+13.4 ptsvs 77.6 average · 2,178 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
114 of 2,178tied with 99 others
Score vs region
+5.3 ptsvs 85.7 average · 505 rated schools in Region 01: Edinburg
Region 01: Edinburg placement
91 of 505tied with 51 others
Score vs county
+6.5 ptsvs 84.5 average · 253 rated schools in Hidalgo County
Hidalgo County placement
36 of 253tied with 26 others
Score vs similar-size group
+9.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 1,347 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
216 of 1,347tied with 54 others
Score vs state
+9.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
1,157 of 7,646tied with 413 others
A91
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 97 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 77.6 average for 2,178 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 85.7 average for 505 rated schools in Region 01: Edinburg.The current score is above the 84.5 average for 253 rated schools in Hidalgo County.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 1,347 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
75%vs 40.6% avg · +34.4 pts
Masters
36%vs 16.1% avg · +19.9 pts
Among 2,019 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Thelma Rosa Salinas STEM Early College HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 91 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 77.6 average for 2,178 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 5 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 114th of 2,178 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 99 others).
Thelma Rosa Salinas STEM Early College HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 91 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 85.7 average for 505 rated schools in Region 01: Edinburg. It is down 5 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 91st of 505 rated schools in Region 01: Edinburg (tied with 51 others).
Thelma Rosa Salinas STEM Early College HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 91 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 84.5 average for 253 rated schools in Hidalgo County. It is down 5 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 36th of 253 rated schools in Hidalgo County (tied with 26 others).
Thelma Rosa Salinas STEM Early College HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 91 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 1,347 similarly sized rated schools. It is down 5 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 216th of 1,347 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 54 others).
Thelma Rosa Salinas STEM Early College HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 91 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is down 5 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 97 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement97 A+26.6 vs similar economic context · 2,019 reporting
School Progress97 A+18.2 vs similar economic context · 2,015 reporting
Closing the Gaps78 C+3.1 vs similar economic context · 2,000 reporting
Relative Performance97 A+20.2 vs similar economic context · 2,014 reporting
Thelma Rosa Salinas STEM Early College HS
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,178 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
97
A
—
School Progress
97
A
—
Closing the Gaps
78
C
2
Academic Growth
—
Not rated
—
Relative Performance
97
A
—
Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 2 points below B in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level94%+27 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,019 reporting
Meets grade level75%+34 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,019 reporting
Masters grade level36%+20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,019 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level50%−19 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,018 reporting
Meets grade level8%−36 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,018 reporting
Masters grade level0%−18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,018 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level97%+31 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,011 reporting
Meets grade level66%+27 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,011 reporting
Masters grade level12%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,011 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
Approaches grade level98%+36 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 647 reporting
Meets grade level89%+55 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 647 reporting
Masters grade level54%+39 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 647 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,178 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Graduation
Four-Year
100.0%+10.5 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 216 rated schools reporting
Five-Year
100.0%+9.8 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 216 rated schools reporting
Six-Year
100.0%+10.3 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 216 rated schools reporting
Dropout Rate
0.0%−1.8 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 217 rated schools reporting
These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only schools in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported school rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.
College, career and military readiness
Total credit for CCMR criteria
100.0%+16.1 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
Criterion
This school% of graduates
Averagesimilar economic context
Differencepercentage points
Reportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria
100.0%
83.9%
+16.1
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 259 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course
92.9%
57.2%
+35.7
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 260 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA
92.9%
19.9%
+73.0
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 260 rated schools reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)
45.2%
13.8%
+31.4
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 260 rated schools reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course
98.8%
26.6%
+72.2
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 260 rated schools reporting
Earned an industry-based certification
2.4%
33.4%
−31.0
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 260 rated schools reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate
0.0%
2.9%
−2.9
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 260 rated schools reporting
Earned an associate degree
75.0%
6.7%
+68.3
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 260 rated schools reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit
0.0%
6.5%
−6.5
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 260 rated schools reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness
0.0%
2.5%
−2.5
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 260 rated schools reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student
1.2%
7.3%
−6.1
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 260 rated schools reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces
1.2%
2.6%
−1.4
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 260 rated schools reporting
Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of
meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this
school minus the average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate,
counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that
criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported school percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
After high school: the following fall
Where school graduates appeared in Texas public higher-education records the fall after graduation. This is a limited next-step measure, not an eventual college-going or completion rate.
