Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Thorndale HS

Milam County · Region 13: Austin · 222 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
85/1002025-26
Change
+5 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
±0.0 ptsvs 85 average · 1,285 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
692 of 1,285tied with 48 others
B85

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 87 in 2021-22. The current score is level with the 85 average for 1,285 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

STAAR result

Science above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
95%vs 58.4% avg · +36.6 pts
Masters
51%vs 30.4% avg · +20.6 pts

Among 1,147 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Current strength

Student Achievement above the similar-context average

89 +3.5 pts vs 85.5

  • 89 is 3.5 points above the 85.5 average among 1,250 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Current strength

Relative Performance above the similar-context average

84 +4.4 pts vs 79.6

  • 84 is 4.4 points above the 79.6 average among 1,246 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Thorndale HS is rated B by TEA, scoring 85 out of 100 for 2025-26 — level with the 85 average for 1,285 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 5 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 692nd of 1,285 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 48 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. After high school: the following fall
  6. Who this school serves
  7. Student counts behind the percentages
  8. Enrollment over time
  9. Discipline and removal from class
  10. Spending per student
  11. Teachers and actual class size
  12. Where this school ranks best
  13. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageThorndale HS 8087879285 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 87 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26B8585.0 1,285 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25A9285.1 1,259 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24B8783.4 1,242 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23B8784.0 1,229 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22B8085.8 1,211 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement89 B+3.5 vs similar economic context · 1,250 reporting
  • School Progress84 B+1.1 vs similar economic context · 1,246 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps74 C−8.3 vs similar economic context · 1,237 reporting
  • Academic Growth64 D−14.5 vs similar economic context · 1,226 reporting
  • Relative Performance84 B+4.4 vs similar economic context · 1,246 reporting
  • Thorndale HS
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,285 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement89B1
School Progress84B6
Closing the Gaps74C6
Academic Growth64D6
Relative Performance84B6

Closest to moving up: Student Achievement, 1 point below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (89), so School Progress (84) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 89.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level90%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,250 reporting
  • Meets grade level63%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,250 reporting
  • Masters grade level21%−7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,250 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level84%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,249 reporting
  • Meets grade level57%−7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,249 reporting
  • Masters grade level9%−21 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,249 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level83%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,245 reporting
  • Meets grade level27%−26 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,245 reporting
  • Masters grade level4%−19 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,245 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level100%+18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,147 reporting
  • Meets grade level95%+37 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,147 reporting
  • Masters grade level51%+21 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,147 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level96%+16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 656 reporting
  • Meets grade level68%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 656 reporting
  • Masters grade level27%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 656 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,285 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Graduation

Four-Year
97.6%+5.0 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 355 rated schools reporting
Five-Year
100.0%+7.7 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 354 rated schools reporting
Six-Year
100.0%+8.3 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 355 rated schools reporting
Dropout Rate
0.0%−0.3 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 355 rated schools reporting

These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only schools in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported school rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.

College, career and military readiness

Total credit for CCMR criteria
83.0%−5.7 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
CriterionThis school% of graduatesAveragesimilar economic contextDifferencepercentage pointsReportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria83.0%88.7%−5.7 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 358 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course59.5%62.0%−2.5 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 358 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA52.4%36.7%+15.7 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 358 rated schools reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)19.0%15.3%+3.7 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 358 rated schools reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course35.7%36.5%−0.8 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 358 rated schools reporting
Earned an industry-based certification40.5%36.6%+3.9 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 358 rated schools reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate0.0%1.1%−1.1 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 358 rated schools reporting
Earned an associate degree0.0%4.1%−4.1 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 358 rated schools reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit52.4%5.8%+46.6 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 358 rated schools reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness4.8%2.8%+2.0 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 358 rated schools reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student11.9%7.3%+4.6 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 358 rated schools reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces0.0%3.3%−3.3 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 358 rated schools reporting

Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this school minus the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate, counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported school percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

After high school: the following fall

Where school graduates appeared in Texas public higher-education records the fall after graduation. This is a limited next-step measure, not an eventual college-going or completion rate.

