STAAR result
Science above Region 03: Victoria averages at Meets and Masters
- Meets
- 50%vs 46.1% avg · +3.9 pts
- Masters
- 23%vs 20.2% avg · +2.8 pts
Among 109 schools in Region 03: Victoria reporting this measure.
See the full measureTraditional public school campus
Sweet Home Elem
Lavaca County · Region 03: Victoria · 164 students
Official school websiteSchool information and family resources
- Current score
- 75/1002025-26
- Change
- −18 ptssince 2021-22
- Score vs similar economic context
- −14.2 ptsvs 89.2 average · 825 rated schools serving a similar economic context
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
- 806 of 825tied with 4 others
- Score vs region
- −4.8 ptsvs 79.8 average · 129 rated schools in Region 03: Victoria
- Region 03: Victoria placement
- 92 of 129tied with 3 others
- Score vs county
- −9.3 ptsvs 84.3 average · 10 rated schools in Lavaca County
- Lavaca County placement
- 9 of 10among reporting schools
- Score vs similar-size group
- −6.7 ptsvs 81.7 average · 912 similarly sized rated schools
- Similar size placement
- 688 of 912tied with 33 others
- Score vs state
- −6.3 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
- Texas placement
- 5,641 of 7,646tied with 202 others
C75
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 96 in 2021-22. The current score is below the 89.2 average for 825 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is below the 79.8 average for 129 rated schools in Region 03: Victoria.The current score is below the 84.3 average for 10 rated schools in Lavaca County.The current score is below the 81.7 average for 912 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is below the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
No academic result met this site’s published threshold for a selected positive signal against Similar economic-disadvantage rate.
Current strength
Chronically absent lower than the Region 03: Victoria average
11.5% −4.5 pts vs 16%
- 11.5% is 4.5 percentage points lower than the 16% average among 124 schools in Region 03: Victoria reporting this measure.
No academic result met this site’s published threshold for a selected positive signal against Lavaca County.
Current strength
Chronically absent lower than the similar-size average
11.5% −5.1 pts vs 16.6%
- 11.5% is 5.1 percentage points lower than the 16.6% average among 837 similarly sized schools reporting this measure.
Current strength
Attendance above the similar-size average
95.2% +1.3 pts vs 93.9%
- 95.2% is 1.3 percentage points above the 93.9% average among 838 similarly sized schools reporting this measure.
Current strength
Chronically absent lower than the Texas average
11.5% −5.2 pts vs 16.7%
- 11.5% is 5.2 percentage points lower than the 16.7% average among 7,358 Texas schools reporting this measure.
Current strength
Attendance above the Texas average
95.2% +1.1 pts vs 94.1%
- 95.2% is 1.1 percentage points above the 94.1% average among 7,366 Texas schools reporting this measure.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Sweet Home Elem is rated C by TEA, scoring 75 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 89.2 average for 825 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 18 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 806th of 825 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 4 others).
Sweet Home Elem is rated C by TEA, scoring 75 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 79.8 average for 129 rated schools in Region 03: Victoria. It is down 18 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 92nd of 129 rated schools in Region 03: Victoria (tied with 3 others).
Sweet Home Elem is rated C by TEA, scoring 75 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 84.3 average for 10 rated schools in Lavaca County. It is down 18 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 9th of 10 rated schools in Lavaca County.
Sweet Home Elem is rated C by TEA, scoring 75 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 81.7 average for 912 similarly sized rated schools. It is down 18 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 688th of 912 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 33 others).
Sweet Home Elem is rated C by TEA, scoring 75 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is down 18 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 5,641st of 7,646 rated Texas schools (tied with 202 others).
