Recent movement
Overall score rose 8 points
68 to 76 2024-25 to 2025-26
See the full measureTraditional public school campus
Stephen F Austin Pri
Lubbock County · Region 17: Lubbock · 220 students
Official school websiteSchool information and family resources
- Current score
- 76/1002025-26
- Change
- −14 ptssince 2021-22
- Score vs similar economic context
- −3.0 ptsvs 79 average · 2,001 rated schools serving a similar economic context
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
- 1,262 of 2,001tied with 57 others
- Score vs region
- −5.5 ptsvs 81.5 average · 182 rated schools in Region 17: Lubbock
- Region 17: Lubbock placement
- 124 of 182tied with 7 others
- Score vs county
- −5.3 ptsvs 81.3 average · 84 rated schools in Lubbock County
- Lubbock County placement
- 58 of 84tied with 4 others
- Score vs similar-size group
- −5.0 ptsvs 81 average · 1,547 similarly sized rated schools
- Similar size placement
- 1,102 of 1,547tied with 38 others
- Score vs state
- −5.3 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
- Texas placement
- 5,432 of 7,646tied with 208 others
C76
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 87 in 2021-22. The current score is below the 79 average for 2,001 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is below the 81.5 average for 182 rated schools in Region 17: Lubbock.The current score is below the 81.3 average for 84 rated schools in Lubbock County.The current score is below the 81 average for 1,547 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is below the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
Recent movement
Overall score rose 8 points
68 to 76 2024-25 to 2025-26
See the full measureRecent movement
Overall score rose 8 points
68 to 76 2024-25 to 2025-26
See the full measureRecent movement
Overall score rose 8 points
68 to 76 2024-25 to 2025-26
See the full measureRecent movement
Overall score rose 8 points
68 to 76 2024-25 to 2025-26
See the full measureSelected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Stephen F Austin Pri is rated C by TEA, scoring 76 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 79 average for 2,001 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 14 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 1,262nd of 2,001 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 57 others).
Stephen F Austin Pri is rated C by TEA, scoring 76 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 81.5 average for 182 rated schools in Region 17: Lubbock. It is down 14 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 124th of 182 rated schools in Region 17: Lubbock (tied with 7 others).
Stephen F Austin Pri is rated C by TEA, scoring 76 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 81.3 average for 84 rated schools in Lubbock County. It is down 14 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 58th of 84 rated schools in Lubbock County (tied with 4 others).
Stephen F Austin Pri is rated C by TEA, scoring 76 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 81 average for 1,547 similarly sized rated schools. It is down 14 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 1,102nd of 1,547 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 38 others).
Stephen F Austin Pri is rated C by TEA, scoring 76 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is down 14 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 5,432nd of 7,646 rated Texas schools (tied with 208 others).
Put the numbers in context
Compare with
Jump to a section
5 years of ratings
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 87 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
View the yearly scores and comparisons
| Year | Rating | Score | Selected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rate | StateTexas average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | C | 76 | 79.0 2,001 reporting | 81.3 7,646 reporting |
| 2024-25 | D | 68 | 78.8 1,983 reporting | 81.2 7,554 reporting |
| 2023-24 | C | 73 | 76.7 1,967 reporting | 78.9 7,466 reporting |
| 2022-23 | C | 71 | 77.2 1,943 reporting | 79.1 7,377 reporting |
| 2021-22 | A | 90 | 82.0 1,924 reporting | 83.7 7,283 reporting |
Where the score comes from
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
- Stephen F Austin Pri
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,001 in cohort)
| Domain | Score | Grade | Points to next grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| Student Achievement | — | Not rated | — |
| School Progress | — | Not rated | — |
| Closing the Gaps | — | Not rated | — |
| Academic Growth | — | Not rated | — |
| Relative Performance | — | Not rated | — |
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
- Students
- 220
- Economically disadvantaged
- 70.9%±0.0 pts vs similar economic context
- English learners
- 6.8%−14.3 pts vs similar economic context
- Special education
- 11.8%−7.0 pts vs similar economic context
- Attendance
- —
- Chronically absent
- —
Student demographics
Stephen F Austin Pri
- African American 2.7%
- Hispanic 69.5%
- White 22.7%
- American Indian 0.9%
- Two or More Races 4.1%
Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,001 reporting for every category shown · 2,001 in full cohort
- African American 12.5%
- Hispanic 57.6%
- White 24%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 2%
- Pacific Islander 0.2%
- Two or More Races 3.4%
Selected comparison average For Region 17: Lubbock · 182 reporting for every category shown · 182 in full cohort
- African American 5%
- Hispanic 61%
- White 30.8%
- American Indian 0.2%
- Asian 1%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 1.9%
Selected comparison average For Lubbock County · 84 reporting for every category shown · 84 in full cohort
