Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus · Alternative Education Accountability

Stubblefield Lrn Ctr

Angelina County · Region 07: Kilgore · 19 students

Current score
92/1002025-26
Change
+4 ptssince 2023-24
Score vs similar economic context
+11.0 ptsvs 81 average · 1,906 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
158 of 1,906tied with 51 others
A92

At a glance

The available rating history is moving up. The current score is above the 81 average for 1,906 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Top placement

Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness

18.2% 3rd of 536 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure · 2025-26

See the full measure

Current strength

Overall score above the similar-context average

92 +11 pts vs 81

  • 92 is 11 points above the 81 average among 1,906 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Current strength

Student Achievement above the similar-context average

92 +12.2 pts vs 79.8

  • 92 is 12.2 points above the 79.8 average among 1,835 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Stubblefield Lrn Ctr is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81 average for 1,906 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 4 points since 2023-24.

Ranks 158th of 1,906 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 51 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Teachers and actual class size
  10. Where this school ranks best
  11. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas average 8892 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26A9281.0 1,906 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25Not Rated—80.9 1,878 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24B8878.9 1,854 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23Not Rated—79.5 1,823 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22Not Rated—82.6 1,798 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement92 A+12.2 vs similar economic context · 1,835 reporting
  • School Progress—Not reported · similar economic context 81.3 · 1,828 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps—Not reported · similar economic context 78.2 · 1,811 reporting
  • Academic Growth—Not reported · similar economic context 74.6 · 1,775 reporting
  • Relative Performance—Not reported · similar economic context 79.5 · 1,828 reporting
  • Stubblefield Lrn Ctr
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,906 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement92A—
School Progress—Not rated—
Closing the Gaps—Not rated—
Academic Growth—Not rated—
Relative Performance—Not rated—

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level92%+16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,835 reporting
  • Meets grade level31%−19 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,835 reporting
  • Masters grade level8%−13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,835 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 77.5% · 1,832 reporting
  • Meets grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 55.2% · 1,832 reporting
  • Masters grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 22.4% · 1,832 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level90%+14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 938 reporting
  • Meets grade level20%−28 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 938 reporting
  • Masters grade level10%−12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 938 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,906 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Completion

Four-Year
61.5%−9.0 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 42 rated schools reporting
Five-Year
78.6%+3.1 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 42 rated schools reporting
Six-Year
87.5%+9.8 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 42 rated schools reporting
Dropout Rate
19.0%+14.1 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 42 rated schools reporting

These measures use TEA's alternative-education accountability population. Each comparison average includes only schools in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported school rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.

College, career and military readiness

Total credit for CCMR criteria
55.0%−32.9 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
CriterionThis school% of graduatesAveragesimilar economic contextDifferencepercentage pointsReportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria55.0%87.9%−32.9 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 533 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course0.0%58.9%−58.9 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 536 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA0.0%28.0%−28.0 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 536 rated schools reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)9.1%10.0%−0.9 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 536 rated schools reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course0.0%33.8%−33.8 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 536 rated schools reporting
Earned an industry-based certification18.2%38.1%−19.9 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 536 rated schools reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate0.0%1.6%−1.6 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 536 rated schools reporting
Earned an associate degree0.0%5.5%−5.5 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 536 rated schools reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit0.0%3.8%−3.8 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 536 rated schools reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness18.2%3.1%+15.1 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 536 rated schools reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student0.0%7.7%−7.7 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 536 rated schools reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces9.1%3.4%+5.7 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 536 rated schools reporting

Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this school minus the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate, counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported school percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
19
Economically disadvantaged
57.9%−0.4 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
10.5%−4.6 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
26.3%+7.5 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
58.5%−35.8 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
86.4%+70.8 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Stubblefield Lrn Ctr

African American: 10.5%Hispanic: 52.6%White: 36.8%
  • African American 10.5%
  • Hispanic 52.6%
  • White 36.8%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,906 reporting for every category shown · 1,906 in full cohort

African American: 10.1%Hispanic: 46.6%White: 36.5%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 2.4%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 3.9%
  • African American 10.1%
  • Hispanic 46.6%
  • White 36.5%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 2.4%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 3.9%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
19
Economically disadvantaged students
11
Emergent bilingual students
2
Special education students
5

TEA context labels

  • Alternative education campus under AEA procedures
  • Alternative education type: dropout recovery school
  • Rated under AEA procedures

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
20
Students in TEA mobility denominator
22
TEA-published mobility rate
90.9%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 19 students in 2025–26. The previous available count is not from the immediately preceding school year, so no year-over-year change is calculated.

Latest enrollment
19

2025–26

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
19
Selected comparison
633.9

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,872 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Stubblefield Lrn Ctr
School yearStudents enrolledStubblefield Lrn CtrChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 Not reported Not available —
2022–23 Not reported Not available —
2023–24 15 No adjacent prior year 642.7
2024–25 Not reported Not available —
2025–26 19 No adjacent prior year 633.9

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Not reported

Rate not available

Disciplinary actions
Not reported

Rate not available

Cumulative year-end enrollment
22

2024–25

TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Stubblefield Lrn Ctr
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 33 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2021–22 23 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2022–23 18 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2023–24 22 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2024–25 22 Not reported — Not reported — — —
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Stubblefield Lrn Ctr in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline Not reported — Not reported — — —
In-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Out-of-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$72,187+$5,681 vs similar economic context
Teachers
5−36.9 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
3.8−15.4 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Stubblefield Lrn Ctr

1 to 5 years: 20%6 to 10 years: 20%11 to 20 years: 60%
  • 1 to 5 years 20%
  • 6 to 10 years 20%
  • 11 to 20 years 60%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,906 reporting for every category shown · 1,906 in full cohort

Beginning: 5.9%1 to 5 years: 25.2%6 to 10 years: 19.4%11 to 20 years: 28.5%21 to 30 years: 16.3%Over 30 years: 4.3%
  • Beginning 5.9%
  • 1 to 5 years 25.2%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.4%
  • 11 to 20 years 28.5%
  • 21 to 30 years 16.3%
  • Over 30 years 4.3%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Stubblefield Lrn Ctr in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classStubblefield Lrn Ctr · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Secondary English214.8

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 1 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 110 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#1 rankings

First-place results

1 measure

  • 1of 23

    All Subjects — Approaches

    Angelina County · of the 23 that report this measure

#2–3 rankings

Second- and third-place results

5 measures

  • 2of 30

    Overall score

    Angelina County · of the 30 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 2of 23

    Student Achievement

    Angelina County · of the 23 that report this measure

  • 2of 19

    Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)

    Similar size · of the 19 that report this measure

  • 2of 19

    Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces

    Similar size · of the 19 that report this measure

  • 3of 536

    Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 536 that report this measure

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

7 measures

  • 6of 19

    Earned an industry-based certification

    Similar size · of the 19 that report this measure

  • 6of 17

    Social Studies — Approaches

    Similar size · of the 17 that report this measure

  • 6of 17

    Social Studies — Masters

    Similar size · of the 17 that report this measure

  • 7of 23

    All Subjects — Masters

    Similar size · of the 23 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 9of 18

    College, career or military ready

    Similar size · of the 18 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 10of 23

    All Subjects — Meets

    Similar size · of the 23 that report this measure

  • 10of 17

    Social Studies — Meets

    Similar size · of the 17 that report this measure · tied with 1

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 003902004.