Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus · Online school

Texas Online Preparatory MS

Huntsville ISD · 2,085 students

Current score
66/1002025-26
Change
−7 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
−14.0 ptsvs 80 average · 1,996 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
1,822 of 1,996tied with 31 others
D66

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 74 in 2021-22. The current score is below the 80 average for 1,996 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Current strength

Chronically absent lower than the similar-context average

0% −16.5 pts vs 16.5%

  • 0% is 16.5 percentage points lower than the 16.5% average among 1,933 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
  • Tied for 1st-lowest of 1,933 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure; 3 schools share that value.
See the full measure

Current strength

Attendance above the similar-context average

100% +5.9 pts vs 94.1%

  • 100% is 5.9 percentage points above the 94.1% average among 1,933 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
  • Tied for 1st of 1,933 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure; 2 schools share that value.
See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Texas Online Preparatory MS is rated D by TEA, scoring 66 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 80 average for 1,996 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 7 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 1,822nd of 1,996 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 31 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. Official improvement and transfer notices
  3. 5 years of ratings
  4. Where the score comes from
  5. Student outcomes
  6. Who this school serves
  7. Student counts behind the percentages
  8. Enrollment over time
  9. Discipline and removal from class
  10. Spending per student
  11. Where this school ranks best
  12. Where this comes from

Official improvement and transfer notices

Official state and federal designations can carry support, reporting requirements or a family transfer option that a single A–F rating does not explain.

Schools identified for improvement

This school
Listed
Selected comparison
27.2%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,996 rated schools reporting

Schools on the PEG list

This school
Not listed
Selected comparison
2.8%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,996 rated schools reporting

Selected comparison percentages are the share of reporting schools in that group found on each dated list. They are neutral prevalence context; changing the comparison never changes this school's official status.

These are dated TEA statuses, fetched 24 August 2026; they are not added to or subtracted from this site's rating.

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
90807060 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageTexas Online Preparatory MS 7383716766 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated C with 74 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26D6680.0 1,996 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25D6779.8 1,971 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24C7177.9 1,951 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23B8378.4 1,918 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22C7382.2 1,894 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement65 D−13.0 vs similar economic context · 1,894 reporting
  • School Progress60 D−20.8 vs similar economic context · 1,886 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps67 D−10.2 vs similar economic context · 1,867 reporting
  • Academic Growth57 F−16.9 vs similar economic context · 1,829 reporting
  • Relative Performance60 D−19.2 vs similar economic context · 1,886 reporting
  • Texas Online Preparatory MS
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,996 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement65D5
School Progress60D10
Closing the Gaps67D3
Academic Growth57F3
Relative Performance60D10

Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 3 points below C in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (65), so School Progress (60) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 65.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level60%−14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,894 reporting
  • Meets grade level34%−14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,894 reporting
  • Masters grade level12%−8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,894 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level78%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,890 reporting
  • Meets grade level51%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,890 reporting
  • Masters grade level20%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,890 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level45%−26 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,881 reporting
  • Meets grade level21%−22 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,881 reporting
  • Masters grade level6%−10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,881 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level65%−9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,730 reporting
  • Meets grade level38%−8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,730 reporting
  • Masters grade level16%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,730 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level46%−28 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 940 reporting
  • Meets grade level19%−27 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 940 reporting
  • Masters grade level5%−16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 940 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,996 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
2,085
Economically disadvantaged
63.9%−0.2 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
8.9%−8.6 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
19.4%+0.5 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
100.0%+5.9 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
0.0%−16.5 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Texas Online Preparatory MS

African American: 18.4%Hispanic: 42.7%White: 29.8%American Indian: 0.5%Asian: 3.5%Pacific Islander: 0.3%Two or More Races: 4.7%
  • African American 18.4%
  • Hispanic 42.7%
  • White 29.8%
  • American Indian 0.5%
  • Asian 3.5%
  • Pacific Islander 0.3%
  • Two or More Races 4.7%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,996 reporting for every category shown · 1,996 in full cohort

African American: 11%Hispanic: 51.1%White: 31.5%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 2.2%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 3.7%
  • African American 11%
  • Hispanic 51.1%
  • White 31.5%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 2.2%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 3.7%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
2,085
Economically disadvantaged students
1,332
Emergent bilingual students
186
Special education students
405

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
615
Students in TEA mobility denominator
2,444
TEA-published mobility rate
25.2%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 2,085 students in 2025–26, an increase of 35 (1.7%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
2,085

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
+35

Increase · +1.7%

Change since 2021–22
−1,117

Decrease · −34.9%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
2,085
Selected comparison
622.7

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,960 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Texas Online Preparatory MS
School yearStudents enrolledTexas Online Preparatory MSChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 3,202 First available year 637.3
2022–23 1,941 Decrease of 1,261 (39.4%) 643.8
2023–24 2,120 Increase of 179 (9.2%) 640.6
2024–25 2,050 Decrease of 70 (3.3%) 635.5
2025–26 2,085 Increase of 35 (1.7%) 622.7

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Not reported

Rate not available

Disciplinary actions
Not reported

Rate not available

Cumulative year-end enrollment
2,444

2024–25

TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Texas Online Preparatory MS
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 2,099 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2021–22 3,688 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2022–23 2,296 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2023–24 2,493 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2024–25 2,444 Not reported — Not reported — — —
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Texas Online Preparatory MS in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline Not reported — Not reported — — —
In-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Out-of-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$6k$13k$20k20232025
  • Texas Online Preparatory MS
  • Parent district: Huntsville ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$8,235
Selected comparison
$12,664

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,967 rated schools reporting

−$4,429 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $8,235 per student for this campus, $12,706 per student for its parent district, Huntsville ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearTexas Online Preparatory MSParent district: Huntsville ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2023$6,669$17,996$16,792$11,147 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,918 rated schools reporting
2024$8,075$16,012$18,125$12,066 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,947 rated schools reporting
2025$8,235$12,706$18,972$12,664 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,967 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 117 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#1 rankings

First-place results

2 measures

  • 1of 7,366

    Attendance

    Texas average · of the 7,366 that report this measure · tied with 18 · full ranking

  • 1of 7,358

    Chronically absent (lowest is best)

    Texas average · of the 7,358 that report this measure · tied with 21 · full ranking

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

16 measures

  • 4of 12

    Reading — Masters

    Walker County · of the 12 that report this measure

  • 5of 12

    Reading — Approaches

    Walker County · of the 12 that report this measure

  • 6of 12

    Reading — Meets

    Walker County · of the 12 that report this measure

  • 7of 11

    Science — Approaches

    Walker County · of the 11 that report this measure

  • 7of 11

    Science — Meets

    Walker County · of the 11 that report this measure

  • 7of 11

    Science — Masters

    Walker County · of the 11 that report this measure

  • 8of 12

    Student Achievement

    Walker County · of the 12 that report this measure

  • 8of 12

    Relative Performance

    Walker County · of the 12 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 8of 12

    All Subjects — Approaches

    Walker County · of the 12 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 9of 12

    Overall score

    Walker County · of the 12 that report this measure

  • 9of 12

    Closing the Gaps

    Walker County · of the 12 that report this measure

  • 9of 12

    All Subjects — Meets

    Walker County · of the 12 that report this measure

  • 9of 12

    All Subjects — Masters

    Walker County · of the 12 that report this measure

  • 10of 12

    School Progress

    Walker County · of the 12 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 10of 12

    Math — Masters

    Walker County · of the 12 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 10of 12

    Per-student spending

    Walker County · of the 12 that report this measure

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 236902048.