 years 20.2%
11 to 20 years 31.3%
21 to 30 years 4.8%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,375 reporting for every category shown · 2,375 in full cohort
Beginning 7.2%
1 to 5 years 27.4%
6 to 10 years 19%
11 to 20 years 27.3%
21 to 30 years 15.1%
Over 30 years 3.5%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 10: Richardson · 1,157 reporting for every category shown · 1,157 in full cohort
Beginning 6.9%
1 to 5 years 29%
6 to 10 years 20.1%
11 to 20 years 27.5%
21 to 30 years 13.7%
Over 30 years 2.8%
Selected comparison averageFor Dallas County · 563 reporting for every category shown · 563 in full cohort
Beginning 7.5%
1 to 5 years 30.2%
6 to 10 years 21.2%
11 to 20 years 26.5%
21 to 30 years 11.9%
Over 30 years 2.7%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,738 reporting for every category shown · 4,738 in full cohort
Beginning 6.1%
1 to 5 years 26.4%
6 to 10 years 19.7%
11 to 20 years 28.9%
21 to 30 years 15.5%
Over 30 years 3.1%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Tosch Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classTosch Elem · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten
15
18.1
Grade 1
17
18.5
Grade 2
20.3
18.4
Grade 3
18
18.8
Grade 4
17.7
18.8
Grade 5
19.3
19.8
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 057914113.