+3.4 ptsvs 90.6 average · 675 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
92 of 675tied with 68 others
Score vs region
+10.7 ptsvs 83.3 average · 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston
Region 04: Houston placement
86 of 1,303tied with 44 others
Score vs county
+10.0 ptsvs 84 average · 140 rated schools in Fort Bend County
Fort Bend County placement
10 of 140tied with 3 others
Score vs similar-size group
+13.5 ptsvs 80.5 average · 4,597 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
176 of 4,597tied with 84 others
Score vs state
+12.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
379 of 7,646tied with 208 others
A94
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is flat; under the rules in force back then it scored 96 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 90.6 average for 675 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 83.3 average for 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston.The current score is above the 84 average for 140 rated schools in Fort Bend County.The current score is above the 80.5 average for 4,597 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
81%vs 73.1% avg · +7.9 pts
Masters
56%vs 42.9% avg · +13.1 pts
Among 663 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Susanna Dickinson Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 94 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 90.6 average for 675 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is unchanged since 2021-22.
Ranks 92nd of 675 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 68 others).
Susanna Dickinson Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 94 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 83.3 average for 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston. It is unchanged since 2021-22.
Ranks 86th of 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston (tied with 44 others).
Susanna Dickinson Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 94 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 84 average for 140 rated schools in Fort Bend County. It is unchanged since 2021-22.
Ranks 10th of 140 rated schools in Fort Bend County (tied with 3 others).
Susanna Dickinson Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 94 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.5 average for 4,597 similarly sized rated schools. It is unchanged since 2021-22.
Ranks 176th of 4,597 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 84 others).
Susanna Dickinson Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 94 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is unchanged since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 96 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement94 A+2.3 vs similar economic context · 663 reporting
School Progress93 A+6.1 vs similar economic context · 661 reporting
Closing the Gaps93 A+4.9 vs similar economic context · 659 reporting
Academic Growth93 A+8.0 vs similar economic context · 658 reporting
Relative Performance86 B+7.2 vs similar economic context · 661 reporting
Susanna Dickinson Elem
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (675 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
94
A
—
School Progress
93
A
—
Closing the Gaps
93
A
—
Academic Growth
93
A
—
Relative Performance
86
B
4
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (94), so
School Progress (93) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 94.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level92%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 663 reporting
Meets grade level81%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 663 reporting
Masters grade level56%+13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 663 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level94%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 663 reporting
Meets grade level84%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 663 reporting
Masters grade level61%+15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 663 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level92%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 661 reporting
Meets grade level79%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 661 reporting
Masters grade level53%+15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 661 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level85%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 622 reporting
Meets grade level74%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 622 reporting
Masters grade level47%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 622 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (675 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
634
Economically disadvantaged
14.9%−0.7 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
12.6%+1.8 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
18.8%+2.7 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
96.5%+0.7 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
4.8%−2.5 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Susanna Dickinson Elem
African American 5.4%
Hispanic 23.8%
White 52.3%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 11.8%
Two or More Races 6.4%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 675 reporting for every category shown · 675 in full cohort
African American 6.6%
Hispanic 21%
White 48.2%
American Indian 0.4%
Asian 18.1%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 5.6%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 04: Houston · 1,303 reporting for every category shown · 1,303 in full cohort
African American 19.1%
Hispanic 53.8%
White 16.9%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 6.7%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.1%
Selected comparison averageFor Fort Bend County · 140 reporting for every category shown · 140 in full cohort
African American 26.7%
Hispanic 34.3%
White 15.3%
American Indian 0.5%
Asian 19%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.9%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,597 reporting for every category shown · 4,597 in full cohort
African American 12.3%
Hispanic 54.3%
White 24.4%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.9%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.6%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
629
Economically disadvantaged students
94
Emergent bilingual students
79
Special education students
118
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
44