Put the numbers in context
Compare with
Jump to a section
5 years of ratings
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 96 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
View the yearly scores and comparisons
| Year | Rating | Score | Selected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rate | StateTexas average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | C | 75 | 89.2 825 reporting | 81.3 7,646 reporting |
| 2024-25 | B | 86 | 89.2 819 reporting | 81.2 7,554 reporting |
| 2023-24 | B | 85 | 88.1 804 reporting | 78.9 7,466 reporting |
| 2022-23 | B | 86 | 88.5 788 reporting | 79.1 7,377 reporting |
| 2021-22 | A | 93 | 89.4 775 reporting | 83.7 7,283 reporting |
Where the score comes from
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
- Sweet Home Elem
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate (825 in cohort)
| Domain | Score | Grade | Points to next grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| Student Achievement | 78 | C | 2 |
| School Progress | 63 | D | 7 |
| Closing the Gaps | 69 | D | 1 |
| Academic Growth | 63 | D | 7 |
| Relative Performance | 57 | F | 3 |
Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 1 point below C in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (78), so School Progress (63) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 78.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
- Approaches grade level
- Meets grade level
- Masters grade level
- Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (825 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
- Students
- 164
- Economically disadvantaged
- 22.0%−1.0 pts vs similar economic context
- English learners
- 0.0%−10.1 pts vs similar economic context
- Special education
- 14.0%−2.8 pts vs similar economic context
- Attendance
- 95.2%−0.4 pts vs similar economic context
- Chronically absent
- 11.5%+2.6 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Sweet Home Elem
- African American 4.9%
- Hispanic 15.2%
- White 77.4%
- Two or More Races 2.4%
Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 825 reporting for every category shown · 825 in full cohort
- African American 8%
- Hispanic 25.6%
- White 48.6%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 12.1%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 5.3%
Selected comparison average For Region 03: Victoria · 129 reporting for every category shown · 129 in full cohort
- African American 6%
- Hispanic 57.6%
- White 33.3%
- American Indian 0.2%
- Asian 0.7%
- Two or More Races 2.1%
Selected comparison average For Lavaca County · 10 reporting for every category shown · 10 in full cohort
- African American 4.9%
- Hispanic 22.7%
- White 68%
- American Indian 0.2%
- Asian 0.4%
- Two or More Races 3.8%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized schools · 912 reporting for every category shown · 912 in full cohort
- African American 6.9%
- Hispanic 45.2%
- White 43.4%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 1%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 3.1%
Statewide average 7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
- African American 11.5%
- Hispanic 52.6%
- White 27.8%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 4.2%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
- Students in this TEA accountability summary
- 164
- Economically disadvantaged students
- 36
- Emergent bilingual students
- 0
- Special education students
- 23
Campus mobility · 2024–25
- Mobile students
- 11
- Students in TEA mobility denominator
- 122
- TEA-published mobility rate
- 9%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 164 students in 2025–26, an increase of 9 (5.8%) from 2024–25.
- Latest enrollment
- 164
2025–26
- Change from 2024–25
- +9
Increase · +5.8%
- Change since 2021–22
- +28
Increase · +20.6%
Enrollment in 2025–26
- This school
- 164
- Selected comparison
- 867
| School year | Students enrolledSweet Home Elem | Change from previous school year | Average enrollmentselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021–22 | 136 | First available year | 883.5 |
| 2022–23 | 145 | Increase of 9 (6.6%) | 889.6 |
| 2023–24 | 148 | Increase of 3 (2.1%) | 884.3 |
| 2024–25 | 155 | Increase of 7 (4.7%) | 876.4 |
| 2025–26 | 164 | Increase of 9 (5.8%) | 867 |
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
- Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
- Suppressed
Rate not available
- Disciplinary actions
- Suppressed
Rate not available
- Cumulative year-end enrollment
- 158
2024–25
| School year | Cumulative enrollment | Studentsall discipline | Students% of enrollment | Actionsall discipline | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020–21 | 150 | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| 2021–22 | 142 | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| 2022–23 | 145 | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| 2023–24 | 150 | Suppressed | — | 25 | 16.67 | — | 14.9 |
| 2024–25 | 158 | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
See 2024–25 discipline categories
| Category | Students | Students% of enrollment | Actions | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All discipline | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| In-school suspensions | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| Out-of-school suspensions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