Graduates in the report
104
Class of 2023–24
Enrolled in Texas public higher education
84
80.8% of graduates
Not found in Texas public higher-ed records
15
14.4% of graduates
Not trackable
5
Fall 2024
Graduates in the report
This school
104
Selected comparison
264.2
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 242 rated schools reporting
Enrolled in Texas public higher education
This school
84
Selected comparison
100.3
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 242 rated schools reporting
Texas-public enrollment rate
This school
80.8%
Selected comparison
36.7%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 242 rated schools reporting
+44.1 pts vs similar economic context
Not-found rate
This school
14.4%
Selected comparison
55.2%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 242 rated schools reporting
−40.8 pts vs similar economic context
Not-trackable rate
This school
4.8%
Selected comparison
8.0%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 242 rated schools reporting
−3.2 pts vs similar economic context
Most common named Texas public destinations
U. OF TEXAS-RIO GRANDE VALLEY (003599)51
SOUTH TEXAS COLLEGE (031034)18
Selected comparison counts are neutral cohort scale context. The percentages put differently sized graduating classes on the same basis, but still cover only the limited Texas-public system observed by this report.
Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, high-school graduates enrolled in higher education, fetched 24 August 2026. The report covers graduates who enrolled in a Texas public college or university the following fall and includes only districts or campuses with more than 25 graduates.
“Not found” does not mean a graduate did not continue their education. It can include private or out-of-state college, work, military service, enrollment after the fall term, or another path the Texas public system does not observe.
“Not trackable” is not an outcome. THECB uses it for graduates with a non-standard identifier that could not be matched to higher-education records.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
206
Economically disadvantaged
91.7%+1.0 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
16.5%−23.8 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
2.4%−15.3 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
97.9%+4.9 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
5.3%−17.8 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Thelma Rosa Salinas STEM Early College HS
Hispanic 100%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,178 reporting for every category shown · 2,178 in full cohort
African American 14.8%
Hispanic 76.3%
White 5.7%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 1.3%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 1.6%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 01: Edinburg · 505 reporting for every category shown · 505 in full cohort
African American 0.2%
Hispanic 97.5%
White 1.9%
Asian 0.3%
Two or More Races 0.1%
Selected comparison averageFor Hidalgo County · 253 reporting for every category shown · 253 in full cohort
African American 0.2%
Hispanic 97.8%
White 1.5%
Asian 0.3%
Two or More Races 0.1%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 1,347 reporting for every category shown · 1,347 in full cohort
African American 8.5%
Hispanic 47.2%
White 39.6%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 1.1%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.1%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
206
Economically disadvantaged students
189
Emergent bilingual students
34
Special education students
5
Early college pathways
Early College High School
206
TEA-published share: 100%
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
79
Students in TEA mobility denominator
480
TEA-published mobility rate
16.5%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 206 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 265 (56.3%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
206
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
−265
Decrease · −56.3%
Change since 2021–22
−250
Decrease · −54.8%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
206
Selected comparison
573.8
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,155 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Thelma Rosa Salinas STEM Early College HS
School year
Students enrolledThelma Rosa Salinas STEM Early College HS
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
456
First available year
619
2022–23
461
Increase of 5 (1.1%)
615.5
2023–24
439
Decrease of 22 (4.8%)
605.3
2024–25
471
Increase of 32 (7.3%)
598.5
2025–26
206
Decrease of 265 (56.3%)
573.8
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
16
3.4% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
16
3.40 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
470
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
3.4%
Selected comparison
13.2%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,326 rated schools reporting
−9.8 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
3.4
Selected comparison
31.5
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,426 rated schools reporting
−28.1 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Thelma Rosa Salinas STEM Early College HS
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
493
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
2021–22
462
11
2.4%
13
2.81
12.7%
30.2
2022–23
460
14
3.0%
16
3.48
13.6%
33.1
2023–24
436
14
3.2%
23
5.28
13.8%
33.4
2024–25
470
16
3.4%
16
3.40
13.2%
31.5