Students in TEA mobility denominator
549
TEA-published mobility rate
8%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 634 students in 2025–26, an increase of 18 (2.9%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
634
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
+18
Increase · +2.9%
Change since 2021–22
+114
Increase · +21.9%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
634
Selected comparison
856.8
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 672 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Susanna Dickinson Elem
School year
Students enrolledSusanna Dickinson Elem
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
520
First available year
871.9
2022–23
547
Increase of 27 (5.2%)
887.2
2023–24
563
Increase of 16 (2.9%)
872.8
2024–25
616
Increase of 53 (9.4%)
865.9
2025–26
634
Increase of 18 (2.9%)
856.8
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
20
3.1% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
25
3.87 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
646
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
3.1%
Selected comparison
5.6%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 422 rated schools reporting
−2.5 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
3.87
Selected comparison
10.1
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 490 rated schools reporting
−6.2 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Susanna Dickinson Elem
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
525
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2021–22
569
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2022–23
565
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2023–24
571
13
2.3%
15
2.63
5.8%
10.5
2024–25
646
20
3.1%
25
3.87
5.6%
10.1
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Susanna Dickinson Elem in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
20
3.1%
25
3.87
5.6%
10.1
In-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
11
1.70
—
8.1
Out-of-school suspensions
14
2.2%
14
2.17
2.6%
3.5
DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Susanna Dickinson Elem
Parent district: Lamar CISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$10,176
Selected comparison
$10,969
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 667 rated schools reporting
−$793 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $10,176 per student for this campus, $24,943 per student for its parent district, Lamar CISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Susanna Dickinson Elem
Parent district: Lamar CISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$8,014
$13,594
$13,054
$7,346
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 578 rated schools reporting
2019
$8,985
$14,455
$13,108
$7,432
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 593 rated schools reporting
2020
$8,540
$18,941
$14,058
$7,750
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 606 rated schools reporting
2021
$9,957
$16,144
$14,797
$8,320
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 614 rated schools reporting
2022
$12,070
$15,842
$15,708
$9,536
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 625 rated schools reporting
2023
$13,104
$19,614
$16,792
$9,761
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 637 rated schools reporting
2024
$9,647
$26,311
$18,125
$10,839
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 653 rated schools reporting
2025
$10,176
$24,943
$18,972
$10,969
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 667 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$78,507+$9,236 vs similar economic context
Teachers
40−14.8 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
15.7+0.7 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Susanna Dickinson Elem
1 to 5 years 20.9%
6 to 10 years 10%
11 to 20 years 42.3%
21 to 30 years 19.4%
Over 30 years 7.5%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 675 reporting for every category shown · 675 in full cohort
Beginning 4.3%
1 to 5 years 23.1%
6 to 10 years 20.2%
11 to 20 years 32.6%
21 to 30 years 17%
Over 30 years 2.7%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 04: Houston · 1,303 reporting for every category shown · 1,303 in full cohort
Beginning 7.7%
1 to 5 years 27.3%
6 to 10 years 20.6%
11 to 20 years 27.2%
21 to 30 years 13.5%
Over 30 years 2.6%
Selected comparison averageFor Fort Bend County · 140 reporting for every category shown · 140 in full cohort
Beginning 5.7%
1 to 5 years 23.9%
6 to 10 years 21.9%
11 to 20 years 30.1%
21 to 30 years 15.4%
Over 30 years 2.9%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,597 reporting for every category shown · 4,597 in full cohort
Beginning 6.1%
1 to 5 years 26.5%
6 to 10 years 19.8%
11 to 20 years 29%
21 to 30 years 15.4%
Over 30 years 3%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Susanna Dickinson Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classSusanna Dickinson Elem · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten
18.7
18.9
Grade 1
18.4
19.1
Grade 2
16.4
19.6
Grade 3
18
21.4
Grade 4
18.7
20.4
Grade 5
20.7
22.2
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 105 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
8 measures
4of 135
Academic Growth
Fort Bend County · of the 135 that report this measure · tied with 2
7of 136
School Progress
Fort Bend County · of the 136 that report this measure · tied with 2
8of 136
All Subjects — Masters
Fort Bend County · of the 136 that report this measure · tied with 1
9of 136
All Subjects — Meets
Fort Bend County · of the 136 that report this measure · tied with 1
9of 136
Reading — Masters
Fort Bend County · of the 136 that report this measure
9of 136
Math — Meets
Fort Bend County · of the 136 that report this measure · tied with 2
9of 136
Math — Masters
Fort Bend County · of the 136 that report this measure
10of 136
Reading — Meets
Fort Bend County · of the 136 that report this measure
Other top-5% rankings
High placements in larger reporting groups
5 measures
176of 4,597
Overall score
Similar size · of the 4,597 that report this measure · tied with 84
200of 4,503
Attendance
Similar size · of the 4,503 that report this measure · tied with 45
208of 4,441
Reading — Approaches
Similar size · of the 4,441 that report this measure · tied with 69
214of 4,441
Math — Approaches
Similar size · of the 4,441 that report this measure · tied with 58
240of 4,441
All Subjects — Approaches
Similar size · of the 4,441 that report this measure · tied with 61
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 079901115.