Graduates in the report
46

Class of 2023–24

Enrolled in Texas public higher education
27

58.7% of graduates

Not found in Texas public higher-ed records
17

37.0% of graduates

Not trackable
2

Fall 2024

Graduates in the report

This school
46
Selected comparison
252.6

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 306 rated schools reporting

Enrolled in Texas public higher education

This school
27
Selected comparison
119.2

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 306 rated schools reporting

Texas-public enrollment rate

This school
58.7%
Selected comparison
48.0%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 306 rated schools reporting

+10.7 pts vs similar economic context

Not-found rate

This school
37.0%
Selected comparison
46.8%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 306 rated schools reporting

−9.8 pts vs similar economic context

Not-trackable rate

This school
4.3%
Selected comparison
5.2%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 306 rated schools reporting

−0.9 pts vs similar economic context

Most common named Texas public destinations

  1. TEMPLE COLLEGE (003627)5

Selected comparison counts are neutral cohort scale context. The percentages put differently sized graduating classes on the same basis, but still cover only the limited Texas-public system observed by this report.

Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, high-school graduates enrolled in higher education, fetched 24 August 2026. The report covers graduates who enrolled in a Texas public college or university the following fall and includes only districts or campuses with more than 25 graduates.

“Not found” does not mean a graduate did not continue their education. It can include private or out-of-state college, work, military service, enrollment after the fall term, or another path the Texas public system does not observe.

“Not trackable” is not an outcome. THECB uses it for graduates with a non-standard identifier that could not be matched to higher-education records.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
222
Economically disadvantaged
37.8%−0.9 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
4.5%−6.5 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
9.9%−8.1 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.7%+0.7 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
9.2%−2.9 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Thorndale HS

Hispanic: 29.3%White: 68.5%Two or More Races: 2.3%
  • Hispanic 29.3%
  • White 68.5%
  • Two or More Races 2.3%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,285 reporting for every category shown · 1,285 in full cohort

African American: 9.2%Hispanic: 34.1%White: 46.6%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 5.2%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 4.5%
  • African American 9.2%
  • Hispanic 34.1%
  • White 46.6%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 5.2%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 4.5%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
222
Economically disadvantaged students
84
Emergent bilingual students
10
Special education students
22

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
24
Students in TEA mobility denominator
222
TEA-published mobility rate
10.8%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 222 students in 2025–26, an increase of 13 (6.2%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
222

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
+13

Increase · +6.2%

Change since 2021–22
+8

Increase · +3.7%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
222
Selected comparison
723.2

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,255 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Thorndale HS
School yearStudents enrolledThorndale HSChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 214 First available year 731.7
2022–23 199 Decrease of 15 (7.0%) 732.6
2023–24 204 Increase of 5 (2.5%) 734.4
2024–25 209 Increase of 5 (2.5%) 730.2
2025–26 222 Increase of 13 (6.2%) 723.2

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
49

22.1% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
83

37.39 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
222

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
22.1%
Selected comparison
10.4%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 998 rated schools reporting

+11.7 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
37.39
Selected comparison
22.4

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,081 rated schools reporting

+15.0 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Thorndale HS
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 228 25 11.0% 45 19.74 8.6% 16
2021–22 225 27 12.0% 46 20.44 10.6% 22.4
2022–23 202 38 18.8% 64 31.68 11.0% 23.6
2023–24 210 35 16.7% 87 41.43 10.7% 24
2024–25 222 49 22.1% 83 37.39 10.4% 22.4
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Thorndale HS in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 49 22.1% 83 37.39 10.4% 22.4
In-school suspensions 38 17.1% 55 24.77 9.3% 17.2
Out-of-school suspensions 14 6.3% 15 6.76 5.1% 7.1
DAEP placements 12 5.4% 13 5.86 3.7% 4.4
Mandatory DAEP placements 12 5.4% 13 5.86 2.9% 3.4
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$7k$19k$32k20182020202220242025
  • Thorndale HS
  • Parent district: Thorndale ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$14,208
Selected comparison
$11,892

