Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus · Alternative Education Accountability

Tegeler Community School

Harris County · Region 04: Houston · 194 students

Current score
95/1002025-26
Change
+1 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+17.6 ptsvs 77.4 average · 2,378 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
39 of 2,378tied with 10 others
A95

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 100 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 77.4 average for 2,378 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Recent movement

Overall score rose 11 points

84 to 95 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 95 is 17.6 points above the 77.4 average among 2,378 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Recent domain gain

Closing the Gaps rose 17 points

73 to 90 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 90 is 15.5 points above the 74.5 average among 2,197 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Current strength

Academic Growth above the similar-context average

97 +24.6 pts vs 72.4

  • 97 is 24.6 points above the 72.4 average among 2,169 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
  • 1st of 2,169 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Tegeler Community School is rated A by TEA, scoring 95 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 77.4 average for 2,378 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 1 point since 2021-22.

Ranks 39th of 2,378 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 10 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. After high school: the following fall
  6. Who this school serves
  7. Student counts behind the percentages
  8. Enrollment over time
  9. Discipline and removal from class
  10. Spending per student
  11. Teachers and actual class size
  12. Where this school ranks best
  13. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
90807060 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageTegeler Community School 9494948495 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 100 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26A9577.4 2,378 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25B8477.1 2,365 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24A9473.9 2,348 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23A9474.2 2,335 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22A9481.7 2,306 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement84 B+13.1 vs similar economic context · 2,218 reporting
  • School Progress97 A+18.5 vs similar economic context · 2,211 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps90 A+15.5 vs similar economic context · 2,197 reporting
  • Academic Growth97 A+24.6 vs similar economic context · 2,169 reporting
  • Relative Performance91 A+14.3 vs similar economic context · 2,211 reporting
  • Tegeler Community School
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,378 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement84B6
School Progress97A—
Closing the Gaps90A—
Academic Growth97A—
Relative Performance91A—

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (97), so Student Achievement (84) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 97.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level83%+16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,218 reporting
  • Meets grade level47%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,218 reporting
  • Masters grade level16%±0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,218 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level65%−4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,217 reporting
  • Meets grade level31%−14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,217 reporting
  • Masters grade level2%−16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,217 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level97%+31 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,207 reporting
  • Meets grade level74%+36 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,207 reporting
  • Masters grade level39%+25 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,207 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level95%+31 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,066 reporting
  • Meets grade level45%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,066 reporting
  • Masters grade level9%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,066 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level91%+27 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 790 reporting
  • Meets grade level53%+17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 790 reporting
  • Masters grade level23%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 790 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,378 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Completion

Four-Year
65.2%−6.3 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 56 rated schools reporting
Five-Year
74.4%−2.0 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 56 rated schools reporting
Six-Year
97.1%+19.6 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 56 rated schools reporting
Dropout Rate
5.3%+0.1 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 56 rated schools reporting

These measures use TEA's alternative-education accountability population. Each comparison average includes only schools in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported school rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.

College, career and military readiness

Total credit for CCMR criteria
22.0%−62.2 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
CriterionThis school% of graduatesAveragesimilar economic contextDifferencepercentage pointsReportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria22.0%84.2%−62.2 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 346 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course6.5%57.0%−50.5 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 348 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA6.5%21.1%−14.6 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 348 rated schools reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)0.0%12.5%−12.5 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 348 rated schools reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course2.2%28.6%−26.4 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 348 rated schools reporting
Earned an industry-based certification17.4%33.9%−16.5 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 348 rated schools reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate0.0%2.7%−2.7 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 348 rated schools reporting
Earned an associate degree0.0%7.1%−7.1 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 348 rated schools reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit0.0%6.2%−6.2 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 348 rated schools reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness0.0%2.9%−2.9 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 348 rated schools reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student4.3%7.8%−3.5 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 348 rated schools reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces0.0%2.8%−2.8 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 348 rated schools reporting

Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this school minus the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate, counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported school percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

After high school: the following fall

Where school graduates appeared in Texas public higher-education records the fall after graduation. This is a limited next-step measure, not an eventual college-going or completion rate.

