Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Tatum MS

Rusk County · Region 07: Kilgore · 309 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
83/1002025-26
Change
+5 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+3.0 ptsvs 80 average · 2,000 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
796 of 2,000tied with 74 others
B83

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 77 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 80 average for 2,000 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Recent domain gain

School Progress rose 2 points

84 to 86 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 86 is 5.2 points above the 80.8 average among 1,889 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

STAAR result

Math above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
50%vs 42.4% avg · +7.6 pts
Masters
19%vs 16.3% avg · +2.7 pts

Among 1,884 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

STAAR result

Reading above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
57%vs 53% avg · +4 pts
Masters
28%vs 21.2% avg · +6.8 pts

Among 1,893 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Tatum MS is rated B by TEA, scoring 83 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80 average for 2,000 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 5 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 796th of 2,000 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 74 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this school ranks best
  12. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageTatum MS 7880808583 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated C with 77 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26B8380.0 2,000 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25B8579.7 1,976 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24B8077.8 1,956 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23B8078.3 1,923 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22C7882.2 1,899 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement80 B+2.1 vs similar economic context · 1,897 reporting
  • School Progress86 B+5.2 vs similar economic context · 1,889 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps76 C−1.2 vs similar economic context · 1,870 reporting
  • Academic Growth80 B+6.1 vs similar economic context · 1,832 reporting
  • Relative Performance86 B+6.9 vs similar economic context · 1,889 reporting
  • Tatum MS
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,000 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement80B10
School Progress86B4
Closing the Gaps76C4
Academic Growth80B10
Relative Performance86B4

Closest to moving up: School Progress, 4 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (86), so Student Achievement (80) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 86.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level79%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,897 reporting
  • Meets grade level49%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,897 reporting
  • Masters grade level20%+0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,897 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level85%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,893 reporting
  • Meets grade level57%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,893 reporting
  • Masters grade level28%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,893 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level80%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,884 reporting
  • Meets grade level50%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,884 reporting
  • Masters grade level19%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,884 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level74%−0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,736 reporting
  • Meets grade level44%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,736 reporting
  • Masters grade level13%−8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,736 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level65%−9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 939 reporting
  • Meets grade level29%−17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 939 reporting
  • Masters grade level9%−12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 939 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,000 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
309
Economically disadvantaged
64.1%−0.2 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
13.9%−3.7 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
16.5%−2.4 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.8%+1.7 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
6.5%−10.1 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Tatum MS

African American: 14.2%Hispanic: 36.2%White: 44%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 1%Two or More Races: 4.2%
  • African American 14.2%
  • Hispanic 36.2%
  • White 44%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 1%
  • Two or More Races 4.2%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,000 reporting for every category shown · 2,000 in full cohort

African American: 11.1%Hispanic: 51.2%White: 31.3%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 2.2%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 3.7%
  • African American 11.1%
  • Hispanic 51.2%
  • White 31.3%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 2.2%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 3.7%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
309
Economically disadvantaged students
198
Emergent bilingual students
43
Special education students
51

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
28
Students in TEA mobility denominator
336
TEA-published mobility rate
8.3%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 309 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 12 (3.7%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
309

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
−12

Decrease · −3.7%

Change since 2021–22
−24

Decrease · −7.2%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
309
Selected comparison
621.2

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,963 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Tatum MS
School yearStudents enrolledTatum MSChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 333 First available year 636
2022–23 338 Increase of 5 (1.5%) 642.5
2023–24 333 Decrease of 5 (1.5%) 639.1
2024–25 321 Decrease of 12 (3.6%) 634.5
2025–26 309 Decrease of 12 (3.7%) 621.2

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
70

20.8% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
130

38.69 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
336

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
20.8%
Selected comparison
12.9%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,536 rated schools reporting

+7.9 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
38.69
Selected comparison
30.1

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,654 rated schools reporting