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,260 rated schools reporting

+$2,316 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $14,208 per student for this campus, $30,144 per student for its parent district, Thorndale ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearThorndale HSParent district: Thorndale ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$10,037$12,199$13,054$7,704 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,152 rated schools reporting
2019$9,499$12,126$13,108$7,847 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,168 rated schools reporting
2020$11,039$14,324$14,058$8,188 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,174 rated schools reporting
2021$11,280$14,360$14,797$8,667 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,192 rated schools reporting
2022$13,139$15,364$15,708$9,870 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,211 rated schools reporting
2023$14,180$15,624$16,792$10,448 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,229 rated schools reporting
2024$13,340$15,205$18,125$11,667 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,243 rated schools reporting
2025$14,208$30,144$18,972$11,892 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,260 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$66,474−$1,130 vs similar economic context
Teachers
22−26.3 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
10.3−3.9 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Thorndale HS

Beginning: 13%1 to 5 years: 6%6 to 10 years: 15.3%11 to 20 years: 39.5%21 to 30 years: 24.7%Over 30 years: 0.9%
  • Beginning 13%
  • 1 to 5 years 6%
  • 6 to 10 years 15.3%
  • 11 to 20 years 39.5%
  • 21 to 30 years 24.7%
  • Over 30 years 0.9%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,285 reporting for every category shown · 1,285 in full cohort

Beginning: 5.2%1 to 5 years: 23.2%6 to 10 years: 19.5%11 to 20 years: 31.3%21 to 30 years: 17%Over 30 years: 3.6%
  • Beginning 5.2%
  • 1 to 5 years 23.2%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.5%
  • 11 to 20 years 31.3%
  • 21 to 30 years 17%
  • Over 30 years 3.6%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Thorndale HS in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classThorndale HS · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Secondary English17.116.1
Secondary languages other than English10.618.4
Secondary math14.417.1
Secondary science14.918.5
Secondary social studies15.318.4

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 184 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#1 rankings

First-place results

5 measures

  • 1of 494

    Science — Approaches

    Region 13: Austin · of the 494 that report this measure · tied with 9

  • 1of 95

    Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit

    Region 13: Austin · of the 95 that report this measure

  • 1of 14

    All Subjects — Approaches

    Milam County · of the 14 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 1of 14

    Science — Meets

    Milam County · of the 14 that report this measure

  • 1of 14

    Science — Masters

    Milam County · of the 14 that report this measure

#2–3 rankings

Second- and third-place results

7 measures

  • 2of 10

    Social Studies — Approaches

    Milam County · of the 10 that report this measure

  • 2of 10

    Social Studies — Meets

    Milam County · of the 10 that report this measure

  • 3of 14

    Student Achievement

    Milam County · of the 14 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 3of 14

    Relative Performance

    Milam County · of the 14 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 3of 14

    All Subjects — Meets

    Milam County · of the 14 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 3of 14

    Math — Approaches

    Milam County · of the 14 that report this measure

  • 3of 10

    Social Studies — Masters

    Milam County · of the 10 that report this measure

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

11 measures

  • 4of 14

    School Progress

    Milam County · of the 14 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 5of 16

    Overall score

    Milam County · of the 16 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 5of 14

    All Subjects — Masters

    Milam County · of the 14 that report this measure

  • 5of 14

    Reading — Approaches

    Milam County · of the 14 that report this measure

  • 5of 14

    Reading — Meets

    Milam County · of the 14 that report this measure

  • 6of 16

    Attendance

    Milam County · of the 16 that report this measure

  • 6of 16

    Chronically absent (lowest is best)

    Milam County · of the 16 that report this measure

  • 6of 16

    Per-student spending

    Milam County · of the 16 that report this measure

  • 9of 14

    Closing the Gaps

    Milam County · of the 14 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 9of 14

    Math — Meets

    Milam County · of the 14 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 10of 14

    Academic Growth

    Milam County · of the 14 that report this measure

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 166905001.