Graduates in the report
40

Class of 2023–24

Enrolled in Texas public higher education
17

42.5% of graduates

Not found in Texas public higher-ed records
22

55.0% of graduates

Not trackable
1

Fall 2024

Graduates in the report

This school
40
Selected comparison
265.6

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 311 rated schools reporting

Enrolled in Texas public higher education

This school
17
Selected comparison
103.8

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 311 rated schools reporting

Texas-public enrollment rate

This school
42.5%
Selected comparison
38.3%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 311 rated schools reporting

+4.2 pts vs similar economic context

Not-found rate

This school
55.0%
Selected comparison
54.6%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 311 rated schools reporting

+0.4 pts vs similar economic context

Not-trackable rate

This school
2.5%
Selected comparison
7.2%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 311 rated schools reporting

−4.7 pts vs similar economic context

Most common named Texas public destinations

  1. SAN JACINTO COLLEGE (029137)16

Selected comparison counts are neutral cohort scale context. The percentages put differently sized graduating classes on the same basis, but still cover only the limited Texas-public system observed by this report.

Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, high-school graduates enrolled in higher education, fetched 24 August 2026. The report covers graduates who enrolled in a Texas public college or university the following fall and includes only districts or campuses with more than 25 graduates.

“Not found” does not mean a graduate did not continue their education. It can include private or out-of-state college, work, military service, enrollment after the fall term, or another path the Texas public system does not observe.

“Not trackable” is not an outcome. THECB uses it for graduates with a non-standard identifier that could not be matched to higher-education records.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
194
Economically disadvantaged
86.2%−0.6 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
32.2%−3.7 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
8.0%−10.3 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
87.4%−5.7 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
52.8%+30.6 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Tegeler Community School

African American: 11.5%Hispanic: 78.2%White: 7.5%Asian: 0.6%Two or More Races: 2.3%
  • African American 11.5%
  • Hispanic 78.2%
  • White 7.5%
  • Asian 0.6%
  • Two or More Races 2.3%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,378 reporting for every category shown · 2,378 in full cohort

African American: 14.2%Hispanic: 73.6%White: 8.4%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 1.4%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 2%
  • African American 14.2%
  • Hispanic 73.6%
  • White 8.4%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 1.4%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 2%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
174
Economically disadvantaged students
150
Emergent bilingual students
56
Special education students
14

TEA context labels

  • Alternative education campus under AEA procedures
  • Alternative education type: dropout recovery school
  • Rated under AEA procedures

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
83
Students in TEA mobility denominator
169
TEA-published mobility rate
49.1%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 194 students in 2025–26, an increase of 44 (29.3%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
194

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
+44

Increase · +29.3%

Change since 2021–22
−141

Decrease · −42.1%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
194
Selected comparison
605.5

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,350 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Tegeler Community School
School yearStudents enrolledTegeler Community SchoolChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 335 First available year 640.5
2022–23 346 Increase of 11 (3.3%) 638.1
2023–24 141 Decrease of 205 (59.2%) 629.9
2024–25 150 Increase of 9 (6.4%) 626.3
2025–26 194 Increase of 44 (29.3%) 605.5

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
32

18.5% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
83

47.98 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
173

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
18.5%
Selected comparison
13.3%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,606 rated schools reporting

+5.2 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
47.98
Selected comparison
32

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,725 rated schools reporting