+8.6 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Tatum MS
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 379 33 8.7% 67 17.68 9.7% 19.3
2021–22 352 36 10.2% 63 17.90 12.8% 29.7
2022–23 350 29 8.3% 46 13.14 13.3% 31.9
2023–24 349 70 20.1% 112 32.09 13.1% 31.6
2024–25 336 70 20.8% 130 38.69 12.9% 30.1
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Tatum MS in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 70 20.8% 130 38.69 12.9% 30.1
In-school suspensions 68 20.2% 111 33.04 11.5% 23.1
Out-of-school suspensions 10 3.0% 10 2.98 7.1% 10.5
DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$6k$13k$20k20182020202220242025
  • Tatum MS
  • Parent district: Tatum ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$8,740
Selected comparison
$12,657

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,972 rated schools reporting

−$3,917 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $8,740 per student for this campus, $16,257 per student for its parent district, Tatum ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearTatum MSParent district: Tatum ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$6,368$11,085$13,054$7,919 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,827 rated schools reporting
2019$6,235$11,814$13,108$8,077 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,843 rated schools reporting
2020$6,818$12,622$14,058$8,661 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,866 rated schools reporting
2021$6,152$14,214$14,797$9,089 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,878 rated schools reporting
2022$7,309$14,736$15,708$10,429 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,900 rated schools reporting
2023$7,920$15,693$16,792$11,140 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,923 rated schools reporting
2024$8,166$16,133$18,125$12,058 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,952 rated schools reporting
2025$8,740$16,257$18,972$12,657 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,972 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$70,486+$4,112 vs similar economic context
Teachers
25−17.0 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
12.2−1.7 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Tatum MS

1 to 5 years: 19%6 to 10 years: 30.4%11 to 20 years: 18.2%21 to 30 years: 9.9%Over 30 years: 22.5%
  • 1 to 5 years 19%
  • 6 to 10 years 30.4%
  • 11 to 20 years 18.2%
  • 21 to 30 years 9.9%
  • Over 30 years 22.5%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,000 reporting for every category shown · 2,000 in full cohort

Beginning: 6.2%1 to 5 years: 26.3%6 to 10 years: 19.1%11 to 20 years: 28%21 to 30 years: 15.9%Over 30 years: 4.1%
  • Beginning 6.2%
  • 1 to 5 years 26.3%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.1%
  • 11 to 20 years 28%
  • 21 to 30 years 15.9%
  • Over 30 years 4.1%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Tatum MS in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classTatum MS · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Grade 615.617.7
Secondary English1315.1
Secondary languages other than English18.517.5
Secondary math17.515.9
Secondary science23.117.3
Secondary social studies20.817.2

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 120 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#1 rankings

First-place results

2 measures

  • 1of 21

    Chronically absent (lowest is best)

    Rusk County · of the 21 that report this measure

  • 1of 19

    Reading — Masters

    Rusk County · of the 19 that report this measure

#2–3 rankings

Second- and third-place results

2 measures

  • 2of 21

    Attendance

    Rusk County · of the 21 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 2of 19

    Reading — Approaches

    Rusk County · of the 19 that report this measure · tied with 1

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

18 measures

  • 4of 19

    All Subjects — Masters

    Rusk County · of the 19 that report this measure

  • 4of 19

    Math — Meets

    Rusk County · of the 19 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 4of 19

    Math — Masters

    Rusk County · of the 19 that report this measure

  • 4of 18

    Academic Growth

    Rusk County · of the 18 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 5of 19

    School Progress

    Rusk County · of the 19 that report this measure

  • 5of 19

    Relative Performance

    Rusk County · of the 19 that report this measure

  • 5of 19

    Math — Approaches

    Rusk County · of the 19 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 6of 19

    All Subjects — Approaches

    Rusk County · of the 19 that report this measure

  • 6of 19

    Reading — Meets

    Rusk County · of the 19 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 7of 19

    All Subjects — Meets

    Rusk County · of the 19 that report this measure

  • 7of 12

    Social Studies — Approaches

    Rusk County · of the 12 that report this measure

  • 8of 19

    Student Achievement

    Rusk County · of the 19 that report this measure

  • 8of 12

    Social Studies — Meets

    Rusk County · of the 12 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 9of 22

    Overall score

    Rusk County · of the 22 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 9of 19

    Closing the Gaps

    Rusk County · of the 19 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 9of 12

    Social Studies — Masters

    Rusk County · of the 12 that report this measure

  • 10of 18

    Science — Approaches

    Rusk County · of the 18 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 10of 18

    Science — Meets

    Rusk County · of the 18 that report this measure

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 201910041.