- African American 8.8%
- Hispanic 54.8%
- White 31.4%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 1.8%
- Pacific Islander 0.2%
- Two or More Races 2.7%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized schools · 1,547 reporting for every category shown · 1,547 in full cohort
- African American 8.9%
- Hispanic 49%
- White 37.5%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 1.2%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 3.1%
Statewide average 7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
- African American 11.5%
- Hispanic 52.6%
- White 27.8%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 4.2%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
- Students in this TEA accountability summary
- 220
- Economically disadvantaged students
- 156
- Emergent bilingual students
- 15
- Special education students
- 26
TEA context labels
- Highest grade is early education, pre-K or kindergarten
Campus mobility · 2024–25
- Mobile students
- Not reported
- Students in TEA mobility denominator
- Not reported
- TEA-published mobility rate
- Not reported
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
- Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
- Not reported
Rate not available
- Disciplinary actions
- Not reported
Rate not available
- Cumulative year-end enrollment
- 236
2024–25
| School year | Cumulative enrollment | Studentsall discipline | Students% of enrollment | Actionsall discipline | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020–21 | 210 | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| 2021–22 | 181 | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| 2022–23 | 215 | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| 2023–24 | 225 | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| 2024–25 | 236 | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
See 2024–25 discipline categories
| Category | Students | Students% of enrollment | Actions | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All discipline | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| In-school suspensions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Out-of-school suspensions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
- Stephen F Austin Pri
- Parent district: Slaton ISD
- Texas average
- Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
- This school
- $11,880
- Selected comparison
- $13,148
For 2025, TEA reported $11,880 per student for this campus, $22,329 per student for its parent district, Slaton ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
| Year | Stephen F Austin Pri | Parent district: Slaton ISD | Texas average | Selected comparison average | Reportingselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | $9,343 | $18,811 | $13,054 | $8,040 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,847 rated schools reporting |
| 2019 | $7,572 | $13,866 | $13,108 | $8,199 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,866 rated schools reporting |
| 2020 | $8,966 | $16,636 | $14,058 | $8,741 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,887 rated schools reporting |
| 2021 | $10,135 | $16,455 | $14,797 | $9,250 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,901 rated schools reporting |
| 2022 | $14,611 | $17,566 | $15,708 | $10,511 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,925 rated schools reporting |
| 2023 | $14,058 | $22,690 | $16,792 | $11,219 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,945 rated schools reporting |
| 2024 | $13,656 | $19,862 | $18,125 | $12,420 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,966 rated schools reporting |
| 2025 | $11,880 | $22,329 | $18,972 | $13,148 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,982 rated schools reporting |
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
- Average salary
- $65,705−$738 vs similar economic context
- Teachers
- 14−29.4 vs similar economic context
- Students per staff member
- 16.2+2.2 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Stephen F Austin Pri
- Beginning 6.6%
- 1 to 5 years 39%
- 6 to 10 years 6.6%
- 11 to 20 years 41.9%
- 21 to 30 years 6.6%
Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,001 reporting for every category shown · 2,001 in full cohort
- Beginning 6.6%
- 1 to 5 years 27.1%
- 6 to 10 years 19%
- 11 to 20 years 27.4%
- 21 to 30 years 15.4%
- Over 30 years 3.9%
Selected comparison average For Region 17: Lubbock · 182 reporting for every category shown · 182 in full cohort
- Beginning 7.4%
- 1 to 5 years 25.5%
- 6 to 10 years 18.1%
- 11 to 20 years 27.1%
- 21 to 30 years 16.6%
- Over 30 years 4.7%
Selected comparison average For Lubbock County · 84 reporting for every category shown · 84 in full cohort
- Beginning 8%
- 1 to 5 years 25.6%
- 6 to 10 years 19.1%
- 11 to 20 years 26.9%
- 21 to 30 years 15.6%
- Over 30 years 3.6%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized schools · 1,547 reporting for every category shown · 1,547 in full cohort
- Beginning 6.6%
- 1 to 5 years 24%
- 6 to 10 years 17.5%
- 11 to 20 years 28.4%
- 21 to 30 years 17.7%
- Over 30 years 5.1%
Statewide average 7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
- Beginning 6.2%
- 1 to 5 years 25.6%
- 6 to 10 years 19.2%
- 11 to 20 years 28.7%
- 21 to 30 years 15.9%
- Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
| Grade or subject | Average students per classStephen F Austin Pri · 2024–25 | Average students per classselected comparison |
|---|---|---|
| Kindergarten | 19.6 | 17.9 |
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 1 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Download the full dataset · this campus's district
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 152903101.