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Thelma Rosa Salinas STEM Early College HS in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
16
3.4%
16
3.40
13.2%
31.5
In-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Out-of-school suspensions
15
3.2%
15
3.19
9.3%
15.3
DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Thelma Rosa Salinas STEM Early College HS
Parent district: La Joya ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$7,914
Selected comparison
$13,238
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,157 rated schools reporting
−$5,324 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $7,914 per student for this campus, $15,199 per student for its parent district, La Joya ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Thelma Rosa Salinas STEM Early College HS
Parent district: La Joya ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$7,431
$12,706
$13,054
$8,327
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,051 rated schools reporting
2019
$7,601
$13,017
$13,108
$8,339
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,078 rated schools reporting
2020
$7,670
$13,922
$14,058
$8,846
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,084 rated schools reporting
2021
$7,673
$14,753
$14,797
$9,661
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,088 rated schools reporting
2022
$8,849
$17,471
$15,708
$11,220
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,105 rated schools reporting
2023
$8,926
$17,081
$16,792
$11,735
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,130 rated schools reporting
2024
$8,854
$16,417
$18,125
$12,642
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,144 rated schools reporting
2025
$7,914
$15,199
$18,972
$13,238
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,157 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$70,758+$2,500 vs similar economic context
Teachers
15−25.6 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
14.1−0.5 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Thelma Rosa Salinas STEM Early College HS
Beginning 0.7%
1 to 5 years 4.1%
6 to 10 years 16.4%
11 to 20 years 54.1%
21 to 30 years 21.9%
Over 30 years 2.1%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,178 reporting for every category shown · 2,178 in full cohort
Beginning 7.4%
1 to 5 years 27.2%
6 to 10 years 18.8%
11 to 20 years 27.1%
21 to 30 years 14.9%
Over 30 years 3.4%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 01: Edinburg · 505 reporting for every category shown · 505 in full cohort
Beginning 2.7%
1 to 5 years 19.3%
6 to 10 years 16.2%
11 to 20 years 35%
21 to 30 years 22.6%
Over 30 years 4.2%
Selected comparison averageFor Hidalgo County · 253 reporting for every category shown · 253 in full cohort
Beginning 2.3%
1 to 5 years 18.4%
6 to 10 years 17.1%
11 to 20 years 37.2%
21 to 30 years 21.6%
Over 30 years 3.5%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 1,347 reporting for every category shown · 1,347 in full cohort
Beginning 6.7%
1 to 5 years 23.7%
6 to 10 years 17.4%
11 to 20 years 28.4%
21 to 30 years 17.6%
Over 30 years 5.4%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Thelma Rosa Salinas STEM Early College HS in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classThelma Rosa Salinas STEM Early College HS · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Secondary English
17.1
15.1
Secondary languages other than English
11.6
18.2
Secondary math
18.3
16.8
Secondary science
20.9
17.7
Secondary social studies
18.9
17.8
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 180 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
4 measures
3of 91
Social Studies — Meets
Hidalgo County · of the 91 that report this measure · tied with 1
3of 42
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA
Hidalgo County · of the 42 that report this measure
3of 42
Earned college credit for a dual credit course
Hidalgo County · of the 42 that report this measure
3of 42
Earned an associate degree
Hidalgo County · of the 42 that report this measure
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
12 measures
4of 242
Student Achievement
Hidalgo County · of the 242 that report this measure · tied with 4
4of 241
School Progress
Hidalgo County · of the 241 that report this measure · tied with 4
4of 241
Relative Performance
Hidalgo County · of the 241 that report this measure · tied with 3
4of 241
Math — Approaches
Hidalgo County · of the 241 that report this measure
4of 91
Social Studies — Masters
Hidalgo County · of the 91 that report this measure · tied with 1
4of 42
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course
Hidalgo County · of the 42 that report this measure
6of 240
Attendance
Hidalgo County · of the 240 that report this measure · tied with 2
7of 91
Social Studies — Approaches
Hidalgo County · of the 91 that report this measure · tied with 2
7of 42
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)
Hidalgo County · of the 42 that report this measure
8of 242
All Subjects — Approaches
Hidalgo County · of the 242 that report this measure
9of 242
All Subjects — Meets
Hidalgo County · of the 242 that report this measure
10of 240
Chronically absent (lowest is best)
Hidalgo County · of the 240 that report this measure
Other top-5% rankings
High placements in larger reporting groups
2 measures
39of 2,019
All Subjects — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,019 that report this measure · tied with 5
57of 2,011
Math — Meets
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,011 that report this measure · tied with 8
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 108912010.