Top placement
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness
18.2% 3rd of 536 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure · 2025-26
See the full measureIndependent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.
Traditional public school campus · Alternative Education Accountability
Angelina County · Region 07: Kilgore · 19 students
At a glance
The available rating history is moving up. The current score is above the 81 average for 1,906 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 80 average for 352 rated schools in Region 07: Kilgore.The current score is above the 76.7 average for 30 rated schools in Angelina County.The current score is above the 84.7 average for 27 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Top placement
18.2% 3rd of 536 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure · 2025-26
See the full measureCurrent strength
92 +11 pts vs 81
Current strength
92 +12.2 pts vs 79.8
Top placement
18.2% 3rd of 101 schools in Region 07: Kilgore reporting this measure · 2025-26
See the full measureCurrent strength
92 +12 pts vs 80
Current strength
92 +12.8 pts vs 79.2
Current strength
92 +15.3 pts vs 76.7
Top placement
92 2nd of 23 schools in Angelina County reporting this measure · 2025-26
See the full measureTop placement
9.1% 2nd of 19 similarly sized schools reporting this measure · 2025-26
See the full measureTop placement
9.1% 2nd of 19 similarly sized schools reporting this measure · 2025-26
See the full measureTop placement
18.2% 3rd of 19 similarly sized schools reporting this measure · 2025-26
See the full measureCurrent strength
92 +10.7 pts vs 81.3
Current strength
92 +13.4 pts vs 78.6
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Stubblefield Lrn Ctr is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81 average for 1,906 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 4 points since 2023-24.
Ranks 158th of 1,906 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 51 others).
Stubblefield Lrn Ctr is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80 average for 352 rated schools in Region 07: Kilgore. It is up 4 points since 2023-24.
Ranks 38th of 352 rated schools in Region 07: Kilgore (tied with 9 others).
Stubblefield Lrn Ctr is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 76.7 average for 30 rated schools in Angelina County. It is up 4 points since 2023-24.
Ranks 2nd of 30 rated schools in Angelina County (tied with 1 other).
Stubblefield Lrn Ctr is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 84.7 average for 27 similarly sized rated schools. It is up 4 points since 2023-24.
Ranks 6th of 27 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 1 other).
Stubblefield Lrn Ctr is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is up 4 points since 2023-24.
Ranks 838th of 7,646 rated Texas schools (tied with 318 others).
Put the numbers in context
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
| Year | Rating | Score | Selected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rate | StateTexas average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | A | 92 | 81.0 1,906 reporting | 81.3 7,646 reporting |
| 2024-25 | Not Rated | — | 80.9 1,878 reporting | 81.2 7,554 reporting |
| 2023-24 | B | 88 | 78.9 1,854 reporting | 78.9 7,466 reporting |
| 2022-23 | Not Rated | — | 79.5 1,823 reporting | 79.1 7,377 reporting |
| 2021-22 | Not Rated | — | 82.6 1,798 reporting | 83.7 7,283 reporting |
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
| Domain | Score | Grade | Points to next grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| Student Achievement | 92 | A | — |
| School Progress | — | Not rated | — |
| Closing the Gaps | — | Not rated | — |
| Academic Growth | — | Not rated | — |
| Relative Performance | — | Not rated | — |
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%.
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
These measures use TEA's alternative-education accountability population. Each comparison average includes only schools in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported school rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.
| Criterion | This school% of graduates | Averagesimilar economic context | Differencepercentage points | Reportingselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total credit for CCMR criteria | 55.0% | 87.9% | −32.9 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 533 rated schools reporting |
| Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course | 0.0% | 58.9% | −58.9 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 536 rated schools reporting |
| Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA | 0.0% | 28.0% | −28.0 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 536 rated schools reporting |
| Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s) | 9.1% | 10.0% | −0.9 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 536 rated schools reporting |
| Earned college credit for a dual credit course | 0.0% | 33.8% | −33.8 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 536 rated schools reporting |
| Earned an industry-based certification | 18.2% | 38.1% | −19.9 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 536 rated schools reporting |
| Earned a level I or level II certificate | 0.0% | 1.6% | −1.6 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 536 rated schools reporting |
| Earned an associate degree | 0.0% | 5.5% | −5.5 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 536 rated schools reporting |
| Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit | 0.0% | 3.8% | −3.8 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 536 rated schools reporting |
| Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness | 18.2% | 3.1% | +15.1 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 536 rated schools reporting |
| Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student | 0.0% | 7.7% | −7.7 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 536 rated schools reporting |
| Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces | 9.1% | 3.4% | +5.7 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 536 rated schools reporting |
Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this school minus the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate, counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported school percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Stubblefield Lrn Ctr
Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,906 reporting for every category shown · 1,906 in full cohort
Selected comparison average For Region 07: Kilgore · 352 reporting for every category shown · 352 in full cohort
Selected comparison average For Angelina County · 30 reporting for every category shown · 30 in full cohort
Selected comparison average For similarly sized schools · 27 reporting for every category shown · 27 in full cohort
Statewide average 7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 19 students in 2025–26. The previous available count is not from the immediately preceding school year, so no year-over-year change is calculated.
2025–26
| School year | Students enrolledStubblefield Lrn Ctr | Change from previous school year | Average enrollmentselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021–22 | Not reported | Not available | — |
| 2022–23 | Not reported | Not available | — |
| 2023–24 | 15 | No adjacent prior year | 642.7 |
| 2024–25 | Not reported | Not available | — |
| 2025–26 | 19 | No adjacent prior year | 633.9 |
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Rate not available
Rate not available
2024–25
| School year | Cumulative enrollment | Studentsall discipline | Students% of enrollment | Actionsall discipline | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020–21 | 33 | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| 2021–22 | 23 | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| 2022–23 | 18 | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| 2023–24 | 22 | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| 2024–25 | 22 | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Category | Students | Students% of enrollment | Actions | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All discipline | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| In-school suspensions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Out-of-school suspensions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Stubblefield Lrn Ctr
Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,906 reporting for every category shown · 1,906 in full cohort
Selected comparison average For Region 07: Kilgore · 352 reporting for every category shown · 352 in full cohort
Selected comparison average For Angelina County · 30 reporting for every category shown · 30 in full cohort
Selected comparison average For similarly sized schools · 27 reporting for every category shown · 27 in full cohort
Statewide average 7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
| Grade or subject | Average students per classStubblefield Lrn Ctr · 2024–25 | Average students per classselected comparison |
|---|---|---|
| Secondary English | 2 | 14.8 |
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 1 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
Out of 110 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
First-place results
1 measure
All Subjects — Approaches
Angelina County · of the 23 that report this measure
Second- and third-place results
5 measures
Overall score
Angelina County · of the 30 that report this measure · tied with 1
Student Achievement
Angelina County · of the 23 that report this measure
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)
Similar size · of the 19 that report this measure
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces
Similar size · of the 19 that report this measure
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 536 that report this measure
Fourth- through tenth-place results
7 measures
Earned an industry-based certification
Similar size · of the 19 that report this measure
Social Studies — Approaches
Similar size · of the 17 that report this measure
Social Studies — Masters
Similar size · of the 17 that report this measure
All Subjects — Masters
Similar size · of the 23 that report this measure · tied with 2
College, career or military ready
Similar size · of the 18 that report this measure · tied with 1
All Subjects — Meets
Similar size · of the 23 that report this measure
Social Studies — Meets
Similar size · of the 17 that report this measure · tied with 1
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Download the full dataset · this campus's district
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 003902004.