+16.0 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Tegeler Community School
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 337 66 19.6% 111 32.94 7.7% 15
2021–22 348 106 30.5% 206 59.20 12.7% 30.4
2022–23 366 99 27.1% 227 62.02 13.7% 33.8
2023–24 198 31 15.7% 61 30.81 13.8% 34
2024–25 173 32 18.5% 83 47.98 13.3% 32
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Tegeler Community School in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 32 18.5% 83 47.98 13.3% 32
In-school suspensions 12 6.9% 12 6.94 11.7% 23
Out-of-school suspensions 32 18.5% 42 24.28 8.8% 14.2
DAEP placements 20 11.6% 22 12.72 5.3% 6.4
Mandatory DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$7k$19k$32k2019202120232025
  • Tegeler Community School
  • Parent district: Pasadena ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$23,793
Selected comparison
$13,321

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,363 rated schools reporting

+$10,473 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $23,793 per student for this campus, $18,084 per student for its parent district, Pasadena ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearTegeler Community SchoolParent district: Pasadena ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2019$11,704$12,390$13,108$8,328 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,270 rated schools reporting
2020$12,140$12,617$14,058$8,845 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,280 rated schools reporting
2021$12,962$13,595$14,797$9,558 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,286 rated schools reporting
2022$14,020$15,651$15,708$11,063 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,306 rated schools reporting
2023$13,720$17,367$16,792$11,588 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,333 rated schools reporting
2024$30,015$17,655$18,125$12,566 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,348 rated schools reporting
2025$23,793$18,084$18,972$13,321 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,363 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$74,896+$7,190 vs similar economic context
Teachers
27−15.1 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
6.5−7.9 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Tegeler Community School

Beginning: 11.2%1 to 5 years: 11.2%6 to 10 years: 4.1%11 to 20 years: 29.9%21 to 30 years: 32.5%Over 30 years: 11.2%
  • Beginning 11.2%
  • 1 to 5 years 11.2%
  • 6 to 10 years 4.1%
  • 11 to 20 years 29.9%
  • 21 to 30 years 32.5%
  • Over 30 years 11.2%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,378 reporting for every category shown · 2,378 in full cohort

Beginning: 7.1%1 to 5 years: 27.4%6 to 10 years: 19%11 to 20 years: 27.3%21 to 30 years: 15.1%Over 30 years: 3.5%
  • Beginning 7.1%
  • 1 to 5 years 27.4%
  • 6 to 10 years 19%
  • 11 to 20 years 27.3%
  • 21 to 30 years 15.1%
  • Over 30 years 3.5%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Tegeler Community School in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classTegeler Community School · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Secondary English8.815.3
Secondary languages other than English3.918.3
Secondary math9.916.7
Secondary science9.717.9
Secondary social studies8.717.9

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 200 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#1 rankings

First-place results

1 measure

  • 1of 2,169

    Academic Growth

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,169 that report this measure

#2–3 rankings

Second- and third-place results

1 measure

  • 2of 13

    Six-Year Completion Rate

    Harris County (alternative-education accountability only) · of the 13 that report this measure

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

4 measures

  • 6of 13

    Dropout Rate (lowest is best)

    Harris County (alternative-education accountability only) · of the 13 that report this measure

  • 7of 13

    Five-Year Completion Rate

    Harris County (alternative-education accountability only) · of the 13 that report this measure

  • 8of 1,080

    School Progress

    Similar size · of the 1,080 that report this measure · tied with 10

  • 8of 13

    Four-Year Completion Rate

    Harris County (alternative-education accountability only) · of the 13 that report this measure

Other top-5% rankings

High placements in larger reporting groups

7 measures

  • 12of 2,207

    Math — Approaches

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,207 that report this measure · tied with 11

  • 15of 906

    Per-student spending

    Harris County · of the 906 that report this measure

  • 27of 2,207

    Math — Masters

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,207 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 32of 2,207

    Math — Meets

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,207 that report this measure · tied with 3

  • 39of 2,378

    Overall score

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,378 that report this measure · tied with 10

  • 66of 2,066

    Science — Approaches

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,066 that report this measure · tied with 17

  • 121of 2,218

    All Subjects — Approaches

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,218 that report this measure · tied with 24

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 101917007.