Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Tool Elem

Henderson County · Region 07: Kilgore · 214 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
95/1002025-26
Change
+5 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+17.4 ptsvs 77.6 average · 2,205 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
43 of 2,205tied with 16 others
A95

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 89 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 77.6 average for 2,205 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Recent movement

Overall score rose 6 points

89 to 95 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 95 is 17.4 points above the 77.6 average among 2,205 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Recent domain gain

Closing the Gaps rose 8 points

83 to 91 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 91 is 16.2 points above the 74.8 average among 2,019 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

STAAR result

All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
67%vs 42.1% avg · +24.9 pts
Masters
36%vs 16.5% avg · +19.5 pts

Among 2,040 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Tool Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 95 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 77.6 average for 2,205 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 5 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 43rd of 2,205 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 16 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this school ranks best
  12. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageTool Elem 9088858995 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 89 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26A9577.6 2,205 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25B8977.3 2,192 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24B8574.7 2,178 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23B8875.2 2,161 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22A9081.6 2,140 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement91 A+18.7 vs similar economic context · 2,040 reporting
  • School Progress96 A+17.1 vs similar economic context · 2,033 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps91 A+16.2 vs similar economic context · 2,019 reporting
  • Academic Growth96 A+23.8 vs similar economic context · 1,987 reporting
  • Relative Performance92 A+14.8 vs similar economic context · 2,033 reporting
  • Tool Elem
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,205 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement91A—
School Progress96A—
Closing the Gaps91A—
Academic Growth96A—
Relative Performance92A—

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (96), so Student Achievement (91) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 96.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level87%+19 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,040 reporting
  • Meets grade level67%+25 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,040 reporting
  • Masters grade level36%+20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,040 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level92%+21 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,038 reporting
  • Meets grade level66%+19 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,038 reporting
  • Masters grade level32%+14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,038 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level82%+16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,028 reporting
  • Meets grade level68%+30 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,028 reporting
  • Masters grade level39%+25 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,028 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,205 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
214
Economically disadvantaged
80.4%−0.5 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
13.1%−16.5 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
17.8%−0.8 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.7%+2.3 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
6.9%−13.7 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Tool Elem

African American: 3.3%Hispanic: 26.2%White: 64.5%American Indian: 0.5%Asian: 1.9%Two or More Races: 3.7%
  • African American 3.3%
  • Hispanic 26.2%
  • White 64.5%
  • American Indian 0.5%
  • Asian 1.9%
  • Two or More Races 3.7%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,205 reporting for every category shown · 2,205 in full cohort

African American: 14%Hispanic: 68.2%White: 13.2%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 1.7%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 2.6%
  • African American 14%
  • Hispanic 68.2%
  • White 13.2%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 1.7%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 2.6%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
214
Economically disadvantaged students
172
Emergent bilingual students
28
Special education students
38

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
31
Students in TEA mobility denominator
161
TEA-published mobility rate
19.3%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 214 students in 2025–26, an increase of 17 (8.6%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
214

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
+17

Increase · +8.6%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
214
Selected comparison
629.1

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,175 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Tool Elem
School yearStudents enrolledTool ElemChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 245 First available year 653.5
2022–23 Not reported Not available —
2023–24 246 No adjacent prior year 650.6
2024–25 197 Decrease of 49 (19.9%) 648.2
2025–26 214 Increase of 17 (8.6%) 629.1

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
26

12.0% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
47

21.66 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
217

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
12.0%
Selected comparison
13.3%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,618 rated schools reporting

−1.3 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
21.66
Selected comparison
32.4

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,726 rated schools reporting