- Sweet Home Elem
- Parent district: Sweet Home ISD
- Texas average
- Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
- This school
- $12,721
- Selected comparison
- $11,126
For 2025, TEA reported $12,721 per student for this campus, $16,744 per student for its parent district, Sweet Home ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
| Year | Sweet Home Elem | Parent district: Sweet Home ISD | Texas average | Selected comparison average | Reportingselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | $7,557 | $8,571 | $13,054 | $7,476 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 726 rated schools reporting |
| 2019 | $8,463 | $9,791 | $13,108 | $7,534 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 742 rated schools reporting |
| 2020 | $9,309 | $10,658 | $14,058 | $7,855 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 752 rated schools reporting |
| 2021 | $9,471 | $11,433 | $14,797 | $8,397 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 757 rated schools reporting |
| 2022 | $15,981 | $15,355 | $15,708 | $9,444 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 774 rated schools reporting |
| 2023 | $11,388 | $10,873 | $16,792 | $9,992 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 789 rated schools reporting |
| 2024 | $11,109 | $12,030 | $18,125 | $11,047 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 804 rated schools reporting |
| 2025 | $12,721 | $16,744 | $18,972 | $11,126 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 818 rated schools reporting |
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
- Average salary
- $58,825−$9,911 vs similar economic context
- Teachers
- 12−43.8 vs similar economic context
- Students per staff member
- 14−0.9 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Sweet Home Elem
- Beginning 9.4%
- 1 to 5 years 8.5%
- 6 to 10 years 16.2%
- 11 to 20 years 41%
- 21 to 30 years 24.8%
Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 825 reporting for every category shown · 825 in full cohort
- Beginning 4.7%
- 1 to 5 years 22.7%
- 6 to 10 years 19.9%
- 11 to 20 years 32.5%
- 21 to 30 years 17%
- Over 30 years 3%
Selected comparison average For Region 03: Victoria · 129 reporting for every category shown · 129 in full cohort
- Beginning 7.1%
- 1 to 5 years 24.6%
- 6 to 10 years 15.4%
- 11 to 20 years 29.3%
- 21 to 30 years 17.1%
- Over 30 years 6.4%
Selected comparison average For Lavaca County · 10 reporting for every category shown · 10 in full cohort
- Beginning 10.1%
- 1 to 5 years 11.7%
- 6 to 10 years 13.4%
- 11 to 20 years 33.3%
- 21 to 30 years 23.3%
- Over 30 years 8.1%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized schools · 912 reporting for every category shown · 912 in full cohort
- Beginning 6.9%
- 1 to 5 years 23.2%
- 6 to 10 years 17.1%
- 11 to 20 years 28.2%
- 21 to 30 years 17.7%
- Over 30 years 6.1%
Statewide average 7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
- Beginning 6.2%
- 1 to 5 years 25.6%
- 6 to 10 years 19.2%
- 11 to 20 years 28.7%
- 21 to 30 years 15.9%
- Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
| Grade or subject | Average students per classSweet Home Elem · 2024–25 | Average students per classselected comparison |
|---|---|---|
| Kindergarten | 20 | 18.8 |
| Grade 1 | 19 | 19.1 |
| Grade 2 | 16 | 19.7 |
| Grade 3 | 15 | 21.1 |
| Grade 4 | 12 | 20.3 |
| Grade 5 | 17 | 21.9 |
| Grade 6 | 17 | 19.4 |
| Secondary English | 14 | 17.7 |
| Secondary math | 8.7 | 18.2 |
| Secondary science | 13 | 20.1 |
| Secondary social studies | 13 | 20.2 |
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 11 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
Where this school ranks best
Out of 114 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
18 measures
-
5of 10
Chronically absent (lowest is best)
Lavaca County · of the 10 that report this measure · tied with 1
-
6of 10
Reading — Approaches
Lavaca County · of the 10 that report this measure · tied with 1
-
6of 10
Math — Approaches
Lavaca County · of the 10 that report this measure
-
6of 10
Per-student spending
Lavaca County · of the 10 that report this measure
-
7of 10
All Subjects — Approaches
Lavaca County · of the 10 that report this measure · tied with 1
-
7of 10
Math — Meets
Lavaca County · of the 10 that report this measure · tied with 1
-
7of 10
Math — Masters
Lavaca County · of the 10 that report this measure · tied with 1
-
8of 10
Student Achievement
Lavaca County · of the 10 that report this measure
-
8of 10
All Subjects — Meets
Lavaca County · of the 10 that report this measure
-
8of 10
All Subjects — Masters
Lavaca County · of the 10 that report this measure
-
8of 10
Reading — Masters
Lavaca County · of the 10 that report this measure
-
9of 10
Overall score
Lavaca County · of the 10 that report this measure
-
9of 10
Closing the Gaps
Lavaca County · of the 10 that report this measure
-
9of 10
Academic Growth
Lavaca County · of the 10 that report this measure
-
9of 10
Reading — Meets
Lavaca County · of the 10 that report this measure
-
9of 10
Attendance
Lavaca County · of the 10 that report this measure
-
10of 10
School Progress
Lavaca County · of the 10 that report this measure
-
10of 10
Relative Performance
Lavaca County · of the 10 that report this measure
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Download the full dataset · this campus's district
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 143905101.