−0.3 ptsvs 87.3 average · 60 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
35 of 60tied with 4 others
Score vs similar-size group
+7.5 ptsvs 79.5 average · 246 similarly sized rated charter campuses
Similar size placement
71 of 246tied with 9 others
Score vs state
+5.3 ptsvs 81.7 average · 829 rated Texas charter campuses
Texas charter placement
297 of 829tied with 37 others
B87
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 86 in 2021-22. The current score is level with the 87.3 average for 60 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 79.5 average for 246 similarly sized rated charter campuses.The current score is above the 81.7 average for 829 rated Texas charter campuses.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
66%vs 63.8% avg · +2.2 pts
Masters
40%vs 32.4% avg · +7.6 pts
Among 60 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
The Leadership Academy is rated B by TEA, scoring 87 out of 100 for 2025-26 — level with the 87.3 average for 60 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context. It is down 2 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 35th of 60 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context (tied with 4 others).
The Leadership Academy is rated B by TEA, scoring 87 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 79.5 average for 246 similarly sized rated charter campuses. It is down 2 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 71st of 246 similarly sized rated charter campuses (tied with 9 others).
The Leadership Academy is rated B by TEA, scoring 87 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.7 average for 829 rated Texas charter campuses. It is down 2 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 86 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement91 A+3.4 vs similar economic context · 60 reporting
School Progress85 B+4.6 vs similar economic context · 57 reporting
Closing the Gaps78 C−6.8 vs similar economic context · 56 reporting
Academic Growth85 B+6.5 vs similar economic context · 56 reporting
Relative Performance69 D−3.6 vs similar economic context · 57 reporting
The Leadership Academy
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (60 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
91
A
—
School Progress
85
B
5
Closing the Gaps
78
C
2
Academic Growth
85
B
5
Relative Performance
69
D
1
Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 2 points below B in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (91), so
School Progress (85) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 91.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level81%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 60 reporting
Meets grade level66%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 60 reporting
Masters grade level40%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 60 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level84%−4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 59 reporting
Meets grade level75%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 59 reporting
Masters grade level48%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 59 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level74%−6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 58 reporting
Meets grade level55%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 58 reporting
Masters grade level31%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 58 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level88%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 54 reporting
Meets grade level70%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 54 reporting
Masters grade level40%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 54 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
Approaches grade level90%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 37 reporting
Meets grade level70%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 37 reporting
Masters grade level50%+18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 37 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (60 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only charter campuses for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
308
Economically disadvantaged
15.9%+1.1 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
2.6%−10.7 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
16.2%+2.6 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.1%−0.2 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
11.9%+1.3 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
The Leadership Academy
African American 3.2%
Hispanic 15.6%
White 63.6%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 10.4%
Pacific Islander 0.3%
Two or More Races 6.5%
Selected comparison averageFor charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 60 reporting for every category shown · 60 in full cohort
African American 9.7%
Hispanic 27.4%
White 34.3%
American Indian 0.4%
Asian 22.2%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 5.8%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized charter campuses · 246 reporting for every category shown · 246 in full cohort
African American 21.8%
Hispanic 57.4%
White 12.6%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.1%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.8%
Texas charter average829 reporting for every category shown · 829 Texas charter campuses in full cohort
African American 17.5%
Hispanic 61.8%
White 12.2%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.5%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.5%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
308
Economically disadvantaged students
49
Emergent bilingual students
8
Special education students
50
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
16
Students in TEA mobility denominator
269
TEA-published mobility rate
5.9%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 308 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 24 (7.2%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
308
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
−24
Decrease · −7.2%
Change since 2021–22
+41
Increase · +15.4%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
308
Selected comparison
566.8
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 60 rated charter campuses reporting
Student enrollment by school year for The Leadership Academy
School year
Students enrolledThe Leadership Academy
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
267
First available year
561.5
2022–23
301
Increase of 34 (12.7%)
540.6
2023–24
293
Decrease of 8 (2.7%)
566.2
2024–25
332
Increase of 39 (13.3%)
567.1
2025–26
308
Decrease of 24 (7.2%)
566.8
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting charter campuses in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Suppressed
Rate not available
Disciplinary actions
Suppressed
Rate not available
Cumulative year-end enrollment
336
2024–25
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for The Leadership Academy
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
258
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2021–22
281
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2022–23
313
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2023–24
300
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2024–25
336
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for The Leadership Academy in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
In-school suspensions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Out-of-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized charter campuses can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
The Leadership Academy
Parent district: Cumberland Academy
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$9,396
Selected comparison
$10,405
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 55 rated charter campuses reporting
−$1,009 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $9,396 per student for this campus, $12,462 per student for its parent district, Cumberland Academy, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
The Leadership Academy
Parent district: Cumberland Academy
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$7,342
$7,814
$13,054
$6,847
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 32 rated charter campuses reporting
2019
$7,380
$8,582
$13,108
$6,974
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 34 rated charter campuses reporting
2020
$7,547
$9,803
$14,058
$7,473
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 37 rated charter campuses reporting
2021
$6,769
$10,710
$14,797
$8,110
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 41 rated charter campuses reporting
2022
$7,489
$11,763
$15,708
$8,929
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 43 rated charter campuses reporting
2023
$10,176
$12,635
$16,792
$9,957
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 50 rated charter campuses reporting
2024
$11,732
$13,530
$18,125
$10,028
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 52 rated charter campuses reporting
2025
$9,396
$12,462
$18,972
$10,405
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 55 rated charter campuses reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$53,625−$6,829 vs similar economic context
Teachers
26−8.1 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
11.9−24.8 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
The Leadership Academy
Beginning 15.4%
1 to 5 years 38.6%
6 to 10 years 30.9%
11 to 20 years 15.4%
Selected comparison averageFor charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 60 reporting for every category shown · 60 in full cohort
Beginning 9.6%
1 to 5 years 36%
6 to 10 years 16.1%
11 to 20 years 16.4%
21 to 30 years 7.5%
Over 30 years 1.1%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized charter campuses · 246 reporting for every category shown · 246 in full cohort
Beginning 12.5%
1 to 5 years 41.8%
6 to 10 years 20.2%
11 to 20 years 16.2%
21 to 30 years 5.5%
Over 30 years 1%
Texas charter average829 reporting for every category shown · 829 Texas charter campuses in full cohort
Beginning 13%
1 to 5 years 44.3%
6 to 10 years 19.6%
11 to 20 years 15.4%
21 to 30 years 4.8%
Over 30 years 0.9%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for The Leadership Academy in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classThe Leadership Academy · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten
14
21.5
Grade 1
10.5
22.1
Grade 2
14.3
22.1
Grade 3
8.5
23.5
Grade 4
8.9
23.1
Grade 5
6.9
22.4
Grade 6
4.6
22.1
Secondary English
7.3
16.4
Secondary languages other than English
8
15.6
Secondary math
4.8
14.7
Secondary science
10.5
18.2
Secondary social studies
10.5
17.9
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 12 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 72 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
1 measure
3of 167
Social Studies — Masters
Similar size · of the 167 that report this measure · tied with 3
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
1 measure
9of 246
Reading — Masters
Similar size · of the 246 that report this measure
Other top-5% rankings
High placements in larger reporting groups
1 measure
12of 246
All Subjects — Masters
Similar size · of the 246 that report this measure · tied with 1
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 212801102.