−10.7 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Tool Elem
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 288 12 4.2% 18 6.25 8.4% 16.7
2021–22 286 21 7.3% 47 16.43 12.9% 30.9
2022–23 295 26 8.8% 37 12.54 13.7% 34
2023–24 286 17 5.9% 21 7.34 13.7% 34
2024–25 217 26 12.0% 47 21.66 13.3% 32.4
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Tool Elem in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 26 12.0% 47 21.66 13.3% 32.4
In-school suspensions 25 11.5% 43 19.82 11.7% 23.4
Out-of-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$6k$26k$47k20182020202220242025
  • Tool Elem
  • Parent district: Malakoff ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$12,927
Selected comparison
$13,043

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,191 rated schools reporting

−$116 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $12,927 per student for this campus, $27,810 per student for its parent district, Malakoff ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearTool ElemParent district: Malakoff ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$6,599$11,992$13,054$8,135 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,074 rated schools reporting
2019$7,613$12,712$13,108$8,262 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,096 rated schools reporting
2020$6,938$13,540$14,058$8,769 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,112 rated schools reporting
2021$7,994$14,978$14,797$9,409 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,123 rated schools reporting
2022$9,523$19,071$15,708$10,837 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,141 rated schools reporting
2023$9,383$39,791$16,792$11,349 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,161 rated schools reporting
2024$10,134$44,594$18,125$12,288 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,177 rated schools reporting
2025$12,927$27,810$18,972$13,043 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,191 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$65,422−$1,722 vs similar economic context
Teachers
21−21.8 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
10−4.3 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Tool Elem

1 to 5 years: 18.3%6 to 10 years: 27.2%11 to 20 years: 22.5%21 to 30 years: 22.5%Over 30 years: 8.9%
  • 1 to 5 years 18.3%
  • 6 to 10 years 27.2%
  • 11 to 20 years 22.5%
  • 21 to 30 years 22.5%
  • Over 30 years 8.9%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,205 reporting for every category shown · 2,205 in full cohort

Beginning: 6.8%1 to 5 years: 27.7%6 to 10 years: 19%11 to 20 years: 27.2%21 to 30 years: 15%Over 30 years: 3.6%
  • Beginning 6.8%
  • 1 to 5 years 27.7%
  • 6 to 10 years 19%
  • 11 to 20 years 27.2%
  • 21 to 30 years 15%
  • Over 30 years 3.6%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Tool Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classTool Elem · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten1818
Grade 1918.4
Grade 21218.4
Grade 318.618.9
Grade 417.319

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 90 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#1 rankings

First-place results

5 measures

  • 1of 296

    Academic Growth

    Region 07: Kilgore · of the 296 that report this measure

  • 1of 28

    Overall score

    Henderson County · of the 28 that report this measure

  • 1of 27

    School Progress

    Henderson County · of the 27 that report this measure

  • 1of 27

    All Subjects — Masters

    Henderson County · of the 27 that report this measure

  • 1of 27

    Math — Masters

    Henderson County · of the 27 that report this measure

#2–3 rankings

Second- and third-place results

8 measures

  • 2of 28

    Chronically absent (lowest is best)

    Henderson County · of the 28 that report this measure

  • 2of 27

    Closing the Gaps

    Henderson County · of the 27 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 2of 27

    Relative Performance

    Henderson County · of the 27 that report this measure

  • 2of 27

    Reading — Approaches

    Henderson County · of the 27 that report this measure

  • 3of 27

    Student Achievement

    Henderson County · of the 27 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 3of 27

    All Subjects — Meets

    Henderson County · of the 27 that report this measure

  • 3of 27

    Reading — Masters

    Henderson County · of the 27 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 3of 27

    Math — Meets

    Henderson County · of the 27 that report this measure · tied with 1

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

5 measures

  • 4of 28

    Attendance

    Henderson County · of the 28 that report this measure

  • 4of 27

    All Subjects — Approaches

    Henderson County · of the 27 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 4of 27

    Reading — Meets

    Henderson County · of the 27 that report this measure

  • 5of 28

    Per-student spending

    Henderson County · of the 28 that report this measure

  • 8of 27

    Math — Approaches

    Henderson County · of the 27 that report this measure

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 107906104.