Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

The Summit (Intermediate)

Harris County · Region 04: Houston · 34 students

Not Rated

At a glance

TEA did not issue an overall rating for The Summit (Intermediate) for 2025-26. Everything TEA did publish for this school is below.

Read the full rating context and placement

TEA did not issue an overall rating for The Summit (Intermediate) for 2025-26. Everything TEA did publish for this school is below.

TEA did not issue an overall rating for this school. Scores below are the figures TEA published; the letter grades are the state's where it issued them.

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Discipline and removal from class
  8. Spending per student
  9. Teachers and actual class size
  10. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
90807060 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas average 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26Not Rated—77.4 2,382 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25Not Rated—77.0 2,371 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24Not Rated—73.8 2,354 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23Not Rated—73.7 2,344 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22Not Rated—81.7 2,316 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement—Not reported · similar economic context 70.5 · 2,221 reporting
  • School Progress—Not reported · similar economic context 78.6 · 2,215 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps—Not reported · similar economic context 74.7 · 2,202 reporting
  • Academic Growth—Not reported · similar economic context 72.7 · 2,178 reporting
  • Relative Performance—Not reported · similar economic context 76.6 · 2,215 reporting
  • The Summit (Intermediate)
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,382 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement—Not rated—
School Progress—Not rated—
Closing the Gaps—Not rated—
Academic Growth—Not rated—
Relative Performance—Not rated—

The scores above are the ones TEA published. TEA did not issue letter grades for this school, so none are shown: the A–F thresholds marked on the chart are the state's, but applying them here would produce a grade the state chose to withhold.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level0%−67 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,221 reporting
  • Meets grade level0%−41 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,221 reporting
  • Masters grade level0%−16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,221 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level0%−69 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,220 reporting
  • Meets grade level0%−44 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,220 reporting
  • Masters grade level0%−18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,220 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level0%−66 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,212 reporting
  • Meets grade level0%−38 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,212 reporting
  • Masters grade level0%−15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,212 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 63.6% · 2,077 reporting
  • Meets grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 34.1% · 2,077 reporting
  • Masters grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 13.9% · 2,077 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 62.7% · 760 reporting
  • Meets grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 34.7% · 760 reporting
  • Masters grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 14.9% · 760 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,382 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
34
Economically disadvantaged
88.2%−0.3 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
35.3%−2.7 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
29.4%+11.2 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
83.0%−10.0 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
55.7%+33.1 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

The Summit (Intermediate)

African American: 11.8%Hispanic: 82.4%Asian: 2.9%Two or More Races: 2.9%
  • African American 11.8%
  • Hispanic 82.4%
  • Asian 2.9%
  • Two or More Races 2.9%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,382 reporting for every category shown · 2,382 in full cohort

African American: 14.5%Hispanic: 74.7%White: 7.2%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 1.3%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 1.8%
  • African American 14.5%
  • Hispanic 74.7%
  • White 7.2%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 1.3%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 1.8%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
34
Economically disadvantaged students
30
Emergent bilingual students
12
Special education students
10

TEA context labels

  • Disciplinary Alternative Education Program (DAEP)

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
369
Students in TEA mobility denominator
370
TEA-published mobility rate
99.7%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
149

Rate not available

Disciplinary actions
323

Rate not available

Cumulative year-end enrollment
Not reported

2024–25

TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for The Summit (Intermediate)
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 Not reported 38 — 85 — — —
2021–22 Not reported 150 — 371 — — —
2022–23 Not reported 175 — 361 — — —
2023–24 Not reported 230 — 528 — — —
2024–25 Not reported 149 — 323 — — —
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for The Summit (Intermediate) in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 149 — 323 — — —
In-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Out-of-school suspensions 128 — 256 — — —
DAEP placements 45 — 52 — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
JJAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$7k$46k$86k20182020202220242025
  • The Summit (Intermediate)
  • Parent district: Pasadena ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$14,255
Selected comparison
$13,013

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,369 rated schools reporting

+$1,242 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $14,255 per student for this campus, $18,084 per student for its parent district, Pasadena ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearThe Summit (Intermediate)Parent district: Pasadena ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$22,897$12,956$13,054$8,289 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,251 rated schools reporting
2019$17,936$12,390$13,108$8,323 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,282 rated schools reporting
2020$18,256$12,617$14,058$8,849 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,292 rated schools reporting
2021$81,915$13,595$14,797$9,590 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,297 rated schools reporting
2022$18,260$15,651$15,708$11,086 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,316 rated schools reporting
2023$14,159$17,367$16,792$11,634 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,342 rated schools reporting
2024$11,486$17,655$18,125$12,460 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,355 rated schools reporting
2025$14,255$18,084$18,972$13,013 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,369 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$65,663−$2,319 vs similar economic context
Teachers
10−31.1 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
3.4−11.1 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

The Summit (Intermediate)

Beginning: 40%6 to 10 years: 28%11 to 20 years: 31%21 to 30 years: 1%
  • Beginning 40%
  • 6 to 10 years 28%
  • 11 to 20 years 31%
  • 21 to 30 years 1%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,382 reporting for every category shown · 2,382 in full cohort

Beginning: 7.4%1 to 5 years: 27.4%6 to 10 years: 18.9%11 to 20 years: 27.1%21 to 30 years: 15%Over 30 years: 3.5%
  • Beginning 7.4%
  • 1 to 5 years 27.4%
  • 6 to 10 years 18.9%
  • 11 to 20 years 27.1%
  • 21 to 30 years 15%
  • Over 30 years 3.5%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for The Summit (Intermediate) in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classThe Summit (Intermediate) · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Grade 5119.4
Grade 68.417.5
Secondary English1315.2
Secondary math9.516.7
Secondary social studies11.817.8

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 101917055.